Pages:
Author

Topic: ethminer-0.9.41-genoil-1.1 - page 16. (Read 397377 times)

sr. member
Activity: 588
Merit: 251
October 02, 2016, 03:51:47 PM
I am using http://ethermine.org, nanopool.org ..thats not a minor issue..it should work with all ...not only one preferable MPH ...that somehow not right.
That a force of shifting away haspower ..didn't u test ?

Yes, I tested on 3 pools: MPH, alpereum, and coinmine.pl.  I did have a small issue with coinmine.pl and stale share submits, because it was not matching the id of the share submit on the reply.  I notified the pool op of the issue after I noticed it.

Today I decided to investigate and see what ethermine is doing, and noticed that it's stratum protocol is actually like dwarf's.  To select dwarf(eth-proxy) mode, add -SP 1 to the command line.  I did a quick test, and was able to authenticate and a few shares were accepted.
sr. member
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum
October 02, 2016, 08:37:46 AM
I am using http://ethermine.org, nanopool.org ..thats not a minor issue..it should work with all ...not only one preferable MPH ...that somehow not right.
That a force of shifting away haspower ..didn't u test ?
sr. member
Activity: 588
Merit: 251
October 02, 2016, 07:36:51 AM
With the new version i just get

X  14:23:30|stratum  :-( Rejected in 1593 ms.
  m  14:23:30|main  Waiting for work package...
  m  14:23:30|main  Waiting for work package...
  m  14:23:30|main  Waiting for work package...
  m  14:23:31|main  Waiting for work package...
  m  14:23:31|main  Waiting for work package...
  m  14:23:31|main  Waiting for work package...
  m  14:23:31|main  Waiting for work package...
  m  14:23:31|main  Waiting for work package...
 billions

I use the same bat file as i use for 1.1.7 what is the problem?


Try a different pool.  Stratum in 1.1.9 is tweaked, and from some other reports I've heard there are problems with Dwarfpool.  I'm guessing they have undocumented (and unreasonable) expectations of the stratum implementation.
sr. member
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum
October 02, 2016, 07:24:41 AM
With the new version i just get

X  14:23:30|stratum  :-( Rejected in 1593 ms.
  m  14:23:30|main  Waiting for work package...
  m  14:23:30|main  Waiting for work package...
  m  14:23:30|main  Waiting for work package...
  m  14:23:31|main  Waiting for work package...
  m  14:23:31|main  Waiting for work package...
  m  14:23:31|main  Waiting for work package...
  m  14:23:31|main  Waiting for work package...
  m  14:23:31|main  Waiting for work package...
 billions

I use the same bat file as i use for 1.1.7 what is the problem?
sr. member
Activity: 305
Merit: 250
October 01, 2016, 10:35:28 PM
already have the 1.1.9

this 1060 does not make at least 21 MH / s?
and which consumption reported by the PCU z?
rx 470 still yields much more than the 1060 maybe over the memos solve
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
October 01, 2016, 10:18:53 PM
Wanting to put my status up. Hoping I can get some advise on how to get a little better hashrate.
What I'm workin wit:
-
CPU: AMD FX 8350 8-core
6GB System memory
GPU:GTX 1060
Description:  Bus Interface: PCIe 3.0 x16, Max Memory Size: 3072 MB, Core Clock(s): 1708 MHz, Memory Clock(s): 2000 MHz, Graphics API Support: DirectX 12.0 OpenGL 4.5 Max TDP: 120 W
Videocard Category:  Desktop
Other names:  NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
=
My current results:

  i  22:59:30|stratum  B-) Submitted and accepted.
  m  22:59:31|main  Mining on PoWhash #114919ad : 18.86MH/s [A1581+0:R26+0:F0]
  m  22:59:33|main  Mining on PoWhash #114919ad : 18.86MH/s [A1581+0:R26+0:F0]
  i  22:59:34|cudaminer0  Solution found; Submitting to eth.pool.minergate.com .
..
  i  22:59:34|cudaminer0    Nonce: 0x7e2cd0f564928474
  i  22:59:35|stratum  B-) Submitted and accepted.
  m  22:59:35|main  Mining on PoWhash #114919ad : 18.86MH/s [A1582+0:R26+0:F0]
  i  22:59:35|stratum  Received new job #0x069f03
  i  22:59:35|cudaminer0  set work; seed: #98c461e5, target: #000000458139
  i  22:59:35|cudaminer0  Solution found; Submitting to eth.pool.minergate.com .
..
  i  22:59:35|cudaminer0    Nonce: 0x9b3c657cd57e3b99
  i  22:59:36|stratum  B-) Submitted and accepted.
  m  22:59:37|main  Mining on PoWhash #069f0367 : 17.59MH/s [A1583+0:R26+0:F0]
  i  22:59:38|stratum  Received new job #0x58a023
  i  22:59:38|cudaminer0  set work; seed: #98c461e5, target: #000000457d46
  m  22:59:39|main  Mining on PoWhash #58a023a5 : 16.75MH/s [A1583+0:R26+0:F0]
  i  22:59:39|cudaminer0  Solution found; Submitting to eth.pool.minergate.com .
..
  i  22:59:39|cudaminer0    Nonce: 0xa664bae9e3f4b172
  i  22:59:39|stratum  B-) Submitted and accepted.
  i  22:59:40|cudaminer0  Solution found; Submitting to eth.pool.minergate.com .
..
  i  22:59:40|cudaminer0    Nonce: 0xa664bae9e534d440
  i  22:59:41|stratum  B-) Submitted and accepted.
  m  22:59:41|main  Mining on PoWhash #58a023a5 : 18.87MH/s [A1585+0:R26+0:F0]
  m  22:59:43|main  Mining on PoWhash #58a023a5 : 18.86MH/s [A1585+0:R26+0:F0]
  i  22:59:44|cudaminer0  Solution found; Submitting to eth.pool.minergate.com .
..
  i  22:59:44|cudaminer0    Nonce: 0xa664bae9e9a8eef5
  i  22:59:44|stratum  B-) Submitted and accepted.
  i  22:59:45|cudaminer0  Solution found; Submitting to eth.pool.minergate.com .
..
  i  22:59:45|cudaminer0    Nonce: 0xa664bae9ea285b39
  i  22:59:45|stratum  B-) Submitted and accepted.
  m  22:59:45|main  Mining on PoWhash #58a023a5 : 18.86MH/s [A1586+0:R26+0:F0]
  i  22:59:46|stratum  Received new job #0x1d10b7
  i  22:59:46|cudaminer0  set work; seed: #98c461e5, target: #000000456b3d
  m  22:59:47|main  Mining on PoWhash #1d10b758 : 14.67MH/s [A1587+0:R26+0:F0]
  m  22:59:49|main  Mining on PoWhash #1d10b758 : 18.86MH/s [A1587+0:R26+0:F0]
  m  22:59:51|main  Mining on PoWhash #1d10b758 : 18.86MH/s [A1587+0:R26+0:F0]
  m  22:59:53|main  Mining on PoWhash #1d10b758 : 18.86MH/s [A1587+0:R26+0:F0]
  m  22:59:55|main  Mining on PoWhash #1d10b758 : 18.86MH/s [A1587+0:R26+0:F0]
  i  22:59:56|cudaminer0  Solution found; Submitting to eth.pool.minergate.com .
..
  i  22:59:56|cudaminer0    Nonce: 0x2e02b336650785e9
  i  22:59:56|stratum  B-) Submitted and accepted.
  m  22:59:57|main  Mining on PoWhash #1d10b758 : 18.86MH/s [A1588+0:R26+0:F0]
  m  22:59:59|main  Mining on PoWhash #1d10b758 : 19.90MH/s [A1588+0:R26+0:F0]
  m  23:00:01|main  Mining on PoWhash #1d10b758 : 17.81MH/s [A1588+0:R26+0:F0]
  m  23:00:03|main  Mining on PoWhash #1d10b758 : 18.74MH/s [A1588+0:R26+0:F0]
  m  23:00:05|main  Mining on PoWhash #1d10b758 : 18.74MH/s [A1588+0:R26+0:F0]
  m  23:00:07|main  Mining on PoWhash #1d10b758 : 18.82MH/s [A1588+0:R26+0:F0]
  i  23:00:09|cudaminer0  Solution found; Submitting to eth.pool.minergate.com .

I am NOT doing any overclocking. 8-CPU cores activated only via BIOS.  

I am a newbie.  I wouild like some info as to if I should be getting a better hashrate with the hardware I have.
 
I am using ethminer-0.9.41-genoil-1.1.6-pre

Bat file :  ethminer.exe -U -S eth.pool.minergate.com:45791 -O [email protected]
-
Looking for any Senior advisment on what I can do better.
sr. member
Activity: 438
Merit: 250
September 30, 2016, 01:32:00 PM
I blindly merged some PR by some dude (not you Ralph ) who claimend they would fix Ubuntu 16 build issues. I guess that was a mistake.

But I don't know if I'll fix it. Working on something else now, not sure if I'll ever release it  Lips sealed
hero member
Activity: 710
Merit: 502
September 30, 2016, 09:01:24 AM
Hello Genoil
I downloaded the last 110 branch (linux) and try to compile and gives me a TON of errors, i don't even know where to begin to look for, can you give me a hint please?, previous 110 branch versions compiled fine.

it's like if you change cmake version or c++ version, dunno.

these are the errors:

Code:
Linking CXX static library libdevcore.a
[ 70%] Built target devcore
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.8/include/stddef.h(432): error: identifier "nullptr" is undefined
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.8/include/stddef.h(432): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/c++/4.8/bits/c++config.h(190): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/exception(63): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/exception(68): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/exception(76): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/exception(83): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/exception(93): error: expected a "{"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/exception_ptr.h(64): error: function "std::current_exception" returns incomplete type "std::__exception_ptr::exception_ptr"

/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/exception_ptr.h(64): error: expected a "{"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/exception_ptr.h(79): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/exception_ptr.h(81): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/exception_ptr.h(82): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/exception_ptr.h(84): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/exception_ptr.h(86): error: declaration is incompatible with previous "std::current_exception"
(64): here
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/exception_ptr.h(86): error: use of a local type to declare a function
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/exception_ptr.h(86): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/exception_ptr.h(87): error: use of a local type to declare a function
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/exception_ptr.h(90): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/exception_ptr.h(92): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/exception_ptr.h(95): error: incomplete type is not allowed
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/exception_ptr.h(95): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/exception_ptr.h(116): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/exception_ptr.h(126): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/exception_ptr.h(143): error: use of a local type to declare a function
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/exception_ptr.h(144): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/exception_ptr.h(147): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/exception_ptr.h(152): error: use of a local type to declare a function
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/exception_ptr.h(153): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/exception_ptr.h(156): error: use of a local type to declare a function
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/exception_ptr.h(157): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/exception_ptr.h(160): error: use of a local type to declare a function
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/exception_ptr.h(161): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/exception_ptr.h(169): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/nested_exception.h(57): error: incomplete type is not allowed
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/nested_exception.h(60): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/nested_exception.h(66): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/nested_exception.h(70): error: identifier "rethrow_exception" is undefined
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/nested_exception.h(73): error: function "std::nested_exception::nested_ptr" returns incomplete type "std::__exception_ptr::exception_ptr"

/usr/include/c++/4.8/new(95): error: expected a "{"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/new(110): error: identifier "__p" is undefined
/usr/include/c++/4.8/new(111): error: expected a "{"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/new(115): error: expected a "{"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/new(116): error: expected a "{"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/cpp_type_traits.h(184): error: identifier "char16_t" is undefined
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/cpp_type_traits.h(191): error: identifier "char32_t" is undefined
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/cpp_type_traits.h(191): error: class "std::__is_integer<>" has already been defined
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/cpp_type_traits.h(314): error: namespace "std::__gnu_cxx" has no member "__normal_iterator"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/cpp_type_traits.h(314): error: expected a ">"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(80): error: inline specifier allowed on function declarations only
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(80): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(105): error: inline specifier allowed on function declarations only
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(105): error: variable "std::constexpr" has already been defined
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(105): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(124): error: inline specifier allowed on function declarations only
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(124): error: variable "std::constexpr" has already been defined
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(124): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(143): error: inline specifier allowed on function declarations only
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(143): error: variable "std::constexpr" has already been defined
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(143): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(162): error: inline specifier allowed on function declarations only
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(162): error: variable "std::constexpr" has already been defined
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(162): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(183): error: inline specifier allowed on function declarations only
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(183): error: variable "std::constexpr" has already been defined
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(183): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(202): error: inline specifier allowed on function declarations only
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(202): error: variable "std::constexpr" has already been defined
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(202): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(221): error: inline specifier allowed on function declarations only
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(221): error: variable "std::constexpr" has already been defined
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(221): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(240): error: inline specifier allowed on function declarations only
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(240): error: variable "std::constexpr" has already been defined
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(240): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(259): error: inline specifier allowed on function declarations only
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(259): error: variable "std::constexpr" has already been defined
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(259): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(278): error: inline specifier allowed on function declarations only
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(278): error: variable "std::constexpr" has already been defined
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(278): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(297): error: inline specifier allowed on function declarations only
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(297): error: variable "std::constexpr" has already been defined
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(297): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(328): error: "constexpr" is not a function or static data member
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(337): error: inline specifier allowed on function declarations only
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(337): error: variable "std::constexpr" has already been defined
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(337): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(356): error: inline specifier allowed on function declarations only
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(356): error: variable "std::constexpr" has already been defined
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(356): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(375): error: inline specifier allowed on function declarations only
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(375): error: variable "std::constexpr" has already been defined
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(375): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(406): error: inline specifier allowed on function declarations only
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(406): error: variable "std::constexpr" has already been defined
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(406): error: expected a ";"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(443): error: inline specifier allowed on function declarations only
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(443): error: variable "std::constexpr" has already been defined
/usr/include/c++/4.8/cmath(443): error: expected a ";"

Error limit reached.
100 errors detected in the compilation of "/tmp/tmpxft_00007e7f_00000000-17_ethash_cuda_miner_kernel.compute_61.cpp1.ii".
Compilation terminated.
CMake Error at ethash-cuda_generated_ethash_cuda_miner_kernel.cu.o.cmake:264 (message):
  Error generating file
  /opt/miners/cpp-ethereum/build/libethash-cuda/CMakeFiles/ethash-cuda.dir//./ethash-cuda_generated_ethash_cuda_miner_kernel.cu.o


please give me a hint to where to look for, previous versions compile just fine. (well i need to modify CMakeCache.txt because cmake fucks something up with libOpenCL.so.1 location, but i change in both, and in older ones compiles perfectly.

(lubuntu 14.04 x64, CUDA 8, driver 367.44)
sr. member
Activity: 305
Merit: 250
September 27, 2016, 04:12:09 PM
1.1.9 seems to have a bug, I get the same as some others:

"Waiting for work package" over and over

1.1.7 has no problems for me

The 1.1.9 windows build works fine for me with MPH, port 20535.
https://github.com/Genoil/cpp-ethereum/tree/110/releases

My 1.1.9nr Linux build has been working stable for over a month.
https://github.com/nerdralph/ethminer-nr/tree/110/releases


thx
legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
aka "whocares"
September 27, 2016, 03:38:51 PM
1.1.9 seems to have a bug, I get the same as some others:

"Waiting for work package" over and over

1.1.7 has no problems for me

The 1.1.9 windows build works fine for me with MPH, port 20535.
https://github.com/Genoil/cpp-ethereum/tree/110/releases

My 1.1.9nr Linux build has been working stable for over a month.
https://github.com/nerdralph/ethminer-nr/tree/110/releases


I don't mine at MPH Wink I use Ethpool.  I will take Genoils advice and stick with 1.1.7 as it works perfectly.  It appears there is an issue with 1.1.9 that several of us are experiencing.  It looks like a Stratum issue but I could be wrong,.
sr. member
Activity: 532
Merit: 250
September 27, 2016, 12:19:32 PM
I am using 1.1.7 for my HD7950, my card is mining about 22 hours per day.
sr. member
Activity: 438
Merit: 250
September 27, 2016, 11:23:10 AM
Yea I use MPH mostly for testing, too.

Don't have much time to look into it. If 1.1.7 does the job, I'd just use that Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 588
Merit: 251
September 27, 2016, 10:57:11 AM
1.1.9 seems to have a bug, I get the same as some others:

"Waiting for work package" over and over

1.1.7 has no problems for me

The 1.1.9 windows build works fine for me with MPH, port 20535.
https://github.com/Genoil/cpp-ethereum/tree/110/releases

My 1.1.9nr Linux build has been working stable for over a month.
https://github.com/nerdralph/ethminer-nr/tree/110/releases
legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
aka "whocares"
September 27, 2016, 04:36:15 AM
1.1.9 seems to have a bug, I get the same as some others:

"Waiting for work package" over and over

1.1.7 has no problems for me
hero member
Activity: 1246
Merit: 708
September 26, 2016, 10:52:57 PM
Try earlier version Maybe?
sr. member
Activity: 305
Merit: 250
September 26, 2016, 05:01:39 PM
hi guys, i have some insues.   Why my miner do not show me my hash? I only see "waiting for work package"   

Second, why nano pool does not show my hash ?   my bat is

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
timeout 20

ethminer.exe --farm-recheck 290 --cl-local-work 256 --cl-global-work 8192 -G --opencl-platform 0 -G -S eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999 -FS eth-eu2.nanopool.org:9999 -O 0x923E02D5E81163d9fe31A2378B9F401dda107f0d.lauro3/[email protected]


using the last version of genoil 1.1.9
genoil 1.1.9 ?
link ?
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
September 26, 2016, 08:53:06 AM
i download the last version of ethminer 1.1     and run the same bat now my hash is 0.00
legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
aka "whocares"
September 26, 2016, 03:43:16 AM
what speed you have on the rx470?  4gigas version?

21.9MH tops on stock clocks/bios (1260/1750), but it tends to fluctuate a lot more and averages out at about 21.3, whereas my kernel does a fairly steady 20.9 when using a high farm-recheck.

There's something wrong with my dropping his kernel into my code though, because it doesn't seem to find any shares Grin.   

Check the end. SGMiner's counter is at the end, yours is at the beginning.

Thanks. That did the trick. Tested both kernels in my (1GB DAG) simulation mode. It's hard to tell which one is faster, I don't think it really makes a difference.

So is your branch with wolfs kernel with that change available?
sr. member
Activity: 305
Merit: 250
September 23, 2016, 06:57:25 PM
sr. member
Activity: 438
Merit: 250
September 23, 2016, 04:40:38 PM
what speed you have on the rx470?  4gigas version?

21.9MH tops on stock clocks/bios (1260/1750), but it tends to fluctuate a lot more and averages out at about 21.3, whereas my kernel does a fairly steady 20.9 when using a high farm-recheck.

There's something wrong with my dropping his kernel into my code though, because it doesn't seem to find any shares Grin.   

Check the end. SGMiner's counter is at the end, yours is at the beginning.

Thanks. That did the trick. Tested both kernels in my (1GB DAG) simulation mode. It's hard to tell which one is faster, I don't think it really makes a difference.
Pages:
Jump to: