Topic: EventChain ⚡Solving Ticketing Problems on the Blockchain - page 20. (Read 48151 times)
FUD or Not i think the team needs to clear their names when it come to accusation like this, if its true that the guy who sent the message is from the team then he showed a very unprofessional way of communication and taking the whole company with it.
I think we should focus on the progress of EventChain project rather than discussing FUD's which could be black propaganda.
The person who will invest his money into something will not ignore anything and it's EC team's duty to clear the doubts and counter the accusations.
Legit one does this.
I was looking for new technologies and innovations, aeternity seems to be one of the nice solutions! Unfortunately I missed the whole period of campaigns and ICO, but will I start to buy slowly, is there a channel slack? I'd like to keep informed!
FUD came from concurrence or jealous people. Everyone should focus on Eventchain and why it is a good project, search real argument and see what is already achieved. Like the ico, which work correctly and continue to raise eth. Eventchain is a strong project with nice forecast, a partnership and a big target market.
I think we should focus on the progress of EventChain project rather than discussing FUD's which could be black propaganda.
I agree, liars and scammers should be ignored and we should focus our attention on EC and their ICO. which is going well btw, 23% of the second phase complete.
I think we should focus on the progress of EventChain project rather than discussing FUD's which could be black propaganda.
FUD is first sign of a successful project. People tend to get jealous. It's natural.
But, it's investor's duty to do due diligence and better use their own understanding.
But, it's investor's duty to do due diligence and better use their own understanding.
Sometimes what we call FUD is wise individuals offering up an advice. I had several warnings prior to investing on polybius icos but i was quick to denounce the FUD instigators.
With time, i was left licking my wound, cos i didn't listen. So till eventchain admin, provide a concrete statement/ proof denouncing this FUDS, i won't just kick it to the side.
Every opinion deserves to be heard. and at the end of the day, we all should be looking out for each other.
FUD is first sign of a successful project. People tend to get jealous. It's natural.
But, it's investor's duty to do due diligence and better use their own understanding.
But, it's investor's duty to do due diligence and better use their own understanding.
Yes it was unfortunate we released him purely because we could not prove if these allegations were true or it was just some early investors of Aventus who were trying to protect their investment so to say.
Our new marketing manager is well versed in not only social media but SEO and direct advertising, an improvement over the last manager! Things can turn out like this and we like to look at it as an opportunity to find someone new for the project bringing more unique benefits.
Our new marketing manager is well versed in not only social media but SEO and direct advertising, an improvement over the last manager! Things can turn out like this and we like to look at it as an opportunity to find someone new for the project bringing more unique benefits.
I don't understand why anyone would attack EventChain when they also invested in Aventus. They are not competing in the same regions so it would make more sense to invest in both if they're bullish on the ticket market.
Anyway, didn't the marketing manager offer to show his post history to prove he didn't make those posts? If I were that released marketing manager I would be really sad or angry having to quit a job over false accusations and do anything to prove the contrary.
Those are unfortunate news for the project, having to quit because some possibly made up story couldn't be proved wrong may be upsetting for the entire team, at least lets hope this actually helps the project by showing people how serious the team is, whiling to take hard decisions for the betterment of the project itself and the team in general, at least for me, this just reinforces my trust in this ICO, thanks EventChain.
firing an individual of the quip of another without solid proof, actually suggest the opposite in my mind. It's actually a sign of weakness in my book.
Really unfortunate happened, but on the way there will always be rocks that will make you stumble, I hope the outcome is fair and become brick for progress, I wish luck in the course of the day, and I look forward to a good future, the project deserves . Following
Yes it was unfortunate we released him purely because we could not prove if these allegations were true or it was just some early investors of Aventus who were trying to protect their investment so to say.
Our new marketing manager is well versed in not only social media but SEO and direct advertising, an improvement over the last manager! Things can turn out like this and we like to look at it as an opportunity to find someone new for the project bringing more unique benefits.
Our new marketing manager is well versed in not only social media but SEO and direct advertising, an improvement over the last manager! Things can turn out like this and we like to look at it as an opportunity to find someone new for the project bringing more unique benefits.
I don't understand why anyone would attack EventChain when they also invested in Aventus. They are not competing in the same regions so it would make more sense to invest in both if they're bullish on the ticket market.
Anyway, didn't the marketing manager offer to show his post history to prove he didn't make those posts? If I were that released marketing manager I would be really sad or angry having to quit a job over false accusations and do anything to prove the contrary.
Those are unfortunate news for the project, having to quit because some possibly made up story couldn't be proved wrong may be upsetting for the entire team, at least lets hope this actually helps the project by showing people how serious the team is, whiling to take hard decisions for the betterment of the project itself and the team in general, at least for me, this just reinforces my trust in this ICO, thanks EventChain.
I could see why people would want to put down other coins in the same industry as competition in fear that if eventchain does well the other coins may not do as well, and I see your argument where you want the whole industry to grow and it would be bullish to invest in both! I see room in the industry for us all to grow and help make the ticketing industry better with our different approaches. I think having multiple coins in similar industries just like in prediction market coins produces healthy competition and further growth for that individual industry!
Yes it was unfortunate we released him purely because we could not prove if these allegations were true or it was just some early investors of Aventus who were trying to protect their investment so to say.
Our new marketing manager is well versed in not only social media but SEO and direct advertising, an improvement over the last manager! Things can turn out like this and we like to look at it as an opportunity to find someone new for the project bringing more unique benefits.
Our new marketing manager is well versed in not only social media but SEO and direct advertising, an improvement over the last manager! Things can turn out like this and we like to look at it as an opportunity to find someone new for the project bringing more unique benefits.
I don't understand why anyone would attack EventChain when they also invested in Aventus. They are not competing in the same regions so it would make more sense to invest in both if they're bullish on the ticket market.
Anyway, didn't the marketing manager offer to show his post history to prove he didn't make those posts? If I were that released marketing manager I would be really sad or angry having to quit a job over false accusations and do anything to prove the contrary.
The Reddit post was created by an Aventus fan as a smear campaign. The marketing contractor that we had at the time allegedly sent some personal messages to some users on reddit that were innapropriate, and he decided to retaliate with an elongated story which really does look like a smear campaign.
We decided to investigate into the messages and could not determine what was real and what was photoshopped in this post, so we just did the easiest thing possible and let the market contractor go, separating him from the current team. He is no longer part of EventChain as of a few days after the Reddit post, and I am personally watching over our current marketing campaign and we are having no issue!
We decided to investigate into the messages and could not determine what was real and what was photoshopped in this post, so we just did the easiest thing possible and let the market contractor go, separating him from the current team. He is no longer part of EventChain as of a few days after the Reddit post, and I am personally watching over our current marketing campaign and we are having no issue!
I didn't know that. Do you think some people are trying to make your company look bad by making up false claims? If you had to release the marketing manager because of targeted attacks to frame him and your company then I feel sorry for him and the team.
Yes it was unfortunate we released him purely because we could not prove if these allegations were true or it was just some early investors of Aventus who were trying to protect their investment so to say.
Our new marketing manager is well versed in not only social media but SEO and direct advertising, an improvement over the last manager! Things can turn out like this and we like to look at it as an opportunity to find someone new for the project bringing more unique benefits.
The Reddit post was created by an Aventus fan as a smear campaign. The marketing contractor that we had at the time allegedly sent some personal messages to some users on reddit that were innapropriate, and he decided to retaliate with an elongated story which really does look like a smear campaign.
We decided to investigate into the messages and could not determine what was real and what was photoshopped in this post, so we just did the easiest thing possible and let the market contractor go, separating him from the current team. He is no longer part of EventChain as of a few days after the Reddit post, and I am personally watching over our current marketing campaign and we are having no issue!
We decided to investigate into the messages and could not determine what was real and what was photoshopped in this post, so we just did the easiest thing possible and let the market contractor go, separating him from the current team. He is no longer part of EventChain as of a few days after the Reddit post, and I am personally watching over our current marketing campaign and we are having no issue!
I didn't know that. Do you think some people are trying to make your company look bad by making up false claims? If you had to release the marketing manager because of targeted attacks to frame him and your company then I feel sorry for him and the team.
Do we know what the amount of sold token during phase 1 is ?
Phase 1 was supposed to last 1000 ETH, but only 890 ETH was raised in phase 1. Phase 1 was supposed to have 11 million EVC sold so with 890 ETHER I imagine 89% of them were sold so a total of 9,900,000 EVC.
That's not correct.
Phase 1 was supposed to be 9650 ETH.
They only raised 864 ETH.
That's 9% or 990,000 tokens.
Do we know what the amount of sold token during phase 1 is ?
Phase 1 was supposed to last 1000 ETH, but only 890 ETH was raised in phase 1. Phase 1 was supposed to have 11 million EVC sold so with 890 ETHER I imagine 89% of them were sold so a total of 9,900,000 EVC.
That's not correct.
Phase 1 was supposed to be 9650 ETH.
They only raised 864 ETH.
That's 9% or 990,000 tokens.
Yes its over 250k but just over half of the soft cap. I really hope more investors get interested in the project. Would be a shame if they can not reach the soft cap. There is a lot of potential here.
Yes, the funding has been adequate so far to continue with intitial development and for Singaporean legal fees.
The results of the Phase-1 are in and yes 864 ETH was raised in about 3 days. or about 990,000 EVC
Now combining the Private presale and Phase-1, we have reached just over 1000 ETH, halfway to our first milestone of 2000!
We are only 4 days into the soft launch and we are confident the project will reach our SC and above, we have many more updates to come. Stay tuned real soon. The community is growing and we are almost at 400 participants in Phase-1 alone! This is more than adequate for 4 days and we expect hundreds more
How much time is there to collect the minimum cap? I hope the project will be published, the plans are grandiose.
This is a chance to get rich early investors.
This is a chance to get rich early investors.
Yes the plans are all going well. There will be opportunities for the early investors to be further rewarded for their long term dedication to the project for believing in us from the beginning, and they should be acknowledged for joining the project.
Investors were scared of that news, but time will pass and you will regain their confidence. I understand it will be privileges for early investors in the form of additional bonuses for long term.
I have informed the team in the telegram chat room that there is going on a lot of fud and potential investors seem to be scared. Some team member replied to me that they will attend this issue. Let's see.
Do we know what the amount of sold token during phase 1 is ?
Phase 1 was supposed to last 1000 ETH, but only 890 ETH was raised in phase 1. Phase 1 was supposed to have 11 million EVC sold so with 890 ETHER I imagine 89% of them were sold so a total of 9,900,000 EVC.
That's not correct.
Phase 1 was supposed to be 9650 ETH.
They only raised 864 ETH.
That's 9% or 990,000 tokens.
Do we know what the amount of sold token during phase 1 is ?
Phase 1 was supposed to last 1000 ETH, but only 890 ETH was raised in phase 1. Phase 1 was supposed to have 11 million EVC sold so with 890 ETHER I imagine 89% of them were sold so a total of 9,900,000 EVC.
That's not correct.
Phase 1 was supposed to be 9650 ETH.
They only raised 864 ETH.
That's 9% or 990,000 tokens.
Yes its over 250k but just over half of the soft cap. I really hope more investors get interested in the project. Would be a shame if they can not reach the soft cap. There is a lot of potential here.
Yes, the funding has been adequate so far to continue with intitial development and for Singaporean legal fees.
The results of the Phase-1 are in and yes 864 ETH was raised in about 3 days. or about 990,000 EVC
Now combining the Private presale and Phase-1, we have reached just over 1000 ETH, halfway to our first milestone of 2000!
We are only 4 days into the soft launch and we are confident the project will reach our SC and above, we have many more updates to come. Stay tuned real soon. The community is growing and we are almost at 400 participants in Phase-1 alone! This is more than adequate for 4 days and we expect hundreds more
How much time is there to collect the minimum cap? I hope the project will be published, the plans are grandiose.
This is a chance to get rich early investors.
This is a chance to get rich early investors.
Yes the plans are all going well. There will be opportunities for the early investors to be further rewarded for their long term dedication to the project for believing in us from the beginning, and they should be acknowledged for joining the project.
How much time is there to collect the minimum cap? I hope the project will be published, the plans are grandiose.
This is a chance to get rich early investors.
This is a chance to get rich early investors.
Do we know what the amount of sold token during phase 1 is ?
Phase 1 was supposed to last 1000 ETH, but only 890 ETH was raised in phase 1. Phase 1 was supposed to have 11 million EVC sold so with 890 ETHER I imagine 89% of them were sold so a total of 9,900,000 EVC.
That's not correct.
Phase 1 was supposed to be 9650 ETH.
They only raised 864 ETH.
That's 9% or 990,000 tokens.
Yes its over 200k but still not even half of the soft cap. I really hope more investors get interested in the project. Would be a shame if they can not reach the soft cap. There is a lot of potential here.
Jump to: