Now that is something new that I haven't thought of. Unless you are in the business of sabotaging bitcoin's reputation that could be seen as potential new area to focus on, in order to erode people's trust that they have on bitcoin.
Now let's review back on the potential loophole. Fungibilty... If you consider the issue on tainted coins you received without yourself knowing the history behind it, 'Yes' there's no denial that will be a problem. But however, on the flipside, it will not become an issue as long as coins get properly mixed and you are dealing only with reputable person. But chances it can still happen to you being victimized is still there.
Bitcoin can never be a perfect system, fiat neither but hey, those who are into the exploits business will use that to their full advantage.
So does this mean you think bitcoin developers will never implement a truly private and untraceable functionality (unlinkability and untraceability between addresses)?
Monero does a pretty good job of this from what I have seen and experienced.
And in no way am I trying to erode people's trust in bitcoin, just merely discussing the potential pitfalls when talking about fungibility.
Like I've said I don't see it as a big issue. There are certainly more important things to worry about like the blocksize debate which we need to seek a consensus in order to move ahead. But I certainly see the fungibility part getting blown out of proportion and then exploited. Tiny issue become a big one.
Monero is Monero. That is a feature. But having looked at bitcoin, I'm sure there is way by the developers to work something on it... which I think they are be in the position to comment, not me.
I see it as a much bigger issue than the block size debate.
The block size debate is based on what user's hiring bitcoin to increase the block size? Who is willing to pay for bitcoin to increase its block size and for what reason?
Is there demand for this by new merchants I'm not aware of?
I honestly think the implementation of "confidential transactions" or something that very closely mimics monero's fungibility would be more worthwhile.
I agree at some point the block size needs to increase but I don't believe it is the biggest problem that bitcoin faces.
Watch this video where Trace Mayer outlines a better focus the community should have right now and tell me what you think:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uHXfEJD6DUkWe aren't even at full blocks and it has taken years to get nowhere in the "debate/discussion" of blocksize.
I agree with Trace mayer when he says that the bitcoin block size debate is a waste of time, money, talent, and resources.