Standard of evidence: Reasonable, articulable suspicion. Warrants examination. Not “proved”.Suspicious links: Permabanned ban evader
#813214 “amine14madrid”,
#887705 “amine15madrid”,
#888390 “amine16madrid”, and other known variations.
[...]
They made me laugh out loud, which is very rare for this forum
As so oft the case, Alia’s explanation is (just barely) plausible.
[...]
- It is unlikely that a new user would ever even see the post-ban whine from the year 2016. I myself oftentimes browse old threads; but usually, they are high-quality threads which have been linked from elsewhere, and/or have significant posts by famous users. How and why did “alia” even find that thread?
- An award of merit is, by definition, an endorsement of the post. What I had assumed to be “a bit of immaturity from a 19-year-old” could, in view of recent evidence, be a shout-out of solidarity to a friend—or a vanity homage to oneself.
[...]
Jeez. I noticed that account in theymos's red trust, thought it was funny, gave it merit. Don't read into it too much. I'm sure theymos can IP check.
Well, set this aside for now. I’m glad you answered how you found it. Seems likely enough.
I see that theymos also found it funny, though he didn’t go back and merit it:
theymos’ negative feedback for #883539 “Amine14madrid ALT”
Date: 2016-08-01
Risked BTC amount: 0.00000000
Reference: (none)
Note: This archive is from gyazo.com, which Alia also uses. I had difficulty with that; I can’t see pictures there, because that site refuses to display the image without Javascript (
which I have disabled since the 90s).
Now, Alia, I would appreciate if you would address what ibminer said. Also this post by NLNico from some pages ago, which you seem to have ignored:
All of that without even getting into the other accounts:
--good details, click to see--
I ask this, not so much to prosecute you, but because I really did mean this:
For the record: I still think that the identity of the person(s) controlling #1764044 “alia” is questionable.
I’m probably the only person on this entire forum who isn’t absolutely convinced that you
are favours/revcback/Light/
et al. Closest thing to a friend you’ve still got here. It would be nice if you could show some evidence of your identity
better than “Skype me”, which your alleged (?) brother could also do:
Also, if you guys still believe I am a scammer, even after I repaid aTriz $2,000 even after he broke the contract then you are all braindead. RIP
Why should my rep be tarnished because of what my brother did? I'm sure that if he was in the situation of taking 0.18 btc and running he would have no hesitation, but I have a moral compass. Why am I being lynched for someone else's wrongdoings?
That struck me as not-scammy. Me, at least; others don’t seem so impressed. But really, all it means is that either you do have a conscience, or this is an impressive long con. 0.18 BTC could be an “investment”, worth much more down the road. Yes, such is what this world has come to...
If you could prove that you are a different individual than your “brother”, that would go a long way toward showing that you returned that money for conscience. Based on what I read at all the links others dug up, I’m not so sure that “if
he was in the situation of taking 0.18 btc and running he would have no hesitation”.
I think he may return it to buy trust, so he could scam out more.Are you him? I hope you’re not. If you’re not, then I might believe that you did that for conscience, yes; and that would show some basic common decency on your part.