Pages:
Author

Topic: Evidence of alias (u=1764044) long con scam! - page 6. (Read 6720 times)

legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
For the third time... I'm not using the script. Are you braindead? And, nice cherrypicking. Try sending the link so people can watch in realtime Wink

Ad hominems get us nowheere

There is nothing to cherry pick. You're failing bigly and you don't have a winning script, that much is obvious.

Link: https://www.bustabit.com/user/makealiagreatagain
jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 115
Lowest EVER interest lending! (Use escrow always)
I deleted a post where you called me "120% scammer", and said nothing else. Please read the rules of the thread.

And yeah, feel free to speculate. Heck, theymos is doing a long con right now. Although, to any logical person, me refunding aTriz and the "long con" narrative do not add up

Actually it adds up really well, just like paying some "profits" when you were hoping to sell the script for 20-30 BTC.

If theymos starts selling a gambling script I'll neg him too. Is that good enough for you?

Speaking of scripts - still not working:



For the third time... I'm not using the script. Are you braindead? And, nice cherrypicking. Try sending the link so people can watch in realtime Wink
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
I deleted a post where you called me "120% scammer", and said nothing else. Please read the rules of the thread.

And yeah, feel free to speculate. Heck, theymos is doing a long con right now. Although, to any logical person, me refunding aTriz and the "long con" narrative do not add up

Actually it adds up really well, just like paying some "profits" when you were hoping to sell the script for 20-30 BTC.

If theymos starts selling a gambling script I'll neg him too. Is that good enough for you?

Speaking of scripts - still not working:

jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 115
Lowest EVER interest lending! (Use escrow always)
Notable on the record:  Alia apparently locked the gambling script thread—just as I was trying to post a rather snide reply which insinuated that she was seeking attention with it.  I suppose not.

I posted something to that effect but perhaps not as nice... alia deleted the post before locking the thread.

Which is good, no need for a misleading thread. This scam thread is much more relevant.

I paid out a lot. Almost $5k. Say what you will about that

Long con. Well, not very long but you didn't know that at the time.

I deleted a post where you called me "120% scammer", and said nothing else. Please read the rules of the thread.

And yeah, feel free to speculate. Heck, theymos is doing a long con right now. Although, to any logical person, me refunding aTriz and the "long con" narrative do not add up

legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Notable on the record:  Alia apparently locked the gambling script thread—just as I was trying to post a rather snide reply which insinuated that she was seeking attention with it.  I suppose not.

I posted something to that effect but perhaps not as nice... alia deleted the post before locking the thread.

Which is good, no need for a misleading thread. This scam thread is much more relevant.

I paid out a lot. Almost $5k. Say what you will about that

Long con. Well, not very long but you didn't know that at the time.
jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 115
Lowest EVER interest lending! (Use escrow always)
Notable on the record:  Alia locked the gambling script thread—just as I was trying to post a rather snide reply which insinuated that she was seeking attention with it.  I suppose not.

cough
copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 2614
If you don’t do PGP, you don’t do crypto!
Notable on the record:  Alia apparently locked the gambling script thread—just as I was trying to post a rather snide reply which insinuated that she was seeking attention with it.  I suppose not.
jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 115
Lowest EVER interest lending! (Use escrow always)
I paid out a lot. Almost $5k. Say what you will about that
Most of what you "paid out" was to a newbie with very shady dealings...

How is that at all relevent? Ad hominems get us nowheere
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
I paid out a lot. Almost $5k. Say what you will about that
Most of what you "paid out" was to a newbie with very shady dealings...
jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 115
Lowest EVER interest lending! (Use escrow always)
I paid out a lot. Almost $5k. Say what you will about that

Yeah, without checking with each of your "winners", for the sake of argument I accepted that you did pay out.
Seeing as the "script" has been proven not to exist/work, the question was 'Why?'
Pro Tip: don't bother to answer that.

No, that's the thing. The only thing that was "proven" was that no script can be profitable in the long run. For me, the script works. Maybe I was just lucky. I even gave aTriz the script, he saw it was real, he run it himself, and it worked.
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1737
"Common rogue from Russia with a bare ass."
I paid out a lot. Almost $5k. Say what you will about that

Yeah, without checking with each of your "winners", for the sake of argument I accepted that you did pay out.
Seeing as the "script" has been proven not to exist/work, the question was 'Why?'
Pro Tip: don't bother to answer that.
jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 115
Lowest EVER interest lending! (Use escrow always)
Oh, gawd.. I've told you already, I stopped using the script. xDDDD

And also, my investors are not imaginary. read: nullius, SyGambler, TelevisionLover, so on and so forth, just ask them. Faggot.

What you're telling is mostly lies.

nullius and SyGambler have already stated that they don't have any proof of you actually making gambling profit with their money, or any proof of the script.

I'll go with Mr. Occam here.

Yeah, that's the way the Razor cuts for me too; there was no script.
If that is the case, it begs the questions:

1) The nearly half a BTC he/she/etc. paid out below was seed money. What for?
2) What did aTriz do or see, in order for him to vouch it?

Quote from: alia
Name      Amount    Return Amount    ROI

 slaman29    0.005           0.007              140%   
    nullius         0.01            0.02              200%
 slaman29     0.1              0.11               110%
 slaman29     0.1              0.107             107%
  v4d1mm    0.005           0.0058           116%
  v4d1mm    0.0475           0.052           109%
SyGambler    0.01            0.014           140%
TelevisionLover  0.01            0.013           130%
TelevisionLover  0.05            0.055           110%
TelevisionLover  0.1            0.109           109%
SyGambler    0.01            0.012           120%
TelevisionLover  0.2            0.22             110%
TelevisionLover  0.2            0.21             105%
TelevisionLover  0.2            0.22             110%
TelevisionLover  0.25            0.275           110%
TelevisionLover  0.25            0.275           110%
live:tonyl6         2.5              2.8           112%
favours         0.8              0.88           110%


Not that it's inconsistent with alia's inconsistency, but I'd have thought that the best way of continuing to bluff this out would have been to push the following story, rather than attempt to argue that math isn't math. The claimed unspecified alteration in house edge would make redundant calcs based on 1%.

Quote from: alia
As for "no strategies will work in gambling" - this does not apply to someone who was intimate with the dev who owns the gambling site, and thus has some insider information.

I'll elaborate further:
The site in question uses an interesting system to rope in users. For each new user, it will let them get a certain amount of profit with ease (the house edge is significantly lower), and once this quota is hit, they will start losing. This way, people feel like the game is not rigged and even upon losing it all, they'll keep trying to put in more money. What I do is, I play until the quota is almost hit, and then I cash out.

Although his/her/etc. later claims that
Quote
tweaking
made the "script" work on more than just one site are yet another inconsistency.





I paid out a lot. Almost $5k. Say what you will about that
full member
Activity: 504
Merit: 185
Oh, gawd.. I've told you already, I stopped using the script. xDDDD

And also, my investors are not imaginary. read: nullius, SyGambler, TelevisionLover, so on and so forth, just ask them. Faggot.

What you're telling is mostly lies.

nullius and SyGambler have already stated that they don't have any proof of you actually making gambling profit with their money, or any proof of the script.

I'll go with Mr. Occam here.

Yeah, that's the way the Razor cuts for me too; there was no script.
If that is the case, it begs the questions:

1) The nearly half a BTC he/she/etc. paid out below was seed money. What for?
2) What did aTriz do or see, in order for him to vouch it?

Quote from: alia
Name      Amount    Return Amount    ROI

 slaman29    0.005           0.007              140%   
    nullius         0.01            0.02              200%
 slaman29     0.1              0.11               110%
 slaman29     0.1              0.107             107%
  v4d1mm    0.005           0.0058           116%
  v4d1mm    0.0475           0.052           109%
SyGambler    0.01            0.014           140%
TelevisionLover  0.01            0.013           130%
TelevisionLover  0.05            0.055           110%
TelevisionLover  0.1            0.109           109%
SyGambler    0.01            0.012           120%
TelevisionLover  0.2            0.22             110%
TelevisionLover  0.2            0.21             105%
TelevisionLover  0.2            0.22             110%
TelevisionLover  0.25            0.275           110%
TelevisionLover  0.25            0.275           110%
live:tonyl6         2.5              2.8           112%
favours         0.8              0.88           110%


Not that it's inconsistent with alia's inconsistency, but I'd have thought that the best way of continuing to bluff this out would have been to push the following story, rather than attempt to argue that math isn't math. The claimed unspecified alteration in house edge would make redundant calcs based on 1%.

Quote from: alia
As for "no strategies will work in gambling" - this does not apply to someone who was intimate with the dev who owns the gambling site, and thus has some insider information.

I'll elaborate further:
The site in question uses an interesting system to rope in users. For each new user, it will let them get a certain amount of profit with ease (the house edge is significantly lower), and once this quota is hit, they will start losing. This way, people feel like the game is not rigged and even upon losing it all, they'll keep trying to put in more money. What I do is, I play until the quota is almost hit, and then I cash out.

Although his/her/etc. later claims that
Quote
tweaking
made the "script" work on more than just one site are yet another inconsistency.





If you look at the bets, it looks like the profit is 0.01ish no matter how much they start with
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1737
"Common rogue from Russia with a bare ass."
Oh, gawd.. I've told you already, I stopped using the script. xDDDD

And also, my investors are not imaginary. read: nullius, SyGambler, TelevisionLover, so on and so forth, just ask them. Faggot.

What you're telling is mostly lies.

nullius and SyGambler have already stated that they don't have any proof of you actually making gambling profit with their money, or any proof of the script.

I'll go with Mr. Occam here.

Yeah, that's the way the Razor cuts for me too; there was no script.
If that is the case, it begs the questions:

1) The nearly half a BTC he/she/etc. paid out below was seed money. What for?
2) What did aTriz do or see, in order for him to vouch it?

Quote from: alia
Name      Amount    Return Amount    ROI

 slaman29    0.005           0.007              140%   
    nullius         0.01            0.02              200%
 slaman29     0.1              0.11               110%
 slaman29     0.1              0.107             107%
  v4d1mm    0.005           0.0058           116%
  v4d1mm    0.0475           0.052           109%
SyGambler    0.01            0.014           140%
TelevisionLover  0.01            0.013           130%
TelevisionLover  0.05            0.055           110%
TelevisionLover  0.1            0.109           109%
SyGambler    0.01            0.012           120%
TelevisionLover  0.2            0.22             110%
TelevisionLover  0.2            0.21             105%
TelevisionLover  0.2            0.22             110%
TelevisionLover  0.25            0.275           110%
TelevisionLover  0.25            0.275           110%
live:tonyl6         2.5              2.8           112%
favours         0.8              0.88           110%


Not that it's inconsistent with alia's inconsistency, but I'd have thought that the best way of continuing to bluff this out would have been to push the following story, rather than attempt to argue that math isn't math. The claimed unspecified alteration in house edge would make redundant calcs based on 1%.

Quote from: alia
As for "no strategies will work in gambling" - this does not apply to someone who was intimate with the dev who owns the gambling site, and thus has some insider information.

I'll elaborate further:
The site in question uses an interesting system to rope in users. For each new user, it will let them get a certain amount of profit with ease (the house edge is significantly lower), and once this quota is hit, they will start losing. This way, people feel like the game is not rigged and even upon losing it all, they'll keep trying to put in more money. What I do is, I play until the quota is almost hit, and then I cash out.

Although his/her/etc. later claims that
Quote
tweaking
made the "script" work on more than just one site are yet another inconsistency.



full member
Activity: 504
Merit: 185
Oh, gawd.. I've told you already, I stopped using the script. xDDDD

And also, my investors are not imaginary. read: nullius, SyGambler, TelevisionLover, so on and so forth, just ask them. Faggot.

What you're telling is mostly lies.

nullius and SyGambler have already stated that they don't have any proof of you actually making gambling profit with their money, or any proof of the script.

I'll go with Mr. Occam here.

Did anyone follow the blockchain to see where their initial investments went and then where their refund came from?

Anyone to think that a script for bustabit is fool proof is a fucking idiot
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Oh, gawd.. I've told you already, I stopped using the script. xDDDD

And also, my investors are not imaginary. read: nullius, SyGambler, TelevisionLover, so on and so forth, just ask them. Faggot.

What you're telling is mostly lies.

nullius and SyGambler have already stated that they don't have any proof of you actually making gambling profit with their money, or any proof of the script.

I'll go with Mr. Occam here.
jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 115
Lowest EVER interest lending! (Use escrow always)
I didn't attempt a scam, dumbfuck. I genuinely believe my script works (as it has been doing for EVERY investor thus far) and I sold it whilst believing that.

You've been told numerous times that it can't work. You can't use the naïveté defense. Well, you can and you do, it just makes you look even more of a liar and a scammer.

Here is how well it works for you and your imaginary investors:

https://www.bustabit.com/user/makealiagreatagain




Oh, gawd.. I've told you already, I stopped using the script. xDDDD

And also, my investors are not imaginary. read: nullius, SyGambler, TelevisionLover, so on and so forth, just ask them. Faggot.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
I didn't attempt a scam, dumbfuck. I genuinely believe my script works (as it has been doing for EVERY investor thus far) and I sold it whilst believing that.

You've been told numerous times that it can't work. You can't use the naïveté defense. Well, you can and you do, it just makes you look even more of a liar and a scammer.

Here is how well it works for you and your imaginary investors:

https://www.bustabit.com/user/makealiagreatagain


jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 115
Lowest EVER interest lending! (Use escrow always)
Answer a simple question. If I am a scammer, why have I scammed nobody? And if I am a scammer, why did I refund $2k of what was rightfully mine?

This question has been answered numerous times, you just don't like the answer.

Attempted scam is still a scam.

You're still insisting that a magic winning script exists. Filthy scammer.

It's been a policy from the very beginning for me to never show my face, so obviously not. You're welcome to skype and interview us both together (bodies only, that is) and ask us anything you like.

What's the point then? We can ask anything we like here, and you're lying just the same.

I didn't attempt a scam, dumbfuck. I genuinely believe my script works (as it has been doing for EVERY investor thus far) and I sold it whilst believing that.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Answer a simple question. If I am a scammer, why have I scammed nobody? And if I am a scammer, why did I refund $2k of what was rightfully mine?

This question has been answered numerous times, you just don't like the answer.

Attempted scam is still a scam.

You're still insisting that a magic winning script exists. Filthy scammer.

It's been a policy from the very beginning for me to never show my face, so obviously not. You're welcome to skype and interview us both together (bodies only, that is) and ask us anything you like.

What's the point then? We can ask anything we like here, and you're lying just the same.
Pages:
Jump to: