Archive:
https://web.archive.org/web/20180302133803/https://github.com/acceptbitcoincash/acceptbitcoincash/issues/540N.b. that the issue comment is by Github user “accept-bitcoin-cash”, “the Accept Bitcoin Cash initiative”, https:// acceptbitcoin.cash/ (URL broken so as to not linkify for a Btrash promotion site). It does not appear to be from “Alia” herself/himself/whatever.
It can be
reasonably inferred that the information was taken as of 2018-02-06 from:
https://www.reddit.com/r/GirlsGoneBitcoin/comments/7t4w7a/can_someone_please_play_with_me/(by a deleted user, now blanked)
...and that it probably reflects information displayed by /u/alia_armelle at that URL, as of that date, by an apparently disinterested party. (“accept-bitcoin-cash” may lie about Btrash, but would have no motive to make stuff up about some arbitrary Reddit camgirl.)
@RGBKey, I seek your expertise for a gambling newbie question: Is it mathematically possible to write a gambling script which loses 90% of the time on a site with a 1% house edge?
If not, Alia is scamming! (Also, if so, Alia was scamming!)
Of course. Betting on a 9.9x multiplier has a 10% chance to win, which would lose 90% of the time on average.
Thanks. I didn’t know that these sites let you choose such a multiplier.
#endif /* defined(GAMBLING_NEWBIE) */
I have further substantive replies upthread, but no time for that now. At that, I will not be spending so much time on this matter going forward—certainly not engaging daily in regular snipes with the “alia” account. But as I said above, I do recommend that the thread remain open for any further substantial evidence. Even under the most favourable (so to speak) assumptions about Alia, this matter intersects with serial scamming in other places; in any case, it is a matter I intend to at least keep an eye on. Keeping it all in one topic would be tidy.