Coincidentally he has the same name. 
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-07-21/who-was-alphabay-founder-alexandre-cazes/8730680
Topic: Evidence of alias (u=1764044) long con scam! - page 16. (Read 6718 times)
Is that her 15 years old "brother"? Coincidentally he has the same name.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-07-21/who-was-alphabay-founder-alexandre-cazes/8730680
Coincidentally he has the same name. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-07-21/who-was-alphabay-founder-alexandre-cazes/8730680
He's clearly quite smart, hence the TED talks. This is what I first wrote about alia:
It's nice to see a Newbie with more Merit than Activity! Welcome to Bitcointalk, glad you joined!
I'll now strike out those last 3 words.I disagree, Loyce. If the TED talk boy is writing this, he underwhelms. I’ve had discussions with “alia” in public and in private about cryptography, computing, software... It would be impressive for the person we thought “she” was. I thought “she” demonstrated a sharp mind with some good potential. But if these posts are actually written by little Mr. TED Talk, then he is actually quite a disappointment.
Expectations are different based on a person’s background. Somebody already giving TED talks should already have a much higher level of knowledge.
Whereas if Alia was actually writing this, I would not expect her to have knowledge which 99.9% of people don’t; and I did see a mind with some potential for real learning. Maybe somebody who could grow to give TED talks someday. Not somebody who already had.
If my brother wishes to comment on this, he shall. But for the record, my Bitcoin technical prowess it not nearly close to that of yours, or for that matter, most people on this forum. I know more about BTC than the average person, but not more than the average bitcointalk user. Make of that what you will
He's clearly quite smart, hence the TED talks. This is what I first wrote about alia:
It's nice to see a Newbie with more Merit than Activity! Welcome to Bitcointalk, glad you joined!
I'll now strike out those last 3 words.I disagree, Loyce. If the TED talk boy is writing this, he underwhelms. I’ve had discussions with “alia” in public and in private about cryptography, computing, software... It would be impressive for the person we thought “she” was. I thought “she” demonstrated a sharp mind with some good potential. But if these posts are actually written by little Mr. TED Talk, then he is actually quite a disappointment.
Expectations are different based on a person’s background. Somebody already giving TED talks should already have a much higher level of knowledge.
Whereas if Alia was actually writing this, I would not expect her to have knowledge which 99.9% of people don’t; and I did see a mind with some potential for real learning. Maybe somebody who could grow to give TED talks someday. Not somebody who already had.
I am disappointed that things on the “0.01 BTC to 1.2 BTC” front suddenly went all quiet after I posted my txids above.
Thank you for your excellent work, NLNico. It will take me awhile t digest all the links you dumped... Will probably comment sometime (much) later. Curious that alia has not commented.
New hypothesis: There really is a girl actively involved, not only as a hireling or sidekick but perhaps even as the one writing the posts here. revcback/favours/whatever is the boyfriend or “FWB” who provides penis for on-camera sex acts which require one. There is no brother-sister relationship.
Observe:
Alia was not the one who suggested a “little brother”. That was me! I was the one who discovered that ibminer’s “15-year-old” was a self-alleged 15-year-old boy; and when ibminer questioned this scenario, I tossed this off-the-cuff:
I dislike speculating about such things, especially in public. But if I try to think of a plausible “why”, the first thing which comes to mind is, “Little brother got jealous of big sis doing that Bitcoin thing, wanted his own exchange account, needed to be 18+, had easy access to her identity docs for alteration.”
This occurred during the time when Alia was allegedly (and probably) asleep. When she returned, she immediately picked up and ran with three distinct things I had written in the interim—including the “little brother” scenario.
Now, think: The female in a boy-girl “friends with benefits” scammer pair gets caught. Another party casually suggests a “little brother” hypothesis. What is the girl going to say?
The foregoing is only a hypothesis—much like my “little brother” hypothesis in the first instance. It is not proved. It does fit available evidence, however. There is simply not (yet) enough evidence to draw firm conclusions.
I also noticed something odd. In some of Alia’s threads, she is hungry and desperate for a meal. In others, she is handling quite large amounts of money.
(There is more I could say to analyze this; but I wish to not detract from one particular point.)
Alia, if you’re trapped in some desperate situation, this is a better opportunity to come clean and get out than you’ve ever had.
There are people here who are highly efficient at running these things down. Hereto undiscovered swaths of your boyfriend’s scamming are being examined, archived, and fit together as puzzle pieces by people who do this as a hobby—perhaps also some who do this for a living. The jig’s up.
The loser promised you a wealthy lifestyle. You don’t need to tell me that. He impressed you with some intelligence. Gives TEDx talks, does he? And then you wind up in situations like this:
There are people who could help, and who could connect you with the right ways to GET OUT NOW.
I myself would like to help you, Alia.
Results are not guaranteed. I don’t know what kind of soup you got yourself into, but it looks to me like you’re in over your head. A chance is a chance. You’re a gambler, right? You take risks. Bet on yourself this time, for real—and for some real merit.
Please take the chance when you have everybody’s attention, and tell us (publicly or—to trusted parties, privately) just what is going on here. Seek advice. Bust your way out of this mess. You could turn out to be the hero of the day, and put all this behind you.
I appreciate the PM you sent me earlier. I feel similarly. I write the foregoing for your sake. Insofar as my own personal interests are concerned, I could leave this thread and not come back. Nobody’s accusing me of anything anymore. But I am still here, waiting for you to prove who you really are...
nullius
Thank you for your excellent work, NLNico. It will take me awhile t digest all the links you dumped... Will probably comment sometime (much) later. Curious that alia has not commented.
* nullius gulps coffee.
New hypothesis: There really is a girl actively involved, not only as a hireling or sidekick but perhaps even as the one writing the posts here. revcback/favours/whatever is the boyfriend or “FWB” who provides penis for on-camera sex acts which require one. There is no brother-sister relationship.
Observe:
Alia was not the one who suggested a “little brother”. That was me! I was the one who discovered that ibminer’s “15-year-old” was a self-alleged 15-year-old boy; and when ibminer questioned this scenario, I tossed this off-the-cuff:
A better question may be "Why is there a 15 year old boy asking for a fake ID matching the name of an e-whore who appeared on this forum a week after that 15 year old boy asked for it"
I dislike speculating about such things, especially in public. But if I try to think of a plausible “why”, the first thing which comes to mind is, “Little brother got jealous of big sis doing that Bitcoin thing, wanted his own exchange account, needed to be 18+, had easy access to her identity docs for alteration.”
This occurred during the time when Alia was allegedly (and probably) asleep. When she returned, she immediately picked up and ran with three distinct things I had written in the interim—including the “little brother” scenario.
Now, think: The female in a boy-girl “friends with benefits” scammer pair gets caught. Another party casually suggests a “little brother” hypothesis. What is the girl going to say?
The foregoing is only a hypothesis—much like my “little brother” hypothesis in the first instance. It is not proved. It does fit available evidence, however. There is simply not (yet) enough evidence to draw firm conclusions.
I also noticed something odd. In some of Alia’s threads, she is hungry and desperate for a meal. In others, she is handling quite large amounts of money.
(There is more I could say to analyze this; but I wish to not detract from one particular point.)
Alia, if you’re trapped in some desperate situation, this is a better opportunity to come clean and get out than you’ve ever had.
There are people here who are highly efficient at running these things down. Hereto undiscovered swaths of your boyfriend’s scamming are being examined, archived, and fit together as puzzle pieces by people who do this as a hobby—perhaps also some who do this for a living. The jig’s up.
The loser promised you a wealthy lifestyle. You don’t need to tell me that. He impressed you with some intelligence. Gives TEDx talks, does he? And then you wind up in situations like this:
I'm really hungry and I want some KFC, but all my funds are in BTC right now.
There are people who could help, and who could connect you with the right ways to GET OUT NOW.
I myself would like to help you, Alia.
Results are not guaranteed. I don’t know what kind of soup you got yourself into, but it looks to me like you’re in over your head. A chance is a chance. You’re a gambler, right? You take risks. Bet on yourself this time, for real—and for some real merit.
Please take the chance when you have everybody’s attention, and tell us (publicly or—to trusted parties, privately) just what is going on here. Seek advice. Bust your way out of this mess. You could turn out to be the hero of the day, and put all this behind you.
I appreciate the PM you sent me earlier. I feel similarly. I write the foregoing for your sake. Insofar as my own personal interests are concerned, I could leave this thread and not come back. Nobody’s accusing me of anything anymore. But I am still here, waiting for you to prove who you really are...
nullius
I'd love to go into a story about how I'm being blackmailed by my boyfriend, I'm super poor, I need money, and this was all a misunderstanding. But the truth is - I'm not poor. I'm not being blackmailed into anything. This is my account, favours belongs to my brother. I can prove this to anyone who is willing to Skype me. I have never scammed a single person, I have only helped them earn money. You may not believe me not, but time will tell how legitimate I am. I only wanted to have fun, make some money, and get a good rep here - looks like just because my brother and I share the same WiFi network, my whole rep has gone to shit. Come back here in a year and see where I am on this forum. You'll be surprised.
I rarely get involved in this kinda stuff but I did some digging (which others may or may not have done, cba digging through like 12 pages of back and forth argument)
On this site: https://www.bountysource.com/issues/54720519-add-alia-armelle-on-ggb-to-the-adult-category (http://archive.is/IiN83)
- name: Alia Armelle on GGB
url: https://www.reddit.com/r/GirlsGoneBitcoin/comments/7t4w7a/can_someone_please_play_with_me/
img:
email_address: [email protected]
bch: Yes
btc: Yes
othercrypto: Yes
On googling your email I got this:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/need-someone-to-buy-me-a-macbook-with-paypal-or-a-card-2052867
https://www.mpgh.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1315419
Now I get siblings using the same accounts but why're you using your brother's email too? Like using into your brother email cause it was already logged into is one thing but explicitly linking it just doesnt add up. Unless ofc your brother's acting like your "manager" (or ePimp)
On this site: https://www.bountysource.com/issues/54720519-add-alia-armelle-on-ggb-to-the-adult-category (http://archive.is/IiN83)
Quote
- name: Alia Armelle on GGB
url: https://www.reddit.com/r/GirlsGoneBitcoin/comments/7t4w7a/can_someone_please_play_with_me/
img:
email_address: [email protected]
bch: Yes
btc: Yes
othercrypto: Yes
On googling your email I got this:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/need-someone-to-buy-me-a-macbook-with-paypal-or-a-card-2052867
https://www.mpgh.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1315419
Now I get siblings using the same accounts but why're you using your brother's email too? Like using into your brother email cause it was already logged into is one thing but explicitly linking it just doesnt add up. Unless ofc your brother's acting like your "manager" (or ePimp)
With a bit of searching, it seems like "favours" is actually (serial) scammer "Light" on the site mpgh.net.
This banned user "Light" has multiple scam accusations:
https://www.mpgh.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1129149
https://www.mpgh.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1113369
https://www.mpgh.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1106394
https://www.mpgh.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1125442
etc.
In the last one, Skype logs are given: https://imgur.com/a/VuxQI it shows the address "15YWc15M7Ht49rMohYrwNh3RggtgAjcMEp" which is wallet 02d8d4de4563bb08 on walletexplorer. This user repeatedly made deposits to Poloniex, specifically to deposit address "1FtzkMkeggTPq7xVn3vTdbU7cDp9NZJoNc".
Now back to bitcointalk:
As per Lauda's request, I am posting a repayment address here.
1PsfsGbooKzMohG9SshFbNUaHRTZUQeu4S
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.189866841PsfsGbooKzMohG9SshFbNUaHRTZUQeu4S
1PsfsGbooKzMohG9SshFbNUaHRTZUQeu4S had 1 TX, sent to Poloniex deposit address "1FtzkMkeggTPq7xVn3vTdbU7cDp9NZJoNc". Other addresses from user "favours" make deposits to the same Poloniex deposit address.
Light's address "15YWc15M7Ht49rMohYrwNh3RggtgAjcMEp" and Alia's address "1Sexyb1p8byGxunfTfHvL9SXsWqHyEPVk" (as seen here), both made payments in to the same cryptopay.me account.
https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/02d8d4de4563bb08?from_address=15YWc15M7Ht49rMohYrwNh3RggtgAjcMEp
https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/b38cffcf6a125c71?from_address=1Sexyb1p8byGxunfTfHvL9SXsWqHyEPVk
As I've stated before... we occasionally share accounts and have similar interests. Go as deep as you want, I've already told you everything there is to know.
And if people really don't want to Skype me over some bullshit... fine, I'll keep my negative trust. Watch how many epic deals I do here. I'm sure I'll go into the green within a couple months
Even if everything you say is true, and even if you are completely trustworthy, your brother is a known scammer across multiple accounts and multiple mediums, even going so far (you claim) to forge your ID in an attempt to gain access to your exchange accounts. You have publically stated that you share forum accounts, wallet addresses, and now payment accounts with him.
Even if everything you say is true, someone would have to be mad to trust you, knowing that a scammer has access to all your accounts.
I am disappointed that things on the “0.01 BTC to 1.2 BTC” front suddenly went all quiet after I posted my txids above.
Thank you for your excellent work, NLNico. It will take me awhile t digest all the links you dumped... Will probably comment sometime (much) later. Curious that alia has not commented.
New hypothesis: There really is a girl actively involved, not only as a hireling or sidekick but perhaps even as the one writing the posts here. revcback/favours/whatever is the boyfriend or “FWB” who provides penis for on-camera sex acts which require one. There is no brother-sister relationship.
Observe:
Alia was not the one who suggested a “little brother”. That was me! I was the one who discovered that ibminer’s “15-year-old” was a self-alleged 15-year-old boy; and when ibminer questioned this scenario, I tossed this off-the-cuff:
I dislike speculating about such things, especially in public. But if I try to think of a plausible “why”, the first thing which comes to mind is, “Little brother got jealous of big sis doing that Bitcoin thing, wanted his own exchange account, needed to be 18+, had easy access to her identity docs for alteration.”
This occurred during the time when Alia was allegedly (and probably) asleep. When she returned, she immediately picked up and ran with three distinct things I had written in the interim—including the “little brother” scenario.
Now, think: The female in a boy-girl “friends with benefits” scammer pair gets caught. Another party casually suggests a “little brother” hypothesis. What is the girl going to say?
The foregoing is only a hypothesis—much like my “little brother” hypothesis in the first instance. It is not proved. It does fit available evidence, however. There is simply not (yet) enough evidence to draw firm conclusions.
I also noticed something odd. In some of Alia’s threads, she is hungry and desperate for a meal. In others, she is handling quite large amounts of money.
(There is more I could say to analyze this; but I wish to not detract from one particular point.)
Alia, if you’re trapped in some desperate situation, this is a better opportunity to come clean and get out than you’ve ever had.
There are people here who are highly efficient at running these things down. Hereto undiscovered swaths of your boyfriend’s scamming are being examined, archived, and fit together as puzzle pieces by people who do this as a hobby—perhaps also some who do this for a living. The jig’s up.
The loser promised you a wealthy lifestyle. You don’t need to tell me that. He impressed you with some intelligence. Gives TEDx talks, does he? And then you wind up in situations like this:
There are people who could help, and who could connect you with the right ways to GET OUT NOW.
I myself would like to help you, Alia.
Results are not guaranteed. I don’t know what kind of soup you got yourself into, but it looks to me like you’re in over your head. A chance is a chance. You’re a gambler, right? You take risks. Bet on yourself this time, for real—and for some real merit.
Please take the chance when you have everybody’s attention, and tell us (publicly or—to trusted parties, privately) just what is going on here. Seek advice. Bust your way out of this mess. You could turn out to be the hero of the day, and put all this behind you.
I appreciate the PM you sent me earlier. I feel similarly. I write the foregoing for your sake. Insofar as my own personal interests are concerned, I could leave this thread and not come back. Nobody’s accusing me of anything anymore. But I am still here, waiting for you to prove who you really are...
nullius
Thank you for your excellent work, NLNico. It will take me awhile t digest all the links you dumped... Will probably comment sometime (much) later. Curious that alia has not commented.
* nullius gulps coffee.
New hypothesis: There really is a girl actively involved, not only as a hireling or sidekick but perhaps even as the one writing the posts here. revcback/favours/whatever is the boyfriend or “FWB” who provides penis for on-camera sex acts which require one. There is no brother-sister relationship.
Observe:
Alia was not the one who suggested a “little brother”. That was me! I was the one who discovered that ibminer’s “15-year-old” was a self-alleged 15-year-old boy; and when ibminer questioned this scenario, I tossed this off-the-cuff:
A better question may be "Why is there a 15 year old boy asking for a fake ID matching the name of an e-whore who appeared on this forum a week after that 15 year old boy asked for it"
I dislike speculating about such things, especially in public. But if I try to think of a plausible “why”, the first thing which comes to mind is, “Little brother got jealous of big sis doing that Bitcoin thing, wanted his own exchange account, needed to be 18+, had easy access to her identity docs for alteration.”
This occurred during the time when Alia was allegedly (and probably) asleep. When she returned, she immediately picked up and ran with three distinct things I had written in the interim—including the “little brother” scenario.
Now, think: The female in a boy-girl “friends with benefits” scammer pair gets caught. Another party casually suggests a “little brother” hypothesis. What is the girl going to say?
The foregoing is only a hypothesis—much like my “little brother” hypothesis in the first instance. It is not proved. It does fit available evidence, however. There is simply not (yet) enough evidence to draw firm conclusions.
I also noticed something odd. In some of Alia’s threads, she is hungry and desperate for a meal. In others, she is handling quite large amounts of money.
(There is more I could say to analyze this; but I wish to not detract from one particular point.)
Alia, if you’re trapped in some desperate situation, this is a better opportunity to come clean and get out than you’ve ever had.
There are people here who are highly efficient at running these things down. Hereto undiscovered swaths of your boyfriend’s scamming are being examined, archived, and fit together as puzzle pieces by people who do this as a hobby—perhaps also some who do this for a living. The jig’s up.
The loser promised you a wealthy lifestyle. You don’t need to tell me that. He impressed you with some intelligence. Gives TEDx talks, does he? And then you wind up in situations like this:
I'm really hungry and I want some KFC, but all my funds are in BTC right now.
There are people who could help, and who could connect you with the right ways to GET OUT NOW.
I myself would like to help you, Alia.
Results are not guaranteed. I don’t know what kind of soup you got yourself into, but it looks to me like you’re in over your head. A chance is a chance. You’re a gambler, right? You take risks. Bet on yourself this time, for real—and for some real merit.
Please take the chance when you have everybody’s attention, and tell us (publicly or—to trusted parties, privately) just what is going on here. Seek advice. Bust your way out of this mess. You could turn out to be the hero of the day, and put all this behind you.
I appreciate the PM you sent me earlier. I feel similarly. I write the foregoing for your sake. Insofar as my own personal interests are concerned, I could leave this thread and not come back. Nobody’s accusing me of anything anymore. But I am still here, waiting for you to prove who you really are...
nullius
With a bit of searching, it seems like "favours" is actually (serial) scammer "Light" on the site mpgh.net.
This banned user "Light" has multiple scam accusations:
https://www.mpgh.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1129149
https://www.mpgh.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1113369
https://www.mpgh.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1106394
https://www.mpgh.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1125442
etc.
In the last one, Skype logs are given: https://imgur.com/a/VuxQI it shows the address "15YWc15M7Ht49rMohYrwNh3RggtgAjcMEp" which is wallet 02d8d4de4563bb08 on walletexplorer. This user repeatedly made deposits to Poloniex, specifically to deposit address "1FtzkMkeggTPq7xVn3vTdbU7cDp9NZJoNc".
Now back to bitcointalk:
As per Lauda's request, I am posting a repayment address here.
1PsfsGbooKzMohG9SshFbNUaHRTZUQeu4S
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.189866841PsfsGbooKzMohG9SshFbNUaHRTZUQeu4S
1PsfsGbooKzMohG9SshFbNUaHRTZUQeu4S had 1 TX, sent to Poloniex deposit address "1FtzkMkeggTPq7xVn3vTdbU7cDp9NZJoNc". Other addresses from user "favours" make deposits to the same Poloniex deposit address.
Light's address "15YWc15M7Ht49rMohYrwNh3RggtgAjcMEp" and Alia's address "1Sexyb1p8byGxunfTfHvL9SXsWqHyEPVk" (as seen here), both made payments in to the same cryptopay.me account.
https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/02d8d4de4563bb08?from_address=15YWc15M7Ht49rMohYrwNh3RggtgAjcMEp
https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/b38cffcf6a125c71?from_address=1Sexyb1p8byGxunfTfHvL9SXsWqHyEPVk
As I've stated before... we occasionally share accounts and have similar interests. Go as deep as you want, I've already told you everything there is to know.
And if people really don't want to Skype me over some bullshit... fine, I'll keep my negative trust. Watch how many epic deals I do here. I'm sure I'll go into the green within a couple months
Do you get your money back if she gets negative trust?
Nope 
I don't that was in the contract. Technically the contract means I have to buy her sig for 3 years, correct? I tried to find your post about it, but couldn't.
It was "in the contract" specifically that red trust wouldn't affect payments?? Wow. Were you pissed up when you agreed to that?
I wouldn't pay the lying con artist a sat; what's she/he/it going to do, sue you?
But now you've accepted that the account is wrecked, you'll want to do something about this rather bizarre sight, guilt by association and all that..
https://i.imgur.com/pZVm2Rg.png
The day I break any term in the contract, I'll refund you in full.
Quote
- - By the end of the three year term, I will be a Legendary member
I think you have already broken at least one term in the contract. Do you seriously think that you will even become Sr. Member let alone Legendary? So please give aTriz his money back!
The term is broken if I am not a Legendary member at the end of the term, so no, it hasn't been broken. And I completely believe that once a trusted member is willing to Skype me, all of this can be proven bullshit and resolved. In fact, I just gave a show to a Legendary member and proved my identity, all went well.
But Sir... Ok Sir.
With a bit of searching, it seems like "favours" is actually (serial) scammer "Light" on the site mpgh.net.
This banned user "Light" has multiple scam accusations:
https://www.mpgh.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1129149
https://www.mpgh.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1113369
https://www.mpgh.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1106394
https://www.mpgh.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1125442
etc.
In the last one, Skype logs are given: https://imgur.com/a/VuxQI it shows the address "15YWc15M7Ht49rMohYrwNh3RggtgAjcMEp" which is wallet 02d8d4de4563bb08 on walletexplorer. This user repeatedly made deposits to Poloniex, specifically to deposit address "1FtzkMkeggTPq7xVn3vTdbU7cDp9NZJoNc".
Now back to bitcointalk:
As per Lauda's request, I am posting a repayment address here.
1PsfsGbooKzMohG9SshFbNUaHRTZUQeu4S
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.189866841PsfsGbooKzMohG9SshFbNUaHRTZUQeu4S
1PsfsGbooKzMohG9SshFbNUaHRTZUQeu4S had 1 TX, sent to Poloniex deposit address "1FtzkMkeggTPq7xVn3vTdbU7cDp9NZJoNc". Other addresses from user "favours" make deposits to the same Poloniex deposit address.
Light's address "15YWc15M7Ht49rMohYrwNh3RggtgAjcMEp" and Alia's address "1Sexyb1p8byGxunfTfHvL9SXsWqHyEPVk" (as seen here), both made payments in to the same cryptopay.me account.
https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/02d8d4de4563bb08?from_address=15YWc15M7Ht49rMohYrwNh3RggtgAjcMEp
https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/b38cffcf6a125c71?from_address=1Sexyb1p8byGxunfTfHvL9SXsWqHyEPVk
Though I haven’t seen it, I seriously doubt that theymos’ questions involve any nudity or sex acts.
I assume theymos has some technical questions about Bitcoin/blockchain/technology that the alia who has been posting should be able to answer. The risk I mentioned isn't associated with his questions, it's with the (possible) underaged girl (or boy) who is going to be on a live stream.Sex acts won't prove any girl on video has been writing posts, that's why I assume technical questions.
Quote
I don’t know of any jurisdiction where it would be illegal to chat with potentially underage persons on camera for this purpose, in an appropriate manner.
I'm not taking that risk.I really don't mind answering such questions, but naturally, the rest of the rules still apply. And pulling the "underage" card out of your ass makes no sense when I've stated my age multiple times.
Though I haven’t seen it, I seriously doubt that theymos’ questions involve any nudity or sex acts.
I assume theymos has some technical questions about Bitcoin/blockchain/technology that the alia who has been posting should be able to answer. The risk I mentioned isn't associated with his questions, it's with the (possible) underaged girl (or boy) who is going to be on a live stream.Sex acts won't prove any girl on video has been writing posts, that's why I assume technical questions.
Quote
I don’t know of any jurisdiction where it would be illegal to chat with potentially underage persons on camera for this purpose, in an appropriate manner.
I'm not taking that risk. Whether my brother wants to come on and defend any of this is up to him. On the other hand, my offer to verify myself is still entirely up for grabs. It seems like nobody is willing to give me the chance to prove myself.
Has the penny not dropped? You're history.
No one is going to take the unnecessary risk to verify whether she/he is lying or not as stated in previous posts so yeah.
^^^ Until someone verifies that, which I doubt anyone will you wont get to legendary ever because of the merit system.
Do you get your money back if she gets negative trust?
Nope I don't that was in the contract. Technically the contract means I have to buy her sig for 3 years, correct? I tried to find your post about it, but couldn't.
It was "in the contract" specifically that red trust wouldn't affect payments?? Wow. Were you pissed up when you agreed to that?
I wouldn't pay the lying con artist a sat; what's she/he/it going to do, sue you?
But now you've accepted that the account is wrecked, you'll want to do something about this rather bizarre sight, guilt by association and all that..
The day I break any term in the contract, I'll refund you in full.
Quote
- - By the end of the three year term, I will be a Legendary member
I think you have already broken at least one term in the contract. Do you seriously think that you will even become Sr. Member let alone Legendary? So please give aTriz his money back!
The term is broken if I am not a Legendary member at the end of the term, so no, it hasn't been broken. And I completely believe that once a trusted member is willing to Skype me, all of this can be proven bullshit and resolved. In fact, I just gave a show to a Legendary member and proved my identity, all went well.
Do you get your money back if she gets negative trust?
Nope I don't that was in the contract. Technically the contract means I have to buy her sig for 3 years, correct? I tried to find your post about it, but couldn't.
It was "in the contract" specifically that red trust wouldn't affect payments?? Wow. Were you pissed up when you agreed to that?
I wouldn't pay the lying con artist a sat; what's she/he/it going to do, sue you?
But now you've accepted that the account is wrecked, you'll want to do something about this rather bizarre sight, guilt by association and all that..
https://i.imgur.com/pZVm2Rg.png
The day I break any term in the contract, I'll refund you in full.
Quote
- - By the end of the three year term, I will be a Legendary member
I think you have already broken at least one term in the contract. Do you seriously think that you will even become Sr. Member let alone Legendary? So please give aTriz his money back!
Preparing more post(s) here. Quick note. I should emphasize that by quoting people, I am not urging any particular person to do this—just making a point:
Though I haven’t seen it, I seriously doubt that theymos’ questions involve any nudity or sex acts. It is not reasonably in question that a girl is involved. The goal here is to identify persons and their relations between each other. I don’t know of any jurisdiction where it would be illegal to chat with potentially underage persons on camera for this purpose, in an appropriate manner.
That said, if any serious crimes are involved (from serial scamming to distribution of any underage sex material), anybody who does this should take into consideration the possibility that at some point, police may wish to talk to them as a witness to authenticate video evidence, etc.
In light of all of this, I do not intend on doing any Skype session to help the scammer prove anything or potentially expose myself to viewing an underage girl on camera. I see more evidence showing this could potentially be the case, so it would be extremely stupid for me, for multiple reasons, to engage in any Skype session at this point.
I was considering doing the Skype session through VPN (with tape on my camera) and theymos' list of questions, but you make a very good point to stay away from this. This could mean actual jail time!Though I haven’t seen it, I seriously doubt that theymos’ questions involve any nudity or sex acts. It is not reasonably in question that a girl is involved. The goal here is to identify persons and their relations between each other. I don’t know of any jurisdiction where it would be illegal to chat with potentially underage persons on camera for this purpose, in an appropriate manner.
That said, if any serious crimes are involved (from serial scamming to distribution of any underage sex material), anybody who does this should take into consideration the possibility that at some point, police may wish to talk to them as a witness to authenticate video evidence, etc.
Do you get your money back if she gets negative trust?
Nope I don't that was in the contract. Technically the contract means I have to buy her sig for 3 years, correct? I tried to find your post about it, but couldn't.
It was "in the contract" specifically that red trust wouldn't affect payments?? Wow. Were you pissed up when you agreed to that?
I wouldn't pay the lying con artist a sat; what's she/he/it going to do, sue you?
But now you've accepted that the account is wrecked, you'll want to do something about this rather bizarre sight, guilt by association and all that..
The day I break any term in the contract, I'll refund you in full.
A self-fulfilling prophecy. OP continues with what was the actual intent behind this thread.
My God, all of you involved in your toddler fight have serious mental problems. 
That was my last post to you. Then again, given that OP's real account is likely to be blacklisted or tagged, it isn't surprising.
It's too late. I paid her 5 months upfront. I'll address the other concerns later.
[1] QED. 
Do you get your money back if she gets negative trust?
Nope I don't that was in the contract. Technically the contract means I have to buy her sig for 3 years, correct? I tried to find your post about it, but couldn't.
It was "in the contract" specifically that red trust wouldn't affect payments?? Wow. Were you pissed up when you agreed to that?
I wouldn't pay the lying con artist a sat; what's she/he/it going to do, sue you?
But now you've accepted that the account is wrecked, you'll want to do something about this rather bizarre sight, guilt by association and all that..
Whether my brother wants to come on and defend any of this is up to him. On the other hand, my offer to verify myself is still entirely up for grabs. It seems like nobody is willing to give me the chance to prove myself.
Has the penny not dropped? You're history.
Jump to: