Topic: Evolution is a hoax - page 197. (Read 108174 times)

Where is your nobel prize? You are useless just like everyone else. We are all ''robots'' already in a way. We all work and do the same shit over and over again for decades just to eventually die. As I said, it is thanks to a few people that we are where we are.

What is it that you invented?
A new way to look at SCIENCE THEORY ..

Plus why would i even tell everyone ?the world will know one day ..
Man if i said who i was and what i do many would want to steal it ..

PLus the ISLAMIC CRAZIES  might blow my shops up ..

LaViolette  and Nikola Tesla We've known for a long time gravity doesn't exist,” Dr. Verlinde said..

Nikola Tesla  is they STUPID answer no YOU ARE

Dr. Verlinde  is they stupid answer no you are

People who have way more knowledge than you will ever have..

Nikola Tesla i suppose he never invented anything?..

TOTAL different opinions to other scientist who say GRAVITY exist ..

So opinions do matter someone will be right and someone will be wrong JUST LIKE YOU ARE ..

What is it that you invented?

Opinions don't mean much without credibility, and what credibility is there?  What's the saying...."Opinions are like assholes...everyone has one"?

With scientific matter, it's the science behind it that matters, still not the opinion that agrees or disagrees with it.

Now off you go again..

Seven things that don't make sense about gravity | New Scientist
https://www.newscientist.com/round.../seven-things-that-dont-make-sense-about-gravi...
Yet look a little closer, and the certainties start to float away, revealing gravity as the most
puzzling and least understood of the four fundamental forces of nature.


9 Scientists Who Dispute Theory of Gravity - The Epoch Times
www.theepochtimes.com/n3/589863-9-scientists-who-dispute-the...gravity/full/
8 Jun 2016 - The conventional understanding of gravity just doesn't seem to fit with what ... LaViolette traced this field of research back to Nikola Tesla in the 19th .... “We've known for a long time gravity doesn't exist,” Dr. Verlinde told the .


Because someones opinion on how something works is not the same as someone else's ..
And to invent you would have to know how something works for you to invent it..


99.9% of people are useless       way to high

So why so much IMMIGRATION? ..

Oh 99% will be useless if robots take over many jobs..

UNIVERSAL INCOME FOR ALL ..

So lets bring this UNIVERSAL INCOME to every human..

The invented sci-fi evolution theory matters. It helps direct people away from Heaven towards Hell.

Now let's look again at the science law/principle that shows us what mutation really is... cause and effect. Mutations are programmed into the universe. The act according to cause and effect. They follow the physics laws of the universe. They are programmed to happen, just like some people have been programmed to think that evolution is a random chance thing, while others understand that it is all programming.

What does inventing something have to do with your opinion? 99.9% of people are useless and meaningless, we are here because a few smart people happen to discover or create new things like computers or discover gravity and how it works.

Everyone is entitled to their opinion, and honestly, opinions don't really have much worth, but can be entertaining at times.

If someones opinions don't have much worth then how do we have all what we have today?..

I mean if i invented something i was right and everyone else is wrong ..

So peoples opinions do MATTER  ..

To discuss my opinion on a scientific matter and many opinions have been right over another opinion..

SO THEY DO MATTER..

It's like magic

And once you start questioning the magic, it's not mesmerizing anymore.  The wizard needs to stay behind the curtain for it to remain fun.

Look at how hard it would be to sell creationism to someone that is an adult and didn't grow up with it.  As soon as you say there was a boy born of a virgin, you'd get a raised eyebrow and a giggle and that would probably be the end of the sales pitch.  And if we flip it around, imagine someone that went to *insert religious building* X times a month for all of childhood.  There's an echo chamber that is going to be almost equally hard to break.  You mention evolution and red flags will be going off because it doesn't align with *insert religious text* that I've read X times and believe 100%.

Everyone is entitled to their opinion, and honestly, opinions don't really have much worth, but can be entertaining at times.

Let's discuss some actual videos about evolution shall we?

Types of Mutation part I

In his 32nd classroom science video on evolution, Aron describes the basic principle behind evolution... specifically Mutations

He describes the difference between a Point mutation (silent, missense, nonsense, substitution, insertion, deletion), and a Frameshift mutation (insertion, deletion)

The evidence he presents in just this single 7-minute video is overwhelming for evolution

Do you have any evidence to support your opinion that evolution is a hoax?

Why is this thread even here? If you don't understand evolution, just watch Aron's 32+ video series

The very interesting thing is that evolutionists show that they need something to believe in. That's why they elevate the evolution science fiction to reality in their minds.

The more evolution theory removes the holes/flaws/weaknesses/bugs/failings/faults between its parts - within itself - the more it furthers itself into science fiction with regard to reality.

With regard to the basic principle of cause and effect alone, evolution is so utterly impossible as to make its believers a laughing stock.

Don't want to accept creation? Don't. Join the countless numbers of people of the past who haven't been able to figure anything else out. Or, continue to play the fool by trying to make fictional evolution into reality.

It's fine that people question evolution or any other scientific theory. What I find stupid is that 99.99% of the people who deny evolution are creationists, like you. They deny a scientific theory because they believe in God and that he created everything with literally no proof, evidence. Creationism is not even a scientific theory, not even a hypothesis, it's just made up shit and yet you think that is true.

That is also my question about evolution of man that's why i don't believe it actually not just the evolution everything i believe more on religion explanation than scientific explanation about creation and evolution.

However, science theories are not known to be all-inclusive in their fields. That means that even though the theories work, that there are additional aspects of the nature and reality that the theories don't talk about, that actually fall into the classification of things the theory is talking about. If these were examined, they might even destroy the whole theory for a different one. That's part of the reason why theories are still theories.

In addition, just because an engineer applies a theory to the job, doesn't mean he is applying the job to the theory. The theory may have good points that the engineer finds don't quite work practically enough to make his project work. So he tweaks his project to make it work. The theory was a good start-point. But the theory has actually failed, even though the engineer instinctively does his project tweaking without at all tweaking the theory.

If you think you can come up with a better model to fit the evidence, by all means try..                OK I WILL HAVE A GO my friend..
Let me know what you thinks ..

Use the 2 words together SCIENCE THEORY and SCIENCE FACT..

We use science theories to come up with science facts and then we use science facts to come up with science theories..

Now if i ask you what have you discovered you would say we have some scientific facts and me the average joe would thinks oh they have discovered something that's real ..

Now if you said to me i have discovered a scientific theory i would think well he as come up with an idea a guess on something that needs more
studying..

Now why i say this is because imagine you want funding and you said i have a scientific fact i would think well he must have something that's real
and i can see touch smell hear and taste it so yes i will fund this project..

Now when you say it's a theory i can say well he just guessing and using scientific facts and maths but it not real yet so i will wait and not fund this project yet until proven to be a fact what he guesses or a hunch..


Now the trouble with today is many many SCIENTIST are using the word science theory to say the work they do is FACT when really they are scamming the people out of money to get funds..

Oh yes i got a science theory BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH ...Oh is it true ..OH YES it's a science theory so it's 100% fact..

So i say use the 2 meanings SCIENCE FACT and SCIENCE THEORY..

Oh i got a science theory and i ended up with a science fact..

Like evolution is science fact..

Because 100% we evolved from this planet so now we know we evolved EVOLUTION becomes science fact..

So now we use science fact I.E evolution to come up with science theories about evolution..

Then you can so no that's science fact or no that's just a science theory..

And then we will know what is actual fact and not a theory..I.E REAL ..


I REST MY CASE..

a scientific theory can be used as if it were a fact, and all your calculations and predictions will work 100% of the time[/b] (if they didn't work 100% of the time, it would be downgraded to a hypothesis, or scrapped as just plain wrong..


 would be downgraded to a hypothesis, or scrapped as just plain wrong..SO WHO IS RIGHT?..

there are several theories of gravity that attempt to make sense of what we know: Newton’s universal law of gravitation, Einstein’s general theory of relativity, modified Newtonian dynamics,

3 calculations now someone MUST BE WRONG?..
So that means 2 will be threw in the BIN          but is it 100% accurate NOT EVEN CLOSE..

Now what about this if it's all been calculated who is wrong HERE?..

which theory explains it — microevolution, macroevolution, speciation, microbial evolution, or chemical evolution..

Now if only one turns out to be true or none 5 different fields have been studying LIES..
But good thing about studying things always fall onto something by ACCIDENT which turn out to be FACT and not a theory..


But ok your right BUT I STILL thinks your wrong..Why because it hurts my mind..

calculations are not THEORIES if using math to do the calculations they be fact..

imagine you think of an explosion that could happen somewhere anywhere so you do the maths

it explodes 20 meters away so you do the MATH then you come up with factual calculations which you think is true..
The math might be right BUT your guess where the eplosion might be totally wrong and might not even be an explosion..

So now the maths is wrong even though the calculations are right it's all still wrong..

But you say what you say About science theory and it says your right BUT i still thinks your all wrong..

That's why evolution is not science, they can't admit it's just a creation of imagination.

It's a good thing the "Theory of Gravity" is just a guess, and it isn't useful for any calculations or predicting future events...

If only Gravity wasn't a "just a theory"... we might send a rocket to the moon... damn shame it's only a Theory of Gravity (BAZINGA!)

Theory means it is proven to be reliable, useful, predictable of future events, and has stood the test of time against any opposition (like BADlogic)

It literally doesn't get better than Theory of Gravity or Theory of Evolution... a scientific theory can be used as if it were a fact, and all your calculations and predictions will work 100% of the time (if they didn't work 100% of the time, it would be downgraded to a hypothesis, or scrapped as just plain wrong... a theory means it is correct and works)

Unlike religion, science can admit to being wrong... if it were wrong, it would correct the mistake, and formulate a better working model

The Theory of Evolution is the current best working model, and it has been proven correct, reliable, and predictive of the future...

If you think you can come up with a better model to fit the evidence, by all means try... but crying because you don't agree with facts is just childish

"No" what? We hadn't been talking about Darwin. Science starting with Darwin (and actually before) thought there was evidence for evolution. Sure they weren't advanced back then as we are. But science has proven evolution impossible the more science looks at it.

It's as I said in my previous post 1 and 2. We found out what Darwin had a difficult time in determining... that evolution is impossible in the real world.

Evolution is just another big hoax.

No, darwin looked around the world and tried to explain it, now the science back then wasn't as advanced as it is today and he didn't really have many tools to test it, however now, we do have the tools to test it thanks to many different sciences like biology, genetics, etc etc which all show that evolution is real.