hi DarkStar_
Lots of good points and questions there.
An exchange lives or dies on its liquidity. A key part of bringing exbet.io to market has been working with market maker partners to bring that liquidity at launch or at a later date. What is clear to us is that commission is only one element in making an exchange attractive to market makers. Being a market maker is a business decision, and so costs (commission) are important, but also a range of other considerations - tech stack, APIs, team behind the exchange, strategy & direction, product offering for recreational customers, and a whole range of other issues that feed into the value proposition for market makers. We believe that we at exbet.io have a lot to offer in these other areas, and we continue to have excellent discussions with liquidity providers/market makers on all these issues.
But back to commission - our current thinking is that 1% commission is a clear, simple, competitive rate. We will always be open to reviewing commission structure if we believe it helps build liquidity and userbase.
On commission breaks for market makers - this is absolutely something that we are looking at on a case-by-case basis. We look to build partnerships with market makers which means finding a mutually beneficial way to work together, and commission rebates can be an important part of that.
Third parties interested in discussing market making on exbet.io - please get in touch and we'd be happy to share more details.