Topic: [FCN] Fantomcoin. CN based, anonymous. Merge mine with BCN, XMR, QCN, duck. - page 31. (Read 127132 times)

It's nothing compared to BCN though.

I think I can look at sync process forever. It's like watching somebody work - never boring. 

For which OS - Win or Lin/OSX?

+1

Winners of the logo contest.

1st place, 0.25 BTC and 250 FCN are going to... sadface!


2nd place, 0.15 BTC and 150 FCN are going to pipipipopopo


3rd place, 0.1 BTC and 100 FCN are going to Rafilsk!


Congratulations to winners!

FCN rewards are sent. Will send BTC rewards as soon as amphibian arrives.

Thank you!

can some one please Dropbox the blockchain , 1 day take at least 1 hour to sync

what is the difference between MRO and MON?

Is it possible to merge mine all CN coins out there? Maybe not right now but can this be deviced?
FCN would shoot up as CN coin #1 if miners could mine all the CN chains simultaneously FCN+BCN+MRO+DUCK+MON+QZR..

Thats a feature I would wish for.

Poloniex unfrozen 

+1 we still don't know why FCN is frozen on poloniex

Hi

Any news as to why still frozen on poloniex please?
Still active trading on Bittrex.

I think this is not that easy..and also it would take a lot of time.

Did you mean that, someone made GPU miner for himself?

How does closed-source of ccminer and free FCM mining connected?

there is closed-source version of ccminer which mines cryptonight. As FCM mining will be for free...

Perhaps there's just testing going on.

Don't think so, if GPU would enter the scene, the source will be here.

Not yet. I wrote to 33zer0w0lf (open-source pool marketing (somewhat) guy) recently - he said he will ask developers about the progress on merged mining. It was friday if I recall correctly. Still no answer.

lots of room for improvement.
ATM top Radeons make 300-400H/s
No idea about Nvidia, but it seems only 750Ti can be used atm and the miner is hybrid cpu/gpu - probably better optimised too.


Are there pools for merged mining, except minergate?

Scrypt ASICs are not quite ready yet. At least it's not delivered. And scrypt was released in 2011.

So, basically, we have 3 years before the CN ASIC moment. Don't think that it is a problem now.

I'm more concerned by the GPU mining - is current level of hashrate on GPU's is a maximum? Or there is still a room for improvement?

Not at all. At first, BTC was CPU-only, and BTC has done, is doing, and will do quite well. That's all I really need to say about that.

But...IF a coin can truly be mined ONLY by CPUs, then that is not a bad thing for several reasons. If everyone has relatively the same amount of hash rate available to them, I think that's a good thing. Then, only those willing to mine and those who want to and/or can invest in more powerful CPUs can avoid the CPU-GPU-ASIC arms race that we've seen with other coins. I haven't bought any new SHA mining equipment for 6 months because, unless you're willing to plop down $4,000+, almost all of it will lose money over time. As much as I love mining, I grew tired of that scenario. But if a coin can be mined only on CPUs, the craziness is greatly reduced.

Now, I doubt that coins that were intended to be CPU-only can remain that way. There are lots of creative and motivated devs who will find a way to make it minable on GPUs and ASICs. I know that it's more than likely that this will eventually become ASIC as well (it's happening on a not-so-efficient level with GPUs now). The need and demand for CN is definitely going to grow, so whatever happens with mining, it will be worth keeping up with. I'm just enjoying the relative calm now