Topic: FEAR OF DUMPING - page 2. (Read 1473 times)
I don't think the team of the new project is concerned with dumping the price of tokens because there really isn't a team that really cares about this. If the team really cares then they should be able to back up funds for sales from bounty hunters because the allocation they provide is not large
That was right dude! most bounty now a day want to pay on their own altcoin maybe they have no huge budget to pay bitcoin or ethereum but this is normal on crypto world maybe you will avoid this kind of situation by joining on bitcoin or ethereum bounty payment.
They don't have to pay us with Bitcoin or Ethereum if they think they could make their project run successfully in the future, because I have seen we had that kind of project before that pays you with Bitcoin yet they still failed on market. TL:DR -> Just make the projects run success first, because so far none of them are actually good for now. 
The fear of dumping often makes the project team fear or avoid the payment of hunters until sometimes after the exchange listing. I wonder why the team make themselves restless on an easy thing like that when they can easily conduct their bounty with bitcoin or ethereum for payment. That will safe them of the fear that the bounty hunter will dump after the exchange listing.
Is not that easy for them to pay btc or in ethereum if their project run only if it have investors. a lot of projects now, dont have sufecient funds and they rely on a free listings and free advertisements of new sites. all good projects are not afraid or have fear of dumping, they have fear if they can't fool investors and they are already working hard for their fake project.
Let's always sympathize the situation, projects are finding fund for their investment to run and we are all aware of that and they wanted their tokens to be utilize and for this to be known worldwide, so why they are going to pay for Btc, or any other stable coin/altcoins right, it doesn't make sense at all, what they need to do is to have the right strategy to minimize dumping.
Yes we afraid of dumping, If the bounty rewards we receive from bounty altcoins are going dump. And most want to dump on it are those people have want to get profit from bounty but in the end are going to be a shitcoins. And they can pay BTC and ETH if the bounty campaign are for weekly payment just like in the services thread we can find some bounty on their that paying BTC.
but what's the point in coins if they are not listed on the exchange. Least of all the team thinks about the income of hunters, and first of all about their own profits and minimize losses. there are not so many bounty hunters that they greatly shaken the value of the coin. this fact is quite exaggerated among hunters
the total distribution obtained by the bounty participant will not be able to shake the price.but is able to provide panic pills to investors and even allocations owned by developers if they sell in bulk within a few days. But whatever the problem, bounty participants cannot be used as the main reason.
The fear of dumping often makes the project team fear or avoid the payment of hunters until sometimes after the exchange listing. I wonder why the team make themselves restless on an easy thing like that when they can easily conduct their bounty with bitcoin or ethereum for payment. That will safe them of the fear that the bounty hunter will dump after the exchange listing.
Is not that easy for them to pay btc or in ethereum if their project run only if it have investors. a lot of projects now, dont have sufecient funds and they rely on a free listings and free advertisements of new sites. all good projects are not afraid or have fear of dumping, they have fear if they can't fool investors and they are already working hard for their fake project.
but what's the point in coins if they are not listed on the exchange. Least of all the team thinks about the income of hunters, and first of all about their own profits and minimize losses. there are not so many bounty hunters that they greatly shaken the value of the coin. this fact is quite exaggerated among hunters
the total distribution obtained by the bounty participant will not be able to shake the price.but is able to provide panic pills to investors and even allocations owned by developers if they sell in bulk within a few days. But whatever the problem, bounty participants cannot be used as the main reason.
The fear of dumping often makes the project team fear or avoid the payment of hunters until sometimes after the exchange listing. I wonder why the team make themselves restless on an easy thing like that when they can easily conduct their bounty with bitcoin or ethereum for payment. That will safe them of the fear that the bounty hunter will dump after the exchange listing.
A real project focuses on to achieve their roadmap. A dumping of 5% of their token won't make any difference. Exchange listing is one of the checkpoint in the roadmap.
The team really has no time watching at the coin price movement if they are really dedicated to deliver what they have stated they would.
Yeah, the situation happened in 2017, but not now. Of the many projects from last year, most of them have become shitcoin now, almost all of them. I have also seen some real projects in the past year, but even though the developers have worked hard according to what they stated before. All of that is still inferior to a dumping done by bounty hunters, in fact this is not the fault of the bounty hunters but the market has turned around, where investors' interest is even smaller compared to that of 2017.
Dumping is currently still not resolved when distribution is made to hunters, dumping will occur if the team has prepared a "buyback" of tokens again to return to normal prices on the market, and that too must have reserve funds or the results of ICO / IEO fundraising.
Don't rely on investors to buy because it's hard to trust anymore.
The fear of dumping often makes the project team fear or avoid the payment of hunters until sometimes after the exchange listing. I wonder why the team make themselves restless on an easy thing like that when they can easily conduct their bounty with bitcoin or ethereum for payment. That will safe them of the fear that the bounty hunter will dump after the exchange listing.
One reason why they are paying the bounty hunters their own native token instead of either Bitcoin or Ethereum is that, they don't want to invest more money to marketing. They don't want to invest their own money into a token which is not sure if it will become a successful project or not. That is the reason why they are not paying thru BTC or ETH. With the fear of dumping, yes bounty hunters are one of the dumpers but it will be a few % of the whole token value compare to the investors whose percentage is far more than what is allocated to give rewards to the bounty hunters. If you will see the allocation between the bounty hunters and investors, it is always the investors who has a highest allocation and that is why they have more chances of dumping it so the fault goes to the investors themselves. Also the team too are the ones dumping their own token for the sake of profit.
That was right dude! most bounty now a day want to pay on their own altcoin maybe they have no huge budget to pay bitcoin or ethereum but this is normal on crypto world maybe you will avoid this kind of situation by joining on bitcoin or ethereum bounty payment.
The fear of dumping often makes the project team fear or avoid the payment of hunters until sometimes after the exchange listing. I wonder why the team make themselves restless on an easy thing like that when they can easily conduct their bounty with bitcoin or ethereum for payment. That will safe them of the fear that the bounty hunter will dump after the exchange listing.
A real project focuses on to achieve their roadmap. A dumping of 5% of their token won't make any difference. Exchange listing is one of the checkpoint in the roadmap.
The team really has no time watching at the coin price movement if they are really dedicated to deliver what they have stated they would.
Yeah, the situation happened in 2017, but not now. Of the many projects from last year, most of them have become shitcoin now, almost all of them. I have also seen some real projects in the past year, but even though the developers have worked hard according to what they stated before. All of that is still inferior to a dumping done by bounty hunters, in fact this is not the fault of the bounty hunters but the market has turned around, where investors' interest is even smaller compared to that of 2017.
The fear of dumping often makes the project team fear or avoid the payment of hunters until sometimes after the exchange listing. I wonder why the team make themselves restless on an easy thing like that when they can easily conduct their bounty with bitcoin or ethereum for payment. That will safe them of the fear that the bounty hunter will dump after the exchange listing.
A real project focuses on to achieve their roadmap. A dumping of 5% of their token won't make any difference. Exchange listing is one of the checkpoint in the roadmap.
The team really has no time watching at the coin price movement if they are really dedicated to deliver what they have stated they would.
The fear of dumping often makes the project team fear or avoid the payment of hunters until sometimes after the exchange listing. I wonder why the team make themselves restless on an easy thing like that when they can easily conduct their bounty with bitcoin or ethereum for payment. That will safe them of the fear that the bounty hunter will dump after the exchange listing.
One reason why they are paying the bounty hunters their own native token instead of either Bitcoin or Ethereum is that, they don't want to invest more money to marketing. They don't want to invest their own money into a token which is not sure if it will become a successful project or not. That is the reason why they are not paying thru BTC or ETH. With the fear of dumping, yes bounty hunters are one of the dumpers but it will be a few % of the whole token value compare to the investors whose percentage is far more than what is allocated to give rewards to the bounty hunters. If you will see the allocation between the bounty hunters and investors, it is always the investors who has a highest allocation and that is why they have more chances of dumping it so the fault goes to the investors themselves. Also the team too are the ones dumping their own token for the sake of profit.
but what's the point in coins if they are not listed on the exchange. Least of all the team thinks about the income of hunters, and first of all about their own profits and minimize losses. there are not so many bounty hunters that they greatly shaken the value of the coin. this fact is quite exaggerated among hunters
The fear of dumping often makes the project team fear or avoid the payment of hunters until sometimes after the exchange listing. I wonder why the team make themselves restless on an easy thing like that when they can easily conduct their bounty with bitcoin or ethereum for payment. That will safe them of the fear that the bounty hunter will dump after the exchange listing.
Bitcoin and Ethereum are already their profits, they cannot make a guaranty that their token will have a value at all in the market and at the price they want on it, if the project is a scam, they can always leave the project and take the profit with them, that is the sales of their token.
This is a good idea that I have been demanding for. But there are some projects that want to make money just through crowdfunding and a means of ICO, IEO etc for the benefit of themselves only. They are not so serious about making their projects a success. They just depend on a luck. So they do not dare pay bounty in eth or btc, but reward bounty hunters in their probably useless tokens.
They are making their own token so that they are not making payments using bitcoin or ethereum or I think yes, it is possible that after their project is not successful, maybe they can give bounty hunters some bitcoin or ethereum as payment for joining and making their project possible. Projects sometimes are not getting successful and we are already aware of that, so maybe it is also a good thing that owners of bounties do something to pay those hunters some of their efforts using bitcoin or ethereum.
You really don't know how the world works yet then, do you?
This is how things should happen ideally, and in a nice world. But in reality project owners are selfish. As they are businessmen, not really crypto people. Remember, they need money, that's the whole reason they set up the project in the first place. If they didn't find success what makes you think they care about bounty hunters, who themselves also don't give a thought to the project other than for money?
Many of you said that the bounty payment makes the huge dump. Is it even worth for new project to do bounties anymore?
Not at all, bounty only is a small part of the total supply so it can not effect too much to the market. To make a huge dump, we need a combination of fudders,whales and panic investors.
The fear of dumping often makes the project team fear or avoid the payment of hunters until sometimes after the exchange listing. I wonder why the team make themselves restless on an easy thing like that when they can easily conduct their bounty with bitcoin or ethereum for payment. That will safe them of the fear that the bounty hunter will dump after the exchange listing.
This kind of thinking is what makes the bounty campaign more complicated for bounty hunters especially the newbies as they will fear that their work and effort will end up to nothing.
But before we conclude anything we should think first if how much the project owners allocate to their bounty campaigns. Usually it ranges from 1-10% of their total coins/tokens but they often offers like 1-3%, do you think this kind of allocation will really affect the price of their tokens/coins upon reaching the exchange? Frankly speaking, the dump of their investors and team behind the project is what makes the price of their tokens/coins goes down pretty badly.
The fear of dumping often makes the project team fear or avoid the payment of hunters until sometimes after the exchange listing. I wonder why the team make themselves restless on an easy thing like that when they can easily conduct their bounty with bitcoin or ethereum for payment. That will safe them of the fear that the bounty hunter will dump after the exchange listing.
it indicates that their project is not good, as long as I join the bounty, sometimes there are some bounties who are afraid of it because investors are too fussy they are afraid of the price being dumped by the bounty hunter even though if calculated they only give 1-2% of supply or token sold. I don't think there will be a deep drop if it's all thrown away, sometimes they won't throw it together, more towards to hold. if the project is good and earns a lot of money shouldn't worry about it, eventually, the price will recover. they can't possibly pay with ETH, because they also don't want to lose money from the sale of their tokens.
but considering a lot of projects now are just money hungry and don't care about much other than than money, those running the projects are probably okay with the potential of dumping right after launch.
because they are already to got a lot of money, no need afraid if their goal are achieved.I think because the project doesn't have the money to pay the bounty hunters, they only want to pay with the tokens they made, tokens that don't have a price yet
i dont know about 'doesnt have money to pay bounty' when they reach softcap, they can calculate how much they spend their money for hunter. Jump to: