Topic: FEAR OF DUMPING - page 6. (Read 1495 times)
Initially, dumping of a project is normal cause that's what bounty hunters came to work for. Of course they could prevent that by showing that the project has successfully acquired big investors and a product or token that provides new features and functions and eventually the money that came out will comeback. There's tons of projects with crappy products because some of it are just made up to take away your money that doesn't provide actual results like cloud mining start ups.
the reason they don't use coins other than the coins they release is to maintain popularity and they want to continue to increase market demand, but what happens is a big dumping and that's what worries them. i'm just not really concerned about that because every project has a plan and main objectives in the project so it's only natural when they worry that prices will collapse when the tokens are traded
If they're so afraid of bounty hunters, they're going to do it as Bitcoin or Ethereum. In this case, they will protect the price of the new project from bounty hunters !! The owners of projects that raise millions of dollars should not see bounty hunters as responsible for everything!
Sad fact is, sometime they pay with their tokens because they don't have money at first open the sale. That is why they can only afford to pay bounty hunters with tokens and price is depends on ICO. So maybe allocation in USD is amount of bounty allocation x their ICO price. That is why sometime what bounty hunter's expected is really different when they see their token rewards in market. About bounty hunter get blamed for dump tokens, maybe they must see how their investor who get discount price do with their tokens first. If they're so afraid of bounty hunters, they're going to do it as Bitcoin or Ethereum. In this case, they will protect the price of the new project from bounty hunters !! The owners of projects that raise millions of dollars should not see bounty hunters as responsible for everything!
Let's find something that will make us not fear, if we truly believe in the project like Bitcoin, then we should not fear of it, let's always keep in mind that in crypto world there's a lot of fudders that will make you panic all the time, if you truly believe in the project and you can sense that it's not real because your instinct said so and you know the future of it then you should not worry about it.
The fear of dumping often makes the project team fear or avoid the payment of hunters until sometimes after the exchange listing. I wonder why the team make themselves restless on an easy thing like that when they can easily conduct their bounty with bitcoin or ethereum for payment. That will safe them of the fear that the bounty hunter will dump after the exchange listing.
What projects are you talking about, is there any real projects in the back ground that i am not aware of, either the team behind the tokens will dump the coins in the market and if they are afraid of the bounty hunters why to ask them to promote the project and giving out tokens just like that, cap those and only give the tokens to investors rather than for bounties, all the token projects are scam in my experience and who cares who dumps first, the hunters or the project team 
. 
If they're so afraid of bounty hunters, they're going to do it as Bitcoin or Ethereum. In this case, they will protect the price of the new project from bounty hunters !! The owners of projects that raise millions of dollars should not see bounty hunters as responsible for everything!
Is this about the ICO projects?
That is all I can think about since this had been talked about ever since.
Yes, I was a bounty for a long time and this discussion had been all over this forum time to time.
It is not really the hunters fault. They should really manage it very well, if they did then a dump wont be seen at all.
That is all I can think about since this had been talked about ever since.
Yes, I was a bounty for a long time and this discussion had been all over this forum time to time.
It is not really the hunters fault. They should really manage it very well, if they did then a dump wont be seen at all.
It's not the hunters fault, but it is because a lot of scammers out there that were trying to buy potential tokens at dip so they are doing their best to create FUD and to create panic in all people, which is happening too that's why many investors and bounty hunters were selling their tokens right after they received it as they don't want to regret in the future.
In my opinion, I don't think that they should control the bounty hunters' reward. They should give them the rewards on an agreed time and let the bounty hunters do what they want to their money.
What they should be doing is finding ways on how solve the problem about insufficient funds and strengthen the project's after the campaign.
What they should be doing is finding ways on how solve the problem about insufficient funds and strengthen the project's after the campaign.
The truth is that most times we have seen bounty hunters dumped but that is not to say that we don't have good bounty hunters that are ready to hodl. you cannot realy blame the team at times but then bounty hunters deserve their payment.
The hunters have never blamed the correct team project, and only the incorrect team is blamed by the hunters, because working as a hunter is very tired, so it is natural when hunters blame the team that is not true. 
Is this about the ICO projects?
That is all I can think about since this had been talked about ever since.
Yes, I was a bounty for a long time and this discussion had been all over this forum time to time.
It is not really the hunters fault. They should really manage it very well, if they did then a dump wont be seen at all.
That is all I can think about since this had been talked about ever since.
Yes, I was a bounty for a long time and this discussion had been all over this forum time to time.
It is not really the hunters fault. They should really manage it very well, if they did then a dump wont be seen at all.
It's not the hunters fault, but it is because a lot of scammers out there that were trying to buy potential tokens at dip so they are doing their best to create FUD and to create panic in all people, which is happening too that's why many investors and bounty hunters were selling their tokens right after they received it as they don't want to regret in the future.
Is this about the ICO projects?
That is all I can think about since this had been talked about ever since.
Yes, I was a bounty for a long time and this discussion had been all over this forum time to time.
It is not really the hunters fault. They should really manage it very well, if they did then a dump wont be seen at all.
That is all I can think about since this had been talked about ever since.
Yes, I was a bounty for a long time and this discussion had been all over this forum time to time.
It is not really the hunters fault. They should really manage it very well, if they did then a dump wont be seen at all.
if using bitcoin or ethereum for payment, dev would cost more than their own tokens/ coins.
so, many devs use their own tokens to pay bounty hunter. that's a good choice to spread tokens to circullating
actually, dev doesnt have to be affraid losing token/ coins value in the market. as long as the coin is good, it would increase in the future
But if the coin isnt good, it would be the problem. the coin cant increase and dump as time goes by
so, many devs use their own tokens to pay bounty hunter. that's a good choice to spread tokens to circullating
actually, dev doesnt have to be affraid losing token/ coins value in the market. as long as the coin is good, it would increase in the future
But if the coin isnt good, it would be the problem. the coin cant increase and dump as time goes by
The truth is that most times we have seen bounty hunters dumped but that is not to say that we don't have good bounty hunters that are ready to hodl. you cannot realy blame the team at times but then bounty hunters deserve their payment.
bounty hunters just must get their rewards, because they do a lot for projects at an early stage of development. without bounty hunters, it will be very difficult for the new projects to make some marketing It's easier paying bounty hunters with the native token instead of Ethereum or bitcoin. Most of these projects hardly reach their hardcap and they won't want to use part of their raised funds to pay hunters when it costs them nothing to pay them with worthless tokens.
in contrast its easier to pay bounty hunter with ethereum than token that will drop the price of product ,developers will be able to maintain the price of product if paid by ethereum or bitcoin ,fear when unfounded dumps will actually benefit developers be able to achieve the future with their products and as far I see there are still many projects fail because of shit token become a virus for investor including paying using their products which will make investor nervous too for future 
The fear of dumping often makes the project team fear or avoid the payment of hunters until sometimes after the exchange listing. I wonder why the team make themselves restless on an easy thing like that when they can easily conduct their bounty with bitcoin or ethereum for payment. That will safe them of the fear that the bounty hunter will dump after the exchange listing.
Often happens lately. but my assumption is not very influential, the allocation for the bounty on prices. and what I know is the allocation for bounties is only 1-5% of the total supply of tokens, so if the project has good prospects it will not be defeated by the bear (dumping). what is too conspicuous is usually the investors who do (dumping), when they see the prospect of a project that they don't like and for the payment of the bounty hunter, it is not very influential in my opinion. but I as a prize hunter is very happy if I can get a payment in the form of BTC / ETH, because lately I only get Shitcoin.
developer works on decision as referring use with limit on value with initial token on release with the terms of ico.
and gains on returns to help with following on extensive with chance as completing projects and deliver to public with manage as collaborating different works on table of briefing with team of development.
and gains on returns to help with following on extensive with chance as completing projects and deliver to public with manage as collaborating different works on table of briefing with team of development.
The truth is that most times we have seen bounty hunters dumped but that is not to say that we don't have good bounty hunters that are ready to hodl. you cannot realy blame the team at times but then bounty hunters deserve their payment.
They work for it so they deserve to be treated as part of the projects and allocated funding should be distributed in the right and exact time period. Bounty Hunters work then it should be the part of the developing team to provide necessary rewards that being offered to the bounty people. They're not the one that should be blamed as they are just looking for opportunities to earn. 
The fear of dumping often makes the project team fear or avoid the payment of hunters until sometimes after the exchange listing. I wonder why the team make themselves restless on an easy thing like that when they can easily conduct their bounty with bitcoin or ethereum for payment. That will safe them of the fear that the bounty hunter will dump after the exchange listing.
It could be that the team behind the project took advantage by holding and throwing the tokens before the bounty hunters, so that when bounty hunters get their tokens, the price will be very far and arguably has no value to sell which ultimately makes the hunters feel that what they are doing it was a waste and a waste of time, but for the team in the project it was a benefit they could get.This is so funny and even more funnier when people believe the reason for locking bounty token is to prevent dump. Most projects gives out huge bonuses to their investors and locks up bounty rewards yet the investors dumps on getting the chance. Any team that fails to do the right thing by working on its platform, the token will dump so let them stop using bounty as an excuse. If they care so much or blame hunters on the dump in price of their token, let them pay with other coins like USDT, BTC or ETH.
locking bounty tokens must also be seen in line with bitcoin prices.if the alt condition as it is today will be a major disaster when the coin is unlocked, the holder will panic psychologically. Using usdt / btc / eth will also suffer losses if the developers estimate misses, most projects are currently only able to promise from stake campaigns, I think the developer is the one who has the highest anxiety level than the others, and herein lies the weakness of the actual project.
The truth is that most times we have seen bounty hunters dumped but that is not to say that we don't have good bounty hunters that are ready to hodl. you cannot realy blame the team at times but then bounty hunters deserve their payment.
Jump to: