Topic: FIFA World Cup 2026 :Canada/Mexico/United States: Discussion Thread - page 282. (Read 62618 times)

Regardless of Argentina win or lose in this world cup,  Lionel Messi would not have been playing in the 2026 world cup. He will be too aged by that time.

Lets suppose, Lionel Messi had lost the 2022 world cup final or the Argentine team was not able to reach the finals, would he had not announced his retirement and will be playing in 2026 world cup ?

Although technically he can play, but that wont help the Argentina cause. They would be needing young legs to run around and score for their team. Experience does matter in football but at same time if you are too aged, you won't be able to leave impression on the game.

I doubt if Messi and Ronaldo will be able to participate in the next world cup. Even we call see the effect of age in their performance,  expecially that of Ronaldo.  In the very next four years their performance will be very terrible. They have done enough and achieved enough,  the best thing is to retire.

Especially Messi, he has won the trophy he has always wanted. Messi got everything he has ever wanted in his career, including a whole collection of trophies and individual awards from various prestigious events. slightly different from Ronaldo, he failed to present the world cup trophy for his country. however, Ronaldo is no less great than his toughest rival. these two megastars, it's time to let a new generation appear to carry the big names of their respective countries.

In the Portugal squad, there are lots of young talents who maybe in the next 4 years their skills and experience will be honed even more. meanwhile, Argentina will also regenerate. Reportedly even, Argentina already has a wonderkid who is predicted to be Messi's incarnation, namely Lucas Roman, who is currently rumored to have joined Barcelona. I'm pretty sure, both Messi and Ronaldo will soon retire from their football career before the 2026 world cup is held.

You are absolutely correct, Messi have achieved everything that is achievable in football, and so is Ronaldo as well, I personally can not find any reason why they should still be in the field of play by the age of 39 upwards, it is better to retire so as to give the younger players the breathing space to prove themselves, like I said in my previous comment, they can not play forever, even if they want to, so it is better for them to give themselves rest while the younger seize the opportunity to show what they are capable of.

No worries mate honestly, I had the same impression too and I just figured it out late that CR7 was the older one and not Messi. Well, looks are quite deceiving as they say.

You got some point there, it's indeed fair for the whole team especially the younger ones to cover the lost ground because eventually, Messi and CR7 won't be with the team anymore. But we can't really deny that there are still a good reason why they must retain if they can, however, their minutes will be heavily reduced because it's not their era anymore. For CR7 though, I think he won't be around at that time already as I've just read an article that he and the Saudi Arabia will having a joint bid with the Greece and Egypt to host the next next WC. So, that comes with a lot of preparation.

Yes, you are right, but we can say that one event is statistically insignificant and the more events we take into account, the more accurate the result. In any case, both your methodology and mine, and any other will show the undoubted dominance of Europe.


You can have any opinion, for example that the Earth is shaped like a suitcase or that COMNEBOL can be compared with Europe and conclude that COMNEBOL dominates, but since this contradicts the facts, then you will look ridiculous with such an opinion. Nothing personal   


You pretty quickly went from boldly saying that COMNEBOL is the strongest federation to counting statistics in one match (which ended in a penalty shoot-out) ... Did something happen? 

Right now we are in 2023 and the 2026 world cup starts in 4 years, which is far away, and Lionel Messi is 35 years old. He indeed got reach many achievements with many teams while playing for Argentina and the clubs he was paying there but playing at age of 39-38 in the world cup is not something many players can reach even the most professional players can't perform like the early years and mostly these players prefer to retire before everyone sees them playing for poor performance level compared to other times and I guess Lionel Messi is one these players.

Lionel Messi is very satisfied with his achievements so far in football, he has won almost all competitions either in the league or in international competition with Argentina. So even if he retires later everyone will always remember the historical moment about him. But the 2022 world cup is the pinnacle of his career and with that I think he is done.

Well, what happens is that in South America these things are quite evident, but you don't have to go very far, in the USA, Europe, they are countries that have always had crime problems, the fact that these statistics are hardly shown is something else, In Mexico, what can be most evident is that there is a lot of the problem with the drug traffickers, it is the strongest because they represent a fairly developed force. But in every government, not only in Mexico, but also in the USA and Canada, security measures must be increased to ensure the tranquility and safety of fans from all over the world, it is a worldwide event, they cannot cope with things go wrong.
Football changes a lot, in Qatar we didn't have Italy or Sweden, but that doesn't mean that they won't qualify for the World Cup, between now and 2026 many things can happen, among them it is also known that they expanded the quotas so that more countries can go to the world, this is very good because we can see the debut of many countries, and therefore we can realize that countries have grown so much in soccer, everything is a process that is giving good As a result, there is nothing else to see JAPAN, they calculate that in a period of time they will always be the world champions, so these things are what have to be seen.

That's true in final of this world cup Argentina controlled the whole game they were totally over France and that's why they won the final .
France performance was not up to the mark according to final just Mbappe saved France from embarrassing defeat and scored all goals for its team.
Argentina performance brilliantly and so is Messi and they deserved this win .

Like it actually baffle me how people talk less about Morroco performance during the entire world cup and are hyping Argentina. Oh I guess because they are African. Argentina played well actually but the officiating favored them in most of their matches. France were just unlucky in that final match and Mbappe efforts was hampered by his team mates with their unprofessional kicks. By the way, football is all about luck and the lucky team won.

I have to agree with you that Argentina showed the most during the entire world cup and in the end deservedly became the world champion.
They were dominant and better in every match, including the final match against the French, and Messi was definitely the best player at the World Cup and made the difference in every match.
Di María's early exit upset the balance of the game and helped the French get back into the match, based on the great individual quality of Mbappe but it was not enough.
Anyway, this was a great and very uncertain final but I agree that the better team won, the team that dominated most of the match.
I hope we will see Messi at the next World Cup, regardless of his age.

Messi's current interview suggests he may not play in the next World Cup. In fact, this year's World Cup was organized historically. And witnessing this historic event, Messi's Argentina made history and secured the World Cup. Lionel Messi is now complete in all aspects.

I guess you didn't watched the final match between Argentina and France. For the initial 80 minutes, France was nowhere in the picture and Argentina had ball possession of 70% plus. With just 10 minutes to go towards the end of regular time, Argentina coach Lionel Scaloni made the big mistake of substituting Ángel Di María with Marcos Acuña. This allowed France to score their first goal in 80th minute and then again in 81st minute. By the end of 120 minutes, score was 3-3, but France had scored two out of that goals through penalty kicks.

The last 10 minutes and then the extra time performance saved France from complete humiliation. But it was clear that Argentina was the better team by a long distance. Since you are talking about stats, check these:

Total shots: ARG 20, FRA 10
Shots on target: ARG 10, FRA 5
Saves: ARG 2, FRA 7

That reminds me back during the celebration of Argentina victory, some people started to make and share memes on Twitter comparing the skin color of Argentina's team and France's team, highlighting the fact one was a South American team and the other one an European team.

There are truly "interesting" people out there on the internet.

Well, the world is getting a bit more mixed these days. For example, in France you have Mbappe, who was born in Paris, France, but his genetics come from his parents. His father is from Cameroon, and his mother from Algeria.

There are many examples like this. I think there is more migration in Europe than in South America though, so that would mean that there are more mixed players in Europe, probably ending up with better players.

I must agree with you and highlight another very important factor...
Do teams in Europe have only European players in their squad? What continents do your players come from?
Argentina and Brazil certainly contribute a lot to these numbers, Brazil for example is the country that most exports players to the world and most of them are playing in European teams.

So, with that I can support your statement that European teams are only good when they play at home, because when they go to play the FIFA World Cup, they have many embezzlements, as most of their good players return to their home teams.

I think everyone has their opinion and we must respect them.
Brazil was a strong team - I couldn't get Neymar off my mind for days when they lost to Croatia -after I saw him crying

Even in this age he is far stronger than most of the player.
He is a diamond and a legend and he wont go off the people mind for long.

The bolded part of you quoting me hopefully sufficiently summarizes what you then put into words again. Actually, my part points the dominance even more out than your post as 1 : 8 is 12.5% for CONMEBOL while 2 : 13 is 15.4% for CONMEBOL.

Still I think that the variance is still quite huge. Now it's true that Europe is dominant, but at times the dominant number of Europe having 29 appearances in the final doesn't sometimes quite reflect how close many of the games actually were. In the semi finals of 2006, who would actually blindly ever guess that Brazil faced Turkey and Germany faced South Korea and both games were decided by a single goal.

I think that in soccer there is sometimes more variance in the game than in tennis, for example. But this is a discussion that could go on forever.

As far as the statistics currently go, you are right in so far as if someone had to bet his or her life on the World Cup winner coming either from CONMEBOL or UEFA, one should of course bet on UEFA. But if it's all about a single team, lots of people would have said "France" last year and would have lost, even more so if they had the choice to choose between Argentina and France after the first group stage game!