Author

Topic: FIFA World Cup 2026 :Canada/Mexico/United States: Discussion Thread - page 283. (Read 58053 times)

legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1338
Regardless of the challenges, one might expect these host nations to face as they prepare for the world, the outcome would be far better than what was experienced in Qatar. The US, Canada, and Mexico are democratic societies that respect the right of people including immigrants. I don't think the abuse and exploitation of workers would be as high as the Qatari experience.

Qatar is not a football nation, therefore they had to start preparing from the scratch for the world cup. But these triple hosts in North America have enough basic amenities that would make the tournament successful. Most stadiums or other basic amenities might just need renovations to make them meet FIFA standards.

We are also expecting to also have a more fan-friendly WorldCup where fans wouldn't be restricted by cultural and other religious beliefs.
And without a doubt this will make the next world cup the most profitable ever, not only the number of games and the TV rights will influence this, but simply the ability of having a beer at the stadium or being able to enjoy yourself on the street without worrying about being arrested will make the next world cup way more successful, after all there were many fans which boycotted the world cup at Qatar due to the many different issues that presented themselves before and during the world cup.
legendary
Activity: 3332
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Key Highlights

1- This will be the first time we will see 48 teams in the tournament, instead of 32.
2- There will be a total of 80 matches to be played in this Fifa world cup.
3- United States will host 60 Matches
4- Canada and Mexico will host 10 matches each.

Is it confirmed that 48 teams will play in WorldCup 26? I heard all this was rumor, but if it happens man this event will not be fun like we had in these past events. A total of 80 match!

Initially the FIFA was planning for a 40 team competition. This was the plan proposed by the then FIFA Gianni Infantino (March 2016). The decision to expand the world cup to 48 teams was taken by the FIFA Council on 2017. But I am not sure about the total number of matches. Initially they were planning for 80, with 3 teams each in 16 groups. But now the format has changed, and there will be 4 teams in each of the 12 groups. So the total number of matches are going to go up to 104. Finalists will play a total of 8 matches.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 987
Give all before death
Regardless of the challenges, one might expect these host nations to face as they prepare for the world, the outcome would be far better than what was experienced in Qatar. The US, Canada, and Mexico are democratic societies that respect the right of people including immigrants. I don't think the abuse and exploitation of workers would be as high as the Qatari experience.

Qatar is not a football nation, therefore they had to start preparing from the scratch for the world cup. But these triple hosts in North America have enough basic amenities that would make the tournament successful. Most stadiums or other basic amenities might just need renovations to make them meet FIFA standards.

We are also expecting to also have a more fan-friendly WorldCup where fans wouldn't be restricted by cultural and other religious beliefs.
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 2025
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I also know about that and it's really regrettable, I believe every country has safety rules for construction workers in their country but construction entrepreneurs ignore them, but the government in the country in North America has strict rules against every construction company in the country

That is how companies push the legal system and walk in a grey zone so they can get things done while saving as much money as possible. Whether it is in the Middle East or in North-America, hiring a citizenship with education to work in a project will be most of the times more expensive than giving the job to an immigrant without education and papers for them to claim the same benefits a citizenship would be entitled to.

The difference is that in North America, it will be more difficult to shady people in power to pull such thing off.



Since we are talking about the Mexican-USA border I expect the FIFA to encounter some obstacles with transportation and mobility for the fans in general...

full member
Activity: 756
Merit: 133
- hello doctor who box
Key Highlights

1- This will be the first time we will see 48 teams in the tournament, instead of 32.
2- There will be a total of 80 matches to be played in this Fifa world cup.
3- United States will host 60 Matches
4- Canada and Mexico will host 10 matches each.

Is it confirmed that 48 teams will play in WorldCup 26? I heard all this was rumor, but if it happens man this event will not be fun like we had in these past events. A total of 80 match!

It is a nice idea to organize the World Cup in different countries. But in terms of transport, it is not optimal for the players. You will always have to travel up and down, which is not great for your preparation. And the distances between these countries can also be considerable. Mexico and a World Cup, we've already experienced that once before in 1986. I thought everything had gone pretty well then. It surprises me a little that they organize the World Cup, since America is not really a football country at all. At least, football is not among the 3 most popular sports. Maybe not even in the top 5.

Let's see how they organize with such distance between countries and teams have to make travel between the games which is very struggling for players. I admit that football (they call it soccer Wink ) is not popular in USA but it is football and I'm sure fans from all over the world will gather and make it amazing as they did this time in Qatar. Qatar was a perfect example of how should an event can be organized.

hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 577
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
The three times winner of world cup Pele buried tomorrow
The former former football legendary (Pele) will be buried tomorrow on the third of January 2023. Where Pele will be buried is the Cemetery of Memorial Necropole Ecumenica center, the Vertical Cemetery in Santos. The tallest cemetery in the whole world in Brazil. He will be buried on the 9th floor of the vertical cemetery. May his soul rest in peace amen.

https://www.facebook.com/103810545080703/posts/pfbid0L2yNPcjbQjVuBLvewP5EWva6ya1e1TzkbYGGCE4252DdCHBHByoYXz2hbJNu3Jp8l/?app=fbl
member
Activity: 672
Merit: 16

I think that this is a new innovation, so i believe that they want to make it to be easy for people so that they can be able to host the world cup very easy, the way I'm seeing it, so therefore i believe, it will be able have a different from the one we have already seen or host last year which is 2022 it was nice and coordinated the way it was organised before.so they are looking up to standards.
If world cup will be hosted by 3 country is not even a problem but the problem is that the countries that will be hosting the World cup have serious restrictions of allowing people to come into their countries . That means countries being restricted can't have any chance of travelling to go watch the world cup.
full member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 110
I really don't know how the audience are going to watch the match, because those who in United States of America cannot travel to and fro to watch the matches among the three countries. And since USA has the highest number of matches in the tournament, the final three matches will be played in USA. Since there are three countries that are hosting the great tournament this this team, the tournament will be more interested because each country will want to make more interesting than the other.
Those who are saying that Argentina will win the next world cup are just playing because the teams that will spring up to beat Argentina will shock everyone..

Since I have been watching World Cup it only one country that normally host the world,  now am confuse how will three countries host the world cup.  That means people that will come watch the world cup can only be in one country that will only host few matches. One country hosting world is the best , for visitors to watch all matches live.
I think that this is a new innovation, so i believe that they want to make it to be easy for people so that they can be able to host the world cup very easy, the way I'm seeing it, so therefore i believe, it will be able have a different from the one we have already seen or host last year which is 2022 it was nice and coordinated the way it was organised before.so they are looking up to standards.
AS the year begins - we bid farewell to the legend Pele - what a great legend he was, Brazil mourns as the wake is going on and they are getting ready to lay him to rest.
That is the reality of life -some people leave their name to be remembered by history. Rest in peace legend!
full member
Activity: 1050
Merit: 109
1xBit.. recovered their reputation
It is about the security measures and the reaction of the building company to the accidents.
For example, in the United States it is common for workers to have a health insurance provided by their employers, so in case of accident a worker will get the medical attention needed for them to survive.

The problem in Qatar was the fact they "hired" a huge percentage of foreign workers, immigrants who did not have the same legal benefits a worker would have in North-America. It was allegedly an inhumane treat.
I also know about that and it's really regrettable, I believe every country has safety rules for construction workers in their country but construction entrepreneurs ignore them, but the government in the country in North America has strict rules against every construction company in the country


Quote
the farthest distance between stadiums can reach 5,000 Kilometers (Km). This is the distance separating Mexico City, as the southernmost host, from Vancouver as the farthest city north, Los Angeles as the farthest city west, and Boston as the farthest east. In fact, the United States alone has nine time zones. The time difference can be up to three hours from one end of the coast to the other.

The 2026 World Cup will have its own impressions and challenges for the fans because the distance between the stadiums is very far and I'm curious how the transportation arrangements will be there
hero member
Activity: 1246
Merit: 534
I really don't know how the audience are going to watch the match, because those who in United States of America cannot travel to and fro to watch the matches among the three countries. And since USA has the highest number of matches in the tournament, the final three matches will be played in USA. Since there are three countries that are hosting the great tournament this this team, the tournament will be more interested because each country will want to make more interesting than the other.
Those who are saying that Argentina will win the next world cup are just playing because the teams that will spring up to beat Argentina will shock everyone..

Since I have been watching World Cup it only one country that normally host the world,  now am confuse how will three countries host the world cup.  That means people that will come watch the world cup can only be in one country that will only host few matches. One country hosting world is the best , for visitors to watch all matches live.
I think that this is a new innovation, so i believe that they want to make it to be easy for people so that they can be able to host the world cup very easy, the way I'm seeing it, so therefore i believe, it will be able have a different from the one we have already seen or host last year which is 2022 it was nice and coordinated the way it was organised before.so they are looking up to standards.
hero member
Activity: 2618
Merit: 548
SecureShift.io | Crypto-Exchange
The Argentina team will have to prepare the team without Messi and Di Maria for the next World Cup. Because the chances of both of them playing in the next World Cup are very low.
It's true that Messi and Di Maria are of course too old to participate in the 2026 world cup and that is an opportunity for other young Argentinian players to fill those positions soon. Maybe at this time with the existing Argentina squad it is still possible to continue moving forward, but the role of Messi and Di Maria as creative figures in the Argentinian attack line will be a serious problem if there are no replacements. Maybe in a year or two, new Argentinian young players will appear, coupled with the current squad they will try to defend the world cup title.

I think it is obvious that the Argentinian national team is facing a generational change because it is not realistic that their main players, Di Maria and Messi, will play in the next World Cup in 4 years.
Will new young players be able to replace Messi? I think that is impossible and that Argentina will have to change the style and concept of the game and play more as a team.
After the departure of Pele, Brazil had to wait 24 years for a new world champion title.
Argentina had something special and unique with Messi. Without Messi, they are just another team out of many.

Indeed, you should try to give up Messi as the team's foundation in attack, if they don't immediately get a strategy or new players who can fill the void, it seems that it will be increasingly difficult to defend the world cup title. I'm not sure if Argentina will keep the same performance in the 2022 world cup and surely there will be more and more senior players who might retire, not only messi in that discussion.
As the FIFA World Cup have got over, players will move towards different clubs for their regular championship. Separate team will be playing for the country to get qualified for the FIFA 2026. More players who had been part of the 2022 World Cup won't be available in the 2026 FIFA World Cup. More senior players leave and turn to be the coach and different other positions. And now it's too early to pick the team for each nation.
member
Activity: 798
Merit: 34
The Argentina team will have to prepare the team without Messi and Di Maria for the next World Cup. Because the chances of both of them playing in the next World Cup are very low.
It's true that Messi and Di Maria are of course too old to participate in the 2026 world cup and that is an opportunity for other young Argentinian players to fill those positions soon. Maybe at this time with the existing Argentina squad it is still possible to continue moving forward, but the role of Messi and Di Maria as creative figures in the Argentinian attack line will be a serious problem if there are no replacements. Maybe in a year or two, new Argentinian young players will appear, coupled with the current squad they will try to defend the world cup title.

I think it is obvious that the Argentinian national team is facing a generational change because it is not realistic that their main players, Di Maria and Messi, will play in the next World Cup in 4 years.
Will new young players be able to replace Messi? I think that is impossible and that Argentina will have to change the style and concept of the game and play more as a team.
After the departure of Pele, Brazil had to wait 24 years for a new world champion title.
Argentina had something special and unique with Messi. Without Messi, they are just another team out of many.

Indeed, you should try to give up Messi as the team's foundation in attack, if they don't immediately get a strategy or new players who can fill the void, it seems that it will be increasingly difficult to defend the world cup title. I'm not sure if Argentina will keep the same performance in the 2022 world cup and surely there will be more and more senior players who might retire, not only messi in that discussion.
It is not possible for Argentina to achieve what they achieved in this world cup in the next world cup. In the next world cup it can even be a shock that a team a small team that has never been showing good performance can be the team to win the World cup. Just like Morocco that was close to the finals.
hero member
Activity: 2128
Merit: 520
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
The Argentina team will have to prepare the team without Messi and Di Maria for the next World Cup. Because the chances of both of them playing in the next World Cup are very low.
It's true that Messi and Di Maria are of course too old to participate in the 2026 world cup and that is an opportunity for other young Argentinian players to fill those positions soon. Maybe at this time with the existing Argentina squad it is still possible to continue moving forward, but the role of Messi and Di Maria as creative figures in the Argentinian attack line will be a serious problem if there are no replacements. Maybe in a year or two, new Argentinian young players will appear, coupled with the current squad they will try to defend the world cup title.

I think it is obvious that the Argentinian national team is facing a generational change because it is not realistic that their main players, Di Maria and Messi, will play in the next World Cup in 4 years.
Will new young players be able to replace Messi? I think that is impossible and that Argentina will have to change the style and concept of the game and play more as a team.
After the departure of Pele, Brazil had to wait 24 years for a new world champion title.
Argentina had something special and unique with Messi. Without Messi, they are just another team out of many.

Indeed, you should try to give up Messi as the team's foundation in attack, if they don't immediately get a strategy or new players who can fill the void, it seems that it will be increasingly difficult to defend the world cup title. I'm not sure if Argentina will keep the same performance in the 2022 world cup and surely there will be more and more senior players who might retire, not only messi in that discussion.
member
Activity: 812
Merit: 13
Crypto bookmaker and casino
I really don't know how the audience are going to watch the match, because those who in United States of America cannot travel to and fro to watch the matches among the three countries. And since USA has the highest number of matches in the tournament, the final three matches will be played in USA. Since there are three countries that are hosting the great tournament this this team, the tournament will be more interested because each country will want to make more interesting than the other.
Those who are saying that Argentina will win the next world cup are just playing because the teams that will spring up to beat Argentina will shock everyone..

Since I have been watching World Cup it only one country that normally host the world,  now am confuse how will three countries host the world cup.  That means people that will come watch the world cup can only be in one country that will only host few matches. One country hosting world is the best , for visitors to watch all matches live.
why did they do that? How will teams be moving from one country to another country
Or maybe the pool matches will happen in one country - the quarterfinal in another and the semifinal and final in another country - but this means that teams will be traveling as soon as the match ends.

This is still very surprising to me for team to be moving form one country to another which do not make it the regular world cup that we used to know. I think there is reason for that which should be disclosed to us but still don't know. Anyhow the FIFA set the next world cup to be depend on them. I hope to see old country that had taken the world cup to win this time.
legendary
Activity: 2394
Merit: 1082
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I really don't know how the audience are going to watch the match, because those who in United States of America cannot travel to and fro to watch the matches among the three countries. And since USA has the highest number of matches in the tournament, the final three matches will be played in USA. Since there are three countries that are hosting the great tournament this this team, the tournament will be more interested because each country will want to make more interesting than the other.
Well, this is exactly what my concern was and i stated it few pages back, but another user( cant recall the name right now) replied and said that the world cup tournaments have become bigger than every single country in the world, and as that, it is no longer a tournament that should be hosted by one country alone, he finds nothing wrong in FIFA deciding to host the 2026 world cup in three different countries.

Personally, like ive said before, tourists, that is those who will be traveling to view the match played live would be the ones at a loss, as they wont be able to watch all the games, international journalists/news outlets are gonna have to spend much more too, as they will have to hire more hands, fly each of them to one of this countries each so they can be able to cover all the happenings in this three countries, if they dont do it this way, logistics might end up being a big problem for them.
This is my thought though.    
full member
Activity: 1890
Merit: 101
cut
The extra money is one thing. Next one is the Visa process, it isn't easy to enter these countries same as one enters Qatar or an Asian country. The upcoming FIFA World Cup will surely be a big hurdle for each and everyone who have got plans to watch it. Anyhow we've got more years and the countries might come with more plans to ease out things.
I believe a more lenient process will be attached to it; they don't expect people to not enjoy the value of their money, and it will only scare people away from going to watch the games unless they're on a free trip, as in the case of country's supporter fans in the World Cup. If it becomes a selection process for everyone to decide where they want to watch the World Cup, it will undoubtedly worsen as more people will prefer to watch mostly the final stages of these matches.
The US, Mexico and Canada are not countries that are super strict with their rules, they prioritize the satisfaction of visitors who are in their countries because it is part of marketing. in fact I'm sure the fans will be allowed to bring liquor and even flares into the stadium, very different from Qatar. hosting the 2026 world cup will definitely be a huge success again and there will be no controversy.
sr. member
Activity: 1554
Merit: 260
I really don't know how the audience are going to watch the match, because those who in United States of America cannot travel to and fro to watch the matches among the three countries. And since USA has the highest number of matches in the tournament, the final three matches will be played in USA. Since there are three countries that are hosting the great tournament this this team, the tournament will be more interested because each country will want to make more interesting than the other.
Those who are saying that Argentina will win the next world cup are just playing because the teams that will spring up to beat Argentina will shock everyone..

Since I have been watching World Cup it only one country that normally host the world,  now am confuse how will three countries host the world cup.  That means people that will come watch the world cup can only be in one country that will only host few matches. One country hosting world is the best , for visitors to watch all matches live.
why did they do that? How will teams be moving from one country to another country
Or maybe the pool matches will happen in one country - the quarterfinal in another and the semifinal and final in another country - but this means that teams will be traveling as soon as the match ends.
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1127
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
An African team can reach FIFA World Cup 2026 final, believes CAF president Patrice Motsepe



Quote
Johannesburg: African football boss Patrice Motsepe told a press conference in Johannesburg on Wednesday he believes a team from the continent can reach the 2026 World Cup final.

“Morocco opened the door by reaching the semi-finals this month and I am confident an African nation will go further at the next World Cup,” said the South African billionaire.

“The main objective of CAF (Confederation of African Football) is for an African nation to win the World Cup and that goal is within reach.”

There will be nine or 10 African qualifiers for an expanded 48-team 2026 World Cup in the United States, Canada and Mexico — up from five in Qatar.

Morocco made history in Qatar by becoming the first African representatives to reach the semi-finals.

The Atlas Lions stunned Belgium in the group stage, then eliminated two more powerful European sides, Spain and Portugal, in the knockout stage before losing to France in the semi-finals.

“There are at least 10 African nations that can compete at the highest level and win the World Cup,” added Motsepe.

Source: https://www.firstpost.com/sports/football-news/an-african-team-can-reach-fifa-world-cup-2026-final-believes-caf-president-patrice-motsepe-11851791.html

 Angry

What nonsense is this guy talking? in africa as i am african we all know that the only teams that are dominant are nigeria, camer, senegal, ivory coast, ghana, egypt, morocco, tunisia, so these are the teams that will always be in the world cup with this new model and no doubt these teams have no chance of reaching the world cup final, so what the hell is this guy talking about?

we all know that in africa soccer federations there is a lot of corruption that even for players to be able to play in their country's team to represent the world cup they need to pay large amounts of money or they will not be called up to play and this gentleman knows that and it does nothing, we all know that in the local African leagues the teams are beggars, they are so poor that they cannot pay the players meager wages and cannot pay the prize when a team wins the league

this gentleman as president of CAF does nothing but watch everything, we all know about the corruption for the organization of the African games, the countries with the most money in Africa benefit from a lot thanks to corruption, he is still dreaming of winning the cup of the world while there is still so much to be resolved internally? he can go on dreaming into infinity, it's just an impossible dream so soon
legendary
Activity: 2814
Merit: 1112
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I really don't know how the audience are going to watch the match, because those who in United States of America cannot travel to and fro to watch the matches among the three countries. And since USA has the highest number of matches in the tournament, the final three matches will be played in USA. Since there are three countries that are hosting the great tournament this this team, the tournament will be more interested because each country will want to make more interesting than the other.
Those who are saying that Argentina will win the next world cup are just playing because the teams that will spring up to beat Argentina will shock everyone..
Usually in the early rounds or the group phase the spectators will focus on the national team from their country and if a team from that country plays in Mexico then they will be in Mexico first until the group phase is over and after that see which country will be the venue for their country, not a hard thing in my opinion. I haven't seen whether Mexico or Canada will only get a spot for group stage matches, if so then spectators will only need visas in two countries.
If anyone says Argentina will win the next World Cup again, it's only the people from Argentina and as far as I know, no country has been able to win 2x in a row apart from Brazil and Italy but that was a long time ago.
member
Activity: 798
Merit: 34
I really don't know how the audience are going to watch the match, because those who in United States of America cannot travel to and fro to watch the matches among the three countries. And since USA has the highest number of matches in the tournament, the final three matches will be played in USA. Since there are three countries that are hosting the great tournament this this team, the tournament will be more interested because each country will want to make more interesting than the other.
Those who are saying that Argentina will win the next world cup are just playing because the teams that will spring up to beat Argentina will shock everyone..

Since I have been watching World Cup it only one country that normally host the world,  now am confuse how will three countries host the world cup.  That means people that will come watch the world cup can only be in one country that will only host few matches. One country hosting world is the best , for visitors to watch all matches live.
Jump to: