What a fucking joke, I understand the globe theory better than anybody else here. It's because of this understanding that I can say without a doubt the Earth is a flat and motionless plane. The globe is a fraud, a hoax and a lie.
Yeah, you figured it out using youtube videos, you are truly a genius, tell us about your scientific paper and articles, please.
I already have, the science is already established.
I can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the Earth is not in motion using a combination of established and replicated scientific experiments. The spinning ball is model has been broken and you're clinging onto a corpse of an idea.
A reasonable conclusion here is that there's a 3rd celestial body in between the plane of the Earth and the Moon.
Keep your reasonable doubt. All kinds of people have proven conclusively that the earth is a spinning globe in motion with the rest of the spinning-globe bodies throughout the universe.
The Sagnac Experiment shows there's an aether with irrefutable empirical proof. With an aether the Michelson & Morley Experiment proves the Earth is motionless and Airy's Failure Experiment corroborates these results.
You've got no room left to wiggle worm.
Well it seems they did find a bit of wiggle room with Einstein's bullshit however, Dufour and Prunier is the final nail in the coffin.
The Sagnac Experiment was designed by Sagnac in 1913 for the specific purpose of detecting the aether and was successful in doing so. The result being the Sagnac Effect and empirical proof of the aether.
I know you won't read it notnatman, but for the sake of others who might be slipping into a like mindset, here's some interesting reading: https://briankoberlein.com/2015/08/11/does-the-aether-exist-hint-no/
This article states that the Sagnac experiment proves the aether "A shift in the interference pattern is exactly what the aether model predicts." A direct quote that contradicts the title of the article proves it's misleading and intellectually dishonest.
It then tries to whitewash the result by claiming it didn't disprove relativity because it (relativity) doesn't apply to rotating systems. Dufour and Prunier totally blow this argument out of the water by proving the results are in fact not consistent with relativity:
"Challenging Modern Physics: Questioning Einstein's Relativity Theories" -- https://books.google.ca/books?id=XVLmihZnsvUC
You've just been BTFO asshole.
Established science like gravity?
Established like density and buoyancy.