Slander, ad hominem attacks and appeal to corrupt authority is all these globalists have in their arsenal, there's no scientific proof for the globe. If there was any scientific proof I'm sure they would have posted it by now instead of calling me every name in the book.
So the fact that objects have the same weight anywhere in the world is not enough proof that we live on the globe?
According to the unproven theories of the globe and gravity neither of which are consistent with observation and measurement, they do claim that objects weigh less at the equator due to the supposed rotation of the Earth. However it can be proven conclusively and scientifically with empirical measurements from multiple documented and established physical experiments
[1][2][3][4] that the Earth is not in motion.
This is clearly another case of "not even wrong".
References:
1. The Michael & Morley Experiment.
2. The Sagnac Effect.
3. The Dufour & Prunier replication of the Sagnac effect.
4. Airy's Failure Experiment.References for what exactly?
1. The Michael & Morley Experiment - proved that there is no "aether", helped in the development of special relativity theory
2. The Sagnac Effect - light speed is constant in inertial frames, needs to be modified in accelerating frames of reference.
3. The Dufour & Prunier replication of the Sagnac effect - speed of light is not affected even if source is in motion in inertial frames, in accelerating frames it has to be reduced. These types of experiments confirm special relativity and general relativity theories.
4. Airy's Failure Experiment. - aberration is due to the rotation of Earth
Dig deeper in your pseudo science barrel! What will you dig up now and twist the facts? One can only wonder...
Can you even read and understand what are you reading? Or you just jump to conclusions made by some other flat Earth "scientists"?
Dome my ass. Weight due to polarized air and atmospheric E- field my ass, LOL.
1. The Michael & Morley Experiment failed to detect the motion of the Earth through the aether, the argument was that the theory of special relativity sates there is no aether.
2. The Sagnac Effect/Experiment was claimed proof of the aether and confirmation that the Earth was indeed motionless, the argument was that the rotating frame of reference was not compatible with special relativity and that the experiment was not conclusive.
3. The Dufour & Prunier replication of the Sagnac Effect took special relativity into account and proved conclusively that special relativity was not consistent with experimental evidence.
4. Airy's Failure Experiment failed to detect the motion of the Earth using starlight and confirms the results of the M&M experiment, the argument was that the stellar aberration was explained by special relativity and the lack of aether.
This is conclusive proof the Earth is motionless.