I'm just going to leave this here..
ZANE - Money for NASA on Flat Earth -- https://youtu.be/onbEQ-9_RKc
Topic: Flat Earth - page 48. (Read 1095196 times)
@odolvlobo,
The human eye has an angular resolution limit of about 1 minute, this equates to being able to see a 1 foot object at a maximum distance of 1/2 Nautical Miles before it's too small to be resolved. If a zoom lens is employed the resolution limit will be less than 1 minute and the distance a 1 foot object can be seen will be extended far beyond the 1/2 NM limit of the human eye.
This shows that a zoom lens or telescope does in fact extend the range of the eye by changing the angular resolution limit. Your point about being able to view celestial objects with the naked eye and magnification is completely non-sequitur.
The human eye has an angular resolution limit of about 1 minute, this equates to being able to see a 1 foot object at a maximum distance of 1/2 Nautical Miles before it's too small to be resolved. If a zoom lens is employed the resolution limit will be less than 1 minute and the distance a 1 foot object can be seen will be extended far beyond the 1/2 NM limit of the human eye.
This shows that a zoom lens or telescope does in fact extend the range of the eye by changing the angular resolution limit. Your point about being able to view celestial objects with the naked eye and magnification is completely non-sequitur.
Totally why one can't determine the distance, with the unaided eye, of things that are light years away. Totally why we need precision instruments and trig to at least give us an idea of how far away those things are. Distance of a light year = approx. 5,865,700,000,000 miles. Distance to Alpha Centauri, next nearest star besides the sun = approx. 4.37 light years.
Imagine they running in area 51 and all they find are some flat earth posters. #get the truth out !
@odolvlobo,
The human eye has an angular resolution limit of about 1 minute, this equates to being able to see a 1 foot object at a maximum distance of 1/2 Nautical Miles before it's too small to be resolved. If a zoom lens is employed the resolution limit will be less than 1 minute and the distance a 1 foot object can be seen will be extended far beyond the 1/2 NM limit of the human eye.
This shows that a zoom lens or telescope does in fact extend the range of the eye by changing the angular resolution limit. Your point about being able to view celestial objects with the naked eye and magnification is completely non-sequitur.
The human eye has an angular resolution limit of about 1 minute, this equates to being able to see a 1 foot object at a maximum distance of 1/2 Nautical Miles before it's too small to be resolved. If a zoom lens is employed the resolution limit will be less than 1 minute and the distance a 1 foot object can be seen will be extended far beyond the 1/2 NM limit of the human eye.
This shows that a zoom lens or telescope does in fact extend the range of the eye by changing the angular resolution limit. Your point about being able to view celestial objects with the naked eye and magnification is completely non-sequitur.
However, a simple telescope extends the range of the eye, and shows us how wrong you are.
A telescope doesn't actually extend the range of the eye -- you can see other galaxies without a telescope. I think that some people are confused about that. A telescope is really just a magnifying glass designed for longer distances.
When you point a telescope at the ground, you can't generally see other galaxies through it.
What you CAN see through a telescope much clearer than with the eye alone, is a ship going over the horizon. No FE.
However, a simple telescope extends the range of the eye, and shows us how wrong you are.
A telescope doesn't actually extend the range of the eye -- you can see other galaxies without a telescope. I think that some people are confused about that. A telescope is really just a magnifying glass designed for longer distances.
@ rjbtc2017,
There's no bloody "balanced take" from the fake news MSM, it's the 1% who own the media perpetrating various criminal conspiracies against the masses.
I'm aware of the Netflix documentary and they edited the shit out of the clips of Bob and Jeran to make them look stupid, that's not "balanced" it's a fucking hit piece you schmuck!
There's no bloody "balanced take" from the fake news MSM, it's the 1% who own the media perpetrating various criminal conspiracies against the masses.
I'm aware of the Netflix documentary and they edited the shit out of the clips of Bob and Jeran to make them look stupid, that's not "balanced" it's a fucking hit piece you schmuck!
Any person who wonder if the earth is actually round can find a lot of information on internet
@rjbtc2017,
If the video you're watching isn't made by an independent flat earth researcher or, the user posting the link abuses the use of emojis then it's just going to be propaganda trash, no exceptions.
Globalist retards just can't not spam emojis to death, that's a fact. I bet you're posting on a mac too.
If the video you're watching isn't made by an independent flat earth researcher or, the user posting the link abuses the use of emojis then it's just going to be propaganda trash, no exceptions.
Globalist retards just can't not spam emojis to death, that's a fact. I bet you're posting on a mac too.
It was a balanced take, for both Flat Earth Believers and Non-Believers. You should watch it, You should not avoid the documentary and judge it without even watching and understanding it.
Wrong, I'm not using Mac.
Some people have passed beyond the believing stage to the knowing stage.
Every FE point is based on incomplete info to prove FE.
@rjbtc2017,
If the video you're watching isn't made by an independent flat earth researcher or, the user posting the link abuses the use of emojis then it's just going to be propaganda trash, no exceptions.
Globalist retards just can't not spam emojis to death, that's a fact. I bet you're posting on a mac too.
If the video you're watching isn't made by an independent flat earth researcher or, the user posting the link abuses the use of emojis then it's just going to be propaganda trash, no exceptions.
Globalist retards just can't not spam emojis to death, that's a fact. I bet you're posting on a mac too.
It was a balanced take, for both Flat Earth Believers and Non-Believers. You should watch it, You should not avoid the documentary and judge it without even watching and understanding it.
Wrong, I'm not using Mac.
Ships disappearing up, over and behind curved water is the go-to proof for the globe. However as soon it's shown, and it can be shown beyond a reasonable doubt, that a ship actually disappears due to the angular resolution limit of the eye it's all over. Ships get optically compressed bottom up and vanish (atmospheric refraction not withstanding). The globe is busted, its prediction falsified.
The globe is a lie and a criminal conspiracy.
The globe is a lie and a criminal conspiracy.
However, a simple telescope extends the range of the eye, and shows us how wrong you are.
Ships disappearing up, over and behind curved water is the go-to proof for the globe. However as soon it's shown, and it can be shown beyond a reasonable doubt, that a ship actually disappears due to the angular resolution limit of the eye it's all over. Ships get optically compressed bottom up and vanish (atmospheric refraction not withstanding). The globe is busted, its prediction falsified.
The globe is a lie and a criminal conspiracy.
The globe is a lie and a criminal conspiracy.
There are no valid arguments left, it's flat.
Sure it is.
There are no valid arguments left, it's flat.
Hey batty, don't disappear like that man, you got me worried that you found out the Earth is round ffs.
Ya know, like your balls. Or are they flat are they? I hope not.
Solid argument.
Ya know, like your balls. Or are they flat are they? I hope not.
Solid argument.
@rjbtc2017,
If the video you're watching isn't made by an independent flat earth researcher or, the user posting the link abuses the use of emojis then it's just going to be propaganda trash, no exceptions.
Globalist retards just can't not spam emojis to death, that's a fact. I bet you're posting on a mac too.
If the video you're watching isn't made by an independent flat earth researcher or, the user posting the link abuses the use of emojis then it's just going to be propaganda trash, no exceptions.
Globalist retards just can't not spam emojis to death, that's a fact. I bet you're posting on a mac too.
Einstein would be proud of you guys.
Have you guys watched this documentary about flat earth? https://www.netflix.com/title/81015076 , Give it a try , especially for the Flat Earthers, this is for you all. 
@notbatman, @exemplaar, et.al,
What do you think of this?
I imagine you will say it is a fabrication because not only is the distance around the edge more like 32,000 nm, but there is no way that a small sailboat could go 32,000 nm distance in only 196 days.
What do you think of this?
Saildrone is first to circumnavigate Antarctica, in search for carbon dioxide
It was an audacious idea: To send an unmanned saildrone on a 13,670-nautical-mile journey around Antarctica alone, ...
...
The 196-day voyage was the world's first autonomous circumnavigation of Antarctica—a technological feat that was unfathomable just a decade ago.
It was an audacious idea: To send an unmanned saildrone on a 13,670-nautical-mile journey around Antarctica alone, ...
...
The 196-day voyage was the world's first autonomous circumnavigation of Antarctica—a technological feat that was unfathomable just a decade ago.
I imagine you will say it is a fabrication because not only is the distance around the edge more like 32,000 nm, but there is no way that a small sailboat could go 32,000 nm distance in only 196 days.
Of course it will be a fabrication. A cartoon with nonexistent path. As of now only The Lord knows what kind of fakery they are preparing and where the "event" will really occur.
In the spinning ball earth model antarctica is an ice continent which covers the bottom of the ball from 78 degrees south latitude to 90 and is therefore not more than 12000 miles in circumference.
Many early explorers includes James Cook and James Clark Ross however in attempting antarctic circumnavigation took 3 to 4 years and clocked 50-60000 miles around.
The british ship challenger also made an indirect but complete circumnavigation of antarctica traversing 69000 miles. This is entirely inconsistent with the spinning ball earth model.
bonus:
But don't worry bobo, for the time will come even for that fakery to be exposed.
Devil must play by the rules - https://biblehub.com/luke/8-17.htm
Meanwhile research biblical cosmology-flat earth!
Devil wants to play by the rules in this life. Why? Because in this life they are stacked in his favor. He KNOWS that acting out of faith gets results. People barely have that kind of faith. So, he tells people the earth is flat, and makes many of them believe it because he understands how faith works.
The way out is to believe that Jesus forgives even when you mistakenly think the earth is flat. How does that work? All mistakes are forgiven when someone places his faith in Jesus salvation. So, if you have faith in Jesus, I can call you brother, even if you think the earth is flat.
Why doesn't flat or globe earth matter with Jesus salvation? Because this whole universe will be destroyed, and there will be a new universe. Saved people will go to the new universe, and nobody knows how much of the kind of physics we have here will be found in the new universe. So, nobody knows if that universe will have a GE or FE. It doesn't matter here. We will know there... except if we don't make it there... and then nothing will matter.
@notbatman, @exemplaar, et.al,
What do you think of this?
I imagine you will say it is a fabrication because not only is the distance around the edge more like 32,000 nm, but there is no way that a small sailboat could go 32,000 nm distance in only 196 days.
What do you think of this?
Saildrone is first to circumnavigate Antarctica, in search for carbon dioxide
It was an audacious idea: To send an unmanned saildrone on a 13,670-nautical-mile journey around Antarctica alone, ...
...
The 196-day voyage was the world's first autonomous circumnavigation of Antarctica—a technological feat that was unfathomable just a decade ago.
It was an audacious idea: To send an unmanned saildrone on a 13,670-nautical-mile journey around Antarctica alone, ...
...
The 196-day voyage was the world's first autonomous circumnavigation of Antarctica—a technological feat that was unfathomable just a decade ago.
I imagine you will say it is a fabrication because not only is the distance around the edge more like 32,000 nm, but there is no way that a small sailboat could go 32,000 nm distance in only 196 days.
Of course it will be a fabrication. A cartoon with nonexistent path. As of now only The Lord knows what kind of fakery they are preparing and where the "event" will really occur.
In the spinning ball earth model antarctica is an ice continent which covers the bottom of the ball from 78 degrees south latitude to 90 and is therefore not more than 12000 miles in circumference.
Many early explorers includes James Cook and James Clark Ross however in attempting antarctic circumnavigation took 3 to 4 years and clocked 50-60000 miles around.
The british ship challenger also made an indirect but complete circumnavigation of antarctica traversing 69000 miles. This is entirely inconsistent with the spinning ball earth model.
bonus:
But don't worry bobo, for the time will come even for that fakery to be exposed.
Devil must play by the rules - https://biblehub.com/luke/8-17.htm
Meanwhile research biblical cosmology-flat earth!
Jump to: