Flat Earth - page 51. | Bitcointalksearch.org

Filos

jr. member

Activity: 34

Merit: 1

There is a plethora of evidence that we have been to space. And not just NASA ofc.

Beyond the GPS that anyone can use with the right equipment, there are topographic satellites for example that are used to find mineral resources. Every flattard is using those in his everyday life.

But they are not smart enough to wonder how can someone find hydrocarbons in the middle of the frakin ocean. Ofc satellites are not the only equipment used. But they are pretty important as a guide.

A great example is jason 3 that uses altimetric data to modelize ocean topography variations. The altitude of sea surface help us determine the density of underlying formations..

Only a total retard would think we haven't been to space by now, two thousand frakin nineteen..

Quote from: XCASH on August 04, 2019, 06:42:14 PM

Notbatman thinks they have never been to space. He also posts in the fake moon landing thread.

Sooo yeah, ok. An argument can become much more idiotic than i thought..

XCASH

legendary

Activity: 929

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Filos on August 04, 2019, 02:28:00 PM

Do you people think that by proving that NASA's images are digitally processed you prove that the earth is flat? I mean wtf how much more idiotic can an argument get?

You think they go to space and take images with an iphone or a simple camera? get real guys...

Notbatman thinks they have never been to space. He also posts in the fake moon landing thread.

Filos

jr. member

Activity: 34

Merit: 1

I would not suggest to any flattard to see the following video. They would not be able to understand it.

Anyhow pretty interesting. (another simple way to prove that the earth is not flat...) Add it to my list above.(prev page)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYZ-Ab9-WHI

Cryptotourist

hero member

Activity: 1190

Merit: 755

Homo Sapiens Bitcoinerthalensis

My favorite:

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: lightlord on August 04, 2019, 03:38:23 PM

Quote from: Cryptotourist on August 04, 2019, 03:10:14 PM

Has this been posted?

Batty?

All evidence of a 3D brain is manipulated by the government, MRI scanners pictures are altered by a secret software, And there is a flat brain inside our skulls with a dome around it. Cheesy

But it's the Eskimos who have an ice-ring around the outer edges.

Grin

lightlord

donator

Activity: 3228

Merit: 1226

★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!

Quote from: Cryptotourist on August 04, 2019, 03:10:14 PM

Has this been posted?

Batty?

All evidence of a 3D brain is manipulated by the government, MRI scanners pictures are altered by a secret software, And there is a flat brain inside our skulls with a dome around it. Cheesy

Cryptotourist

hero member

Activity: 1190

Merit: 755

Homo Sapiens Bitcoinerthalensis

Has this been posted?

Batty?

Filos

jr. member

Activity: 34

Merit: 1

Ofc NASA's images have digital processing.. :facepalm:

Do you people think that by proving that NASA's images are digitally processed you prove that the earth is flat? I mean wtf how much more idiotic can an argument get?

You think they go to space and take images with an iphone or a simple camera? get real guys...

Anyone can check out raw images from NASA here for example: https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/raw-images/raw-image-viewer/?order=earth_date+desc&per_page=50&page=0

But that's not appealing to the average joe... so yeah

Astargath

hero member

Activity: 1624

Merit: 645

Quote from: notbatman on August 04, 2019, 07:03:27 AM

^^^ While primarily intended to highlight issues with JPEG compressed images, the ELA is still useful in highlighting issues in a .PNG format image hence the ability of the application to load that format.

Quote

...
In August 2007, Dr. Neal Krawetz gave a presentation at the Black Hat Briefings computer security conference. The presentation, titled "A Picture's Worth", covered a handful of novel photo analysis algorithms. (A video of the presentation is available from iTunes, search for "Krawetz". The associated white paper and slides are available online.) Using these algorithms, researchers can determine if a picture is real or computer graphics, if it was modified, and even how it was modified. Dr. Krawetz gave variations of this presentation at different conferences between 2007 and 2010.
...
Source: http://fotoforensics.com/faq.php

Here's the white paper: https://blackhat.com/presentations/bh-dc-08/Krawetz/Whitepaper/bh-dc-08-krawetz-WP.pdf | archive.org

Here's more from the tutorial:

Quote

...
Look around the picture and identify the different high-contrast edges, low-contrast edges, surfaces, and textures. Compare those areas with the ELA results. If there are significant differences, then it identifies suspicious areas that may have been digitally altered.
...

Source: http://fotoforensics.com/tutorial-ela.php

In this case the ELA highlights the inconstant background noise behind the stars and other issues.

While my use of the fotoforensics software and analysis of the NASA provided image thereof is far from conclusive, there's a preponderance of evidence of fraud with NASA and their claims. This being the case the chances that the provided image is authentic approaches zero.

What I mean by "fixed them" is they've anticipated my use of fotoforensics and modified the images accordingly so as not to highlight any inconsistencies. What they didn't anticipate is me pulling a frame from their little video.

So you are analyzing a 'photo' that is actually a frame from a video, LOL

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

^^^ While primarily intended to highlight issues with JPEG compressed images, the ELA is still useful in highlighting issues in a .PNG format image hence the ability of the application to load that format.

Quote

...
In August 2007, Dr. Neal Krawetz gave a presentation at the Black Hat Briefings computer security conference. The presentation, titled "A Picture's Worth", covered a handful of novel photo analysis algorithms. (A video of the presentation is available from iTunes, search for "Krawetz". The associated white paper and slides are available online.) Using these algorithms, researchers can determine if a picture is real or computer graphics, if it was modified, and even how it was modified. Dr. Krawetz gave variations of this presentation at different conferences between 2007 and 2010.
...
Source: http://fotoforensics.com/faq.php

Here's the white paper: https://blackhat.com/presentations/bh-dc-08/Krawetz/Whitepaper/bh-dc-08-krawetz-WP.pdf | archive.org

Here's more from the tutorial:

Quote

...
Look around the picture and identify the different high-contrast edges, low-contrast edges, surfaces, and textures. Compare those areas with the ELA results. If there are significant differences, then it identifies suspicious areas that may have been digitally altered.
...

Source: http://fotoforensics.com/tutorial-ela.php

In this case the ELA highlights the inconstant background noise behind the stars and other issues.

While my use of the fotoforensics software and analysis of the NASA provided image thereof is far from conclusive, there's a preponderance of evidence of fraud with NASA and their claims. This being the case the chances that the provided image is authentic approaches zero.

What I mean by "fixed them" is they've anticipated my use of fotoforensics and modified the images accordingly so as not to highlight any inconsistencies. What they didn't anticipate is me pulling a frame from their little video.

odolvlobo

legendary

Activity: 4466

Merit: 3391

Quote from: notbatman on August 04, 2019, 12:47:53 AM

^^^ Do you honestly think that's a real photograph? Alarm bells should be going off looking at that...

You can see where the layer the stars are on is, the background noise highlighted by the ELA is inconsistent. I tried analyzing the full size jpeg images but they've fixed them so the analysis is useless. However the frame from the animation still has enough information to show it's a fraudulent composite image.

Real or not, you can't use ELA on that image because it is not a JPEG.

What do you mean "they've fixed them"? Are you saying that your analysis of the JPEGs shows that they have not been manipulated?

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

^^^ Do you honestly think that's a real photograph? Alarm bells should be going off looking at that...

You can see where the layer the stars are on is, the background noise highlighted by the ELA is inconsistent. I tried analyzing the full size jpeg images but they've fixed them so the analysis is useless. However the frame from the animation still has enough information to show it's a fraudulent composite image.

odolvlobo

legendary

Activity: 4466

Merit: 3391

Quote from: notbatman on July 29, 2019, 02:32:59 PM

^^^ [frame 0] CGI image confirmed:
http://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=8ca8c9967563c41cbb03002b4ae85f13b1c99166.47527&show=ela -- http://archive.is/kB3GV

Unfortunately, ELA is designed for JPEG images and the one you analyzed is a PNG, so I don't think any interpretation of the results is valid.

Quote from: http://fotoforensics.com/tutorial-ela.php

ELA highlights differences in the JPEG compression rate. ...

Maileynonac

newbie

Activity: 24

Merit: 0

Vsause made a great video about this many years ago

sirazimuth

legendary

Activity: 3388

Merit: 3514

born once atheist

Quote from: ?? on ??

is theory is really confusing because in my school days I will think only the Earth is round and sphere in shape but right now this theory is really giving me the doubt about how education is which is right

Say what?? You're actually telling me that you're confused because some obsessive trolling FE buffoon has a retarded 4 year thread on bitcointalk claiming the earth is a pancake?
You might need to get out more.

So how's that post count/merit harvesting working out for you?

Cryptotourist

hero member

Activity: 1190

Merit: 755

Homo Sapiens Bitcoinerthalensis

Quote from: Filos on August 02, 2019, 07:56:21 AM

I wouldn't expect to persuade a flathead

You can't really, batty is a brilliant example. Grin

Filos

jr. member

Activity: 34

Merit: 1

So let me get this straight. You would expect to see the curvature in a picture like that? loool

Do you even understand the scale? (top tip scale is not an angle xDDD ) or Perspective of projection? (google that, since you didn't catch it at school).

Do you even comprehend that they have to include the curvature in the equations to build a bridge like that?
Darn, this is like stealing candy from a toddler.

Anyone can research everything i posted.

I wouldn't expect to persuade a flathead... I wish you the best man.

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

Filos is so stupid and BADecker so intellectually dishonest, it hurts.

I can only imagine the horrific pain Filos experiences when viewing the above image. The concept that the vanishing point, his eye height and the ground could actually form a triangle must be tearing him apart inside...

Imagine the poor SOB in a tunnel so long that he couldn't see the light at the end, he'd start balling up.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Right. Eye height doesn't have anything to do with how far the eye can see. With a telescope the eye can see much farther no matter the height. The point is the clarity of what is being seen as it goes over the horizon.

We have all kinds of pictures of stuff going over the horizon. My thought is that people who take pictures of ships going over the horizon generally don't CGI their pictures. This has been going on for years where people have been watching and photographing things going over the horizon.

Now we have FE people all of a sudden talking about CGI, and bringing in pictures that show that there isn't any horizon to go over... that horizon means something else that's different than what we have seen for several hundred years.

So, it is my judgment that the CGI stuff is being done by the FE people, since nobody else sees what they see.

It's like they (FE people) were preparing for war, but nobody else (GE people) got ready, because nobody else knew they were preparing for war. Then they dump the war on us, and it's taking us a while to even realize that they are serious.

Cool

Filos

jr. member

Activity: 34

Merit: 1

Keep cursing at me mate.

feels good

Eye Height is not an angle... lol

Nice, standing on the only thing you can barely understand.. cheers

Topic: Flat Earth - page 51. (Read 1095196 times)