Author

Topic: Flat Earth - page 614. (Read 1095196 times)

hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
February 18, 2017, 10:25:22 AM
So you think stuff that falls because there is gravity do you? LOL  

What you call gravity is just density...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gg2URbkJo18

Wow flat earthers are weird bunch of people. Density is what it is a density. How can you define property of thing as a force? How do you explain the fact that there is gravitational acceleration?

You people are really uneducated arent you?

I dont say that gravity is what Newton have called it but at least on earth its a fact that there is a gravitational acceleration. Gravity or what we call of it is just an acceleration caused by inertia. You can say anything about density but it has nothing to do with any acceleration does it?

There so many people that doesnt know shit about anything that they need to invent things that was already invented. How fucking stupid are they. Gravitational acceleration is a fact. You cant deny it unless you are some weird alterright american from India like the guy from the video. You can actualy argue if gravitational acceleration is constant or not and if its magnetic, electric or based on a mass but dont make ignorant out of yourself.

Do you guys really think that you explore the america by finding that helium goes upward? wow. I mean.... wow its so... weird.

But yes you make one thing right. The gravity is based on a difference of pressures - a magnetic pressures imho. But there is still a force involved otherwise there wouldnt be any acceleration.

Newton actualy had said he doesnt have any idea why gravity works so dont say like he knew everything. He and Galileo observed few things here and there and some of those things are irrefutable.

So how does tides are created? Do you seriously think that the disc of the earth just float in the endless waters, then im speachless. Why dont we have a sea sickness if we are one giant boat in the middle of some stupid shit piehole.




How can you explain something just to have a lot more questions like - WTF ARE THOSE waters? and such. You make simple things way more complicated and you are happy you answered what are the tides. No fuckhead - you have made things more complicated not less.

Dont tell me its written somewhere in the bible. Because its not. The only mentioning of waters are the Earth waters and heaven waters. I guess that the heaven is not below the earth does it? You cant even read Bible with understanding not to mention sixth grade schoolbook.

Quote

Seriously after 6 minutes in this vidoe the guy is telling about the mountains that pulls the nails out of the ships and is not strong enough or at least blind the sailors. MIRACLE! Or some heavy lsd trips there. You flat earthers have fun partying dont you? Its soooooo unfactual.
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 517
February 18, 2017, 10:01:17 AM
Even Newton didn't think his theory of gravity added up when trying to explain the tides...  Funny how gravity is selective about which waters it affects causing the tidal affect and that there is such great variance in the tides... Maybe the gravitational "LAW" isn't universal?  Maybe there are gravitational boundaries like national boundaries that regulate gravity!  Roll Eyes LOL  Again it is all pure lunacy.... Get it LUNACY! ROFL

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZgyV5Pgrdmo
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 517
February 18, 2017, 09:40:26 AM
So you think stuff that falls because there is gravity do you? LOL 

What you call gravity is just density...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gg2URbkJo18
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
February 18, 2017, 09:11:24 AM
It's not just that heliocentrism is bad science it's a lie crafted by psychopaths as part of a massive conspiracy of faggots spanning generations.

Bundles-of-Sticks are non-sentient. Your entire argument is invalid.

Like anything the queers at Vice print has any value (notice that Bob, a degenerate himself is ahead of the curve and has omitted any reference to the Vice article. +1 good goy points for you Bob!), they're probably defrauding their advertisers with fake clicks for fake news like the rest of the MSM.

You don't think being a degenerate has any bearing on the honesty and integrity of the material a media outlet produces? If Vice wants to be facetious with their Flat Earth comments then I'm going to call them out for being the faggot kikes they are.

IMO I'm making a valid point by linking degeneracy with a lack of honesty and integrity in reporting the news.
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 517
February 18, 2017, 08:57:02 AM


Quote from: VICE
I'm still not sure what psychological purpose being a flat-earth truther fulfills

What psychological purpose does knowing the truth about where you live serve?


Bad Slave

It serves to free your mind from 500 years of bullshit lies. It's not just that heliocentrism is bad science it's a lie crafted by psychopaths as part of a massive conspiracy of faggots spanning generations.

Once you figured out we live a locker at a bus station it is amazing how your perspective changes.  Now about 90% of the nonsense that is broadcast as news becomes obvious what the purpose is, to manipulate people and keep the slaves under control.  

You soon begin to realize that about 90% of the scientism(masquerading as science) stuff are theories to try and make sense of the lies that were told and the stories only get more ridiculous as the stories have to get wilder to explain the obvious.  

So many seemingly intelligent people have no idea what is going on and it is sad that the whole world believes the lies and stories of these psychopaths that enslave the earth.  

Once you discover the earth isn't what we were told you then question EVERYTHING, and find out most of it is BS.  So for those asking how does it affect you to know the nature of the earth... Well try it and find out.  It is one of the most profound things imaginable.  

So how does it affect you to know the nature of the place where we live.
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
February 18, 2017, 02:35:57 AM

Neither the earth appearing flat when standing on the surface or convex when viewed from a distance are illusions; they're simply different points of perspective.

No. The earth is REALLY appearing flat the way it should not appear in globe earth. There is NO curvature . Nada, nothing, zero. Its not a matter of perspective. The curvature is observable only at a very high altitude. When you see no curvature at 10 miles high you can be sure something is wrong with the globe model. Thats an empirical fact, you can ignore it, you can put pictures from higher altitude. That does not make a difference that at that relativly low altitudes you see a shit not a curvature.

That ofcourse does not mean that the earth is flat. That means that you can have two witnesses that tell the truth what they see and both contradicts themselfs. You can say that there is a conspiracy like flat earthers do, or you can say that flat earthers are crazy. You dismiss one witness and problem is solved.

What if both are right and there is no conspiracy and flat earthers are not crazy? Its illogical to happen, so the answer is that both are wrong if both are right, thats the only logical solution. Thats the paradox of illusion. They dont lie about the facts but the facts are misleading, and there is a third deductive fact that can be deduced from the reasoning how that illusion works. Its common in science that inductive facts can form deductive fact if they are contradictory.
sr. member
Activity: 337
Merit: 258
February 18, 2017, 02:12:49 AM
Dont you people think its all illusion as the shape of the earth looks like its flat and in the upper atmosphere it looks like its convex? Dont you think the only logical conclusion is that both of them are an illusion? The only logical conclusion that both of them are illusions.

From a logical point of view and every detective would tell you that, if you have two witnesses and both of them contradicts themselfs their cases are dismissed in favour of some other explanation because its logical to assume they are misled or misleading.

In Poland we have a proverb. When two are fighting the third is wins. In that sittuation a logical winner is the concave earth. Thats what logic says - you just dont want to admitt the defeat yet.

Youve got to love the logic when you love the truth. Most of you dont love logic because lets face it - 95% of you are a stinking liars or fools that does not know they are lying to themselfs.

In every other sittuation when you would see any item that looks different depending on the distance to it, you would not assume one of the look is true. You would assume ( if you are a sensible person) that there is something wrong with your vision.

Neither the earth appearing flat when standing on the surface or convex when viewed from a distance are illusions; they're simply different points of perspective.
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
February 18, 2017, 12:02:31 AM
Dont you people think its all illusion as the shape of the earth looks like its flat and in the upper atmosphere it looks like its convex? Dont you think the only logical conclusion is that both of them are an illusion? The only logical conclusion that both of them are illusions.

From a logical point of view and every detective would tell you that, if you have two witnesses and both of them contradicts themselfs their cases are dismissed in favour of some other explanation because its logical to assume they are misled or misleading.

In Poland we have a proverb. When two are fighting the third is wins. In that sittuation a logical winner is the concave earth. Thats what logic says - you just dont want to admitt the defeat yet.

Youve got to love the logic when you love the truth. Most of you dont love logic because lets face it - 95% of you are a stinking liars or fools that does not know they are lying to themselfs.

In every other sittuation when you would see any item that looks different depending on the distance to it, you would not assume one of the look is true. You would assume ( if you are a sensible person) that there is something wrong with your vision.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
February 17, 2017, 11:29:25 PM

Quote from: VICE
I'm still not sure what psychological purpose being a flat-earth truther fulfills

What psychological purpose does knowing the truth about where you live serve?


Bad Slave

It serves to free your mind from 500 years of bullshit lies. It's not just that heliocentrism is bad science it's a lie crafted by psychopaths as part of a massive conspiracy of faggots spanning generations.
sr. member
Activity: 337
Merit: 258
February 17, 2017, 09:02:10 PM
So you think you live on a ball?  Nice intro to Jeranism's Youtube channel...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7I4Im93dzWA

Nope, I know I live on a sphere, or more accurately, an oblate spheroid...enough said.
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 517
February 17, 2017, 08:23:17 PM
Very cool music video:
Eratosthenes Was Wrong - Cover of the Chris Wrock Original

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhVGrjoFjhc
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 517
February 17, 2017, 08:12:22 PM
So you think you live on a ball?  Nice intro to Jeranism's Youtube channel...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7I4Im93dzWA
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
February 17, 2017, 06:15:25 PM
Even people with money understand that the earth is a globe:


The Globalists Strike Back With A Major Push Toward A Cashless Society






Last May we learned that the 500 euro note is being completely eliminated, and just a few weeks ago the European Commission released a new "Action Plan" which instructs member states to explore "potential upper limits to cash payments".  In the name of "fighting terrorism", this "Action Plan" discusses the benefits of "prohibitions for cash payments above a specific threshold" and it says that those prohibitions should include "virtual currencies (such as BitCoin) and prepaid instruments (such as pre-paid credit cards) when they are used anonymously."

This new document does not mention what an appropriate threshold would be for member states, but we do know that Spain already bans certain cash transactions above 2,500 euros, and Italy and France already ban cash transactions above 1,000 euros.

This is a perfect way to transition to a cashless society without creating too much of an uproar.  By setting a maximum legal level for cash transactions and slowly lowering it, in effect you can slowly but surely phase cash out without people understanding what is happening.


Read more at http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/the-globalists-strike-back-with-a-major-push-toward-a-cashless-society.


Cool
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1005
My mule don't like people laughing
February 17, 2017, 04:14:43 PM
Very interesting observations showing offshore rigs out over 9 miles off the coast of CA.  This is pretty good.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vP7lyAKNpj4

Yes this proves that curvature is working. Since its about 8 inches for 1 mile then 9.41 miles = 6.27 feet

Using this image I took from the video you posted we can all see that about 6 feet of the platform habitat cannot be seen. In other words it is obscured by the horizon due to the curvature of the earth.


legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
February 17, 2017, 03:37:08 PM


...
But it isn't a scattered-light void we see. Rather, we see off into space. FE science is way off base.
...

You need to shave those eyebrows, they're limiting your view of the night sky!

You know I bet if I did the math I'd find that a really distant star according to the heliocentric conspiracy could have an apparent visual size with a diameter less than the Planck length. At the very least your average visible star would have a diameter of less than 750 nm i.e. the lowest wavelength the eye can see.

Stars are close, less than 3,000 miles above us.


Guess what? The math has been done many times over. And the distance is so great that there is really no way to tell through standard triangulation how far away the stars are.

Oh, that's right. There is FE math that is different than standard math.

What funny farm are you in again?

Cool
sr. member
Activity: 417
Merit: 253
I hate everyone, equally.
February 17, 2017, 03:32:58 PM

I know the stars are close, but I don't know about "less than 3000 miles".  But the point is the same.  The stars are close, the sun and the moon are close.  The height and nature of this enclosed system is unknown other than what few glimpses we have of historical info, folk lore, and biblical accounts.  If anyone else actually knows more than that it appears they sure are not sharing the info.

Nobody knows how far this plane we live on extends, or if there are other areas like the known inhabited area we are in exists.  Admiral Bird seemed to indicate he had seen other areas.  Who knows if he had any particular reason to tell such a story, but it is out there for everyone to chew on.   

Here is some fun stuff, Globe Earth "Street interviews"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4qRexQDqv14




 Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 517
February 17, 2017, 02:11:44 PM


...
But it isn't a scattered-light void we see. Rather, we see off into space. FE science is way off base.
...

You need to shave those eyebrows, they're limiting your view of the night sky!

You know I bet if I did the math I'd find that a really distant star according to the heliocentric conspiracy could have an apparent visual size with a diameter less than the Planck length. At the very least your average visible star would have a diameter of less than 750 nm i.e. the lowest wavelength the eye can see.

Stars are close, less than 3,000 miles above us.


I know the stars are close, but I don't know about "less than 3000 miles".  But the point is the same.  The stars are close, the sun and the moon are close.  The height and nature of this enclosed system is unknown other than what few glimpses we have of historical info, folk lore, and biblical accounts.  If anyone else actually knows more than that it appears they sure are not sharing the info.

Nobody knows how far this plane we live on extends, or if there are other areas like the known inhabited area we are in exists.  Admiral Bird seemed to indicate he had seen other areas.  Who knows if he had any particular reason to tell such a story, but it is out there for everyone to chew on.   

Here is some fun stuff, Globe Earth "Street interviews"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4qRexQDqv14
sr. member
Activity: 417
Merit: 253
I hate everyone, equally.
February 17, 2017, 01:27:53 PM


 Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
February 17, 2017, 12:03:44 PM


...
But it isn't a scattered-light void we see. Rather, we see off into space. FE science is way off base.
...

You need to shave those eyebrows, they're limiting your view of the night sky!

You know I bet if I did the math I'd find that a really distant star according to the heliocentric conspiracy could have an apparent visual size with a diameter less than the Planck length. At the very least your average visible star would have a diameter of less than 750 nm i.e. the lowest wavelength the eye can see.

Stars are close, less than 3,000 miles above us.
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
February 17, 2017, 09:38:03 AM
Very interesting observations showing offshore rigs out over 9 miles off the coast of CA.  This is pretty good.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vP7lyAKNpj4

Of greater importance that proving globe earth is the chemtrail "dust" in the atmosphere.

Cool
Jump to: