Topic: Flat Earth - page 611. (Read 1095196 times)

How so? There is a different moisture of the atmosphere and different density of the atmosphere relativly to the altitude and the weather. Hows so the gravitational acceleration is constant? And how so that the more you go below the sea level you have a higher pressure of water.

Please. Save your breath. You cant just invent empirical facts a new, you need to interpret them, otherwise you create your own realities.

Other than that the same concept of creating a force from the get go is unscientific as hell and proves your physical knowledge is low. Force is not something that is being created by action, to the contrary. If we would live in a Flat world we would be surrounded by a perpetum mobile devices of the unlimited energy that would be absolutely free. If only that would be possible. */activate a dream mode. Sell me your patent dear notbatman sir.

And if its a repulse for of the higher density objects by the lower density objects, then why is the repulsion always directed downwards? The only answer is because there is some kind of force (or "antiforce" directed upwards) working downwards other than repulsion. Its so fucking simple why cant you get it?

Btw is it just me or the concept of repulsion of higher density objects by lower density object seems counterfactual? Shouldnt that be the other way around?

It's the density of the medium that's responsible for the magnitude of the acceleration of an object, that's why objects of different densities fall at the same speed.

So if the force that is being created is due to the density of an object relative to the medium it displaces, why do objects dropped from a height in air all accelerate at the same speed towards the Earth? If your model was correct, objects of higher density would create a greater force and consequently fall faster, this is not observable by anyone, anywhere on Earth.

Electromagnetism plays a role.  I think you touched upon it when talking about the positive and negative charges.  Interesting how we take the "observable, testable, reproducible" natural sciences and pervert them into the "mythical, un-explainable, fiction" and anyone who questions that is how things work are just "science deniers"....  It is really pretty sad.

If anything the knowledge of the flat earth and the doors that opens should give research a boost into the areas that were really the realm of Tesla and a greater emphasis on how the earth really works.  It is pretty clear that the earth is an engineering marvel and it is incredibly complex.  So much to learn! 

When air or any medium is displaced by an object there's a resulting force based on its density relative to that medium. If the object is less dense such as a helium balloon it rises or floats and if it's more dense like a led ball than it falls or sinks. The force that holds you to the Earth is air or water pressure.

The end of the Flat Earth.

Terminator 2 T1000 death

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLkm5XFX3C4

And still you fail to understand that density is not a force.

Density can't act on an object, it is just a measurement of an object's mass/volume, some outside force must act on the object in order for it to move, in any direction.

So, in your world of a flat Earth, what is the force that acts on all objects that hold them to the Earth?

Ill quote someone on from this thread some pages ago.

"Science motherfuckers. Do you speak it? "

As of yet I saw NO PROPER SCIENCE presented by flat earthers outside of rockets not working in the vacuum and being unlikely that earth rotates and airplanes moves unhindred. You have a lack of knowledge of observable facts about light, gravity, perspective, geometry, trigonometry and much much much more. Present one sentence that is valid and maybe someone might want to talk to you.

All you do is mentioning that someone is not legit. Ok maybe they are not. Present your position that is not internaly incoherent, because as of yet you just constantly contradict yourself. You might be perceptive a little but that doesnt make you speak science.

You show a love for science fiction.   

"So far you haven't shown any love for Science."


Best regards.

So far, every FE thing said has so many holes in it, that if it were Swiss cheese, a mouse wouldn't find enough food to stay alive.

I dont want to burst your bubble but the guy that says what is observable according to the topic is not what you would call a troll. You torture the language so much that its becoming pointless to point you that you do that.

Make some flat earth dictionary will you?

for example

a troll according to flat earth dictionary is:

1. Someone who talk to me.
2. Someone who argue with me without fully agreeing with my point of view.
3. Someone who makes me feel uncomfortable.
4. Someone who does believe the official version of values.

There is a reason I don't respond to the trolls... I already hit ignore on most of them and all their posts are blocked so I never see them until someone not blocked quotes them...

I personally am only interested in those who are adding value to this topic and are really interesting in trying to understand the science and the observations.  I could care less what somone who is too lazy to go look up a gopro lense corrector on the app store.... Seriously, they bring zero value to this conversation...

"See that ship disappears hull first, it must have gone over the curve of the earth... DUH!"  I don't have any more time to waste with people who are clearly "public school educated" and have no interest in learning anything.  Leave them to their fantasies...  

And maybe look it in a VR device while somebody is pumping your cock for fun: why caring when you can have a blow job for free?!?

VR is real and maybe we are living inside it: how can you trust time if you cannot prove it by yourself?!?


Best regards.

You got another argument besides "hey look at this balloon footage taken with a GoPro wide angle lens"?



edit:

inb4 "hey look at this airplane footage from behind a curved window".


edit2:

inb4 "hey look at this Apollo 11 footage of a round window and studio set backdrop".

World's Highest Airship







World's Highest Airship

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELwvh9vLJfw


====================================


See Also ATO - Airship To Orbit PDF


Read more at http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/213058-2017-02-20-worlds-highest-airship.htm.


--------------------------------------------------------


If the earth were flat, these guys^^^ would have said something about it.

Have you been stuck away in your funny farm for so long that you don't realize that common people use the word "gravity" when they talk about whatever it is that holds us on the ground? Are you so dense that you don't realize gravity is a word describing this whatever "stuff?"

The simple definition of "gravity" from http://www.dictionary.com/browse/gravity?s=t:
Did you find anything in that definition that talks about gravity theory? In the same way, nothing in the definition talks about density.

Go ahead and believe that gravity and density are the same, if you like. But you are really dense if you think that you are doing anything other than attempting to change the language when you expect common people to understand what you are talking about.

Gravity has a connotation with gravitational acceleration that is an observable fact. You cant ignore gravitational acceleration when you speak of gravity. When you dont mention gravitational acceleration when you explain what is a phenomen of gravity you perverse the language.

Not everything in the term of gravity is bullshit and unexplainable. You might be even right when you think that its density of an item is more important than the mass itself. Density is a part of the mass phenomena. Ok Im able to believe that is the case, but there is still a phenomen of gravitational acceleration you need to explain why it exist. Or another phenomen is that you have different density of liquids on different altitudes beneath the sea level.

You NEED to explain what force is behind the acceleration. I know what that force is. Its the force of antimagnetic inertia that is an antispace (I use layman terms like I would suggest flat earthers use as well explaining gravity or dont) force that Keen Wheeler is talking about. There are some issues with it, that the forces of antimagnatic inertia as most of the things in the universe are not straight like a flat earth but all objects known in nature are curved. Mostly they are curved in the golden ratio like a fibbonaci sequence or a snails armour, so that would mean that flat earth is the only nonmade object that is naturally straight. Its quite unlikely.

If you really thinking about the experiments proving definitivly what is the shape of the earth look at this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GkINYroQtVA

This is the goedetic experiments and only geodetic experiment can prove it. Opponents were arguing that its not accurate and other bullshit, so they were told to make a counter experiment. More than hundred years have passed and globe earthers still have no geodetic proof that earth is ironfilled ball. Because it isnt so, and they cant have a geodetic proof for something nonexistant.

You might ignore the scientific experiments but dont say you wait for scientific experiments (made by real scientists checked by real scientists, observed by critiques) when you ignore the existing ones.

P.S Keen Wheeler just go one step further with the work of Eric Dollard, the modern N. Tesla in his hypothesises. Its not like he discovers america or anything like that.

And haha ofcourse Steven Christopher is not hmmm how to say... special haha. I mean I dont believe that he is, he had just made nice video about the subject. Actually this guy little piss me off because he is comparing to Jesus Christ and comparing his wisdom to the Christ wisdom is like comparing a heavy weight to a super light weight. Its not even a contest - ofcourse in favour of the Jesus wisdom.

Agreed, Absolutely ZERO reason to use the word "gravity".  It is a pathetic excuse to explain absolute BS. 

Density and buoyancy explain everything they throw this BS word around to try and explain their "theories".  Bad science is still bad science even if you create your own language and words to describe the "science fiction".     

The word "gravity" is only used when an explanation for bullshit is needed, I'm not changing anything.