Topic: Flat Earth - page 751. (Read 1095196 times)

There is no curvature, so don't know what exactly did you saw.

Can you provide us proof or evidence that can back up your claim?

Like this:
Commercial Airliner USA LAX to Frankfurt Germany 5,800 mile trip NO CURVATURE  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jB5YwfUcdWI

LAX to PHX Where is the Curvaturehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Nbg00TJqJo

There is also footage from concorde, no curvature, high altitude balloons, no curvature. Actually tons of them, all without curvature.

To much babbling in vain is coming from your mouth. Read your Bible properly to avoid that.

Oh really, smart guy. People of the earth didn't know... You silly little...whatever you are. The prophets and apostles did know and understand very well. The Word of God is Truth, not your deceptive imagination how things should be.

Here is the difference, but it is true that we don't know much.

Consider the weight at the center of the earth. This is an extremely difficult to calculate accurately. However, we know from experience that if you lower a spherical "diving bell" down into the ocean by cable from a ship, and allow it to fill up with water a couple of miles down and then seal it, that when you bring it to the surface and open it, excess water bubbles out.

This means that water is actually compressed by its own weight at only a couple of miles down. So, how much is liquid iron compressed at near 4,000 miles down - the center of the earth - with the whole weight of the earth on it from all sides? Nobody knows. Nobody can even begin to calculate the pressure. And nobody knows how magnetism acts in liquid iron under that much pressure. We have no way to measure magnetism under pressures like this.

In addition, when you calculate a 1,000 MPH spinning globe that is the size of the earth, the strength of gravity easily overcomes the centrifugal force. The size of the earth makes the twisting motion that would normally be caused by inertia to be so small that it isn't noticed.



Seismologists measure the vibration at various places on the earth. They don't know exactly what materials in the ground the vibrations caused by earthquakes must go through to get here or there. But through testing and much observation, it is easy to see that the earth is globular, just by how long it takes for earth vibrations to get from one point to another.

For example. If there is a 7.8 magnitude earthquake in Ecuador, the moment of the quake seismologists all over the world are informed by radio that the quake happened. They don't have to wait for days, wondering where those vibration on their seismographs came from.

Seismology is a reasonably exact and accurate science, and it shows us that the earth is globular, by the rate at which earthquake and volcano vibrations reach different areas on the globe, and by the inter-communication of seismologists.

interesting.... yeah... that's one way to describe it i guess lol

I'm posting here just to follow the replies you get, it's very interesting to read (most of them)

Everyone knows when you expose a magnet to extreme heat it looses its magnetism.
If you believe in the 1000 miles an hour spinning ball which apparently is very hot at its centre (forever) a magnet does not function.   


For the once how are a bit behind times, check sig for a starter.
Exciting times await. Very soon a full functional map and model will be at hand.

@ OP  lol this is interesting and funny really.    I think the best plan for me would be 2 things. First one I will book passage on a ship and take a journey across the oceans. Then I will see if at some point the whole ship tips over the egde and we all fall or slide downwards.

The other thing I will do is hire a professional hole borer that uses diamond-tip bores etc for all kinds of rocks and stuff. The borer must put a small remotely controlled camera on the tip when the time comes ie, when he feels the pressure from boring becomes significantly less - this would indicate the tip of the bore has reached the other side of earth and has gone right through. Now retract the bore and put camera on (now push through hole all the way down to other side again) so we can get a visual (if there is heaven firstly), and if indeed we see stars, then see what the heavenly formations on the other side of earth looks like!!  LOL  

 

They believe that all the airplane windows are intentionally made with a special curve built into them, so it appears that the earth is round when it is not. They think that the conspiracy of NASA goes this deep.

Also, if you happen to get some really flat windows on your plane, they will tell you it has to do with our general misconception about perspective.

----------

Have you ever received a Nigerian email? Lots of folks get hung up on the idea that they have friends over there in Africa, friends who need their money. So, they send them money.

I knew a guy like this, once. He was absolutely hung up on some woman who he had never even seen a picture of, hung up for at least months, maybe years, sent her many $thousands, and when I saw him last, was finally finding out the hard way that he had been had. I think the embarrassment was the reason he left town... couldn't face all his buddies.

We all have blind sides. Most of us can be made to see the truth by a few friends showing us where we went wrong. A few folks just can't see their mistake... usually because they are emotionally hung up on it... like a religion.

Flat-earthers have a blind spot against NASA or globular earth for some reason. It has become like a philosophy or religion in them. The handful of them that exist suggest that it is the majority of the rest of us who have the blind spot. It is difficult setting them straight without hurting their feelings, maybe in a big way.

dont waste your time.. you cant win against this kind of stupid.

  earth is not flat!

When you look outside of the window of a plane, if you are high enough, you can see the curvature of the Earth. Having seen this first hand, I think it justifies the roundness of the Earth without relying on third-party info.

The people of the earth before the telescope didn't really understand outer space. Where do the heavens start? Don't they start at the ground and spread upwards? Because of this, the heavens can be interpreted in the minds of the ancient peoples to fit everything above the ground. Just because they didn't know that the heavens extends beyond the air, doesn't mean that it doesn't. The waters above the air heavens is what they were thinking about, not the waters above the outer space heavens. However, spectroscopy of the heavens shows us that there is water at the far distant reaches of outer space.

Yet again you are completely misguided.
The firmament is solid and can't be destroyed by any natural force. This verse is after the flood, can you read, can you cope?
Psa 148:3,4  Praise ye him, sun and moon: praise him, all ye stars of light. Praise him, ye heavens of heavens, and ye waters that be above the heavens.
 
Stupid nasa was thinking that they will be able to destroy the firmament in operation fishbowl, firing nuclear missiles up to 480miles high. It is all documented you can learn for yourself.
If nasa would read the Creator's manual, they could learn that the dome can not be destroyed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkujMTSFr9o

I admire your faith. At times you express your faith to be in the things of the Bible, at least somewhat. In this religion of yours, keep on believing in Jesus salvation. It will be fun chatting in Heaven.

There's no outer-space, stars aren't great balls of fire billions of miles away. You're a moron for believing the pictures and lies NASA feeds you. If you rearrange the letters it spells SATAN (using the forked tongue as the T) for God's sake.

The water canopy that formerly covered the earth, was destroyed in the Great Flood of Noah's day. This was the starting time of the formation of C-14 in the atmosphere, because there was no water canopy protecting the earth from cosmic radiation anymore. The radiation from outer space gradually filled the earth, corrupting the DNA of people, so that people gradually had more and more genetic anomalies in their bodies. This reduce their age from hundreds of years per person to that which we see today.

The earth is not flat and never was. The stars are great monsters off in distant space, similar to what cosmologists suggest.

Fakery can not be confirmed or explained as truth, no matter how hard you try or desire in your mind.

Now go and search Nasa live earth footage, and then compare their ridiculous cgi footage to real balloon one. Search on YouTube:flat earth balloon footage. Come here and tell me if you see a ball, satellites, rotating, spinning and wobbling ball...crap.
Nasa have been exposed with fake moon landings, bubbles in space, transparent fraud astro-nots and many more fakes. Their fairy-tale of "universe" is to destroy the reality of a Creator and make humans feel
like random accidentally, small and unimportant specks of dust.

You can't fly with no air. And air is diluted water. Earth was formed out of water. You are living in created environment called plane earth under the dome with water below and above.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUFvtVdYkqI

And all this on a globular earth. Trajectories are simply different on a globular earth than what they would be on a flat earth.

If the rail gun were large enough or powerful enough, shooting a projectile parallel to the ground would produce an "arced tangent," as the projectile left orbit. The further the projectile moved away from earth's gravity, the less arced its flightpath would become... until it was essentially straight.

Its a though life being a globot this days. Breaking laws of thermodynamics (we all know it cant be done),  rail-gun  projectiles first accenting then descending, traveling at different speed and still hitting a target....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lladSqEFOF0

You misunderstand. The fact of microwave radiation isn't the drivel. Rather, the cause and source of background radiation is guesswork. It's nice ideas. But that's all.

The point that I am getting at is, if science/media/politics/universities are not honest enough to say that they don't know when C-14 came into being on Earth, and that they don't know to what extent C-14 varied over past millennia, then they certainly don't know anything about the past of background radiation. And anything that they might say about it other than that it is detectable and measurable, doesn't necessarily have any fact behind it.