I sincerely believe this notion is a by-product of a complete distrust in the establishment. If every word coming from the mouth of the beast is a lie, why couldn't this one be as well?
+1
the fact a working scale model of flat earth exists and no working scale model of sphere or hollow earth is a massive give away, also if you look deep into vortex maths, all will be revealed. maths is the cryptography left to us by the ancients which were still decoding
I hope you understand the problems of having a "working scale model of earth" while you're actually *on* Earth. But hey, if you have a scale model of a flat earth located in some distant part of space where it isn't subject to all of the forces present near Earth itself, I'd love to see it. Any physical model of a planetary body would be invalid right off the bat if it is affected by forces of the body it is attempting to model.
Fortunately, we have computers that allow us to create virtual models based upon precise mathematical inputs. So, naturally, your task would be to create a virtual flat earth model that accounts for all of the data, modeled from physics equations that would allow you to predict events in the model. Do you have such equations? No, you do not, and accordingly no such working model of a flat earth exists.
go look up the recreation of the ancient greek antikythera mechanism, theres your working scale model of flat earth, found on earth and recreated, they wont tell you its a scale model of flat earth as that goes against "common core" or "common purpose" but if you watch it and study it you will see im not wrong, that device has predicted the location of stars and planets, the sun and moon with 100% accuracy for cenuries, if thats not a working scale model then were back to having 3 concepts that none have evidence for, if you think im blindly accepting 1 concept out of 3 with zero physical evidence then your a fool im afraid
That's not a scale model of Earth. Wonderful, you don't even know what constitutes a model.
Put another way, it's about as much of a scale model of Earth as a Punnett Square is a model of Darwinian Evolution.
go and watch the recreation, you haven't had time to so your commenting based on your own programed opinion, watch research and learn
jeez you really can lead a human to knowledge but cant make them look at it can you
you are making idiocracy a reality my learned friend
i dont type out this info for the good of my health, im attempting to educate you on the real world, if there was nothing in this then why are numerous universities funding string theory? because they know the real world is far from popular belief
another 1, nasa now say were on an oblique spheroid aka a giant pear yet nasa own images of sphere earth blow this new theory out of the water, stop falling for the bullshit your spoon fed because your too lazy to do your own due diligence and research
What were you saying? You know what they say about assuming...
We already had this conversation.
yeah and i dont recall you replying to "thats a matter of opinion and open minds that 1 mate Wink" lol
watch it with an open mind, the earth is center to everything in space, the antikythera mechanism shows that, then if you raise up the top of the mechanism off the top of earth depicting cog, then you have the earth and the skys, with perfectly accurate locations of everything we allegedly already know about...
hey im still not fully convinced myself but i no longer believe the sphere earth concept myself, there are 3 concepts and so far i prefer flat earth, i dont pretend to know all the ins and outs, but i do like to theorize as thats how we progress, yeah i may be wasting my time but thats my choice im sure out of 7.8 billion of us, me choosing to prefer 1 concept over the other 2 isnt likely to hinder progress in any way shape or form, we are insignificant in the grand scheme of things
1) I didn't respond to it because I don't feel like taking the time to explain the differences between fact and opinion. There are correct interpretations and incorrect ones. Sometimes interpretations can be blurry, but this isn't one of those times. It's not a flat earth model. It's not even close.
2) An open mind is one thing, a rational mind is another. You seem to be favoring the former at the expense of the latter. For example, now you're saying that the device proves a geocentric earth (it doesn't), which has nothing to do with proving a flat earth.
3) Yes, you can believe what you want, and yes you can waste time if you choose. But you don't have to. There's no need to reinvent the wheel in this case. We've already figured this out.
1 lol you seem to be under some misguided opinion that your programmed opinion has some kind of value amongst true free thinkers, your opinion is programed, that doctrine you likely received from a school, i get it you cant help but resort back to the bullshit you were programmed with, this is you withholding progress by not even looking at the evidence you are presented.
2 erm yes it does, you have still clearly not looked at the recreation, due diligence and research are very valuable
either that or you lack the imagination to replace 1 gear with a longer gear to raise up the sky system from the earth plane cog but hey thats your hang up, all you are doing is proving you are an ignorant individual desperately clinging to the doctrines you were implanted with, all you have to do is watch the recreation of the device, its not rocket science, mind neither is string theory, yet countless universities are working on string theory and investing heavily, must be something in it for these places to be investing, thats just common sense
3 not trying to reinvent the wheel, im trying to prove 1 of the 3 concepts right or wrong, so far you have offered no evidence of substance, you have regurgitated somebody elses theories which are not true, sorry if you dont like it but facts are facts
the truth cares not what your opinion might be, the truth cares not what 7.8 billion opinions may be, the truth is the truth, and is generally not appreciated evidenced by your comments
