Topic: Flat Earth - page 77. (Read 1095196 times)

I swear this clown spends hours composing these posts that sound like he's some smart ass know it all when in reality he
is more full of shit than than a clogged toilet at a cheap-ass mexican all-you-can-eat buffet.

After the Global Warming is a Scam thread now I find the Flat Earth one... lol

Observation does not agree with the claim the Earth's surface curves, TV brainwashed idiots need to fuck off and die.




A "Ph.D. astrophysicist" from a MSM propaganda mouthpiece, just fuck off. Astrophysics isn't a real science, it's a load of theoretical garbage. That list didn't even raise a single valid point just look at #5 for example, the fucking retard can't even comprehend that the atmosphere has an effect on what we see. The truth is he's probably not a compete retard and he is in fact just a lying faggot.

Ok fine. Point made. Now can you please answer my question?

^^^ LOL! You FE jokers are just like the Left. You bring up all kinds of stuff that doesn't work according to your methods of calculating.

Look here knucklehead and look properly. Connect these two simple dots if you can, and then we can talk about why the bottom portion of the buildings are not fully visible.

If we were on a ball NONE of the buildings would be visible. All would be obstructed by your imaginary "curve of the earth".



                                                               +

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tallest_buildings_in_Chicago#Tallest_buildings

^^^ Antarctica - Sorry We're Closed! -- https://youtu.be/MJt7sNd2ChE

All you need to do is to travel to the antarctical and fly above it and look below. Physically.

Otherwise, here is some good information you can make use of. https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/distances.html?n=468

I am hearing this concept since my childhood days because there is lots of confusion available till now about the earth is circular or not but I go with the scientific results.

^^^ Good thing there are more FE videos.     

Yes they are proof and evidence when you have hundreds of different videos of the same thing from hundreds of different sources and I'm not talking only about videos of the earth from space but also from airplanes, etc etc. You also have 24/7 livestreams of the earth, you can literally see the ISS with your eyes or a camera, etc.

Videos proof anything?
So every movie you watched is true, you have seen proof of it with own eyes and can testify in court that it is 100% true.
No the earth is not "flat" so to speak but it is equally stupid to turn your coffee cup upside down and expect the coffee to stay in it.

Insert quote from notbatman about refraction, reflection, mirage, convergence and other shit mindlessly to argue against literally anything.

I still don't understand how the water can block the bottom of the building on a flat earth because the water is below the building and there is nothing between me and the bottom of the building, no matter how far away it is.

The sun never shrinks, your brain on the other hand...

^^^ Many of the videos include people who are angry or bitter. A real scientist doesn't get angry or bitter. He's simply out there to observe, and express his observations. So, even if the videos were all that there was, we couldn't trust them because of the people who make them.

youtube gives so many videos about ppl who believe that ^^
lol,  if you watch few hours from these videos you are near to
an mental breakdown

I know this is old but it's still disturbing for me. In my mind, there's always a question -- what if, for some reason, this is true? 

^^^ The horizon line is comprised of objects on the plain converging at your/camera center of vision, this central point called the vanishing point is where objects are too small to be resolved and vanish (spread out into a line for all objects in the field of view). If the viewers perspective is raised then the viewing angle is increased and objects appear taller and thus can be resolved pushing the vanishing point further off into the distance.

Now what's going on in that image is the atmosphere that's full of atomized water droplets forms a compound magnifying lens and the buildings that normally would be too small to resolve are greatly enlarged so that they are visible, however their vertical position remains unchanged and the bottoms get masked off by the much closer vanishing point forming the horizon in front of the greatly enlarged buildings. Everything below the horizon line is physical water/land and forms an opaque barrier.

This is also the same reason the Sun remains the same size throughout the day, the magnification enlarges the Sun at the same rate as convergence shrinks it where it eventually sets due to perspective. This can be confirmed by filming sunset from atop a very tall mountain during cool dry conditions where, the Sun can be seen shrinking to a point and eventually fading into the haze.

Ok, I can accept that. But then what is it about the horizon line that cuts off the bottoms of buildings? Why does your picture not show this effect? At what point are the rails and the poles in the picture "cut off by the horizon".