^^^ Discrediting the inventor of the oscilloscope isn't going to fly, it's game over for relativity. There's no credible argument against the results of the 1887 M&M experiment; the Earth is motionless.
But it's not what you think, since there are plenty of proofs that fly in the face of the things that you say. The Earth isn't flat, even though the complex experiments that you quote might suggest it in some ways.
Simple things like the horizon being shown to be near, when the eye is at 1 inch above the water, is one of them. Another simple one is the water level being different between the Atlantic and the Gulf. Another is all the misinterpretation you use with regard to the Bible.
If the things that you talk about prove that certain aspects of standard science are wrong, flat Earth doesn't answer your ideas. Here is what is closer to the truth. The fact that the nature of the aether isn't what FE people say, or even what aether people say. And certainly the aether exists, contrary to what standard science says.
There are reasons why the people behind standard science don't want the truth about the aether to become known. Part of it is that we wouldn't have to rely on crude oil if we understood how the aether works. And there would be additional freedom, like easy ways to get to space, if common people understood the aether.
What wouldn't surprise me at all would be to find that you are working for standard science. Your FE junk is being used to warp any true knowledge people are figuring out about the aether, just to help keep big oil in business through the continuation of the ignorance of the people.
