@af_newbie, a Farday cage blocks some radiated EM waves and static electric fields, it doesn't block all electromagnetic phenomenon. A magnetic compass for example will continue to function inside a Faraday cage and, electric displacement current (such as in a capcitor) can also pass through the cage.
Look at the phenomenon of electromigration, this effect is akin to how the force pushing you down works. It's not a direct push from the electric field, the less dense particles push on the more dense particles as they're attracted to the positive anode. With Earth and the buoyant forces pushing you down it's the action of displacement current acting on the atmosphere, however just a current of charged ions is usually involved with the example of electromigration.
You could imagine for simplicity's sake that we're all inside a giant asymmetric capacitor with the negative plate being the surface of the Earth and, the positive plate being the surface of the dome above. The apparent or fictitious force we all know and love as gravity is all but an electrical action that mediates density and buoyancy between the plates of this electrical device.
Topic: Flat Earth - page 82. (Read 1095196 times)
The only one in checkmate here is anybody using gravity or relativity to argue their point, why do you think Astargath is trying so hard to discredit and ignore Dufour & Prunier's 1939 replication of Sagnac experiment.
The force acting on an object is from the displaced medium, that being aether (vacuum), air, water or whatever the object is surrounded by. Aether flows through all matter with little to no resistance and can't be shielded against.
My point here is that the force pushing you down is ultimately electric in origin but it's not a direct action like how they claim gravity works. There's an entirely different process involved akin to what's known as "electromigration", this effect like the force pushing you down will continue to act even inside a Faraday cage.
The force acting on an object is from the displaced medium, that being aether (vacuum), air, water or whatever the object is surrounded by. Aether flows through all matter with little to no resistance and can't be shielded against.
My point here is that the force pushing you down is ultimately electric in origin but it's not a direct action like how they claim gravity works. There's an entirely different process involved akin to what's known as "electromigration", this effect like the force pushing you down will continue to act even inside a Faraday cage.
LOL. Electric fields do not go inside Faraday's cages.
Migration my ass. You and your 'electric field theory' are a toast. Checkmate. Done deal.
BTW, nobody is talking about gravity in this argument. You invent shit as you go. 'Electromigration', WTF?
Hey, 'electric field' there is a nice Faraday's cage over there, let's go inside to take a look around. But I cannot, every time I try I just get stuck to the surface of the cage and go to the ground. Well, you just 'migrate', ask notbatman, he 'knows'. But how do I get out? Well, you 'migrate' again. LOL.
Like I said. Checkmate. 'Electromigration' does not exist. If it did, all telecommunications equipment would never work, some tuner circuits are using Faraday's cages to block electric fields. Sorry. You are done.
The only one in checkmate here is anybody using gravity or relativity to argue their point, why do you think Astargath is trying so hard to discredit and ignore Dufour & Prunier's 1939 replication of Sagnac experiment.
The force acting on an object is from the displaced medium, that being aether (vacuum), air, water or whatever the object is surrounded by. Aether flows through all matter with little to no resistance and can't be shielded against.
My point here is that the force pushing you down is ultimately electric in origin but it's not a direct action like how they claim gravity works. There's an entirely different process involved akin to what's known as "electromigration", this effect like the force pushing you down will continue to act even inside a Faraday cage.
The force acting on an object is from the displaced medium, that being aether (vacuum), air, water or whatever the object is surrounded by. Aether flows through all matter with little to no resistance and can't be shielded against.
My point here is that the force pushing you down is ultimately electric in origin but it's not a direct action like how they claim gravity works. There's an entirely different process involved akin to what's known as "electromigration", this effect like the force pushing you down will continue to act even inside a Faraday cage.
'' so hard to discredit and ignore Dufour & Prunier's 1939 replication of Sagnac experiment'' You haven't proved that such experiment ever happened, you are trying to discredit thousands of scientists who replicated hundreds of experiments that prove gravity is real and earth is a globe.
How many experiments have you done yourself?
The only one in checkmate here is anybody using gravity or relativity to argue their point, why do you think Astargath is trying so hard to discredit and ignore Dufour & Prunier's 1939 replication of Sagnac experiment.
The force acting on an object is from the displaced medium, that being aether (vacuum), air, water or whatever the object is surrounded by. Aether flows through all matter with little to no resistance and can't be shielded against.
My point here is that the force pushing you down is ultimately electric in origin but it's not a direct action like how they claim gravity works. There's an entirely different process involved akin to what's known as "electromigration", this effect like the force pushing you down will continue to act even inside a Faraday cage.
The force acting on an object is from the displaced medium, that being aether (vacuum), air, water or whatever the object is surrounded by. Aether flows through all matter with little to no resistance and can't be shielded against.
My point here is that the force pushing you down is ultimately electric in origin but it's not a direct action like how they claim gravity works. There's an entirely different process involved akin to what's known as "electromigration", this effect like the force pushing you down will continue to act even inside a Faraday cage.
^^^ You're the idiot for claiming unproven theory is fact. Coulomb's inverse square law is something that can be demonstrated in the lab, gravity or more accurately relativity is unproven theory that has been falsified in the lab.
@born yesterday_stupid as fuck, get inside a Faraday cage then have it lowered into a lake.
@born yesterday_stupid as fuck, get inside a Faraday cage then have it lowered into a lake.
Like I said. Checkmate. All done using your 'electric field theory', and your arguments.
^^^ You're the idiot for claiming unproven theory is fact. Coulomb's inverse square law is something that can be demonstrated in the lab, gravity or more accurately relativity is unproven theory that has been falsified in the lab.
@born yesterday_stupid as fuck, get inside a Faraday cage then have it lowered into a lake.
@born yesterday_stupid as fuck, get inside a Faraday cage then have it lowered into a lake.
Like I said. Checkmate. All done using your 'electric field theory', and your arguments.
^^^ You're the idiot for claiming unproven theory is fact. Coulomb's inverse square law is something that can be demonstrated in the lab, gravity or more accurately relativity is unproven theory that has been falsified in the lab.
@born yesterday_stupid as fuck, get inside a Faraday cage then have it lowered into a lake.
@born yesterday_stupid as fuck, get inside a Faraday cage then have it lowered into a lake.
An unproven law is not a fact and cannot be demonstrated in a lab, have you demonstrated it in a lab yourself or are you trusting information you read on the internet? If it has been falsified then recreate it and do it yourself, otherwise you are just trusting people for no reason.
^^^ You're the idiot for claiming unproven theory is fact. Coulomb's inverse square law is something that can be demonstrated in the lab, gravity or more accurately relativity is unproven theory that has been falsified in the lab.
@born yesterday_stupid as fuck, get inside a Faraday cage then have it lowered into a lake.
@born yesterday_stupid as fuck, get inside a Faraday cage then have it lowered into a lake.
Earth's electric field defines up & down and provides the constraints that density and buoyancy work within. Coulomb's inverse square law quantifies the forces involved.
Isn't density and buoyancy based on gravity? Did you not read that pretty important part when you did your awesome research? Or are you actually this stupid? It's quite remarkable that you pick a few scientists and a few scientific laws to believe and disregard all the others, I wonder how your brain works.
Earth's electric field defines up & down and provides the constraints that density and buoyancy work within. Coulomb's inverse square law quantifies the forces involved.
Faraday's cages block both static and non-static electric fields.
Objects weigh the same inside Faraday's cages as they weigh outside of them. Checkmate.
^^^ Except that if this were the case, we wouldn't need the generators in hydroelectric. The falling of the water would be enough to produce the electricity we need.
Earth's electric field defines up & down and provides the constraints that density and buoyancy work within. Coulomb's inverse square law quantifies the forces involved.
^^^ The reason why it is still gravity is, people don't go into consideration of Newton or Sagnac when they use gravity. They just use it. And they call it gravity because that is the word they were taught to call it.
For most people by far, gravity is an event thing. It isn't theories that discuss why it works the way it does, or why not.
All you are trying to do is mess up the minds of people. Your explanations of why gravity should be called something else don't have anything to do with flat Earth. Rather, they have to do with messing with the minds of people.
For most people by far, gravity is an event thing. It isn't theories that discuss why it works the way it does, or why not.
All you are trying to do is mess up the minds of people. Your explanations of why gravity should be called something else don't have anything to do with flat Earth. Rather, they have to do with messing with the minds of people.
Things fall or sink because they're more dense than the air or water they're surrounded by; they're pushed down by the medium.
With government, schools, churches and the media all preaching the miracle of the globe in unison they need the magic of gravity to hold it all together. Telling people there's a giant ball below them with a magic force pulling them down to explain away the absurdity of sticking to a sphere while it spins in a vacuum, is the perfect example of gaslighting or, to "mess up the minds of people" as you so ineloquently put it.
There's a reason they can't explain what causes gravity, because the theory is 100% pure bullshit!
The medium that pushes things down is called gravity.
You can take a light aircraft up 20,000 to 30,000 feet, and dive it so that you have zero gravity effect inside the plane for a few moments. Without this gravity effect, density inside the plane doesn't act at all to separate less dense objects from more dense objects.
You can't say that it is static electricity, because static electricity of the amount necessary to handle a plane would shoot all over the place with lightening bolts.
If standard science is all wrong about what gravity is and what makes it tick, FE theory is way more wrong. FE science doesn't hold a candle to gravity science, even if FE happened to be true. Why not? Because without gravity, the flame of the candle would engulf the whole candle. There isn't any FE explanation for that, that operates on other materials at the same time. So, are there two or more kinds of density?
^^^ The reason why it is still gravity is, people don't go into consideration of Newton or Sagnac when they use gravity. They just use it. And they call it gravity because that is the word they were taught to call it.
For most people by far, gravity is an event thing. It isn't theories that discuss why it works the way it does, or why not.
All you are trying to do is mess up the minds of people. Your explanations of why gravity should be called something else don't have anything to do with flat Earth. Rather, they have to do with messing with the minds of people.
For most people by far, gravity is an event thing. It isn't theories that discuss why it works the way it does, or why not.
All you are trying to do is mess up the minds of people. Your explanations of why gravity should be called something else don't have anything to do with flat Earth. Rather, they have to do with messing with the minds of people.
Things fall or sink because they're more dense than the air or water they're surrounded by; they're pushed down by the medium.
With government, schools, churches and the media all preaching the miracle of the globe in unison they need the magic of gravity to hold it all together. Telling people there's a giant ball below them with a magic force pulling them down to explain away the absurdity of sticking to a sphere while it spins in a vacuum, is the perfect example of gaslighting or, to "mess up the minds of people" as you so ineloquently put it.
There's a reason they can't explain what causes gravity, because the theory is 100% pure bullshit!
And what causes the 'medium' to push objects down? How does the 'medium' know that it needs to push the object down not in any other direction?
I think you have just discovered gravity.
^^^ The reason why it is still gravity is, people don't go into consideration of Newton or Sagnac when they use gravity. They just use it. And they call it gravity because that is the word they were taught to call it.
For most people by far, gravity is an event thing. It isn't theories that discuss why it works the way it does, or why not.
All you are trying to do is mess up the minds of people. Your explanations of why gravity should be called something else don't have anything to do with flat Earth. Rather, they have to do with messing with the minds of people.
For most people by far, gravity is an event thing. It isn't theories that discuss why it works the way it does, or why not.
All you are trying to do is mess up the minds of people. Your explanations of why gravity should be called something else don't have anything to do with flat Earth. Rather, they have to do with messing with the minds of people.
Things fall or sink because they're more dense than the air or water they're surrounded by; they're pushed down by the medium.
With government, schools, churches and the media all preaching the miracle of the globe in unison they need the magic of gravity to hold it all together. Telling people there's a giant ball below them with a magic force pulling them down to explain away the absurdity of sticking to a sphere while it spins in a vacuum, is the perfect example of gaslighting or, to "mess up the minds of people" as you so ineloquently put it.
There's a reason they can't explain what causes gravity, because the theory is 100% pure bullshit!
Prove it, you read that somewhere and believed it, why? Did you do any experiments yourself or do you just believe anything you read if it fits your narrative? How many experiments have you done using density which by the way requires gravity. You are a knucklehead and ignore the hard questions because you know you have done 0 experiments and you simply believe what you read online.
Earth-FLAT
^^^ The reason why it is still gravity is, people don't go into consideration of Newton or Sagnac when they use gravity. They just use it. And they call it gravity because that is the word they were taught to call it.
For most people by far, gravity is an event thing. It isn't theories that discuss why it works the way it does, or why not.
All you are trying to do is mess up the minds of people. Your explanations of why gravity should be called something else don't have anything to do with flat Earth. Rather, they have to do with messing with the minds of people.
For most people by far, gravity is an event thing. It isn't theories that discuss why it works the way it does, or why not.
All you are trying to do is mess up the minds of people. Your explanations of why gravity should be called something else don't have anything to do with flat Earth. Rather, they have to do with messing with the minds of people.
Things fall or sink because they're more dense than the air or water they're surrounded by; they're pushed down by the medium.
With government, schools, churches and the media all preaching the miracle of the globe in unison they need the magic of gravity to hold it all together. Telling people there's a giant ball below them with a magic force pulling them down to explain away the absurdity of sticking to a sphere while it spins in a vacuum, is the perfect example of gaslighting or, to "mess up the minds of people" as you so ineloquently put it.
There's a reason they can't explain what causes gravity, because the theory is 100% pure bullshit!
^^^ It's not even gravity anymore, Newtonian gravity (1687) was a test to see if you're paying attention to his calculated description of motion and optics or not. He stated outright in his letters that there was a conspiracy of Jews and secret societies. Today and in response to the 1887 M&M experiment it's not "gravity" but relativity (1905). Unfortunately relativity was falsified in 1939 by D&P with their replication of the Sagnac experiment (1913).
You might as well have a 24/7 live-stream from the the Star Trek universe, it's currently got about as much credibility if you read the comments people leave.
You might as well have a 24/7 live-stream from the the Star Trek universe, it's currently got about as much credibility if you read the comments people leave.
''Unfortunately relativity was falsified in 1939 by D&P with their replication of the Sagnac experiment (1913)''
Prove it, I have seen no evidence that gravity has been falsified aside from you saying it, you can't even prove the experiment happened, you didn't do the experiment yourself and you didn't meet Sagnac or the others, you don't even know if they are real, why should you believe it? You think they are faking gravity/space and the whole earth yet believe some written papers on the internet quite easily, don't you think?
^^^ The reason why it is still gravity is, people don't go into consideration of Newton or Sagnac when they use gravity. They just use it. And they call it gravity because that is the word they were taught to call it.
For most people by far, gravity is an event thing. It isn't theories that discuss why it works the way it does, or why not.
All you are trying to do is mess up the minds of people. Your explanations of why gravity should be called something else don't have anything to do with flat Earth. Rather, they have to do with messing with the minds of people.
For most people by far, gravity is an event thing. It isn't theories that discuss why it works the way it does, or why not.
All you are trying to do is mess up the minds of people. Your explanations of why gravity should be called something else don't have anything to do with flat Earth. Rather, they have to do with messing with the minds of people.
^^^ It's not even gravity anymore, Newtonian gravity (1687) was a test to see if you're paying attention to his calculated description of motion and optics or not. He stated outright in his letters that there was a conspiracy of Jews and secret societies. Today and in response to the 1887 M&M experiment it's not "gravity" but relativity (1905). Unfortunately relativity was falsified in 1939 by D&P with their replication of the Sagnac experiment (1913).
You might as well have a 24/7 live-stream from the the Star Trek universe, it's currently got about as much credibility if you read the comments people leave.
You might as well have a 24/7 live-stream from the the Star Trek universe, it's currently got about as much credibility if you read the comments people leave.
Jump to: