I have a hard time see how you can not be satisfied by the latest post. YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT SOMETHING THAT HAPPEND OVER A MONTH AGO ON A DIFFERENT SITE (basically). A BUG. THERE WAS NO INTENTION TO FUCK ANYONE OVER, THE NEW SITE HAS BEEN IMPROVED ON BOTH SAFETY AND BUGS HAS BEEN FIXED. THE GAME IS FAIR TO THE PLAYERS, AS IT ALWAYS WAS INTENDED TO BE!
I am defending the site not because of the finiancial situation (I have it fixed - but it's fun to see it grow) but because I want my friend to succeed here. You know, compassion.
The facts you are talking about are on a site one month old; instead of looking backwards why not look at the current, fixed site? You are saying there is no trustworthiness, there are still good people on the internet and it will be proven within a few days that the site is here to stay.
Here's an extreme example: if the people behind MtGox opened up a new bitcoin exchange, would you use it?
I love how you ignore my reply completly, who is doing short answers now?
That's one hell of of an extreme example, for one Gox didn't fix their code, nor pay their users back. It's a shame, unfair and seemingly just to add to insult to compare Gox to this project. And even your long drawn example of Gox fails because users still kept buying there even when things were fubar. This site took downtime instead to fix the issues, and managed to do so.
I don't need to answer your questions or respond to your comments. I'm not trying to sell you something, you are trying to sell me something. Besides, your responses are the Company Line. They are predictable and don't provide any insight.
As I said, it was an extreme example, I was trying to illustrate the point that people will be wary of doing business with places that they don't trust. I don't trust your site because of the way that it has operated in the past. Is that necessarily fair to you, as a new investor? Probably not, but you probably should have vetted your investments a little better if you didn't want that perception of your site.
Here's the bottom line: is your site fair? I don't know. Is it run well? I don't know. It's entirely possible that the site is 100% on the up-and-up and is a great place to play, and it would be a shame if the history prevents people from experiencing that. But you can't blame people for being wary to try it out, based on that history. How do you get people to ignore your past and focus on your future? I don't know that either. I made one suggestion (offer a bounty for people to essentially bug test the software and odds and give it a thumbs up) and it was rejected. Then why even write here? We have responded, refunded and do what we can. People play, there has even been a few deposits done - works well so far and as we run into any bugs we will fix them.
I am not trying to sell you anything, if you really can't let go the first incident even tho it has been fixed, and the money you lost has been refunded to you we dont want you by now. You just keep throwing fieces at us for no reason, repeating the same stuff over and over. Fine, dont trust our site - but if you aren't going to use it why are you still posting here??
Bold: The site is fair. Did you bother to check the FAQ? How do you know any site is run well? Time tells, but you aren't giving us any time, instead you scare users away by crying about stuff that's completly irrelevent to the site as it is today. The "people" you are refering to is you since you are the only one who keeps questioning it, which you have a right to do but not 100 times over and over.
How to get people to ignore a crappy version of a game and keep them comming back when new version is released? Fix what was wrong.
Your bounty aint needed when a new game starts a SHA1-hash key will appear. This hash will then be shown decrypted when your game is finnished to show you how the game were setup. Read the FAQ.