I'm just not sure about Fofana's performance at Chelsea but I wouldn't like to be prejudiced either. Most probably Chelsea are thinking of him as their backup striker while there is Nkunku. But of course the performance levels can make a change in balances in the team. Fofana is a player who has performed amazingly for Molde in this season so far. He has scored quite many goals. Can he be like Jr Haaland maybe? 
One of Haaland's old teams was also Molde that's why I made that joke. 
One of Haaland's old teams was also Molde that's why I made that joke. Hope you do understand that Nkunku won't be available for Chelsea until the summer which the season will be over by then. If we can't get our scoring problem settled now, of what difference does it make to the season that has started badly. Fofana is no backup to Nkunku instead a backup to Aubameyang and if he impressed the coach, he might even be a starter and then combine with Nkunku when next season begins.
If Fofana can give us 50% of what Haaland is giving Manchester city, I think we have gotten our season back on track. Chelsea lack goal scorers and all our forward are worst at converting chances or crating one themselves. Sterling that was bought to create chances has been poor this season and so has Mount and the others.
Of course. I wanted to mean that Nkunku would be the main striker of the team when Chelsea have him and Fofana in the team at the same time.
Fofana seems to have a good potential but we don't know how effective he would be able to play in the biggest and most challenging league in Europe. Haaland was ready for bigger fights already but we don't know much about Fofana yet. He will need to prove himself but we will see how much time Potter will give chance to him. Actually I think Potter could give him enough chances to prove himself to the team because he has done the same for Broja so far. Broja couldn't score much unfortunately.
