So I just wonder which expect return is correct. I prefer 95.15% one.
I use a calculator as well, but it is a bit more involved than the one you reference imo, although the results are still very close.
I checked out the calculator that you posted and the default pay table for Joker's Wild that is preloaded into it revealed the 1.4%* house edge.
(*My calculations show the standard pay table provides a 1.4013% house edge.)
I will show them side by side below:
FortuneJack Standard
Either, fortunejack needs to correct their info to reflect a ~4.7% house edge or change the payouts.
FortuneJack, I view this as a major issue that is just as important, if not more important, than a wallet security bug.
I would hope we are on the same page in this regard. I, also did not see a house edge percentage posted at all regarding blackjack. I will look into that next.
Should I post this to the bugbounty email? or would you rather just pm me here?
I have not read the whole thread, but I would assume this has not been mentioned otherwise it would have already been corrected one way or the other. Surprising to say the least because the thread is ~6 months old.
P.S. fox, I do not think you would prefer the 95.15% unless you are the house.LOL, you misunderstood what I said, I said:"
So I just wonder which expect return is correct. I prefer 95.15% one." I mean I prefer 95.15% is the correct one, I didn't mean I prefer playing 95% house edge game.
I am not silly. That's why I like playing blackjack but not other games. BJ on FJ also had high house edge, they modified the house rule, house edge may be 1%-2%. So after I lost some coins in blackjack here, I left here.
And your speculation about 98.6% is correct, 98.6% expect return is standard one, FJ just copied that figure but set the lower return of 2 pairs, royal flush and etc. So 98.6% should be a false advertisement/statement. FJ should modify it to 95.15%