Hi,
i don't know (cause i haven't much to try the exchange)... but someone is trying to exchange RDD to BTC and it seems impossible.
Can you verify if everything is ok on the exchange?
Thanks
Topic: FORTUNEJACK.COM |Deposit 777 play with 1777 mBTC |Live Casino, Slots, Betting - page 576. (Read 459391 times)
January 04, 2015, 04:59:17 PM
January 01, 2015, 05:25:30 PM
so for what you know FortuneJack dice is provably fair?
Yes. I only played dice, and only checked about 20 rolls, but from what I saw it is provably fair.
January 01, 2015, 09:12:04 AM
i suggest all people try bingo
good luck boys and girls
good luck boys and girls
January 01, 2015, 09:08:50 AM
I've doubled 0.05 btc ( whit "dice" game ) but at the end I lost all :
However it was funny (only a little test).
However it was funny (only a little test).
the damn 14 in row loss on 2x
still people dont get that 2x kills always
January 01, 2015, 08:08:13 AM
the bingo herer is really cool. wished there were players there.
its fun with 10 people and 40 tickets
its fun with 10 people and 40 tickets
January 01, 2015, 12:37:37 AM
doing good with CLAM on dice up 22clam
i guess you should only gamble clams from now on, going by your track record with other coins including BTC
. Happy new year 2015 to everyone!! Hope you win a lot this coming year!! 
December 31, 2014, 06:05:40 PM
I've doubled 0.05 btc ( whit "dice" game ) but at the end I lost all :
However it was funny (only a little test).
However it was funny (only a little test).
December 31, 2014, 10:22:23 AM
doing good with CLAM on dice up 22clam
December 31, 2014, 09:22:17 AM
I made a bunch more rolls and they all verify.
Here's the code I used to generate the rolls. It's a big shorter and easier to read than the code I got from the site. I took out the stuff that wasn't needed and unuglified it (then I replaced i with ii throughout because the forum thinks that an 'i' in square brackets means I want to switch to italics):
I verified my rolls like this:
Edit: here it is in a compact 10 lines of ugly code:
Copy/paste those 10 lines into the console (hit F12), then run:
to see what that server seed and client seed combination should give you.
Here's the code I used to generate the rolls. It's a big shorter and easier to read than the code I got from the site. I took out the stuff that wasn't needed and unuglified it (then I replaced i with ii throughout because the forum thinks that an 'i' in square brackets means I want to switch to italics):
Quote
var N = 624, M = 397, MATRIX_A = 0x9908b0df, UPPER_MASK = 0x80000000, LOWER_MASK = 0x7fffffff, mt = new Array(N);
function multiply(n1, n2) {
var sum = 0;
for (var i = 0; i < 32; ++i) if ((n1 >>> i) & 1) sum += (n2 << i);
return sum;
}
function roll(server_seed, client_seed) {
var ii, j, k;
mt[0] = 19650218;
for (ii = 1; ii < N; ii++) mt[ii] = multiply(1812433253, mt[ii - 1] ^ (mt[ii - 1] >>> 30)) + ii;
for (ii = 1, j = 0, k = N; k; k--) {
mt[ii] = (mt[ii] ^ multiply(mt[ii - 1] ^ (mt[ii - 1] >>> 30), 1664525)) + (j%2 ? client_seed : server_seed) + j%2;
if (++j, ++ii >= N) mt[0] = mt[N - (ii = 1)];
}
for (k = N - 1; k; k--) {
mt[ii] = (mt[ii] ^ multiply(mt[ii - 1] ^ (mt[ii - 1] >>> 30), 1566083941)) - ii;
if (++ii >= N) mt[0] = mt[N - (ii = 1)];
}
mt[0] = UPPER_MASK;
for (ii = 0; ii < N - M; ii++) mt[ii] = mt[ii + M] ^ (((mt[ii] & UPPER_MASK) | (mt[ii + 1] & LOWER_MASK)) >>> 1) ^ MATRIX_A * (mt[ii + 1] & 1);
for (;ii < N - 1; ii++) mt[ii] = mt[ii + (M - N)] ^ (mt[ii] & UPPER_MASK) | (mt[ii + 1] & LOWER_MASK) >>> 1 ^ MATRIX_A * (mt[ii + 1] & 1);
return (k = mt[0], k ^= k >>> 11, k ^= k << 7 & 0x9d2c5680, k ^= k << 15 & 0xefc60000, (k ^ k >>> 18) + 10001 * 0xfffff)%10001 / 100;
}
function multiply(n1, n2) {
var sum = 0;
for (var i = 0; i < 32; ++i) if ((n1 >>> i) & 1) sum += (n2 << i);
return sum;
}
function roll(server_seed, client_seed) {
var ii, j, k;
mt[0] = 19650218;
for (ii = 1; ii < N; ii++) mt[ii] = multiply(1812433253, mt[ii - 1] ^ (mt[ii - 1] >>> 30)) + ii;
for (ii = 1, j = 0, k = N; k; k--) {
mt[ii] = (mt[ii] ^ multiply(mt[ii - 1] ^ (mt[ii - 1] >>> 30), 1664525)) + (j%2 ? client_seed : server_seed) + j%2;
if (++j, ++ii >= N) mt[0] = mt[N - (ii = 1)];
}
for (k = N - 1; k; k--) {
mt[ii] = (mt[ii] ^ multiply(mt[ii - 1] ^ (mt[ii - 1] >>> 30), 1566083941)) - ii;
if (++ii >= N) mt[0] = mt[N - (ii = 1)];
}
mt[0] = UPPER_MASK;
for (ii = 0; ii < N - M; ii++) mt[ii] = mt[ii + M] ^ (((mt[ii] & UPPER_MASK) | (mt[ii + 1] & LOWER_MASK)) >>> 1) ^ MATRIX_A * (mt[ii + 1] & 1);
for (;ii < N - 1; ii++) mt[ii] = mt[ii + (M - N)] ^ (mt[ii] & UPPER_MASK) | (mt[ii + 1] & LOWER_MASK) >>> 1 ^ MATRIX_A * (mt[ii + 1] & 1);
return (k = mt[0], k ^= k >>> 11, k ^= k << 7 & 0x9d2c5680, k ^= k << 15 & 0xefc60000, (k ^ k >>> 18) + 10001 * 0xfffff)%10001 / 100;
}
I verified my rolls like this:
Quote
console.log(roll( 1441202626, 672999), // 35.48
roll(-1734677756, 439284), // 42.14
roll( 1381382730, 400138), // 42.06
roll( 210996502, 043923), // 47.93
roll( -749482183, 932860), // 70.01
roll( 838855046, 694872), // 76.10
roll(-1969168664, 544456), // 91.38
roll( 750895370, 139452), // 98.59
roll( 484402262, 456027), // 30.50
roll( 1799451977, 296354), // 32.54
roll(-1319575640, 658432), // 35.03
roll( -455200602, 934854)); // 68.39
roll(-1734677756, 439284), // 42.14
roll( 1381382730, 400138), // 42.06
roll( 210996502, 043923), // 47.93
roll( -749482183, 932860), // 70.01
roll( 838855046, 694872), // 76.10
roll(-1969168664, 544456), // 91.38
roll( 750895370, 139452), // 98.59
roll( 484402262, 456027), // 30.50
roll( 1799451977, 296354), // 32.54
roll(-1319575640, 658432), // 35.03
roll( -455200602, 934854)); // 68.39
Edit: here it is in a compact 10 lines of ugly code:
Code:
var N = 624, M = 397, MATRIX_A = 0x9908b0df, UPPER_MASK = 0x80000000, LOWER_MASK = 0x7fffffff, mt = new Array(N);
function multiply(n1, n2) {var sum = 0; for (var i = 0; i < 32; ++i) if ((n1 >>> i) & 1) sum += (n2 << i); return sum; }
function roll(server_seed, client_seed) { var i, j, k; mt[0] = 19650218;
for (i = 1; i < N; i++) mt[i] = multiply(1812433253, mt[i - 1] ^ (mt[i - 1] >>> 30)) + i;
for (i = 1, j = 0, k = N; k; k--) { mt[i] = (mt[i] ^ multiply(mt[i - 1] ^ (mt[i - 1] >>> 30), 1664525)) + (j%2 ? client_seed : server_seed) + j%2;
if (++j, ++i >= N) mt[0] = mt[N - (i = 1)]; }
for (k = N - 1; k; k--) { mt[i] = (mt[i] ^ multiply(mt[i - 1] ^ (mt[i - 1] >>> 30), 1566083941)) - i; if (++i >= N) mt[0] = mt[N - (i = 1)]; }
mt[0] = UPPER_MASK; for (i = 0; i < N - M; i++) mt[i] = mt[i + M] ^ (((mt[i] & UPPER_MASK) | (mt[i + 1] & LOWER_MASK)) >>> 1) ^ MATRIX_A * (mt[i + 1] & 1);
for (;i < N - 1; i++) mt[i] = mt[i + (M - N)] ^ (mt[i] & UPPER_MASK) | (mt[i + 1] & LOWER_MASK) >>> 1 ^ MATRIX_A * (mt[i + 1] & 1);
return (k = mt[0], k ^= k >>> 11, k ^= k << 7 & 0x9d2c5680, k ^= k << 15 & 0xefc60000, (k ^ k >>> 18) + 10001 * 0xfffff)%10001 / 100; }
function multiply(n1, n2) {var sum = 0; for (var i = 0; i < 32; ++i) if ((n1 >>> i) & 1) sum += (n2 << i); return sum; }
function roll(server_seed, client_seed) { var i, j, k; mt[0] = 19650218;
for (i = 1; i < N; i++) mt[i] = multiply(1812433253, mt[i - 1] ^ (mt[i - 1] >>> 30)) + i;
for (i = 1, j = 0, k = N; k; k--) { mt[i] = (mt[i] ^ multiply(mt[i - 1] ^ (mt[i - 1] >>> 30), 1664525)) + (j%2 ? client_seed : server_seed) + j%2;
if (++j, ++i >= N) mt[0] = mt[N - (i = 1)]; }
for (k = N - 1; k; k--) { mt[i] = (mt[i] ^ multiply(mt[i - 1] ^ (mt[i - 1] >>> 30), 1566083941)) - i; if (++i >= N) mt[0] = mt[N - (i = 1)]; }
mt[0] = UPPER_MASK; for (i = 0; i < N - M; i++) mt[i] = mt[i + M] ^ (((mt[i] & UPPER_MASK) | (mt[i + 1] & LOWER_MASK)) >>> 1) ^ MATRIX_A * (mt[i + 1] & 1);
for (;i < N - 1; i++) mt[i] = mt[i + (M - N)] ^ (mt[i] & UPPER_MASK) | (mt[i + 1] & LOWER_MASK) >>> 1 ^ MATRIX_A * (mt[i + 1] & 1);
return (k = mt[0], k ^= k >>> 11, k ^= k << 7 & 0x9d2c5680, k ^= k << 15 & 0xefc60000, (k ^ k >>> 18) + 10001 * 0xfffff)%10001 / 100; }
Copy/paste those 10 lines into the console (hit F12), then run:
Code:
roll(750895370, 139452)
to see what that server seed and client seed combination should give you.
so for what you know FortuneJack dice is provably fair?
December 31, 2014, 04:04:59 AM
are you still gonna have a jackpot for video poker?
December 31, 2014, 12:46:13 AM
dooglus i really love this sites sofware and that it accepts 8 cryptocoins.
glad you went thur it to verify rolls
glad you went thur it to verify rolls
Well, verifying rolls by that complicated process is not for the weak of heart
. That seems so complicated to a normal person like me. Glad we have people like doogs around, who can do all the hard work for us 
.I always knew that the rolls would check out as these guys have been very genuine since i started playing with them, but there is always a nagging feeling in the back of your head. Glad doogs has clarified that now!
Also would like to report that my referral commissions have been cleared now!
December 31, 2014, 12:35:59 AM
dooglus i really love this sites sofware and that it accepts 8 cryptocoins.
glad you went thur it to verify rolls
glad you went thur it to verify rolls
December 30, 2014, 09:41:51 PM
I made a bunch more rolls and they all verify.
Here's the code I used to generate the rolls. It's a big shorter and easier to read than the code I got from the site. I took out the stuff that wasn't needed and unuglified it (then I replaced i with ii throughout because the forum thinks that an 'i' in square brackets means I want to switch to italics):
I verified my rolls like this:
Edit: here it is in a compact 10 lines of ugly code:
Copy/paste those 10 lines into the console (hit F12), then run:
to see what that server seed and client seed combination should give you.
Here's the code I used to generate the rolls. It's a big shorter and easier to read than the code I got from the site. I took out the stuff that wasn't needed and unuglified it (then I replaced i with ii throughout because the forum thinks that an 'i' in square brackets means I want to switch to italics):
Quote
var N = 624, M = 397, MATRIX_A = 0x9908b0df, UPPER_MASK = 0x80000000, LOWER_MASK = 0x7fffffff, mt = new Array(N);
function multiply(n1, n2) {
var sum = 0;
for (var i = 0; i < 32; ++i) if ((n1 >>> i) & 1) sum += (n2 << i);
return sum;
}
function roll(server_seed, client_seed) {
var ii, j, k;
mt[0] = 19650218;
for (ii = 1; ii < N; ii++) mt[ii] = multiply(1812433253, mt[ii - 1] ^ (mt[ii - 1] >>> 30)) + ii;
for (ii = 1, j = 0, k = N; k; k--) {
mt[ii] = (mt[ii] ^ multiply(mt[ii - 1] ^ (mt[ii - 1] >>> 30), 1664525)) + (j%2 ? client_seed : server_seed) + j%2;
if (++j, ++ii >= N) mt[0] = mt[N - (ii = 1)];
}
for (k = N - 1; k; k--) {
mt[ii] = (mt[ii] ^ multiply(mt[ii - 1] ^ (mt[ii - 1] >>> 30), 1566083941)) - ii;
if (++ii >= N) mt[0] = mt[N - (ii = 1)];
}
mt[0] = UPPER_MASK;
for (ii = 0; ii < N - M; ii++) mt[ii] = mt[ii + M] ^ (((mt[ii] & UPPER_MASK) | (mt[ii + 1] & LOWER_MASK)) >>> 1) ^ MATRIX_A * (mt[ii + 1] & 1);
for (;ii < N - 1; ii++) mt[ii] = mt[ii + (M - N)] ^ (mt[ii] & UPPER_MASK) | (mt[ii + 1] & LOWER_MASK) >>> 1 ^ MATRIX_A * (mt[ii + 1] & 1);
return (k = mt[0], k ^= k >>> 11, k ^= k << 7 & 0x9d2c5680, k ^= k << 15 & 0xefc60000, (k ^ k >>> 18) + 10001 * 0xfffff)%10001 / 100;
}
function multiply(n1, n2) {
var sum = 0;
for (var i = 0; i < 32; ++i) if ((n1 >>> i) & 1) sum += (n2 << i);
return sum;
}
function roll(server_seed, client_seed) {
var ii, j, k;
mt[0] = 19650218;
for (ii = 1; ii < N; ii++) mt[ii] = multiply(1812433253, mt[ii - 1] ^ (mt[ii - 1] >>> 30)) + ii;
for (ii = 1, j = 0, k = N; k; k--) {
mt[ii] = (mt[ii] ^ multiply(mt[ii - 1] ^ (mt[ii - 1] >>> 30), 1664525)) + (j%2 ? client_seed : server_seed) + j%2;
if (++j, ++ii >= N) mt[0] = mt[N - (ii = 1)];
}
for (k = N - 1; k; k--) {
mt[ii] = (mt[ii] ^ multiply(mt[ii - 1] ^ (mt[ii - 1] >>> 30), 1566083941)) - ii;
if (++ii >= N) mt[0] = mt[N - (ii = 1)];
}
mt[0] = UPPER_MASK;
for (ii = 0; ii < N - M; ii++) mt[ii] = mt[ii + M] ^ (((mt[ii] & UPPER_MASK) | (mt[ii + 1] & LOWER_MASK)) >>> 1) ^ MATRIX_A * (mt[ii + 1] & 1);
for (;ii < N - 1; ii++) mt[ii] = mt[ii + (M - N)] ^ (mt[ii] & UPPER_MASK) | (mt[ii + 1] & LOWER_MASK) >>> 1 ^ MATRIX_A * (mt[ii + 1] & 1);
return (k = mt[0], k ^= k >>> 11, k ^= k << 7 & 0x9d2c5680, k ^= k << 15 & 0xefc60000, (k ^ k >>> 18) + 10001 * 0xfffff)%10001 / 100;
}
I verified my rolls like this:
Quote
console.log(roll( 1441202626, 672999), // 35.48
roll(-1734677756, 439284), // 42.14
roll( 1381382730, 400138), // 42.06
roll( 210996502, 043923), // 47.93
roll( -749482183, 932860), // 70.01
roll( 838855046, 694872), // 76.10
roll(-1969168664, 544456), // 91.38
roll( 750895370, 139452), // 98.59
roll( 484402262, 456027), // 30.50
roll( 1799451977, 296354), // 32.54
roll(-1319575640, 658432), // 35.03
roll( -455200602, 934854)); // 68.39
roll(-1734677756, 439284), // 42.14
roll( 1381382730, 400138), // 42.06
roll( 210996502, 043923), // 47.93
roll( -749482183, 932860), // 70.01
roll( 838855046, 694872), // 76.10
roll(-1969168664, 544456), // 91.38
roll( 750895370, 139452), // 98.59
roll( 484402262, 456027), // 30.50
roll( 1799451977, 296354), // 32.54
roll(-1319575640, 658432), // 35.03
roll( -455200602, 934854)); // 68.39
Edit: here it is in a compact 10 lines of ugly code:
Code:
var N = 624, M = 397, MATRIX_A = 0x9908b0df, UPPER_MASK = 0x80000000, LOWER_MASK = 0x7fffffff, mt = new Array(N);
function multiply(n1, n2) {var sum = 0; for (var i = 0; i < 32; ++i) if ((n1 >>> i) & 1) sum += (n2 << i); return sum; }
function roll(server_seed, client_seed) { var i, j, k; mt[0] = 19650218;
for (i = 1; i < N; i++) mt[i] = multiply(1812433253, mt[i - 1] ^ (mt[i - 1] >>> 30)) + i;
for (i = 1, j = 0, k = N; k; k--) { mt[i] = (mt[i] ^ multiply(mt[i - 1] ^ (mt[i - 1] >>> 30), 1664525)) + (j%2 ? client_seed : server_seed) + j%2;
if (++j, ++i >= N) mt[0] = mt[N - (i = 1)]; }
for (k = N - 1; k; k--) { mt[i] = (mt[i] ^ multiply(mt[i - 1] ^ (mt[i - 1] >>> 30), 1566083941)) - i; if (++i >= N) mt[0] = mt[N - (i = 1)]; }
mt[0] = UPPER_MASK; for (i = 0; i < N - M; i++) mt[i] = mt[i + M] ^ (((mt[i] & UPPER_MASK) | (mt[i + 1] & LOWER_MASK)) >>> 1) ^ MATRIX_A * (mt[i + 1] & 1);
for (;i < N - 1; i++) mt[i] = mt[i + (M - N)] ^ (mt[i] & UPPER_MASK) | (mt[i + 1] & LOWER_MASK) >>> 1 ^ MATRIX_A * (mt[i + 1] & 1);
return (k = mt[0], k ^= k >>> 11, k ^= k << 7 & 0x9d2c5680, k ^= k << 15 & 0xefc60000, (k ^ k >>> 18) + 10001 * 0xfffff)%10001 / 100; }
function multiply(n1, n2) {var sum = 0; for (var i = 0; i < 32; ++i) if ((n1 >>> i) & 1) sum += (n2 << i); return sum; }
function roll(server_seed, client_seed) { var i, j, k; mt[0] = 19650218;
for (i = 1; i < N; i++) mt[i] = multiply(1812433253, mt[i - 1] ^ (mt[i - 1] >>> 30)) + i;
for (i = 1, j = 0, k = N; k; k--) { mt[i] = (mt[i] ^ multiply(mt[i - 1] ^ (mt[i - 1] >>> 30), 1664525)) + (j%2 ? client_seed : server_seed) + j%2;
if (++j, ++i >= N) mt[0] = mt[N - (i = 1)]; }
for (k = N - 1; k; k--) { mt[i] = (mt[i] ^ multiply(mt[i - 1] ^ (mt[i - 1] >>> 30), 1566083941)) - i; if (++i >= N) mt[0] = mt[N - (i = 1)]; }
mt[0] = UPPER_MASK; for (i = 0; i < N - M; i++) mt[i] = mt[i + M] ^ (((mt[i] & UPPER_MASK) | (mt[i + 1] & LOWER_MASK)) >>> 1) ^ MATRIX_A * (mt[i + 1] & 1);
for (;i < N - 1; i++) mt[i] = mt[i + (M - N)] ^ (mt[i] & UPPER_MASK) | (mt[i + 1] & LOWER_MASK) >>> 1 ^ MATRIX_A * (mt[i + 1] & 1);
return (k = mt[0], k ^= k >>> 11, k ^= k << 7 & 0x9d2c5680, k ^= k << 15 & 0xefc60000, (k ^ k >>> 18) + 10001 * 0xfffff)%10001 / 100; }
Copy/paste those 10 lines into the console (hit F12), then run:
Code:
roll(750895370, 139452)
to see what that server seed and client seed combination should give you.
December 30, 2014, 04:17:07 PM
In the email our team member notified you that the code would not work for old rolls. You tried to verify the roll which happened on December 28th, while the problem has been solved on December 29th.
In the email I was told the code wouldn't work for old rolls, but I was trying to verify my most recent roll - a roll I made after asking for the roll algorithm.
I didn't realise that "old" meant "as recent as yesterday".
Is there any way to verify any of the rolls which were made before the 29th of December, or was the site entirely non-provably fair until then? According to your OP the site has been provably fair since launch. Is that not the case?
Have you tried to verify the rolls after the problem was solved?
I wasn't aware that I had found another problem. I thought the only problem was that your site mentioned two different ways of calculating the server seed hash, both of which were wrong.
Are you saying that I also discovered that the who 'twister' thing was broken too, so much so that it only works on rolls made since Dec 29th? Does that mean I get another bounty?
I just tried making some more rolls to test the code I was given:
Here's the roll:
Here are the relevant details in text form:
Code:
seed hash: 5DFA5AEEFDD135402AE2024F394B18F668B06E016AC4DDEDD3314AAB06A4F01E
sseed: -749482183
cseed: 932860
secret: 27920cb263931c992e1542351ee32d94
sseed: -749482183
cseed: 932860
secret: 27920cb263931c992e1542351ee32d94
The seed hash checks out:
Code:
$ echo -n '-749482183;27920cb263931c992e1542351ee32d94' | sha256sum
5dfa5aeefdd135402ae2024f394b18f668b06e016ac4ddedd3314aab06a4f01e -
5dfa5aeefdd135402ae2024f394b18f668b06e016ac4ddedd3314aab06a4f01e -
But when I take the code I was given and add this on the end:
Code:
var sseed = '-749482183';
var cseed = '932860';
var n = 10001;
var mt = new MersenneTwister19937();
mt.init_by_array([sseed,cseed],2);
var rnd = mt.genrand_int32();
var finalRoll = (rnd % n + n) % n;
console.log('rnd: '+rnd);
console.log('finalRoll: '+finalRoll);
var cseed = '932860';
var n = 10001;
var mt = new MersenneTwister19937();
mt.init_by_array([sseed,cseed],2);
var rnd = mt.genrand_int32();
var finalRoll = (rnd % n + n) % n;
console.log('rnd: '+rnd);
console.log('finalRoll: '+finalRoll);
then run it, I see this:
rnd: 1710041670
finalRoll: 683
whereas the screenshot says I rolled 70.01.
What am I doing wrong now? I hope this isn't another bug or you guys will be going bust with all the bounties you owe me!
Edit: ah, I need to specify the seeds as numbers not strings:
Code:
var sseed = -749482183;
var cseed = 932860;
var n = 10001;
var mt = new MersenneTwister19937();
mt.init_by_array([sseed,cseed],2);
var rnd = mt.genrand_int32();
var finalRoll = (rnd % n + n) % n;
console.log('rnd: '+rnd);
console.log('finalRoll: '+finalRoll/100);
var cseed = 932860;
var n = 10001;
var mt = new MersenneTwister19937();
mt.init_by_array([sseed,cseed],2);
var rnd = mt.genrand_int32();
var finalRoll = (rnd % n + n) % n;
console.log('rnd: '+rnd);
console.log('finalRoll: '+finalRoll/100);
Now it works!
rnd: 1267703758
finalRoll: 70.01
I'll put a page up that people can use to verify their rolls independently of your site if that will help.
December 30, 2014, 01:39:13 PM
I enjoy this site, I actually really like the relatively new blackjack game, and the video poker has really nice graphics. I think I'm actually in the positive here so that's cool I'd recommend +++1
I'd recommend +++1 
December 30, 2014, 01:25:17 PM
So despite not being able to see my bet list, and not being able to verify the site's provable fairness, I made a few dice bets, ended up with a small profit in CLAMs, and was able to withdraw it almost instantly.
The problem has already been solved and you can check your rolls without any problems. You also qualified for a bug bounty.
Let us know if you will have any questions
Good Luck
One of your guys emailed me, telling me that you need https://fortunejack.com/js/MersenneTwister19937.js to verify your rolls.
It would be useful if that was linked from the site so that other people could verify their rolls.
Edit: I tried using the code to verify my most recent roll, but it didn't work.
Here's how I was told to verify the roll:
In the email our team member notified you that the code would not work for old rolls. You tried to verify the roll which happened on December 28th, while the problem has been solved on December 29th.
Have you tried to verify the rolls after the problem was solved?
December 29, 2014, 04:40:55 PM
It would be useful if that was linked from the site so that other people could verify their rolls.
And so were you able to verify your rolls?And were the rolls legit?
I wasn't able to verify them. I expect it's just another mistake on their end rather than deliberate deception. We'll see...
December 29, 2014, 03:32:15 PM
So despite not being able to see my bet list, and not being able to verify the site's provable fairness, I made a few dice bets, ended up with a small profit in CLAMs, and was able to withdraw it almost instantly.
The problem has already been solved and you can check your rolls without any problems. You also qualified for a bug bounty.
Let us know if you will have any questions
Good Luck
One of your guys emailed me, telling me that you need https://fortunejack.com/js/MersenneTwister19937.js to verify your rolls.
It would be useful if that was linked from the site so that other people could verify their rolls.
And were the rolls legit?
December 29, 2014, 03:22:38 PM
So despite not being able to see my bet list, and not being able to verify the site's provable fairness, I made a few dice bets, ended up with a small profit in CLAMs, and was able to withdraw it almost instantly.
The problem has already been solved and you can check your rolls without any problems. You also qualified for a bug bounty.
Let us know if you will have any questions
Good Luck
One of your guys emailed me, telling me that you need https://fortunejack.com/js/MersenneTwister19937.js to verify your rolls.
It would be useful if that was linked from the site so that other people could verify their rolls.
Edit: I tried using the code to verify my most recent roll, but it didn't work.
Here's how I was told to verify the roll:
Here's the code I ran:
Code:
function MersenneTwister19937()
{N=624;M=397;MATRIX_A=0x9908b0df;UPPER_MASK=0x80000000;LOWER_MASK=0x7fffffff;var mt=new Array(N);var mti=N+1;function signed32(n1)
{return n1
{return n1<0?(n1^UPPER_MASK)+UPPER_MASK:n1;}
function subtraction32(n1,n2)
{return n1
{return unsigned32((n1+n2)&0xffffffff)}
function multiplication32(n1,n2)
{var sum=0;for(var i=0;i<32;++i){if((n1>>>i)&0x1){sum=addition32(sum,unsigned32(n2<
this.init_genrand=function(s)
{mt[0]=unsigned32(s&0xffffffff);for(mti=1;mti>>30))),mti);mt[mti]=unsigned32(mt[mti]&0xffffffff);}}
this.init_by_array=function(init_key,key_length)
{var i,j,k;this.init_genrand(19650218);i=1;j=0;k=(N>key_length?N:key_length);for(;k;k--){mt[i]=addition32(addition32(unsigned32(mt[i]^multiplication32(unsigned32(mt[i-1]^(mt[i-1]>>>30)),1664525)),init_key[j]),j);mt[i]=unsigned32(mt[i]&0xffffffff);i++;j++;if(i>=N){mt[0]=mt[N-1];i=1;}
if(j>=key_length)j=0;}
for(k=N-1;k;k--){mt[i]=subtraction32(unsigned32((dbg=mt[i])^multiplication32(unsigned32(mt[i-1]^(mt[i-1]>>>30)),1566083941)),i);mt[i]=unsigned32(mt[i]&0xffffffff);i++;if(i>=N){mt[0]=mt[N-1];i=1;}}
mt[0]=0x80000000;}
this.genrand_int32=function()
{var y;var mag01=new Array(0x0,MATRIX_A);if(mti>=N){var kk;for(kk=0;kk>>1)^mag01[y&0x1]);}
for(;kk>>1)^mag01[y&0x1]);}
y=unsigned32((mt[N-1]&UPPER_MASK)|(mt[0]&LOWER_MASK));mt[N-1]=unsigned32(mt[M-1]^(y>>>1)^mag01[y&0x1]);mti=0;}
y=mt[mti++];y=unsigned32(y^(y>>>11));y=unsigned32(y^((y<<7)&0x9d2c5680));y=unsigned32(y^((y<<15)&0xefc60000));y=unsigned32(y^(y>>>18));return signed32(y);}
this.genrand_int31=function()
{return(this.genrand_int32()>>>1);}
this.genrand_real1=function()
{return this.genrand_int32()*(1.0/4294967295.0);}
this.genrand_real2=function()
{return this.genrand_int32()*(1.0/4294967296.0);}
this.genrand_real3=function()
{return((this.genrand_int32())+0.5)*(1.0/4294967296.0);}
this.genrand_res53=function()
{var a=this.genrand_int32()>>>5,b=this.genrand_int32()>>>6;return(a*67108864.0+b)*(1.0/9007199254740992.0);}}
var sseed = -504039391;
var cseed = 498;
var n = 10001;
var mt = new MersenneTwister19937();
mt.init_by_array([sseed,cseed],2);
var rnd = mt.genrand_int32();
var finalRoll = (rnd % n + n) % n;
console.log('rnd: '+rnd);
console.log('finalRoll: '+finalRoll);
{N=624;M=397;MATRIX_A=0x9908b0df;UPPER_MASK=0x80000000;LOWER_MASK=0x7fffffff;var mt=new Array(N);var mti=N+1;function signed32(n1)
{return n1
{return n1<0?(n1^UPPER_MASK)+UPPER_MASK:n1;}
function subtraction32(n1,n2)
{return n1
{return unsigned32((n1+n2)&0xffffffff)}
function multiplication32(n1,n2)
{var sum=0;for(var i=0;i<32;++i){if((n1>>>i)&0x1){sum=addition32(sum,unsigned32(n2<
this.init_genrand=function(s)
{mt[0]=unsigned32(s&0xffffffff);for(mti=1;mti
this.init_by_array=function(init_key,key_length)
{var i,j,k;this.init_genrand(19650218);i=1;j=0;k=(N>key_length?N:key_length);for(;k;k--){mt[i]=addition32(addition32(unsigned32(mt[i]^multiplication32(unsigned32(mt[i-1]^(mt[i-1]>>>30)),1664525)),init_key[j]),j);mt[i]=unsigned32(mt[i]&0xffffffff);i++;j++;if(i>=N){mt[0]=mt[N-1];i=1;}
if(j>=key_length)j=0;}
for(k=N-1;k;k--){mt[i]=subtraction32(unsigned32((dbg=mt[i])^multiplication32(unsigned32(mt[i-1]^(mt[i-1]>>>30)),1566083941)),i);mt[i]=unsigned32(mt[i]&0xffffffff);i++;if(i>=N){mt[0]=mt[N-1];i=1;}}
mt[0]=0x80000000;}
this.genrand_int32=function()
{var y;var mag01=new Array(0x0,MATRIX_A);if(mti>=N){var kk;for(kk=0;kk
for(;kk
y=unsigned32((mt[N-1]&UPPER_MASK)|(mt[0]&LOWER_MASK));mt[N-1]=unsigned32(mt[M-1]^(y>>>1)^mag01[y&0x1]);mti=0;}
y=mt[mti++];y=unsigned32(y^(y>>>11));y=unsigned32(y^((y<<7)&0x9d2c5680));y=unsigned32(y^((y<<15)&0xefc60000));y=unsigned32(y^(y>>>18));return signed32(y);}
this.genrand_int31=function()
{return(this.genrand_int32()>>>1);}
this.genrand_real1=function()
{return this.genrand_int32()*(1.0/4294967295.0);}
this.genrand_real2=function()
{return this.genrand_int32()*(1.0/4294967296.0);}
this.genrand_real3=function()
{return((this.genrand_int32())+0.5)*(1.0/4294967296.0);}
this.genrand_res53=function()
{var a=this.genrand_int32()>>>5,b=this.genrand_int32()>>>6;return(a*67108864.0+b)*(1.0/9007199254740992.0);}}
var sseed = -504039391;
var cseed = 498;
var n = 10001;
var mt = new MersenneTwister19937();
mt.init_by_array([sseed,cseed],2);
var rnd = mt.genrand_int32();
var finalRoll = (rnd % n + n) % n;
console.log('rnd: '+rnd);
console.log('finalRoll: '+finalRoll);
It showed:
$ node twister.js
rnd: 1861962187
finalRoll: 6010
$
but that's not what I rolled:
Edit2: This is important stuff - can we please have a verifier that people can run to and get the same results as they get on the site?
December 29, 2014, 01:38:38 PM
So despite not being able to see my bet list, and not being able to verify the site's provable fairness, I made a few dice bets, ended up with a small profit in CLAMs, and was able to withdraw it almost instantly.
The problem has already been solved and you can check your rolls without any problems. You also qualified for a bug bounty.
Let us know if you will have any questions
Good Luck
Jump to: