everyone is talking about "why" freebitcoin acquired FUN token but nobody says "why not", I mean what is the reason why they shouldn't do it? Let's say it was dead before they acquired it, why is it a bad thing that they still managed to acquire it anyway?
It is definitely something I would say a positive for them, I wouldn't really mind them getting a coin that is not used anymore as well, like literally zero volume with absolutely nobody trading it for years now, it would still work, why? Because we are talking about having your own coin, maybe freebitcoin could have started their own coin as well, there wasn't a need for getting someone elses, that much is true, but that doesn't change the fact that people are focusing on what was and not what could be and that is why I believe we are focusing on the wrong place. I say this was great deal, after all I never knew it beforehand anyway.
This is basically proof that freebitcoin did something right. First of all we can't stop talking about it because fun token is now part of freebitcoin and if it is part of it and we are on their topic that means we can talk about it.
However what I believe is the main problem and awesome thing is that there could be people who dislike this new feature or there could be some people who are in love with it, but in the end we are talking about it and that is how marketing is done, just get people to talk about you because the more people talk about it means the more people will come and that is the idea of marketing. So, basically we are in a situation where we could make a profit in the long run from these talks.