Pages:
Author

Topic: FreiCoin (FRC) discussion (was FreiCoin (FRC) for TRC, PPC, LTC or BTC) - page 9. (Read 42592 times)

member
Activity: 91
Merit: 10
can this chart be redone now..  would be interesting to see
You should notice that the difficulty rose after the peak, which lead to the decrease in hashrate, which in turn lead to much slower block times. The decrease therefore looks much more significant and abrupt than it's actually been. I'd guess that we're still somewhere around 45-50 GH/s right now.

legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
Boom...




I think another chart would be handy.... hashrate seams to have dropped

More blocks need to be solved before we will have real data on this. It's still greater than 40GH/s, guaranteed, not counting pools I don't know about and solo miners.

The last estimate from ABE came in at 62 GH/s.

For anyone keeping track of this.

can this chart be redone now..  would be interesting to see
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
Proposed Freicoin Notations


Standard Notation:
Use the symbol ⌠ to represent Freicoin in everyday transactions. The symbol is a truncated 'long s'. It is a simple symbol to write by hand, has low ambiguity with other symbols in the alphabet, and can be used to replace the decimal mark.

You can access this symbol by holding Alt and typing 244 on your numeric pad on Windows.

Alt-244. Go ahead and try it.

Examples:

6⌠ = "six freicoin"

6.001⌠ or 6⌠001 = "six and one thousanth freicoin"


Scientific Notation:
For large or small values we suggest scientific notation. For this purpose we use the German character 'Eszett,' or 'ß'. The eszett is a ligature of ⌠+s, which we intend to represent "freicoin, scientific."

You can access this symbol by holding Alt and typing 225 on your numeric pad on Windows.

The symbol uses following formula: xßy = x * 10 ^ y

Alt-225. Go ahead and try it.

Examples:

6.001ß6 = 6001000⌠

6.001ß-5 = 0⌠00006001 or 0.00006001⌠




I'm not so sure about this idea. It may be controversial.


I'm not a fan.

I would rather just

355.6 frc
or
355.6(with an F like the bitcoin  ฿)
sr. member
Activity: 966
Merit: 311
Proposed Freicoin Notations


Standard Notation:
Use the symbol ⌠ to represent Freicoin in everyday transactions. The symbol is a truncated 'long s'. It is a simple symbol to write by hand, has low ambiguity with other symbols in the alphabet, and can be used to replace the decimal mark.

You can access this symbol by holding Alt and typing 244 on your numeric pad on Windows.

Alt-244. Go ahead and try it.

Examples:

6⌠ = "six freicoin"

6.001⌠ or 6⌠001 = "six and one thousanth freicoin"


Scientific Notation:
For large or small values we suggest scientific notation. For this purpose we use the German character 'Eszett,' or 'ß'. The eszett is a ligature of ⌠+s, which we intend to represent "freicoin, scientific."

You can access this symbol by holding Alt and typing 225 on your numeric pad on Windows.

The symbol uses following formula: xßy = x * 10 ^ y

Alt-225. Go ahead and try it.

Examples:

6.001ß6 = 6001000⌠

6.001ß-5 = 0⌠00006001 or 0.00006001⌠




I'm not so sure about this idea. It may be controversial.
sr. member
Activity: 966
Merit: 311
Boom...




I think another chart would be handy.... hashrate seams to have dropped

More blocks need to be solved before we will have real data on this. It's still greater than 40GH/s, guaranteed, not counting pools I don't know about and solo miners.

The last estimate from ABE came in at 62 GH/s.

For anyone keeping track of this.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
@TradeFortress, please keep that discussion to your own fork thread. This thread is for Freicoin.

but the fork from TradeFortress is maybe the future of Freicoin...

Because leaving all the original developers and others behind will really help this fork thrive, oh, wait...

If you want to try I0Coin again, feel free, but I doubt you will get very far with an idealistic currency without idealists.

I'm not investing in (just) FRC, I'm investing in maaku, and the concept of the foundation as well. Without these added value items, I'm not that interested in the currency. If someone proves that they are willing to take up the baton and run it forward with the same kind of vigor I might change my mind, but right now I don't see the point except to troll and try to kill the original project.

It's like buying a patent to a product, or the company that invented (or at least produced the relevant innovations around) the product. One is far more likely to succeed than the other.
Nyx
sr. member
Activity: 274
Merit: 250
@TradeFortress, please keep that discussion to your own fork thread. This thread is for Freicoin.

but the fork from TradeFortress is maybe the future of Freicoin...
legendary
Activity: 905
Merit: 1011
@TradeFortress, please keep that discussion to your own fork thread. This thread is for Freicoin.
vip
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
How many times must we explain that this foundation fund is for the distribution to people who do not and can not mine, not the property of developers.  If you distrust us that is one thing but stop repeating these accusation that we these funds have 'gone to developers'.  Mining over the last few years has become so capitol intensive and centralized that it is simply too undemocratic a process to distribute a coin base upon when the goal of any legitimate currency is broad circulation amongst the general public, not the enrichment of the first adopters.  Mining needs to become a sustainable business and this is why we have provided for an ongoing revenue stream that will support mining in perpetuity.

Mining may not be the best way. Proof of stake might not. But this is NOT decentralized. It is centralized. There is a "federal reserve" for FreiCoin, and that was developed by the FreiCoin developers.

You cannot claim that this is a coin "for the 99%" when you have 80% of coins given to a select group of people. You can call it a foundation, corporation, whatever, but it is being given to a group of people in an undemocratic manner.

Vote with your hashpower - if you feel that 80% of what coins should be yours, instead is given to a bunch of hard coded addresses, use the default client.

But if you don't think that's what should happen, use a fork of this open source project that is a fork of bitcoin.
sr. member
Activity: 826
Merit: 250
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
How many times must we explain that this foundation fund is for the distribution to people who do not and can not mine, not the property of developers.  If you distrust us that is one thing but stop repeating these accusation that we these funds have 'gone to developers'.  Mining over the last few years has become so capitol intensive and centralized that it is simply too undemocratic a process to distribute a coin base upon when the goal of any legitimate currency is broad circulation amongst the general public, not the enrichment of the first adopters.  Mining needs to become a sustainable business and this is why we have provided for an ongoing revenue stream that will support mining in perpetuity.
vip
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
I don't think that "compatible fork" will work. Even if it does, you're getting a different distribution than was designed, which, by the way, was already different from bitcoin's (better IMO): http://www.freicoin.org/freicoin-generation-graph-t41.html
I haven't bothered to calculate what distribution you would get though, but I think you will take lots of years to get final fixed supply.

I don't think we need more profit for miners, I would rather give it to the free software foundation (for example) even if they "sell them into existence". But if you really want this, I would start a new fork (without trying compatibility) from scratch.


Block reward will not be changed. The coin creation will not be changed. Only the distribution will. Instead of putting 80% to the developers (you could call the 1%), 100% is given to the miners.

Vote with your hashpower. It's how cryptocoins are decentralized and open.
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1002
I don't think that "compatible fork" will work. Even if it does, you're getting a different distribution than was designed, which, by the way, was already different from bitcoin's (better IMO): http://www.freicoin.org/freicoin-generation-graph-t41.html
I haven't bothered to calculate what distribution you would get though, but I think you will take lots of years to get final fixed supply.

I don't think we need more profit for miners, I would rather give it to the free software foundation (for example) even if they "sell them into existence". But if you really want this, I would start a new fork (without trying compatibility) from scratch.
vip
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
Where is the 80% tax? I'm not too familiar with the sourcecode but that's absolutely ridiculous and I want to remove it.
If you do I expect that none of your blocks will be accepted by the FreiCoin network. Have a look in main.cpp for 'GetInitialDistributionBudget'. This shows the addresses that receive the Foundation percentage.

Check out this awesome Freicoin fork:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/freicoin-frc-fork-without-80-of-coins-given-to-freicoin-foundation-134629
https://github.com/gladoscc/freicoin


All of your blocks WILL be accepted by the current FreiCoin network. This simply removes the check to see if there is the 80% tax, and will accept all (otherwise perfectly valid) blocks. Migrate to this fork, tell all your friends to do it, get pools to do it. Why?

Because this will soon be changed so that the coins normally given to the Foundation forcefully will be given to the miner instead! First of all we will need people running this fork. So make it Smiley
full member
Activity: 151
Merit: 100
Ok, just forked it. Working on removing it and distributing it democratically to miners.

I have pledged 1000 FRC for this purpose (if you want it...). But please consider another creation rate than bitcoin, like this one suggested by Adrian-X:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1274548
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1005
Where is the 80% tax? I'm not too familiar with the sourcecode but that's absolutely ridiculous and I want to remove it.
If you do I expect that none of your blocks will be accepted by the FreiCoin network. Have a look in main.cpp for 'GetInitialDistributionBudget'. This shows the addresses that receive the Foundation percentage.
vip
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
Ok, just forked it. Working on removing it and distributing it democratically to miners.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
Whoa, there are a lot of cats in this wall.
What's the 80% thing?

I'm thinking of it as a tax.  My understanding is that the 80% is placed into a "foundation" in which a group (which has not been established yet, but will likely be made up of the founders of FRC), will decide how and when to spend it.  So far it hasn't been touched, but could be at any time. 

I wish it didn't exist, or if it did, was at a much more reasonable level of 10% or less. 

Someone will probably eventually fork the coin without it.  There have been several people comment that they were working on it, but whether they actually are or not, who knows. 
vip
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
What's the 80% thing?
sr. member
Activity: 966
Merit: 311
Boom...




I think another chart would be handy.... hashrate seams to have dropped

More blocks need to be solved before we will have real data on this. It's still greater than 40GH/s, guaranteed, not counting pools I don't know about and solo miners.
legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1001
RUM AND CARROTS: A PIRATE LIFE FOR ME
What is wrong with costless hoarding? I'm not convinced there is any problem with it. Some people will hoard and some will invest, it all depends on the person and their incentives. If there is money to be made through investing- people will invest. If not they won't. People won't hoard if they dont' have some better alternative. Currently hoarding is the status-quo among cryptocoins because there just isn't very much of value to do with the coins themselves.

Because costless hoarding is impossible with REAL assets, everything in our world decays, entropy is inevitable.  When you accumulate a surplus of goods to have as a reserve for future consumption that is perfectly natural and good, but their will be an inevitable cost in decay before the reserve is consumed.

Now if we know for sure that costless hoarding is impossible with real physical assets, yet money which is entirely a social construct of man appears to allow that which the laws of physics forbid.  How can that be reconciled?  The laws of physics ALWAYS trump social constructs, their is no costless hoarding even with money, money is simply causing a cost-shifting from the hoarder to the rest of society (which we call usury) which is why we can't ALL hoard at no cost, someone must always lose.

Your last point about "hoarding because their is nothing to do with the coins" is the classic supply-side economic error, the belief that is the fault of a 'supply' for not enticing money to move in the face of it's desire to remain stationary.  It's argued that an increase in supply and a lowering of prices will entice money to move, but if the prescription is for continuing declines in price then how ever tempting it may be to purchase on the first drop in prices the expected future infinity of price declines constitute an even strong incentive to keep hoarding.  

The reality is their is nothing to do with the coins because they are being hoarded, remove the hoarding incentive and the uses will spring up.

"Because costless hoarding is impossible with REAL assets"
But is our current financial system really "REAL" assets anyway? When the financial crisis hit, hundreds of billions of dollars in wealth were 'destroyed' but did they ever really exist? It's free to hoard Zeros.

"money which is entirely a social construct of man appears to allow that which the laws of physics forbid.  How can that be reconciled?  The laws of physics ALWAYS trump social constructs"

LOVE man. I disprove you with LOVE. Social Construct. Trumps Physics. Free to Hoard. The more you divide it, the more of it you have. All you need is love.  Grin (But seriously, I'm being serious.)

"the classic supply-side economic error, the belief that is the fault of a 'supply' for not enticing money to move in the face of it's desire to remain stationary"

Money doesn't have a desire to remain stationary. It's not like the money in my wallet wants to jUmP OuT! I have to have something to spend it on. If I'm all alone in the middle of the ocean and there is no one and nothing that accepts money for anything, I don't just take what cash I have and toss it to the seagulls. I wait until some point in the future when I get somewhere (or when someone gets to me) that DOES take my money and then I make exchanges. Crypto-currency is a money on an island without any goods for sale.

The real error I think is in forgetting that as this is sort of a 'virtual' currency that is being bootstrapped the conditions are a bit more novel  then traditional money. None of us really know each other, nor can reach each other. So it's very hard to find goods and services that are both  in demand, and can be exchanged over either great distances or mediums. If this were an "in person" or REAL currency and all of us were in close proximity then we wouldn't have this dearth of economic opportunities. If there were nothing to sell people would at the very least turn to services or prostitution.

Not surprisingly this is what actually happens: Monkeys when taught the basics of money almost immediately turn to prostitution.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/05/magazine/05FREAK.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

But this only works, once again, in person. In virtual world we are struggling to find places to spend our money, but we don't waste it just because we have nothing better to do with it. So classic error, I think not.
Pages:
Jump to: