We all know satoshi said multiple implementations would be bad.
Admittedly, he did. However, the world is replete with multiple interoperating implementations of various protocols. Indeed, even Bitcoin is already working with multiple interoperating implementations. Are you stating that Satoshi's worst fears about multiple implementations need be slavishly adhered to?
Quote
And yes if BU took over the president would have control through appointed deputies, whom he can have removed if he wishes.
Nonsense. There are no deputies. There are four differentiated officers -- each with limited and defined powers -- and members.
Quote
BU is to run a mining and it is stated if they own greater than 51% they will no do anything to not control greater than 51%.
The AoF do speak of a mining pool. Something I argued against at the time. Not because there is anything inherently wrong with it, but rather because operating a pool seemed to me to be a distraction to the core effort.
But I don't think the pool never had anyone actually put the effort in to set it up. It is an unrealized plan. So even if it does not explicitly ban owning 51% of the network, it actually owns 0%.
If you have evidence to the contrary, I'm certainly willing to consider it. But you seem to be merely concern trolling. Almost as if your quasi-religious belief that Bitcoin is perfectly resistant to change is being threatened or something.
