Pages:
Author

Topic: G A M B L E R S ❗❗ What are your thoughts on this? (Read 813 times)

hero member
Activity: 2716
Merit: 698
Dimon69
I love to gamble against other person and not against computer , this makes me more competitive and aware of the situation that just playing online or against programmed game.

actually before pandemic i constantly go to a friends house just to gamble and only visiting crypto gambling site whenever i succeed in trading or received my payments from bounty/campaigns.

so obviously i will choose the one that is not totally an online gambling.
There is fun in playing with other people and the chance that we can win depending on our opponent. It will boost our confidence and starts to think we were good at that game when we already starts to won. There are already live casinos now who offers gaming with others and provide a chat box for interactions. The online casinos evolving  gives many gamblers option to discover what they think they prefer more with real people or just against themselves or the house.
hero member
Activity: 2828
Merit: 611
I love to gamble against other person and not against computer , this makes me more competitive and aware of the situation that just playing online or against programmed game.
I believe most gamblers are preferring to play against other gamblers because they are believing when they are competing against another human then there will be less possibilities of manipulation even in the probably fair environment. I'm not going to justify their opinion is right or wrong but when we are looking for instant gambling then we need to go for playing against house because there cannot be some player will be waiting for you to arrive and join to compete against you all the times. This is the reason why playing against houses kind of gambling is more popular and widely available everywhere.
hero member
Activity: 2002
Merit: 535
~
Actually, skill games are least fair because you might be playing against a computer script or simply an opponent who is far superior than you. In contrast, luck games are much more fair because they work on a provably fair system and you can verify your bets.

To me, the ideology of making money with gambling itself has a big hole in it.
I have not thought like that, if there are bot then it will not be a fair game at all as it is impossible to defeat the bot. I am sure there are people who can identify these bots. I am not an expert in card games and hence i am not too worried about that or nor does i understand the fairness every gambling sites provides. If you doubt the team then they can also mess around the provably fair system.

You cannot approach gambling as a means of making money but approach as a means of trying your luck.
hero member
Activity: 2604
Merit: 816
🐺Spinarium.com🐺 - iGaming casino
Actually in gambling it's very rewarding if you got to end winning either you win depending on your luck or win depending on your strategy and we do have our own choices which one do we like to play with that could be most entertain for us. But I am a type of a gambler that wanted to win in a competition like using my skills and wanted to develop more strategy so that winning in this kind of gambling will be more rewarding for ma so that's why I choose casino B than casino A.
Yeah it's true Gambling is rewarding but it's depends also if we know how to play the game , that's why as a Gamblers we need to practice our skills to make more advanced and competing other opponent it's more likely to play with them cause it makes fun while playing in the Gambling.
If you decide to practice your skills to have more advanced, you need to consider that it will require more money to learn unless you learn and practice without using money. If so, you can do that but the feels will be different if you do not use and maybe you will not get the thrill of playing gambling. Besides that, when you play with money, the sensation will be there and you will feel that playing gambling will be excited.
hero member
Activity: 1106
Merit: 527
I have read all comments above there are different preferences upon choosing a gambling casino, there are some who say it is much better if you will try them both and others says it is good if you will not against the computer or the house edge. But for me, yes, both are profitable or maybe it will easily wipe out your all balance in a matter of a minute while on gambling. That is true, both of them to are very risky but I think the risk was already there and all you have to do is manage the risk because if there is a high risk means a high potential of gaining profit. So in my opinion, you can choose both and it depend on where you are comfortable at.
hero member
Activity: 3024
Merit: 680
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
Both are good and you have a chance to win on both, but there are too many risks playing in poker I'm not a good poker player I only play poker with my friends and I lose many times and to think of my friends are not good on poker too,
I'm also not a good poker because I can be that emotional when there's a streak that I've got no good hands.

so I have to go for option number 1 which is relying on luck to make a profit.
This is also hard, you're going to depend on your luck if you target for the profit. It's a hard choice if you're for the profit.
sr. member
Activity: 2030
Merit: 269
Both are good and you have a chance to win on both, but there are too many risks playing in poker I'm not a good poker player I only play poker with my friends and I lose many times and to think of my friends are not good on poker too, so I have to go for option number 1 which is relying on luck to make a profit.
sr. member
Activity: 1148
Merit: 346

Actually in gambling it's very rewarding if you got to end winning either you win depending on your luck or win depending on your strategy and we do have our own choices which one do we like to play with that could be most entertain for us. But I am a type of a gambler that wanted to win in a competition like using my skills and wanted to develop more strategy so that winning in this kind of gambling will be more rewarding for ma so that's why I choose casino B than casino A.


  Yeah it's true Gambling is rewarding but it's depends also if we know how to play the game , that's why as a Gamblers we need to practice our skills to make more advanced and competing other opponent it's more likely to play with them cause it makes fun while playing in the Gambling.
full member
Activity: 2520
Merit: 204
I love to gamble against other person and not against computer , this makes me more competitive and aware of the situation that just playing online or against programmed game.

actually before pandemic i constantly go to a friends house just to gamble and only visiting crypto gambling site whenever i succeed in trading or received my payments from bounty/campaigns.

so obviously i will choose the one that is not totally an online gambling.
hero member
Activity: 2170
Merit: 530
Yes that's what I mean for my own strategy that it is better to used skill and competing other opponent there's a big possible to win than to wait our lucky time so I choose casino B . Besides that we can practice and enhanced our skill to be more good in the game for me that's the advantage for the casino B.

Actually in gambling it's very rewarding if you got to end winning either you win depending on your luck or win depending on your strategy and we do have our own choices which one do we like to play with that could be most entertain for us. But I am a type of a gambler that wanted to win in a competition like using my skills and wanted to develop more strategy so that winning in this kind of gambling will be more rewarding for ma so that's why I choose casino B than casino A.
full member
Activity: 1148
Merit: 158
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
Assume you have $100 and must choose between the two casino versions shown below to turn a proft. Which will you choose?

-----

Depending on my mood, but most likely I would choose B as for I love playing using my skills and its more fun. But in some days, that you don't want to think and just waste down some money... I would probably go for A
hero member
Activity: 2954
Merit: 796
1. Casino A:
Players in this casino compete against the platform (house) in games such as BlackJack, Rollet, Slots, etc... .
In this type of casino, players must rely on luck and other factors to make a profit.

2. Casino B:
Players in this casino compete against each others in games such as Ludo, Poker, Rummy, etc... .
In this type of casino, players rely on their luck and skills to make a profit.
There is only one winner in each game (Ludo: first place, Poker/Rummy: last man standing).
I would go with type A casinos and I know it's not a common opinion but the reasoning behind choosing a luck-based casino where we compete against house edge is the lower edge. I have seen that in most platforms and games where a dealer is involved or players play among themselves, the platform charges hefty fees for that and that's much higher than the usual house edge.

If the house edge & platform commission are the same, then no doubt I would play multiplayer games because it's much more fun and engaging while also a good chance to show off the skills and make some money.

The reason it has a high house edge is to cover operating cost since they don't have any source of income compared when the house is directly playing to players. There's a pros and cons in both option and it solely depends on the skills of the player. If the player has good skill per se poker then it will be good for him to play against other players instead against House even the house edge is much bigger, In the end he will have huge profit for his skill advantage which he can't use if he play against the house.

But only few casino will offer a pure Player to Player game due to a lot competition out there. Imagine a huge operating cost for a small profit on house edge which you can't guarantee if many people will play on your table.
legendary
Activity: 3276
Merit: 2442
I would rather compete against the other players. (In your example it is "casino B") It is because it is almost certain that you are going to lose against the house. ("casino A") But people on the other hand can be dumb sometimes (that includes you too) unlike the house. It means you can win more often against the real players.

However, I haven't looked at how "casino B" really operates but I assume that it also gets his share from the players because otherwise the casino wouldn't be able to make profits. If casino B provides this platform for the players, they have to take something from the players, unless they get their money from the ad givers which is very unlikely. So, in any case, the casino still always wins whether it is casino A or Casino B.
sr. member
Activity: 1148
Merit: 346
For me I'll rather choose B  than A cause  in the Casino B which mean that  you can win by  your skills and luck than Casino A waiting for your luck to win the game. In Casino B you have carry your victory by your skills of you are good and have greater ideas than the other player  you probably win the game.
That also means that you have to be better than the other gamblers.
I think it is also better if there will be the choice that you can be against the house in skilled manner but that's unlikely.

 Yes that's what I mean for my own strategy that it is better to used skill and competing other opponent there's a big possible to win than to wait our lucky time so I choose casino B . Besides that we can practice and enhanced our skill to be more good in the game for me that's the advantage for the casino B.
hero member
Activity: 3024
Merit: 745
Top Crypto Casino
For me I'll rather choose B  than A cause  in the Casino B which mean that  you can win by  your skills and luck than Casino A waiting for your luck to win the game. In Casino B you have carry your victory by your skills of you are good and have greater ideas than the other player  you probably win the game.
That also means that you have to be better than the other gamblers.
I think it is also better if there will be the choice that you can be against the house in skilled manner but that's unlikely.
sr. member
Activity: 1148
Merit: 346
For me I'll rather choose B  than A cause  in the Casino B which mean that  you can win by  your skills and luck than Casino A waiting for your luck to win the game. In Casino B you have carry your victory by your skills of you are good and have greater ideas than the other player  you probably win the game.
hero member
Activity: 3010
Merit: 629
And I think that generally, when people want to gamble, they are simply seeking a quick entertainment and not anything extended. They don't want to have to install an app, enter a training tutorial, and wait for people to come online.
Well thats true, some gamblers prefer to play games that purely rely on luck. Special skills are not needed whom gamblers dont also want to learn first before they can able to play. Its a bit hassle since you only want is to enjoy the game and hoping to earn. But still, I prefer games which require skills because you are not only relying on luck but you can also apply what you have learn through experience on playing that particular game.
hero member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 598
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I play on luck so my choice is on option number 1 most of my activities on gambling sites are luck-based I love playing on luck games because I'm not good at games that require skills and concentration it's time-consuming to try how to learn various skills on Poker, Blackjack and besides I have good success in luck-based games.

hero member
Activity: 1176
Merit: 543
fillippone - Winner contest Pizza 2022
I would rather compete with my fellow gamblers to be lucky to win a bet. It is very difficult to win against the house cause the house has different ways to make sure that the game is out of the hand if the gamblers. Winning against the house with a big success can be as a result of high altitude luck that might have tricked the house of possible outcomes.
sr. member
Activity: 504
Merit: 250
I think that Casino B is more attractive to me due to the community engagement aspect.

However, I can see why most people would still default to Casino A.

People like consistency and knowing that they're always going to get a provably fair outcome despite the lower odds of winning that they may have. You have to understand that when you do your R&D in this space. Perhaps include a play against house option alongside your option B?
Pages:
Jump to: