Topic: G A M B L E R S ❗❗ What are your thoughts on this? - page 7. (Read 801 times)
Blackjack doesn't rely on luck, if you can card count then it's probably a skill based of some sort. In my opinion, this is a matter of perspective, to be fair, there's more chances of winning in Casino A if you only play Blackjack and you can do a card counting.
Assume you have $100 and must choose between the two casino versions shown below to turn a proft. Which will you choose?
Assuming I have that money and if I like both type of game, I will split the money. $50 for the A and other $50 for the B. Why I should choose one of them if I like both. I think it will give a better chance not to lose all the money unless I get bad luck on those two games.
It's subjective on every players and there might be a person who can choose both if it's available in the same casino. I'm into skill to be honest so my bet would be on the option B and more likely on poker game.
This is misleading as the option B also has fees, thus both are negative-sum from players' perspective. Then, in the option A, players also compete against other players in the form of luck, thus the narrative of option A against the house, vs option B against other player is not accurate.
The more accurate is in option A, the luck factor is the most dominant in deciding a winner, whereas in the option B, skill also is an important factor. Option A also has higher fees compared to option B (usually).
I'll always pick slots, not because of profit et al., but because I like the game.
The more accurate is in option A, the luck factor is the most dominant in deciding a winner, whereas in the option B, skill also is an important factor. Option A also has higher fees compared to option B (usually).
I'll always pick slots, not because of profit et al., but because I like the game.
Whatever games you'd love, you can really play and enjoy it.
I personally loved playing the house games, like crash games online and the dice game but I'm not trying to beat the house because its not possible, I just love playing it. If I do have extra fund, I play poker because I know having a good capital on this can bring you in a longer games. This will always depend on your gambling plan, $100 is already a good amount to start with I'll go for the games that I'd love.
I personally loved playing the house games, like crash games online and the dice game but I'm not trying to beat the house because its not possible, I just love playing it. If I do have extra fund, I play poker because I know having a good capital on this can bring you in a longer games. This will always depend on your gambling plan, $100 is already a good amount to start with I'll go for the games that I'd love.
It depends on the time that's available to gamble for me. Casino B would likely take a lot of time and require focus than Casino A which I can easily set on auto. I'm not the type of player that's really good at these games but playing against other players was definitely fun based on personal experience though.
Assume you have $100 and must choose between the two casino versions shown below to turn a proft. Which will you choose?
I can not give a clear A or B answer to that because it always depends on in what mood i currently am. To be honest most of the times i just want to gamble a little without having to be totally focused and alert all the time and then i just listen to some music and watch some Videos and stuff like that while i play the slot machine for example. Whenever i feel like playing in a more competitive way then i choose games like poker where i can play against real opponents.
Well, if I have to play a game that requires the skills to compete with other players, then why not choose casino b over casino a? I mean it is a no brainer to participate on something where strategic gameplay influences the chances of winning rather playing based on pure luck.
And I'd rather play with human than with bots.
And I'd rather play with human than with bots.
I'd choose casino A here I know i'll get crushed by the house edge later on but on the other hand I suck at those last man standing type of games where there's only one winner so from my perspective i'm better off taking my chances against the house compared to pvp games. I still like gambling against others once in a while like lotteries and certain contests but they're somewhat difficult to maintain I remember there's one casino who tried launching a coinflip gambling site then it ended up failing due to lack of interest.
I chose A, because option B I can do it in real life. LOL
This question is basically whether you prefer to play against bots (code) or humans. Not the main consideration for choosing a casino platform because the two options are just variants of the game which one company can provide all of them. I can bet weekly for my favorite sports clubs and while I can play crash every day.
This question is basically whether you prefer to play against bots (code) or humans. Not the main consideration for choosing a casino platform because the two options are just variants of the game which one company can provide all of them. I can bet weekly for my favorite sports clubs and while I can play crash every day.
If you want to make profits with the money you have and you are offering only one between these two then B is better choice because pvp games maybe mich easier comparing against winning the house but still there is no assurance of winning it.
There being only 1 winner in the B scenario is a deterrent against selecting that option. Having been in crypto for years, I remember there being a player versus player (pvp) trivia website where players could compete for crypto winnings. Some suspect the owner of the trivia website participated in games. There was one player who knew the answer to every question who won a lot more than they probably should. Those types of potential scams, which have been around for many years, raise suspicion with the "1 winner per game" format.
That said, I think I would still prefer option B over option A. Simply due to it giving the impression that chances of winning might be more fair or balanced than competing against a house algorithm.
That said, I think I would still prefer option B over option A. Simply due to it giving the impression that chances of winning might be more fair or balanced than competing against a house algorithm.
2. Casino B:
Players in this casino compete against each others in games such as Ludo, Poker, Rummy, etc... .
In this type of casino, players rely on their luck and skills to make a profit.
There is only one winner in each game (Ludo: first place, Poker/Rummy: last man standing).
Check out this thread if you're interested in such an idea.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annbsc-wunzogames-plat-to-earn-a-new-daonfts-concept-5352967
2. Casino B:
Players in this casino compete against each others in games such as Ludo, Poker, Rummy, etc... .
In this type of casino, players rely on their luck and skills to make a profit.
There is only one winner in each game (Ludo: first place, Poker/Rummy: last man standing).
I didn't realize it was off topic; tell me how to move it and I'll do so. Sorry tho!
Bottom left side corner of this thread, you will notice that there is an option to either move / lock topic
Take this as a friendly suggestion but I think you should probably lock this thread after you move it to gambling discussion board. Thread like this has the potential to become another mega spam thread
A game should be fair, even if luck is sometimes part of what makes it entertaining. I'll go with B since I don't want to risk with other factors that may or may not favor one of us. If I play using my skills, I have a fair and high probability of winning because my experience and observations are based on them.
Playing against an opponent gives me an advantage in determining my opponent's next move and plans, but playing a game with the house is always a no for me because only a few players emerged as winners.
There is a significant difference between playing against a player and playing against the odds xd Playing against an opponent gives me an advantage in determining my opponent's next move and plans, but playing a game with the house is always a no for me because only a few players emerged as winners.
I didn't realize it was off topic; tell me how to move it and I'll do so. Sorry tho!
Bottom left side corner of this thread, you will notice that there is an option to either move / lock topic
Take this as a friendly suggestion but I think you should probably lock this thread after you move it to gambling discussion board. Thread like this has the potential to become another mega spam thread
A game should be fair, even if luck is sometimes part of what makes it entertaining. I'll go with B since I don't want to risk with other factors that may or may not favor one of us. If I play using my skills, I have a fair and high probability of winning because my experience and observations are based on them.
Playing against an opponent gives me an advantage in determining my opponent's next move and plans, but playing a game with the house is always a no for me because only a few players emerged as winners.
Playing against an opponent gives me an advantage in determining my opponent's next move and plans, but playing a game with the house is always a no for me because only a few players emerged as winners.
Naturally, because I am a gambler who is dominant in playing slots, so I will choose point A. Maybe because I rely on luck according to what I have in terms of gambling knowledge. I know that it is a big risk that the funds will often lose rather than win against the casino house itself. But for me controlling losses is a good way, even though we will be played by the house in gambling, it doesn't mean we are lazy and don't have a strategy. If the victory has been obtained, then I prefer to withdraw it first in order to minimize losses.
How about moving this topic to Gambling Discussion board.
I didn't realize it was off topic; tell me how to move it and I'll do so. Sorry tho! Jump to: