Topic: Game-Protect.com did not refund my money and stopped replying to my emails - page 5. (Read 4722 times)

Deliberately misleading. I already posted a full rebuttal to your denials.

Happy to see he hasn't gotten any 'donations' since Oct 2.  Good work everyone.

Cool. Where did h4ns say that he was donating?

It is not called a donation, it is a donation in writing!

Calling it a donation doesn't make it a donation, just like how calling others braindead doesn't change the fact that you are merely projecting your pathetic insecurities upon others online, where you believe you can find fulfillment in your pseudo-anonymity.

@ 1982dre, actmyname, addarmstrong, alexrossi, asphyxiate, Astargath, Avirunes, BigBoy89, bL4nkcode, bob123, bones261, cabalism, Captain Corporate, CASIO, ChiBitCTy, crwth, CryptopreneurBrainboss, DaveF, DiamondCardz, DireWolfM14, DreamerBT, eckmar, efialtis, examplens, Foxpup, Hakorede, HCP, Hhampuz, hopenotlate, iasenko, iluvbitcoins, Initscri, jimmyhate, JSRAW, Kalemder, Kevinn22, kruglikov, LeGaulois, LeonGhibli, LFC_Bitcoin, lighpulsar07, Lutpin, marlboroza, mindrust, Mirae, mocacinno, morvillz7z, mosprognoz, mu_enrico, NeuroticFish, nutildah, o_e_l_e_o, Pamoldar, pandukelana2712, PassThePopcorn, passwordnow, RHavar, rhomelmabini, robelneo, Rodeo02, Royse777, ScamViruS, sheenshane, Slow death,  squatz1, stompix, subSTRATA, suchmoon, SyGambler, TECSHARE, The Parmasist, TheUltraElite, TMAN, TwitchySeal, whitcher_sense, WinRateCasino, yahoo62278, yazher, yogg, Zwei

Your partner in crime xtraelv investigated that a legally binding agreement, let alone a written contract, does not exist!


Does not exist!

Game Protect only takes donations without any legally binding agreement.

Does not exist!

Game Protect does not make contracts and therefore can not intent to be legally bound by such!

Who did I scam and how?

And he's gone on another trust feedback spam spree, this time demanding that we "tell at what day and how the alleged scam happened". I finally decided to give in to his demands, because deep down I'm a nice guy and I enjoy giving people what they want.

You now owe GP 20,000 Euro.

Congrats

Lets say a player gets frustrated with a casino for some reason and calls them a scam on a forum. (happens all the time)

Do you think the Casino has the right to just take the players money from their account, cancel any withdraws and just keep it and tell the player the funds were being deducted from $10,000 that the player now owes the Casino?

What would you say to a Casino that did this?

Who's wrong, Casino or Player?

I am not able to see a written contract there, please quote it

I am not able to see at what day and how the scam happened, please quote it

h4ns says that his brain substantiated September 3rd that Game Protect is a scam / show, after I asked him if he can lend me BTC worth 10€, but asking to lend BTC worth 10€ is not a scam in the real world


h4ns says that his brain substantiated September 3rd that Game Protect is a scam / show, after I asked him if he can lend me BTC worth 10€, but the red flag says around July 2019

There are tons of "Scam" threads in SBR and other places where users call casinos and bookmakers scam - they are still getting their withdrawals processed, of course.

Game Protect - please resolve this with h4ns instead of grinding water - it's impossible to grind water so just stop it ... think about it for the sake of your business, and I'm saying it without any incentives whatsoever.

Lets say a player gets frustrated with a casino for some reason and calls them a scam on a forum. (happens all the time)

Do you think the Casino has the right to just take the players money from their account, cancel any withdraws and just keep it and tell the player the funds were being deducted from $10,000 that the player now owes the Casino?

What would you say to a Casino that did this?

Who's wrong, Casino or Player?

In the real world it works like this:

- If Game Protect violated a written contract, resulting in damages, around July 2019, then h4ns's brain would have substantiated that Game Protect is a scam / show around July 2019 and not September 3rd after I asked him if he can lend me BTC worth 10€ the second time!


- If the brain of a customer substantiated that Game Protect is a scam / show, then it would withdraw its 7 pending enforcement cases?

I just posted a damn link stating that in the EU an email can be considered a written god-damn contract.

Please... read...

_{https://www.icaew.com/archive/library/subject-gateways/law/legal-alert/2018-02/case-law-court-confirms-emails-can-create-legally-binding-contracts}
https://parissmith.co.uk/blog/even-emails-text-messaging-can-constitute-legally-binding-agreement/


This is Golden Ocean Group Ltd v Sagacor Mining Industries PVT Ltd and another [2012] EWCA Civ 265, UK.

IE, by placing your name or entity "Game Protect", that you take legal responsibility for its contents.

Id be hard pressed to find a judge that wouldn't run in h4ns' favour at this point.

The theme is written contract and not what emails can create!

Where is the written contract?

Did you not honestly read what I just sent. Emails can create legally binding contracts. A contract is an agreement. Look, I know your english isn't great, but if it isn't, you can't then over-analyze verbiage.

1) Good call sign of a scammer. "ITS A DONATION". Wow, you still created, within your email, a list of obligations for yourself. Besides, the very definition of what you are doing, I would argue, isn't a donation. Transactions aren't considered "donations" when in exchange for something, regardless of whether you'd like to call it a "donation" or not. For example, in Canadian law (which I assume would run the same as EU): "Thus, a gift is the voluntary and gratuitous transfer of property.[59] Furthermore, the donor must not draw any personal benefit, either directly or indirectly, in consideration for the transfer.[60] The gesture must be entirely gratuitous and a reflection of liberal intent on the part of the donor in regard to the donee."
2) This seems like a promise to me: http://i.gyazo.com/c93468342382dcdf69fe53a0000ac19a.png


With your edit, you literally just confirmed what I said. So you're making promises but saying you'll take "donations". That's scamming people. You can't say "I'll do this TASK for you, IF you make a donation" and then once you take the donation say "Well, because I SAID it was a donation, I no longer have to do TASK for you"

That's against the law mate. If you state, ahead of time, that the donation is in exchange for a service, it's no longer considered a donation. It's considered a legitimate, taxable BTW, transaction.

So you're honestly probably evading tax laws by calling them donations aren't you. Ah, that aught to get sketchy.

Here you are, calling everyone else criminals, when you're probably committing tax evasion yourself and you're committing donation fraud.

The theme is written contract and not binding agreements, but thank you for confrming that a legally binding agreement does not exist!

1) I never had the intention to enter into legal relations.

Despite of this, donations exclude legal relations by default.

Real world legal aspects: Donations are given without return consideration.

2) I never promised anything

Fine, you want a different country:

https://parissmith.co.uk/blog/even-emails-text-messaging-can-constitute-legally-binding-agreement/
https://www.icaew.com/archive/library/subject-gateways/law/legal-alert/2018-02/case-law-court-confirms-emails-can-create-legally-binding-contracts

The following obligations in EU law have to be met:

An intention by both parties to enter into legal relations
An offer by one of the parties which is capable of being accepted by the other
Acceptance of that offer by the other, and
A mutual promise by each to provide something of value to the other (known in law as 'consideration')

ALL of which are applicable to your email exchange with h4ns.

For written contracts the signatures of both parties are required!


New York law is not applicable!


At what day and how?