★★★ GameCredits - The future of in-game monetization ★★★ - page 70.

Majormax

legendary

Activity: 2534

Merit: 1129

Quote from: shavers on August 23, 2017, 04:06:43 PM

It's called moderation. And yes, i'll keep deleting rubbish posts. Constructive criticism is welcomed, useless posts are not. Whoever feels the urge to elaborate it's "Brilliant idea" about, say, >Why not POS<, feel free to start your own thread, or even better - make your own coin and do it "the proper way". Best of luck anyway.

Also I suggest you delete posts about price. Well-managed, mature coins have a separate 'Speculation' thread. Game has one too.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/gamecredits-speculation-1873396

shavers

sr. member

Activity: 439

Merit: 288

Quote from: ngin-x on August 21, 2017, 09:54:31 PM

Quote from: wheelz1200 on August 21, 2017, 11:17:58 AM

Quote from: ngin-x on August 20, 2017, 09:31:40 PM

Quote from: Jack Kuveke on August 20, 2017, 11:02:05 AM

Quote from: Rogerdale on August 20, 2017, 09:54:58 AM

Quote from: Jack Kuveke on August 20, 2017, 09:18:11 AM

Appreciate the support guys! I promise these kinds of people don't truly get to me (maybe in the moment, but never more than that). I feel it's just important to respond factually and firmly. Think it can only breed confidence in new investors who venture to our thread.

I believe 130M cap is too small for a currency that is going to be a "national currency for all gamers". You can see that "national currency of darknet" Monero has 800M market cap. I expect GameCredits be somewhere there.

But guys, Scrypt mining algo is truly and obvious bad thing... To advance and be the first you need to be the leading currency in your mining algo, and now you are behind Litecoin.

We'll do whatever is best for the currency and project. We're not crazy people. But right now we're stable and growing, and if we think that might stop if we don't change we'll definitely begin thinking about the best course of action.

Jack, I hope you are thinking about moving to POS at some point. POW is a dying consensus algo and should not be supported anyway as it's slow and wastes electricity. We gotta move with the times you know.

How is pow slower than pos? And i think btc is doing just fine sitting on pow sha mining right now. A fork to pos would not make sense just for the sake of switching to pos.

BTC is doing just fine? It takes several hours to get a confirmation. Extensive studies have already been done to show that POW is very slow by nature and no matter what you do, it cannot be scaled up to the level of Visa/Mastercard's 3000 TX/s standard without sacrificing decentralization.

Transaction fees are also very high as billions of dollars are being wasted just to secure the blockchain. It's meaningless wastage of electricity to do usless computations which in turn damages the environment. POS has none of these problems and it also incentivizes people to hold the coins rather than sell 'em.

What if i tell you we've have developed our own proprietary software that works in synergy with blockchain and can handle up to 70,000 transactions per second and can be scaled beyount that figure when needed. I'm not saying we took a wider prospective than segwit creators but we definitely took different approach, exactly tailored for our needs.

shavers

sr. member

Activity: 439

Merit: 288

It's called moderation. And yes, i'll keep deleting rubbish posts. Constructive criticism is welcomed, useless posts are not. Whoever feels the urge to elaborate it's "Brilliant idea" about, say, >Why not POS<, feel free to start your own thread, or even better - make your own coin and do it "the proper way". Best of luck anyway.

bizzyb

legendary

Activity: 1652

Merit: 1001

Don't look at my signature!

Dear gameCredits community, I thought you might be interested in the beta launch of our gaming portal www.MUEgs.com

We currently have the one game "circuits", developed in house by roslinpl, undergoing public beta testing.

We hope to be able to reach out soon to other games developers, possibly from this community, to grow the games portfolio.

Hope you find this of interest

Many thanks

B
Team MUE

bhoybitcoin

full member

Activity: 336

Merit: 100

“Join The Blockchain Revolution In Logistics”

Quote from: george_crypto on August 22, 2017, 11:06:08 AM

Quote from: Jack Kuveke on August 21, 2017, 03:13:46 PM

Guys, we will be sponsoring Blockemon17, the largest blockchain conference in Serbia August 26th.

You can learn more about the conference here: http://conf.blockemon.org/2017/

Thanks Jack, it's good news.

It could be good for the awareness of larger crowd. It seem lots of action on your side these days Cool

Thanks for the info. This is such a great idea that these experts in blockchain are willing to share their knowledge in cryptocurrencies. Big opportunity for me to part of it.

george_crypto

full member

Activity: 406

Merit: 102

Quote from: Jack Kuveke on August 21, 2017, 03:13:46 PM

Guys, we will be sponsoring Blockemon17, the largest blockchain conference in Serbia August 26th.

You can learn more about the conference here: http://conf.blockemon.org/2017/

Thanks Jack, it's good news.

It could be good for the awareness of larger crowd. It seem lots of action on your side these days Cool

wheelz1200

legendary

Activity: 3752

Merit: 1415

Quote from: ngin-x on August 21, 2017, 09:54:31 PM

Quote from: wheelz1200 on August 21, 2017, 11:17:58 AM

Quote from: ngin-x on August 20, 2017, 09:31:40 PM

Quote from: Jack Kuveke on August 20, 2017, 11:02:05 AM

Quote from: Rogerdale on August 20, 2017, 09:54:58 AM

Quote from: Jack Kuveke on August 20, 2017, 09:18:11 AM

Appreciate the support guys! I promise these kinds of people don't truly get to me (maybe in the moment, but never more than that). I feel it's just important to respond factually and firmly. Think it can only breed confidence in new investors who venture to our thread.

I believe 130M cap is too small for a currency that is going to be a "national currency for all gamers". You can see that "national currency of darknet" Monero has 800M market cap. I expect GameCredits be somewhere there.

But guys, Scrypt mining algo is truly and obvious bad thing... To advance and be the first you need to be the leading currency in your mining algo, and now you are behind Litecoin.

We'll do whatever is best for the currency and project. We're not crazy people. But right now we're stable and growing, and if we think that might stop if we don't change we'll definitely begin thinking about the best course of action.

Jack, I hope you are thinking about moving to POS at some point. POW is a dying consensus algo and should not be supported anyway as it's slow and wastes electricity. We gotta move with the times you know.

How is pow slower than pos? And i think btc is doing just fine sitting on pow sha mining right now. A fork to pos would not make sense just for the sake of switching to pos.

BTC is doing just fine? It takes several hours to get a confirmation. Extensive studies have already been done to show that POW is very slow by nature and no matter what you do, it cannot be scaled up to the level of Visa/Mastercard's 3000 TX/s standard without sacrificing decentralization.

Transaction fees are also very high as billions of dollars are being wasted just to secure the blockchain. It's meaningless wastage of electricity to do usless computations which in turn damages the environment. POS has none of these problems and it also incentivizes people to hold the coins rather than sell 'em.

And has infinite coin distribution.

Look im not saying pos doesnt have its advantages but if you think development is done with pow you're wrong, i.e. off chain transactions, block size increase, etc. And we are only at the beginning of crypto development...if pow is dead why isnt there a debate and strong backing for all pow coins to ditch it. All im saying is no need to fork everytime something comes up...

ngin-x

full member

Activity: 308

Merit: 100

Quote from: wheelz1200 on August 21, 2017, 11:17:58 AM

Quote from: ngin-x on August 20, 2017, 09:31:40 PM

Quote from: Jack Kuveke on August 20, 2017, 11:02:05 AM

Quote from: Rogerdale on August 20, 2017, 09:54:58 AM

Quote from: Jack Kuveke on August 20, 2017, 09:18:11 AM

Appreciate the support guys! I promise these kinds of people don't truly get to me (maybe in the moment, but never more than that). I feel it's just important to respond factually and firmly. Think it can only breed confidence in new investors who venture to our thread.

I believe 130M cap is too small for a currency that is going to be a "national currency for all gamers". You can see that "national currency of darknet" Monero has 800M market cap. I expect GameCredits be somewhere there.

But guys, Scrypt mining algo is truly and obvious bad thing... To advance and be the first you need to be the leading currency in your mining algo, and now you are behind Litecoin.

We'll do whatever is best for the currency and project. We're not crazy people. But right now we're stable and growing, and if we think that might stop if we don't change we'll definitely begin thinking about the best course of action.

Jack, I hope you are thinking about moving to POS at some point. POW is a dying consensus algo and should not be supported anyway as it's slow and wastes electricity. We gotta move with the times you know.

How is pow slower than pos? And i think btc is doing just fine sitting on pow sha mining right now. A fork to pos would not make sense just for the sake of switching to pos.

BTC is doing just fine? It takes several hours to get a confirmation. Extensive studies have already been done to show that POW is very slow by nature and no matter what you do, it cannot be scaled up to the level of Visa/Mastercard's 3000 TX/s standard without sacrificing decentralization.

Transaction fees are also very high as billions of dollars are being wasted just to secure the blockchain. It's meaningless wastage of electricity to do usless computations which in turn damages the environment. POS has none of these problems and it also incentivizes people to hold the coins rather than sell 'em.

Jack Kuveke

sr. member

Activity: 630

Merit: 252

Guys, we will be sponsoring Blockemon17, the largest blockchain conference in Serbia August 26th.

You can learn more about the conference here: http://conf.blockemon.org/2017/

Jack Kuveke

sr. member

Activity: 630

Merit: 252

Quote from: parepare on August 21, 2017, 02:18:23 PM

Quote from: Jack Kuveke on August 20, 2017, 09:18:11 AM

Appreciate the support guys! I promise these kinds of people don't truly get to me (maybe in the moment, but never more than that). I feel it's just important to respond factually and firmly. Think it can only breed confidence in new investors who venture to our thread.

LOL on that too. Deleting posts confirms your statement.

I haven't deleted any of your posts myself. First I've actually seen of you, but I'm sure Alex (the guy who created this thread) had a good reason.

parepare

member

Activity: 85

Merit: 10

Quote from: Jack Kuveke on August 20, 2017, 09:18:11 AM

Appreciate the support guys! I promise these kinds of people don't truly get to me (maybe in the moment, but never more than that). I feel it's just important to respond factually and firmly. Think it can only breed confidence in new investors who venture to our thread.

LOL on that too. Deleting posts confirms your statement.

wheelz1200

legendary

Activity: 3752

Merit: 1415

Quote from: ngin-x on August 20, 2017, 09:31:40 PM

Quote from: Jack Kuveke on August 20, 2017, 11:02:05 AM

Quote from: Rogerdale on August 20, 2017, 09:54:58 AM

Quote from: Jack Kuveke on August 20, 2017, 09:18:11 AM

Appreciate the support guys! I promise these kinds of people don't truly get to me (maybe in the moment, but never more than that). I feel it's just important to respond factually and firmly. Think it can only breed confidence in new investors who venture to our thread.

I believe 130M cap is too small for a currency that is going to be a "national currency for all gamers". You can see that "national currency of darknet" Monero has 800M market cap. I expect GameCredits be somewhere there.

But guys, Scrypt mining algo is truly and obvious bad thing... To advance and be the first you need to be the leading currency in your mining algo, and now you are behind Litecoin.

We'll do whatever is best for the currency and project. We're not crazy people. But right now we're stable and growing, and if we think that might stop if we don't change we'll definitely begin thinking about the best course of action.

Jack, I hope you are thinking about moving to POS at some point. POW is a dying consensus algo and should not be supported anyway as it's slow and wastes electricity. We gotta move with the times you know.

How is pow slower than pos? And i think btc is doing just fine sitting on pow sha mining right now. A fork to pos would not make sense just for the sake of switching to pos.

Jack Kuveke

sr. member

Activity: 630

Merit: 252

Quote from: cryptocronic on August 21, 2017, 10:52:44 AM

Is there an official list of all games that have integrated GAME into them?

http://play.gamecredits.com/

cryptocronic

full member

Activity: 241

Merit: 100

cryptocronic.com

Is there an official list of all games that have integrated GAME into them?

rapidleech

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

in near future
do we see increasing price ?

Rogerdale

sr. member

Activity: 700

Merit: 330

Quote from: shavers on August 21, 2017, 04:35:27 AM

Quote from: ngin-x on August 20, 2017, 09:31:40 PM

Quote from: Jack Kuveke on August 20, 2017, 11:02:05 AM

Quote from: Rogerdale on August 20, 2017, 09:54:58 AM

Quote from: Jack Kuveke on August 20, 2017, 09:18:11 AM

Appreciate the support guys! I promise these kinds of people don't truly get to me (maybe in the moment, but never more than that). I feel it's just important to respond factually and firmly. Think it can only breed confidence in new investors who venture to our thread.

I believe 130M cap is too small for a currency that is going to be a "national currency for all gamers". You can see that "national currency of darknet" Monero has 800M market cap. I expect GameCredits be somewhere there.

But guys, Scrypt mining algo is truly and obvious bad thing... To advance and be the first you need to be the leading currency in your mining algo, and now you are behind Litecoin.

We'll do whatever is best for the currency and project. We're not crazy people. But right now we're stable and growing, and if we think that might stop if we don't change we'll definitely begin thinking about the best course of action.

Jack, I hope you are thinking about moving to POS at some point. POW is a dying consensus algo and should not be supported anyway as it's slow and wastes electricity. We gotta move with the times you know.

We're not actually. GameCredits is Gamers' coin, thus mineable. That's another benefit for gamers and that was the idea from the beginning. Gamers should be able to put their GPUs into good use while not playing games. The new wallet will provide mining option out of the box.

Although you technically can use GPU to mine a coin with asic-mineable algo, but it will be so inefficient, that it won't pay off the electricity. GTX 1080 gives 895 KH/s for Scrypt:

http://1stminingrig.com/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-mining-performance-review/

It is about $0.05 per day. Mining ethereum on this card will bring $2.23 per day. Electricity cost for this card is $0.56 per day.

shavers

sr. member

Activity: 439

Merit: 288

Quote from: ngin-x on August 20, 2017, 09:31:40 PM

Quote from: Jack Kuveke on August 20, 2017, 11:02:05 AM

Quote from: Rogerdale on August 20, 2017, 09:54:58 AM

Quote from: Jack Kuveke on August 20, 2017, 09:18:11 AM

Appreciate the support guys! I promise these kinds of people don't truly get to me (maybe in the moment, but never more than that). I feel it's just important to respond factually and firmly. Think it can only breed confidence in new investors who venture to our thread.

I believe 130M cap is too small for a currency that is going to be a "national currency for all gamers". You can see that "national currency of darknet" Monero has 800M market cap. I expect GameCredits be somewhere there.

But guys, Scrypt mining algo is truly and obvious bad thing... To advance and be the first you need to be the leading currency in your mining algo, and now you are behind Litecoin.

We'll do whatever is best for the currency and project. We're not crazy people. But right now we're stable and growing, and if we think that might stop if we don't change we'll definitely begin thinking about the best course of action.

Jack, I hope you are thinking about moving to POS at some point. POW is a dying consensus algo and should not be supported anyway as it's slow and wastes electricity. We gotta move with the times you know.

We're not actually. GameCredits is Gamers' coin, thus mineable. That's another benefit for gamers and that was the idea from the beginning. Gamers should be able to put their GPUs into good use while not playing games. The new wallet will provide mining option out of the box.

ngin-x

full member

Activity: 308

Merit: 100

Quote from: Jack Kuveke on August 20, 2017, 11:02:05 AM

Quote from: Rogerdale on August 20, 2017, 09:54:58 AM

Quote from: Jack Kuveke on August 20, 2017, 09:18:11 AM

Appreciate the support guys! I promise these kinds of people don't truly get to me (maybe in the moment, but never more than that). I feel it's just important to respond factually and firmly. Think it can only breed confidence in new investors who venture to our thread.

I believe 130M cap is too small for a currency that is going to be a "national currency for all gamers". You can see that "national currency of darknet" Monero has 800M market cap. I expect GameCredits be somewhere there.

But guys, Scrypt mining algo is truly and obvious bad thing... To advance and be the first you need to be the leading currency in your mining algo, and now you are behind Litecoin.

We'll do whatever is best for the currency and project. We're not crazy people. But right now we're stable and growing, and if we think that might stop if we don't change we'll definitely begin thinking about the best course of action.

Jack, I hope you are thinking about moving to POS at some point. POW is a dying consensus algo and should not be supported anyway as it's slow and wastes electricity. We gotta move with the times you know.

Albortz

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 250

Tax Attorney - Investor - Entrepreneur

Quote from: Rogerdale on August 20, 2017, 10:20:28 AM

Quote from: Albortz on August 20, 2017, 10:01:38 AM

Quote from: Rogerdale on August 20, 2017, 09:54:58 AM

Quote from: Jack Kuveke on August 20, 2017, 09:18:11 AM

Appreciate the support guys! I promise these kinds of people don't truly get to me (maybe in the moment, but never more than that). I feel it's just important to respond factually and firmly. Think it can only breed confidence in new investors who venture to our thread.

I believe 130M cap is too small for a currency that is going to be a "national currency for all gamers". You can see that "national currency of darknet" Monero has 800M market cap. I expect GameCredits be somewhere there.

But guys, Scrypt mining algo is truly and obvious bad thing... To advance and be the first you need to be the leading currency in your mining algo, and now you are behind Litecoin.

Well I don't think so. You don't have to be leading in your algo class. LTC is known as silver to gold. I know that is BS but it is used in real life more often than GAME right now.

GAME (I love it) is used for micro payments. LTC is used to move big amounts 100k+ because its fast and old and trusted. It has a different angle which is good.

I believe in LTC as well as in GAME and I would just give it some time. Its hard to get people to adapt to anything new.

No, because LTC miners will mine GAME only if it is more profitable comparing to LTC. And to secure this profit, they need to sell GAME as soon as possible, otherwise this switch doesn't really make sense.

But GAME is more profitable to mine than LTC.... Don't get me wrong most miners, exchange the bear minimum of their coins. Nomater what they mine.

Almost all of the miners I know, speculate of a bright future for crypto and they believe in all coins succeeding (more of less of course) but all coins will increase over time. And if the underlying tech or service associated with the coin is good, they mine it.

All these facts are in GAME.

Jack Kuveke

sr. member

Activity: 630

Merit: 252

Quote from: Rogerdale on August 20, 2017, 09:54:58 AM

Quote from: Jack Kuveke on August 20, 2017, 09:18:11 AM

Appreciate the support guys! I promise these kinds of people don't truly get to me (maybe in the moment, but never more than that). I feel it's just important to respond factually and firmly. Think it can only breed confidence in new investors who venture to our thread.

I believe 130M cap is too small for a currency that is going to be a "national currency for all gamers". You can see that "national currency of darknet" Monero has 800M market cap. I expect GameCredits be somewhere there.

But guys, Scrypt mining algo is truly and obvious bad thing... To advance and be the first you need to be the leading currency in your mining algo, and now you are behind Litecoin.

We'll do whatever is best for the currency and project. We're not crazy people. But right now we're stable and growing, and if we think that might stop if we don't change we'll definitely begin thinking about the best course of action.

Topic: ★★★ GameCredits - The future of in-game monetization ★★★ - page 70. (Read 550143 times)