OK, Adrenaline 18.5.1 and Windows 10 April 2018 Update were no go for me.
They are just too buggy at this point.
I would recommend not to install either of them if you would like to run GGS.
Topic: Gateless Gate Sharp 1.3.8: 30Mh/s (Ethash) on RX 480! - page 12. (Read 214354 times)
Oh, by the way, I enabled secure connections to NanoPool's Monero servers for the GitHub version.
Seems to be working well so far...
Seems to be working well so far...
As I was having a problem with Windows 10 April 2018 Update, I found Adrenaline 18.5.1. Hope this would solve the problem...
Not bad, not bad... I guess I could take care of power consumption later.
https://i.imgur.com/VhTukXa.png
https://i.imgur.com/VhTukXa.png
what is the cclock, mclock, intensity? is this hynix or samsung?
i can confirm that...there is no magic ´to get this speed with that powerdraw. with the right configs/mods its easy to get >2k on a vega56 with half ot the powerconsumption
Yeah, It's true, now I have found a good setting for very low conumption and good hashrate with vega 64.
I have 1880H/s and 115W, CN7 and always GGS.
Now I test this setting if are rock solid.
Not bad, not bad... I guess I could take care of power consumption later.
what is the cclock, mclock, intensity? is this hynix or samsung?
i can confirm that...there is no magic ´to get this speed with that powerdraw. with the right configs/mods its easy to get >2k on a vega56 with half ot the powerconsumption
Now with my vega 64(nitro+ samsung memory) I have about 1940H/s with 195/205W and rock stability.
Mining GRAFT (CN7)
Hope to see your new version very soon
Mining GRAFT (CN7)
Hope to see your new version very soon
have you been able to find what's wrong with CN heavy ?
I tested with XMR stak and it also take advantage of 8gb card for heavy thus increasing the speed compared to CNv7...
I double checked with your code...... and Xmrstak ones ... 
but I was unable to find anything.
Damn, I am not a good Dev!
it's a good time to introduce profit-based optimization and algorithm switching. ? is it ?
Isn't easier to send a pm to Nplus, Nemos,Tutulfo, Megaminer, Forage and ask them how to integrate your miner in their autoswitch software ?
They normally need a command line ... and Api...
I tested with XMR stak and it also take advantage of 8gb card for heavy thus increasing the speed compared to CNv7...
I double checked with your code......
and Xmrstak ones ... but I was unable to find anything.Damn, I am not a good Dev!
it's a good time to introduce profit-based optimization and algorithm switching. ? is it ?
Isn't easier to send a pm to Nplus, Nemos,Tutulfo, Megaminer, Forage and ask them how to integrate your miner in their autoswitch software ?
They normally need a command line ... and Api...
See, it ain't that easy.
Vega 64 with the crazy AMD driver was driving me nuts, but I will take a look at CryptoNight-Heavy today.My original plan all the way back from the beginning is to integrate an optimizer and an auto-switcher
into the miner. This design choice should make sense once all the planned features are in place.
have you been able to find what's wrong with CN heavy ?
I tested with XMR stak and it also take advantage of 8gb card for heavy thus increasing the speed compared to CNv7...
I double checked with your code...... and Xmrstak ones ... but I was unable to find anything.
Damn, I am not a good Dev!
it's a good time to introduce profit-based optimization and algorithm switching. ? is it ?
Isn't easier to send a pm to Nplus, Nemos,Tutulfo, Megaminer, Forage and ask them how to integrate your miner in their autoswitch software ?
They normally need a command line ... and Api...
I tested with XMR stak and it also take advantage of 8gb card for heavy thus increasing the speed compared to CNv7...
I double checked with your code......
and Xmrstak ones ... but I was unable to find anything.Damn, I am not a good Dev!
it's a good time to introduce profit-based optimization and algorithm switching. ? is it ?
Isn't easier to send a pm to Nplus, Nemos,Tutulfo, Megaminer, Forage and ask them how to integrate your miner in their autoswitch software ?
They normally need a command line ... and Api...
profit based means for money?
What I meant was optimization that is geared toward maximizing profit for the user.
I will have to add a fee for optimization and benchmarking, though.
profit based means for money?
Actually. it's a good time to introduce profit-based optimization and algorithm switching. More work, more work...
Not bad, not bad... I guess I could take care of power consumption later.
what is the cclock, mclock, intensity? is this hynix or samsung?
Not bad, not bad... I guess I could take care of power consumption later.
what is the cclock, mclock, intensity? is this hynix or samsung?
This is just for rx480 ? Btw need patcher after mod bios using this tool?
No and no. I am preparing Version 1.3.8 right now, so you might want to wait for it.
Will this one have updated kernels and/or binary kernels?
This is just for rx480 ? Btw need patcher after mod bios using this tool?
No and no. I am preparing Version 1.3.8 right now, so you might want to wait for it.
This is just for rx480 ? Btw need patcher after mod bios using this tool?
And just for the kicks here's an RX 570 8gb doing 1260 H/s on Cryptonight-Heavy.
What sorcery is this? Would you mind sharing us your settings and straps?
Ok, you need comparison ?
YOUR RX480 8GB SAMSUNG.... Ubermix timing, stock for the rest with 9 hours optimize+memory timing+watchdog running)
As reference, I have 28.4 Mh/s in etash.( Optimize + memorytiming NOT extended)
GGS MoneroV7: 1034 h/s
GGS SumokoinV7:670H/s
Srbminer Monero v7 1thread 976 h/s 2threads 1033 H/s
Srbminer Sumokoinv7 1 thread 980 h/s 2 threads 988 h/s
That is what an average guy can do
but:
Rx 580 8gb Micron, PBE 1 click
29.5 Etash vs 31.9 Claymore
GGS SumokoinV7:670H/s
SRBMiner Sumokoin 1060 ( and it work at 1300 core!)
So, it seems, that V7 is in par but Heavy is not when is something YOU optimize ( or you have had in hand).
Heavy in SRB is weard, it keep moving between 980 1030 1060. Not always the same card.
Cpu kicks ? it happened to me in GGS when using ODD numbers of threads/worksize as well.
When something isn't preoptimized, the gap is bigger in Heavy but exist also in v7 smaller
YOUR RX480 8GB SAMSUNG.... Ubermix timing, stock for the rest with 9 hours optimize+memory timing+watchdog running)
As reference, I have 28.4 Mh/s in etash.( Optimize + memorytiming NOT extended)
GGS MoneroV7: 1034 h/s
GGS SumokoinV7:670H/s
Srbminer Monero v7 1thread 976 h/s 2threads 1033 H/s
Srbminer Sumokoinv7 1 thread 980 h/s 2 threads 988 h/s
That is what an average guy can do
but:
Rx 580 8gb Micron, PBE 1 click
29.5 Etash vs 31.9 Claymore
GGS SumokoinV7:670H/s
SRBMiner Sumokoin 1060 ( and it work at 1300 core!)
So, it seems, that V7 is in par but Heavy is not when is something YOU optimize ( or you have had in hand).
Heavy in SRB is weard, it keep moving between 980 1030 1060. Not always the same card.
Cpu kicks ? it happened to me in GGS when using ODD numbers of threads/worksize as well.
When something isn't preoptimized, the gap is bigger in Heavy but exist also in v7 smaller
This is VERY interesting.. I wonder where I can get Polaris 10 with Micron GDDR5...
I will try to push the next version either today or tomorrow, so you can try an updated optimizer.
I don't know if I should include the new kernels in the GCN assembly, though.
I will do more testing tonight and then decide.
Not bad, not bad... I guess I could take care of power consumption later.
Ok, you need comparison ?
YOUR RX480 8GB SAMSUNG.... Ubermix timing, stock for the rest with 9 hours optimize+memory timing+watchdog running)
As reference, I have 28.4 Mh/s in etash.( Optimize + memorytiming NOT extended)
GGS MoneroV7: 1034 h/s
GGS SumokoinV7:670H/s
Srbminer Monero v7 1thread 976 h/s 2threads 1033 H/s
Srbminer Sumokoinv7 1 thread 980 h/s 2 threads 988 h/s
That is what an average guy can do
but:
Rx 580 8gb Micron, PBE 1 click
29.5 Etash vs 31.9 Claymore
GGS SumokoinV7:670H/s
SRBMiner Sumokoin 1060 ( and it work at 1300 core!)
So, it seems, that V7 is in par but Heavy is not when is something YOU optimize ( or you have had in hand).
Heavy in SRB is weard, it keep moving between 980 1030 1060. Not always the same card.
Cpu kicks ? it happened to me in GGS when using ODD numbers of threads/worksize as well.
When something isn't preoptimized, the gap is bigger in Heavy but exist also in v7 smaller
YOUR RX480 8GB SAMSUNG.... Ubermix timing, stock for the rest with 9 hours optimize+memory timing+watchdog running)
As reference, I have 28.4 Mh/s in etash.( Optimize + memorytiming NOT extended)
GGS MoneroV7: 1034 h/s
GGS SumokoinV7:670H/s
Srbminer Monero v7 1thread 976 h/s 2threads 1033 H/s
Srbminer Sumokoinv7 1 thread 980 h/s 2 threads 988 h/s
That is what an average guy can do
but:
Rx 580 8gb Micron, PBE 1 click
29.5 Etash vs 31.9 Claymore
GGS SumokoinV7:670H/s
SRBMiner Sumokoin 1060 ( and it work at 1300 core!)
So, it seems, that V7 is in par but Heavy is not when is something YOU optimize ( or you have had in hand).
Heavy in SRB is weard, it keep moving between 980 1030 1060. Not always the same card.
Cpu kicks ? it happened to me in GGS when using ODD numbers of threads/worksize as well.
When something isn't preoptimized, the gap is bigger in Heavy but exist also in v7 smaller
Jump to: