Author

Topic: GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) - page 1411. (Read 3377922 times)

member
Activity: 154
Merit: 10
One would think they would just check here https://github.com/GAWMiners/paycoin/graphs/contributors and see there is not a whole lot of coding action happening ... Anyone know who "Paycoindev" is btw? I'd totally trust that guy, he's super transparent by the looks. /s   Huh

Yes. I have it on a very solid source that Brad Chun of Butterkiss Consulting is paycoindev on GAW's Github and also responsible for the initial development of Paycoin.


https://www.linkedin.com/in/bradchun

www.followthecoin.com/author/brad-chun/

http://techlaunch.com/mentors/brad-chun/

http://www.zoominfo.com/p/Bradley-Chun/1544301850



Someone should ask Mr. Chun about GAW / PayBase / Paycoin since he supposedly chooses to work with companies and ideas to invest in that he believes in.

https://twitter.com/butterkissco
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 260
The Scamcoats are coming!
What about the initial 130,000 coins put in the test address. Someone finally mentioned that on HT.  No word about where they came from or where they went. Reminds me of the old joke about the factory worker and the gate guard:

Every day at the end of his shift the worker shows up at the gate with a wheelbarrow full of sawdust. The guard looks through the sawdust every time and never finds anything in it and waves the guy through. After they have both retired they run into eachother in a bar, and the guard says: "Hey, we are both retired now, so you can level with me. I KNOW you were stealing something in those wheelbarrows filled with sawdust, what was it you were stealing?" And the worker says "Wheelbarrows, dumbass!"
member
Activity: 154
Merit: 10
One would think they would just check here https://github.com/GAWMiners/paycoin/graphs/contributors and see there is not a whole lot of coding action happening ... Anyone know who "Paycoindev" is btw? I'd totally trust that guy, he's super transparent by the looks. /s   Huh

Yes. I have it on a very solid source that Brad Chun of Butterkiss is paycoindev on GAW's Github and also responsible for the initial development of Paycoin.


https://www.linkedin.com/in/bradchun

www.followthecoin.com/author/brad-chun/

http://techlaunch.com/mentors/brad-chun/

http://www.zoominfo.com/p/Bradley-Chun/1544301850
full member
Activity: 378
Merit: 100
Leaving this article here, thanks to all the members that did good investigative work.

http://www.miningpool.co.uk/burned-paycoins-come-back-to-life-appear-to-be-sent-to-exchanges/

This one got buried under a flood of meme shit and red herring chases, so I just wanted to bring it back to the front page. It's both damning and verifiable.

There was a meme about this about 40 pages back from last week when we figured it out.

Last week? Correct me if I've got this wrong, but the coins that were supposed to be destroyed, but weren't, were here:
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?119166.htm

Then starting two days ago (not last week) the coins were moved, and combined with others, here:
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?P9HwdnKRZD5niS7ua9pSV4DnjKxRPHw73Y.htm

(@gawceo's response was that he would "look into it" but of course nothing happened as a result.)

Then yesterday they moved to exchanges:

(From a deleted HT article.)

This is @gawceo's non-response:
https://hashtalk.org/topic/31586/test-coin-and-compounding-update/3

And today this was published:
http://www.miningpool.co.uk/burned-paycoins-come-back-to-life-appear-to-be-sent-to-exchanges/

It's not a great article (no offense to the author) because it just explains what happens without citing the details that would make it possible for anyone else to check. Maybe coinfire or someone will pick this up and do a more thorough investigation and report.

EDIT: More data from the 31586 HT thread, in a comment from tekneeks:
Quote
@GAWCEO , @Dent why does the post in the other thread show it being transferred to cryptsy:

Yes, It's pretty obvious those are being (ultimately) sold on exchanges. Let's take the first one:

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?295135.htm

43,834.136119 XPY from the wallet that contains the test coins is merged with other coins into a 50k XPY address:

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?PN3Gc5HMNLhWET7ZXn9MZRzZ9KMpZxZSoL.htm

This address sends the 50k (minus 1.13 transaction fee) to this address:

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?PTEGCrMaU7hSoMGCRAccxhYVuBZrx5F4La.htm

This address then starts distributing the 50k in very small amounts, 5.66 XPY at first:

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?295181.htm

The change always goes to a new address:

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?PRYocgeE9EfS1sCARRWX8brwv8MaebNqsV.htm

Here is where it gets interesting. The next address that receives 57.649 XPY is a known Cryptsy address:

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?295200.htm

So is the next one:

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?295207.htm

The one after that is not tagged:

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?295235.htm

But then, this:

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?295250.htm

BITTREX, huh?

Then, Paybase:

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?295258.htm

You can go on clicking through the chain, you will find that small portions of the initial 50k are being sent to different exchanges:

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?295774.htm (BITTREX)
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?296777.htm (Cryptsy)
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?297299.htm (Paybase)
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?297348.htm (Paybase)
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?297392.htm (BITTREX)
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?297404.htm (Cryptsy)

Just the fact that all this happened points to some serious disarray inside of GAW. It's tempting to suspect that Josh understands blockchains so poorly that he thought that when attention died down he could quietly sell off those coins and nobody would notice. 
legendary
Activity: 3570
Merit: 1959
I'm reading some of this thread

https://hashtalk.org/topic/31644/yes-or-no/4

And I actually feel bad for some of these people. (Well, not as badly as I should anymore)? - One guy says YES, but only because he took out a 15 BTC loan that is now worth like 6.2 BTC

Another guy was saying how he rides a bike now cuz he sold his car.

It's almost like the twilight zone over there, seems so many of them hanging on to any little "feature" or something that may help the price..

One would think they would just check here https://github.com/GAWMiners/paycoin/graphs/contributors and see there is not a whole lot of coding action happening ... Anyone know who "Paycoindev" is btw? I'd totally trust that guy, he's super transparent by the looks. /s   Huh
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 260
The Scamcoats are coming!
Hold on, The Hash King has issued a press release regarding the SEC investigation:

hero member
Activity: 1316
Merit: 502
Last one I can think, let's see if any action going on there which might suggest what is going on here:

great auk wireless

also for fun throw each of the lawyer's names in, they may very well be suing someone close to him etc.  Also, Stuart Fraser and also Cantor Fitzgerald...you never know.
sr. member
Activity: 458
Merit: 250
Leaving this article here, thanks to all the members that did good investigative work.

http://www.miningpool.co.uk/burned-paycoins-come-back-to-life-appear-to-be-sent-to-exchanges/

This one got buried under a flood of meme shit and red herring chases, so I just wanted to bring it back to the front page. It's both damning and verifiable.

I am surprised no other crypto news site is picking this up.  (Apart from the Garza dick sucking cryptocoinsnews site of course)
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
Leaving this article here, thanks to all the members that did good investigative work.

http://www.miningpool.co.uk/burned-paycoins-come-back-to-life-appear-to-be-sent-to-exchanges/

This one got buried under a flood of meme shit and red herring chases, so I just wanted to bring it back to the front page. It's both damning and verifiable.

There was a meme about this about 40 pages back from last week when we figured it out.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100

not sure what that has to do with but nothing relevant either.

Try the wifey's name:

"Jessica D Garza"

and mother's name

"Hope K Graza" and new name " Hope K Vowels" and "Hope Garza Vowels"



None of the others had results. The ones from this year for Jessica don't appear relevant to Gaw and are probably someone else.
full member
Activity: 378
Merit: 100
Leaving this article here, thanks to all the members that did good investigative work.

http://www.miningpool.co.uk/burned-paycoins-come-back-to-life-appear-to-be-sent-to-exchanges/

This one got buried under a flood of meme shit and red herring chases, so I just wanted to bring it back to the front page. It's both damning and verifiable.
hero member
Activity: 1316
Merit: 502
Try the wifey's name:

"Jessica D Garza"

and mother's name

"Hope K Graza" and new name " Hope K Vowels" and "Hope Garza Vowels"
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Interesting. Try just "SEC"  or "U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission" or "Securities and Exchange Commission" then wade through all their cases and see if anything clicks.



Try Homero ganza



Nothing relevant in either one.
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
sr. member
Activity: 283
Merit: 250
hero member
Activity: 1316
Merit: 502
Interesting. Try just "SEC"  or "U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission" or "Securities and Exchange Commission" then wade through all their cases and see if anything clicks.
GAW
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
Actually just inspected element with chrome so it took 2 seconds. But "no" to answer your question. I don't.
Jump to: