Topic: GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) - page 2420. (Read 3377790 times)

I agree, it would be incredibly foolish.

That is why I have been trying to get a full response on this issue since it first occurred to me two months ago about 12 hours after Hashlet Primes went on sale for $16/MH. Long before any CNN interviews.

What about the definitive proof that you are using new customer payments to payout "mining earnings"?

Why don't mining earnings come from actual mining?


This couldn't be further from the truth. Your statements are 100% backed by faith/trust not verifiable facts.

Feel free to post your mining address if that's not true. I expect ~20 PH/s of sha-256 or 1000 GH/s of scrypt.


So basically your argument is that "we have so much money, why would we scam people?"?

I'm going to have to award you zero jimmothypoints for that excuse.


Yes that's exactly why. Every other legit cloudmining company has no problem disclosing their mining address, why is GAW different?


Despite all the pictures? You mean the pictures that show 1/10th of the hashrate you claim to possess? Surely you understand why we don't buy it.

Pics can be faked (not that I think yours are) but a mining address is definitive and publicly verifiable proof that the hashrate exists, take advantage of it.


It's not our job to be transparent, we aren't the ones trying to sell millions of dollars worth of promises.

Thank you for the response--can you answer a bit more straight-forwardly?

1. Are you attempting to seek compliance or clarification on compliance from the SEC right now regarding potential unregistered securities violations?

2. When did such an attempt begin in earnest?

I'm pretty sure that GAW wouldn't be open to interviews with CNN and other huge media outlets if they were trying to hide behind an illegal business. Just food for thought.

We have an entire team of people we are bringing for that specific reason. Compliance managers, etc. Additionally, we have already engaged with a group that specializes in helping companies obtain the proper licenses. We are well aware of the things we need to do, and we are doing them. We want crypto to become something the banks are not afraid of. We think we have a shot at that.

Josh, in the latest cloud miner interview (with the other Scott), you mentioned talking to the SEC about compliance.

When I have brought this issue up before in email, you did not mention this step. One might assume that you too are concerned that you might be running an unregistered security and are attempting to make it legal.

That's great if so! More power to you.


However, to pretend that you are not running an unregistered security does not inspire trust. If you are attempting to become compliant to SEC regulations, then say so. No shame in that.

Figured since everyone was making an appearance, I wold too

First,  I am curious. Why doesn't the whole "tell the truth" thing apply both ways? You guys demand GAW is truthful and transparent, yet you guys are not. You have posters literally just making things up. For example, that Scott guy has resorted to just making up facts, without a shred of proof. Most here don't bother to do any real research and present any real facts.

For example, I consistently see you guys talk about "every" person that talks negatively getting censored, yet there are negative comments about us all over the place on the HT. Additionally, I just counted all the people that have ever been banned by me, and its less then 100 users, which represents less then 1% of the active users there. How is that "everyone"?

Notice that when I defend the companies position, I typically use numbers and facts. Most of the posters here just make things up, focus on what supports their position and ignore the things that don't. You guys were all over our TOS with it mentioned virtual miners, and now that it references physical miners, no one brings it up anymore? Focus on what makes us look bad, and ignore the things that don't.

Not to mention most of the posters here buy from us! if we are so bad, why would you want to do business with us?

If you think we are violating securities laws, and the team of attorneys and all the investor relationships are are forming are some how missing that, then report us. But why keep talking about it? You guys honestly think its more believable that with all the capital and visibility we have that it makes more sense for us to be breaking the law and scamming people, then us building this company to sell for billions one day? Again, you just choose to ignore what makes your view make sense, and make up the missing information.

You guys still claim we have no miners, based on what proof? Because I refuse to not disclose my total Hash rate? Right......it makes more sense to believe that I don't really have any (despite all the pictures, etc) and for some reason I spend millions on miners that I never hook up. Then to believe that I don't disclose it for competitive reasons? And you guys wonder why I do not not address any of your questions?

Secondly, you guys claim that many of the posters on HT are like a cut, but what are you guys? You guys can not stand to hear anything pro GAW just as much as the posters on HT can not hear anything against GAW. I have seen people, literally, just post their opinions about us on reddit in a neutral way and get down-voted to the point there post dont even show. How is that different then anything you guys do here?

I just find it ironic that about half the points that get made on here are all about being transparent and accepting of other different perspectives when the posters here are just as biased.

I would happily answer any question that someone has when they are actually looking for an answer, not a way to drive their own agenda. But look at it from my view, how can I do that with the way things are handled here? The bottom line is, you guys only hear what you want to hear. Just like you claim HT users do.

Whether you guys believe it or not, I want the same thing you guys do. For crypto to be successful.

Anyways, its unlikely I will respond here again given they way you guys typically handle things here. And to most it will not make a difference, but to some, maybe it will. Minimally, anyone new thinking about doing business with, can read this, then come to their own conclusions.

You're trying too hard. Cloudmining by itself is by definition a security. It's a profit sharing agreement, period.

There no amount of wording/obfuscation that will make it exempt from security laws/regulations.

Nope.

Have you reported this to the proper authorities?

You have any comment on the below, Volder?  (apologies to everyone who has heard me beat this dead horse)

My prior comments were:
Josh has stated, unequivocally, that Zenpool profits are paid out on:
1. private rentals
2. mining
3. day-trading
4. undisclosed other activities.

Your profits payouts are not a 1MH share of a mining pool, but a share of quite a few other activities in which MH does not even figure (like in day trading).

What is a security?
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/77b

The term “security” means any note, stock, treasury stock, security future, security-based swap, bond, debenture, evidence of indebtedness, certificate of interest or participation in any profit-sharing agreement, collateral-trust certificate, preorganization certificate or subscription, transferable share, investment contract, voting-trust certificate, certificate of deposit for a security, fractional undivided interest in oil, gas, or other mineral rights, any put, call, straddle, option, or privilege on any security, certificate of deposit, or group or index of securities (including any interest therein or based on the value thereof), or any put, call, straddle, option, or privilege entered into on a national securities exchange relating to foreign currency, or, in general, any interest or instrument commonly known as a “security”, or any certificate of interest or participation in, temporary or interim certificate for, receipt for, guarantee of, or warrant or right to subscribe to or purchase, any of the foregoing.


edit: I wonder if the "Zenpool negotiations" are Josh's attempt to either legally insulate himself against this very real federal crime, or perhaps a way to buy time to seek compliance without acknowledging the real reason?

Yea this has been done and someone has my ticket. Hoping they sort this soon so I can sell while my hashlets are still worth something & get the hell out of Dodge.

I think you need to open an account on freshdesk with the same email address as your account on zencloud.

Wouldn't want to be in your shoes.  From chatting with you many times on TMB irc channel I know you got in that position truly wanting to help GAW in the early beginning.


Funny, I remember it like it was yesterday!

Honestly, I do not believe for a minute that it IS in his hands. I believe it is entirely in the hands of the crypto-currency world, the general public that may use it and the supposed large bankers and VCs. I can not believe they met with him and were blown away by anything he said and that they fully trust him with their money. He may think hes running the show but when you insert large bankers and VC's into a no name company run by a no name individual with all this controversy, then it is they that are "pulling it off".

I don't disagree. I don't blame anyone. It is what it is, what's done is done. That was a long time ago.

No doubt about it. It was much better back in the old days when we were complaining about our Blades going down... again. More real miners talking instead of "investors."

Yea well thats the thing, they only care about the next new customer not the existing ones. Once they have your money you go to the back of the queue.

All I want to do is sell my last remaining 3mhs multihashlet which is making me 0.00000001BTC/day after maintenance fees (which interestingly never came down from day 1 though payouts did & continue to do so) and withdraw my last $20 so I can forget about the operation entirely.

It'll be a bumpy ride, but he'll pull it off.

I don't really care if you believe me or not. The last time I spoke to Josh was on Oct 30th, and he didn't respond, so it was a one sided conversation. I was just having a good time helping people out, perhaps it is my fault. I never wanted any fame, though. It's not as fun helping people out anymore. Things have changed.