Topic: GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) - page 2422. (Read 3377891 times)

Well, if he was tasked in trying to clean up GAWs image he did a horrible job... He portrayed a horrible image of GAW supporters - They should take that hashlet back IMO.

Anyway - Let's move on! Enough excitement for one day!

Not only is he a shill. Hes a condescending, arrogant, spineless shill. Go back to HT and bow to your GAWD. You earned your new shiny digital do nothing doodad aka. Paycoin Origin Hashlet

And with this, I'm done. Some people just can't have nice things, can they?

• You said this referring to proof of any actual mining: “What I do know is my payouts are correct for the hashrates I maintain there.” What pools are you mining and how much have you been mining them since the announcement of Hashpool? If you are still mining other pools, by what factor has your overall payouts dropped?

My Genesis Hashlets have been pointed at Guild. If I had the same hashrate at home pointed at Guild, I'd have the same payouts, less the money I'd be paying for their pool fees, power, internet connection and cooling of my rigs. My other Hashlets are gathering HashPoints for the conversion and ICO. I'm not mining other pools right now.

Is this a name change on Top 10 Prime Users, getting ready to dump??

10   Top10Finally   3852.00 MH

Its funny when volder started selling primes, a lot of others started selling too then the next day an announcement was made and the price of primes went up (he didn't sell 1 because people panicked and started selling for less)

I missed your post, or ignored it consciously because of this comment "First off you need to slow down with demanding rules which we must follow on how we can engage you or anyone on this forum". I decide my rules of participation here, not you.

• It strikes me rather odd that you would have any information whatsoever that anyone and everyone else invested in GAW wouldn't have. You did say you have a lot of skin in the game. Does that mean you are privy to things that those with far less skin in the game are not?

What strikes you as odd, is actually a function of how the real world works. I've not revealed, as I stated in another answer that you didn't read, anything that isn't available to you to read for yourself as having been asked and answered at some point in time on Hashtalk.

• You said this referring to proof of any actual mining: “What I do know is my payouts are correct for the hashrates I maintain there.” What pools are you mining and how much have you been mining them since the announcement of Hashpool? If you are still mining other pools, by what factor has your overall payouts dropped?

My Genesis Hashlets have been pointed at Guild. If I had the same hashrate at home pointed at Guild, I'd have the same payouts, less the money I'd be paying for their pool fees, power, internet connection and cooling of my rigs. My other Hashlets are gathering HashPoints for the conversion and ICO. I'm not mining other pools right now.

• I found this that you stated, referring to the Zenpool negotiations, to be rather disturbing: “The negotiations were said to be completed, and it's my opinion that Josh is waiting for a strategic time to restore the payouts for the ZenPool closer to the ICO.” Why, in the world, would he not restore payouts immediately? Do you mean to tell me that negotiations were made and that Josh is mining Zenpool and profiting more while paying out less until he decides to restore payouts?

Again, I answered this question in a post already.

[/list]

LTCG is great because he keeps it so simple and everything is reliable because of it.  If you go onto ltcgeartalk any post that is someone with a problem has been resolved within a few days time, whereas with GAW it could be 2 weeks before anything is fixed and half the time they just close the ticket without fixing the problem.  

Interesting. I know LTCG doesnt. I have a lot invested there and haven't had a single issue. A few delays, but they were explained and fixed within a day.

Isn't a TOS voided anyway wen there's constant changes and no notificAtion? Pretty sure there is a legal timeframe to notify about changes.

And with this, I'm done. Some people just can't have nice things, can they?

I'm with you there. I'm just mildly amused by rootdude's arrogance with that "no shill" rule that's all. But he's been answering questions, so let's give him that.

And yet you still didn't answer it.

He sounds like a politician. 

To this level, just GAW because they've made promises and changed them. They've said one thing and did another. They made agreements and changed them on the fly. They constantly update their TOS to add new and even more ridiculous things to cover their butts. In short, what you see is not what you get.

Just outTA Curiousity. Do any of the other cloud companies have this much suspicion or is just GAW?

And yet you still didn't answer it.

Are you asking me if I'd come in here and spend a few hours answering the kind of questions you guys are asking and taking the abuse for a 1MH Hashlet? I have to admit, that question made me laugh out loud though.

You mean he's managing expectations - this is something that everyone does to some degree since even on HT, the upside sometimes spins out of his control too. There are a LOT of people participating on the PayCoin project, employees, contractors, consultants and the like - all of which have some interest in helping make it a success, since I think it suits everyone that a real competitor come to the forefront in crypto to BTC, which will drive everyone to do it better.

I'm a big believer in the power of crypto to change finance as we know it. Every crypto, and to some degree even Bitcoin, has failed to deliver on promises to be a paradigm change in finance because they lacked the resources to make it happen, the cohesiveness to overcome the hurdles that decentralization represents, etc. By that, I mean that by it's very nature, Bitcoin is a tough sell to any investment by the old world economies because of it's very nature - there's no asset to really 'bet' on. This is what Josh is attempting to overcome with a solution that remains a good balance of the features that make Bitcoin attractive to the people against the needs of the financial and VC interests that need to see some assets behind the venture. By assets I mean a company with the people to pull off building the bridge between the two worlds. This is what PayCoin is going to try to represent - that bridge. I believe that vision of his to be a powerful one, and the right way to approach success.

So hate if you want. I'd rather try to help his company be successful by contributing to the project and helping make good, sound decisions with reasoned input.

As far as HT and censorship is concerned, I really only have one thing to say. It's GAW's sandbox, and if you want to play in it, it's by GAW's rules. Period. I don't think there's anything more to be said about that subject.

Any more questions? I think I've been fair in my responses and have answered everything asked of me to the best of my ability. If you want more of the same, I spend my time mostly over at HT, and you can PM me anytime and I'll be sure to answer there as well. We can, as a community, use all the help and suggestions that you have and I hope some of you find your way back to help, even if you decide not to participate.