Topic: GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) - page 2424. (Read 3377790 times)

I strongly disagree with you, my first account with hundreds of posts was shadow banned for an unknown reason but my history lives to show that I've never attacked anyone or said anything disrespectful.  I then had to create another account to ask a question in the beginner question, following that I posted only once after Josh implied that an hour of his online store down could be a bigger loss than an hour of Apples Internet sales.  See the following link and by all means tell me how I was disrespectful.  

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9557085

You're talking with 0 experience on the matter.. because of your "social standing" on HT you are immune to Josh shadow ban button, you can be as critical as you want as long as you're not going ballistic..  if he was going to shadow ban any of the top users (you, daffy, pcfan, etc) a riot would ensue... but shadow banning anybody else who is critical (while being constructive) about the company is fair game because it's a private company?  

If you go back another couple of page you'll notice someone getting shadow banned for asking Josh if he meant "CNN" when typing "CCN" in a post, this was enough to get him shadow banned.

There is nothing accusatory, disrespectful, defamatory or outside of the forum rules in all the examples I've just provided you.. moderation to the extent that it currently is does nothing other than hurt GAWs reputation and make people think there is something to hide.  Shadow banning someone is making a very aggressive statement, it's a slap in the face to that individual with 0 chance for appeal... you have no idea what you have said, Josh obviously won't reply to you and you just lost months of reputation.[/list]

That's bad and the hashtalk strict censoring is perhaps one of the biggest red flags IMO. 
As of late anyone who provides any constructive criticism, asks a legitimate question (such as yourself) or lets just call it what it is, isnt a GAW cheerleader is banned/shadow banned or has their comments deleted.

Listen even though we all have our suspicions nobody truly knows if this whole "Paycoin" campaign is legit or not.
-It could be the next big thing.
-It could be a great idea but ruined by incompetence/arrogance (most likely in my opinion)
-It could be a huge scam.

But when you censor anyone who provides any sort of doubt or raises legit questions it screams stay away or get the hell out while you can.
 

I have been asking about proof of blocks from the first day I invested in GAW (the same day I got banned for simply asking about it). Investing in a company like this and not knowing where the money comes from is, well, not smart. If they provided proof of blocks mined either directly or indirectly meaning contracts, I think I would have no option but to trust that its (to a point) a legit business. The fact that they cant or wont do that is just stupid. Why would any company not want more business/money, isn't that the whole point? At this point if they do start providing proof of blocks mined, I would like to see proof of blocks mined a month ago or two months ago, not just starting today.

Haven't they also released their wallets addresses?  I remembering seeing one of their posts with those addresses in it.

There are ways to do it much better, check out AMHASH for example. That should be the minimum standard of cloud mining transparency. I'm not making any claims about their profitability or anything, just how they prove that they are mining at the hashrate they claim they have sold. That's still not 100% proof since some creative accounting might be taking place in reporting their sales etc - although that can be verified through third parties such as Havelock and Hashie, so there would have to be some serious collusion to fake it.

The point is that there is no reason for other cloud mining businesses, including GAW to not provide their mining addresses to the public. Especially if what you're saying about their mining being mostly BTC is true.

What's going on here? Is Hashtalk down again?


Cold wallet / hot wallet perhaps? For example new customer payments (mostly small amounts probably) may be coming into their hot wallet and mining revenue might be going into their cold wallet, especially if they are solo mining and don't want those 25 BTC amounts be exposed to any risk. So they pay the withdrawals directly from the hot wallet as long as there is enough funds in it, but it doesn't mean they can't have a cold wallet full of mining revenue. Keep in mind that they also sell stuff for USD on their website and don't need to convert BTC to fiat as long as the USD income can cover their electric bills and payroll and such.

I don't know if that outweighs the downside. I'd say they probably don't care about looking legit from that perspective and that has been their stance since day one. If you don't trust us that's your problem.

That's just a theory of course. The problem with it is that with the current BTC mining profitability they would have to have 20-30 PH/s SHA256 to sustain the payouts if the estimates of 500-1000 GH/s Scrypt-equivalent hashrate are correct. And that would be visible on Bitcoin network and for some reason it isn't.

Can I get 1 jimmothycoin instead?

Man..I was shadow banned by Josh for asking if it was CNN or CCN or both since he made a typo. I've been a member of this community for a few months and always helped people out there, reported bugs instead of abusing it, made translations of his announcement for the people who don't speak english..and now i get slapped in the face.. Not fair if you ask me.

My bad. I read it as a couple of million by the end of this year, so ya my numbers are going to be orders of magnitude off  

I'm has also assumed that miners = customers, but he could literally mean miners, i.e. I have bought 1000 hashlets therefore 1 customer = 1000 miners, which would change the numbers as well.

So it's really hard to derive anything, because the word choice leaves it very open to interpretation.

LOL - I would call myself Josh too if I had that name.

Dude, you are promoting your own coin and you are hating on GAW's coin, hypocrite much? Please...

On Point one. Have you considered that with the right technology one could make Amazon accept BTC, PayCoin or any currency. Amazon does not give a damn what currency you use as long and they get it in USD.

Think out of the box.

Questions:

1. Is there any proof that actual mining is taking place at a 1:1 ratio of hash power sold?

2. Has there been any public evidence that PayCoin is actually close to finishing development? An ever evolving white paper doesn't lend credence that this coin is almost ready to launch.

3. Who are the developers of PayCoin? ZenCloud has had a large number of issues with payouts, deposits, graphs, boost timers, etc. If the in-house development team is having issues with a project like ZenCloud running; I'm worried about the quality of the PayCoin codebase. Not to mention that HashTalk is running on an outdated version of NGINX that's over 7 months old, and has almost daily downtime . . .


EDIT:

4. You stated earlier that "People who really can't grasp a business model or figure out the technology behind it." So what exactly is GAW's business model and the technology they are using? Physical miners? Unregistered securities?

1) What is the status of the ZenPool "negoitiations"? It was promised by GAW CEO that the pool would return to levels the same, if not GREATER than before. This has been forgotten about...

2) Why can't I use hashpoints to buy new miners? I'm stuck at either collecting satoshis (i believe the maint fees eat up about 90% of payouts) or collecting store credit and having faith on a future project. Wouldn't it benefit GAW to allow me to buy new miners/sell them and they make 10% profit? Atleast it gives people a way out.. but this has been denied.

3) Why aren't there any details as when hashpoints will be converted? Hashcoin.com had a countdown but now it redirects to paycoin with no info about release date but an email update.

4) Why, when asked, does GAW CEO respond "just dont invest with me then" as an answer to any technical questions?  

5) Why do you have so much faith in one man? As far as I can tell, the main supporters of GAW are the early adopters. Those who bought hashlets at 16$, were converted to prime and made ROI already. What do you have to lose? Nothing.... and this is why your are so faithful... but ask the same question to someone who just bought in in october and payouts dropped 90%.

Thanks for your time..

I'll refrain... Cause I would love to you see defend one of the least profitable cloud mining companies in existence.

edit - Also worth pointing out several other threads about GAW are being similarly approached by other hard-core GAW supporters... Very large coincidence if you ask me.

Now I'm not calling anyone anything... But by definition if anyone is on here supporting at the request of GAW you are by definition a shill.

Notice how nothing was provided to support anything GAW does... He's actually participating in exactly what he was attacking...

It's one of the official Mt. GAW shills!

FYI - This guy is a heavy heavy fanboy over at GAW. Evidently hasn't read the supporting documentation and traceable evidence of anything posted on this forum due his heavy bias.

Might have another Bitgeek on our hands.

Well only thing I can think of is HashKing has declared that the payouts are not from mining. But from a few different sources. So in this case, it would make sense if your payout got traced back to a "holding wallet" (which wouldn't point back to a recent block creation).

Maybe your payout was from a lucky streak HashKing had at PrimeDice?  :grinning:

Every time I see that doggieman yokel post here

I´m tempted to go back in GAW he´s been such

an outstanding counter-indicator for me elsewhere.