Pages:
Author

Topic: Gay marriage will destabilise family life - page 5. (Read 10664 times)

legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1027
Also you say I insult people.Does it feel horrible not nice Grin..
So imagine what gay people go threw everyday. If your offended by me imagine what gay people are feeling?.They get killed.
To many gay people scared to be free because of death hatred shun away.WHY
To many secret gays throwing stones"hypocrites"because of death hatred shun away.

Does it matter what consenting adults do with there lives as long as they hurt no one.
example say 5 people all loved each other would it matter if all 5 married each other if they hurt no one
There adults.
If a straight sex axeman killed another person in another city what affect does it have on your life if you don't know the person..Nothing you go arrr then carry on with your life..
So why would 2 gay people getting married bother you more than some killer axeman or some child dying of starvation
It's not being political correct it's called having a hart Grin
So many people angry at gayness but not angry at child neglect child poverty jobs government for war
OH I forgot if people are gay they are to blame for all those reasons anyway..

Jungle people stand there naked with no shame
You do the same on a tube station will you feel ashamed ..WHY..Because you been told to feel like that
Well now your getting told to love gayness.. Because for thousands of years you been told gayness is a sin.When most creatures do it..So because of a few gay hating rulers.. everybody had to hate gay even if they where gay..
they had to hate themselves..SO SAD..WELL NO MORE..JUST LIKE THE JEWS NO MORE..
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 1958
First Exclusion Ever
popcorn is a perfect example of the hostility of the true believers who are "intolerant of intolerance"You say..
Better than no rule with rules.

See the trouble is your saying its a discussion.When it's an insult..This is the same sort of discussion would you discuss this EXAMPLE.

Black people marriage will destabilise family life
Pakistani people marriage will destabilise family life
Ginger people marriage will destabilise family life
Fat people marriage will destabilise family life
Ugly people marriage will destabilise family life
Acne spotty people marriage will destabilise family life

When people get married is it guaranteed they will stay together for ever.When people split up is it nice for there kids to see the break up.

SO WHY PICK ON GAY PEOPLE THEN
6 examples lets discuss the 6 examples..NO.. why because it's all bullshit and insulting..
So TECSHARE carry on with your fight for NO RULES WITH RULES because you make no sense.

TECSHARE you say government gives us rules and you hate the rules .
So i suppose we need to live by your rules so now we would live under the TECSHARE rules?

So after all that fighting and killing we done for you defeating the government we got to live by your rules now..So all that fighting was for nothing..Back to square 1 with RULES.

How does life work without rules?

Did you eat a lot of paint chips as a kid?

legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1027
False. It affects only gays... I don't even see how you can think otherwise...

And nobody accused you of bigotery. You were just told that your argument is stupid and false. Except for Popcorn1 of course but he keeps insulting and yelling on everyone so that doesn't count.

Saying "false", and then not explaining your reasoning at all is not an argument. That is just you standing on a street corner with a bullhorn yelling your opinion at the world. Yes, more opinions my argument is "stupid & false", of course no reasoning behind it to back that up, it just is because I said so. You are right no one accused me of "bigotery", but popcorn is a perfect example of the hostility of the true believers who are "intolerant of intolerance" and think they are "evening things out" by attacking "the other side", when in reality we are all on the same side and he is actually driving people away from accepting homosexuals with his behavior. He is not exactly the best ambassador for the gay community (or the English speaking community either). I am glad you can designate him as "doesn't count" for me, otherwise I would have to make that decision for myself.

The fact is gay marriage effects everyone regardless of your denials. The law is designed to apply to everyone equally. The law does not verify your sexual preferences, it applies to all humans in the jurisdiction, and all humans in the jurisdiction pay the price of the legislation. Saying "false" does not make this less true, and denying anyone else a say in this situation is not equality, it is the creation of a "protected class" which we can not discuss without spiteful shitheels like popcorn on "both sides" of the fence demolishing anything resembling civil debate, thinking he is "winning" by doing so.

I'm straight and married and as far as I'm concerned, if two gay people want to get married, that's their business.  It's hard to criticize when a large percentage of traditional marriages end in divorce and there are a lot of other heterosexual relationships that produce children out of wedlock.

Yes it is upon their business. Besides business it's opposite to nature as well the creations. For some sort of need someone started regulating it which eventually got acceptance over other countries. This needs to be eliminated.
it's opposite to nature as well the creations..So why does it repeat over and over again in most species..And it's you who needs to be eliminated.ANOTHER THICK SHIT.

WHO ELSE WANTS TO GET THE PISS TAKEN OUT OF THEM
It be nice for subject to go because it's all lies but be my guest and try and i will rip you to shreds on this subject.HOW CAN ANYONE WIN AGAINST LOVE..So come and try Grin

Actually, it makes it easier to criticize. Until the government got involved in marriage, the vast majority of them were successful. Now with no fault divorce, people (mostly women) are paid to break up their marriages and then either supported by their divorced partner and or the state. The government getting involved in marriage of any kind is a failure. Government involvement in marriage should be abolished for everyone. Now days more marriages fail than succeed. State marriage is simply a system to strip the population of its wealth by eating families, gay or straight.

I'm straight and married and as far as I'm concerned, if two gay people want to get married, that's their business.  It's hard to criticize when a large percentage of traditional marriages end in divorce and there are a lot of other heterosexual relationships that produce children out of wedlock.

My Thoughts Exactly! Thank you! I was planning to say almost the same words. We would have the right to be against the gay marriage only if all the heterosexual marriages were perfect. But since they are like Hell mostly why should we oppose something different?

Yes, like opposing government involvement in any marriage, straight or gay.




popcorn is a perfect example of the hostility of the true believers who are "intolerant of intolerance"You say..
Better than no rule with rules.

See the trouble is your saying its a discussion.When it's an insult..This is the same sort of discussion would you discuss this EXAMPLE.

Black people marriage will destabilise family life
Pakistani people marriage will destabilise family life
Ginger people marriage will destabilise family life
Fat people marriage will destabilise family life
Ugly people marriage will destabilise family life
Acne spotty people marriage will destabilise family life

When people get married is it guaranteed they will stay together for ever.When people split up is it nice for there kids to see the break up.

SO WHY PICK ON GAY PEOPLE THEN
6 examples lets discuss the 6 examples..NO.. why because it's all bullshit and insulting..
So TECSHARE carry on with your fight for NO RULES WITH RULES because you make no sense.

TECSHARE you say government gives us rules and you hate the rules .
So i suppose we need to live by your rules so now we would live under the TECSHARE rules?

So after all that fighting and killing we done for you defeating the government we got to live by your rules now..So all that fighting was for nothing..Back to square 1 with RULES.

How does life work without rules?


legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 1958
First Exclusion Ever
False. It affects only gays... I don't even see how you can think otherwise...

And nobody accused you of bigotery. You were just told that your argument is stupid and false. Except for Popcorn1 of course but he keeps insulting and yelling on everyone so that doesn't count.

Saying "false", and then not explaining your reasoning at all is not an argument. That is just you standing on a street corner with a bullhorn yelling your opinion at the world. Yes, more opinions my argument is "stupid & false", of course no reasoning behind it to back that up, it just is because I said so. You are right no one accused me of "bigotery", but popcorn is a perfect example of the hostility of the true believers who are "intolerant of intolerance" and think they are "evening things out" by attacking "the other side", when in reality we are all on the same side and he is actually driving people away from accepting homosexuals with his behavior. He is not exactly the best ambassador for the gay community (or the English speaking community either). I am glad you can designate him as "doesn't count" for me, otherwise I would have to make that decision for myself.

The fact is gay marriage effects everyone regardless of your denials. The law is designed to apply to everyone equally. The law does not verify your sexual preferences, it applies to all humans in the jurisdiction, and all humans in the jurisdiction pay the price of the legislation. Saying "false" does not make this less true, and denying anyone else a say in this situation is not equality, it is the creation of a "protected class" which we can not discuss without spiteful shitheels like popcorn on "both sides" of the fence demolishing anything resembling civil debate, thinking he is "winning" by doing so.

I'm straight and married and as far as I'm concerned, if two gay people want to get married, that's their business.  It's hard to criticize when a large percentage of traditional marriages end in divorce and there are a lot of other heterosexual relationships that produce children out of wedlock.

Yes it is upon their business. Besides business it's opposite to nature as well the creations. For some sort of need someone started regulating it which eventually got acceptance over other countries. This needs to be eliminated.
it's opposite to nature as well the creations..So why does it repeat over and over again in most species..And it's you who needs to be eliminated.ANOTHER THICK SHIT.

WHO ELSE WANTS TO GET THE PISS TAKEN OUT OF THEM
It be nice for subject to go because it's all lies but be my guest and try and i will rip you to shreds on this subject.HOW CAN ANYONE WIN AGAINST LOVE..So come and try Grin

Actually, it makes it easier to criticize. Until the government got involved in marriage, the vast majority of them were successful. Now with no fault divorce, people (mostly women) are paid to break up their marriages and then either supported by their divorced partner and or the state. The government getting involved in marriage of any kind is a failure. Government involvement in marriage should be abolished for everyone. Now days more marriages fail than succeed. State marriage is simply a system to strip the population of its wealth by eating families, gay or straight.

I'm straight and married and as far as I'm concerned, if two gay people want to get married, that's their business.  It's hard to criticize when a large percentage of traditional marriages end in divorce and there are a lot of other heterosexual relationships that produce children out of wedlock.

My Thoughts Exactly! Thank you! I was planning to say almost the same words. We would have the right to be against the gay marriage only if all the heterosexual marriages were perfect. But since they are like Hell mostly why should we oppose something different?

Yes, like opposing government involvement in any marriage, straight or gay.



sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 252
I want to note that this was not my point. I don't support parents dictating someone's sexuality for them, nor do I support the state removing a child from their natural parents for doing so as long as they are not otherwise being abused. My only implication was that friends and family, some times direct dependents are homosexual, which has a direct effect on not only them, but all of the residents of the places where the law is in effect. This is why I did not want to give any examples because it leaves so much room for interpretation and slinging accusations. The point is the law applies to everyone, not just gays. The implication that it does not effect anyone else is a lie. Furthermore the constant accusations of bigotry, homophobia, etc placed upon anyone who dares raise this point is not only abusive but counterproductive to true equality.

False. It affects only gays... I don't even see how you can think otherwise...

And nobody accused you of bigotery. You were just told that your argument is stupid and false. Except for Popcorn1 of course but he keeps insulting and yelling on everyone so that doesn't count.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
Gay marriage doesnt destabilize family life,its depends on the person who is within the family.
If a certain family accept their neighbor that they are gay it wont affect them or the way they live in the community.
legendary
Activity: 2800
Merit: 1115
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Your facts are lies..The guy your talking about is a TOTAL LIAR. So what he as said is all lies..So you believe liars do you.. CRAZY
The guy trying to make him self cash and fame .So all your proof now has to be thrown out of the window..Be no good in court your evidence  

Also what he was doing was not in support for the gay community

"Oh give me a break" "Yeah, yeah, I know, you're an adult," Little Popcorn

The study researched and arrived at a result the Pink Mafia didn't like and the one that put a gigantic amount of Political Money to cover up the truth are the liars.

Pink Mafia Logic: Pay the study makers make them say what we want to hear and then put it all over the press, if someone disagrees we will throw them under a bus and never mention our false studies were lies or correct it in the news.
Equality! Acceptance! Tolerance! Ignorance!

Who sponsors these studies 90% of the media is controlled by the Pink Mafia in the USA.
Be honest if you mind drone the big six corporations you can make up all the BS you want just look at Trump bashing.

By surveying what is available for consumption in the mass media, it is easy to see what type of society these 6 corporations are helping to construct. They have the power to warp reality by calling staged shows ‘reality’ shows. Ideas which don’t support mainstream narratives and the consumer agenda are omitted, and stories about independent people over-coming strife without dependence on government are seldom if ever elevated.

The bottom line is that corporate media is a behemoth of special interests and mind controllers. So much of the human story is omitted in this capitalistic, for-profit environment scheme like this, which is why now more than ever the independent, alternative media is such a gem for human kind.

But we love you anyways even if you control a cesspool of crap we call the mainstream media, honestly we give you the respect and love that you won't give us, but why don't you love us Gay Sempai, and give us the love that you so diligently deny US.

http://www.wakingtimes.com/2015/08/28/the-illusion-of-choice-90-of-american-media-controlled-by-6-corporations/




I want to note that this was not my point. I don't support parents dictating someone's sexuality for them, nor do I support the state removing a child from their natural parents for doing so as long as they are not otherwise being abused. My only implication was that friends and family, some times direct dependents are homosexual, which has a direct effect on not only them, but all of the residents of the places where the law is in effect. This is why I did not want to give any examples because it leaves so much room for interpretation and slinging accusations. The point is the law applies to everyone, not just gays. The implication that it does not effect anyone else is a lie. Furthermore the constant accusations of bigotry, homophobia, etc placed upon anyone who dares raise this point is not only abusive but counterproductive to true equality.

Sum it up:
The Butterfly Effect: It creates ripples all over and different choices that create headaches in cause and effect.
+ Political Correctness
“I think the big problem this country has is being politically correct. I’ve been challenged by so many people, and I don’t frankly have time for total political correctness. And to be honest with you, this country doesn’t have time either."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/the-mash/is-america-becoming-too-p_b_9387060.html
legendary
Activity: 2800
Merit: 1115
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I like trump so when your voting for him make sure you know what your voting for because what you say makes no difference to the gay community.
I see Donald trump like this.A bio party man.perfect president. republican liberal democrat all rolled into 1.
So could be a good thing trump. But then again could be the worse thing America have ever done
BUT can it get any worse than what's on offer now.So what ever happens still wont bother the LGBT
Community.
Plus why get rid of the LGBT movement Don't you like to PARTY Grumpy old fart Cheesy
I am to old to party but let the young enjoy there lives and be free .BORING MAN we don't get long on this planet Grin


Trump is Samson pushing the paradigm back to open discussion, he ain't got time for this.
He's breaking up Super PAC's which pay their way to influence and power at the expense of everyone else and breaking establishment traditions while pointing out all the crap they are spouting, i'm just grateful we have a guy that's doing all that for everyone's sake.

If you look at who's really trying to stop free speech it's : the left.
Are you aware of how Facebook and Twitter are censoring conservative voices?
It's by assaulting debate under the brand of equality.

Textbooks nowadays write in minor characters under the brand of equality and inclusion to give a historical viewpoint that is not relevant so minorities feel better. The Haudenosaunee political system ring a bell? I thought so.
http://www.thecollegefix.com/post/26568/

Pretending to be nice and clean on the outside then having your minions attack your opponents for you using attack Ads then pretending to be squeaky clean themselves is US politics.

Trump can exist because our norms have become hollowed shells of what they purport to be. Our norms have been gamed. It feels very much like we’ve gotten to a point where people in many of our institutions, in positions of authority, follow the letter of the law about civic decency, but have almost entirely abandoned the spirit of the law. Trump just takes the last little leap and ditches the letter of the law too.


legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 2112
I stand with Ukraine.
I'm straight and married and as far as I'm concerned, if two gay people want to get married, that's their business.  It's hard to criticize when a large percentage of traditional marriages end in divorce and there are a lot of other heterosexual relationships that produce children out of wedlock.

My Thoughts Exactly! Thank you! I was planning to say almost the same words. We would have the right to be against the gay marriage only if all the heterosexual marriages were perfect. But since they are like Hell mostly why should we oppose something different?
legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1027
I'm straight and married and as far as I'm concerned, if two gay people want to get married, that's their business.  It's hard to criticize when a large percentage of traditional marriages end in divorce and there are a lot of other heterosexual relationships that produce children out of wedlock.

Yes it is upon their business. Besides business it's opposite to nature as well the creations. For some sort of need someone started regulating it which eventually got acceptance over other countries. This needs to be eliminated.
it's opposite to nature as well the creations..So why does it repeat over and over again in most species..And it's you who needs to be eliminated.ANOTHER THICK SHIT.

WHO ELSE WANTS TO GET THE PISS TAKEN OUT OF THEM
It be nice for subject to go because it's all lies but be my guest and try and i will rip you to shreds on this subject.HOW CAN ANYONE WIN AGAINST LOVE..So come and try Grin


legendary
Activity: 3192
Merit: 1213
Enterapp Pre-Sale Live
I'm straight and married and as far as I'm concerned, if two gay people want to get married, that's their business.  It's hard to criticize when a large percentage of traditional marriages end in divorce and there are a lot of other heterosexual relationships that produce children out of wedlock.

Yes it is upon their business. Besides business it's opposite to nature as well the creations. For some sort of need someone started regulating it which eventually got acceptance over other countries. This needs to be eliminated.
legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1027
The implications of approving gay marriage are very large.

In a house there father and mother and the child easily identifies it, at school she learns about reproduction, reproductive organs, for women and men, as they reproduce the animals.

but comes home has two men in which calls father and know it if the other will be the mother, even if parents try to explain it at school the child too suffered with colleagues in the street the child too suffered with people

Whenever the gay couple out with the child, the child had suffered discrimination

The problem is that even for me to accept a lot, do not accept gays and two man to kiss in front of me threw up and now imagine the radicals?

Have countries that gays are tortured, are dead ... how many countries this double wrath gay?

  as two men vain to explain to the child how they reproduce? even if the child until 12 years old stay with this couple as they grow come a time that will not endure and fled home.
Go back in your mud hut Dumb ass
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1100
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
The implications of approving gay marriage are very large.

In a house there father and mother and the child easily identifies it, at school she learns about reproduction, reproductive organs, for women and men, as they reproduce the animals.

but comes home has two men in which calls father and know it if the other will be the mother, even if parents try to explain it at school the child too suffered with colleagues in the street the child too suffered with people

Whenever the gay couple out with the child, the child had suffered discrimination

The problem is that even for me to accept a lot, do not accept gays and two man to kiss in front of me threw up and now imagine the radicals?

Have countries that gays are tortured, are dead ... how many countries this double wrath gay?

  as two men vain to explain to the child how they reproduce? even if the child until 12 years old stay with this couple as they grow come a time that will not endure and fled home.
legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1027
To techshares point
Child says hes Gay
Parents intervene
Social Services appear take child away where before it was within the parents purview to intervene.

Yes it can destabilize a family life simply said.

I want to note that this was not my point. I don't support parents dictating someone's sexuality for them, nor do I support the state removing a child from their natural parents for doing so as long as they are not otherwise being abused. My only implication was that friends and family, some times direct dependents are homosexual, which has a direct effect on not only them, but all of the residents of the places where the law is in effect. This is why I did not want to give any examples because it leaves so much room for interpretation and slinging accusations. The point is the law applies to everyone, not just gays. The implication that it does not effect anyone else is a lie. Furthermore the constant accusations of bigotry, homophobia, etc placed upon anyone who dares raise this point is not only abusive but counterproductive to true equality.
Your trying to have NO RULES WITH RULES.Wont work sorry
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 1958
First Exclusion Ever
To techshares point
Child says hes Gay
Parents intervene
Social Services appear take child away where before it was within the parents purview to intervene.

Yes it can destabilize a family life simply said.

I want to note that this was not my point. I don't support parents dictating someone's sexuality for them, nor do I support the state removing a child from their natural parents for doing so as long as they are not otherwise being abused. My only implication was that friends and family, some times direct dependents are homosexual, which has a direct effect on not only them, but all of the residents of the places where the law is in effect. This is why I did not want to give any examples because it leaves so much room for interpretation and slinging accusations. The point is the law applies to everyone, not just gays. The implication that it does not effect anyone else is a lie. Furthermore the constant accusations of bigotry, homophobia, etc placed upon anyone who dares raise this point is not only abusive but counterproductive to true equality.
legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1027

Go and do your research.


Disgraced Researcher on Gay Marriage Accused of Lying about Funding

Not only does it appear that UCLA grad student Michael LaCour lied about the results of his study on how easy it is to change minds on gay marriage, but it also appears he falsified data on his CV.

With much ballyhoo, Science journal published a paper by LaCour and his colleague, Professor Donald Green of Columbia University, which showed that opponents of gay marriage could not only have their minds changed after a 20-minute scripted conversation, but that their minds stayed changed over time.

The mainstream and advocacy media celebrated the results. After all, this fit into the narrative that Americans are eager to support “marriage equality,” and even opponents can be persuaded if they meet an earnest gay man face to face.

Turns out, it all appears to be a fraud. The grad student allegedly faked the data and later said he accidentally deleted it from his computer. His colleague hastily wrote to Science, stating the paper was a phony.

Now it comes to light that LaCour allegedly lied about funding sources for his now-disgraced study. He claimed he received funding for his paper from the Ford Foundation, the Williams Institute at UCLA, and the Evelyn and Walter Haas, Jr. Fund. Each institution now denies ever funding LaCour or his study.

Jesse Singal, writing in New York magazine’s Science of Us reported Tuesday that another funding claim on LaCour’s CV is also phony. LaCour said he received $160,000 from the Jay and Rose Phillips Family Foundation. The foundation reportedly told Singal they had not funded LaCour at all.

One of the odd angles of the media narrative is the comparison between Michael LaCour’s alleged fraud and the authenticated research of Mark Regnerus, who has become a punching bag for advocates of same-sex marriage.

Regnerus published the largest-ever analysis of children raised by LGBTs compared to those raised by single moms and those raised by their biological mother and father. His study showed that across a whole host of measurements, the children raised by two men or two women in a same-sex relationship fared far worse in life than those raised by the children’s biological mother and father. Despite an ongoing assault on his methods and findings, Regnerus’s study has never been retracted by the peer-reviewed publication that published it. What’s more, even though his university carried out an investigation, both his methods and findings were given a clean bill of health, even by those who support gay marriage.

Matthew Franck, writing at First Things, says any comparison between the two studies and the two researchers is entirely specious. One study was “the first ever research, using a nationally representative sample, on the young-adult outcomes for kids raised by people who have same-sex romantic relationships.” The other reportedly was a fraud. No comparison.

http://www.nbcnews.com/science/science-news/gay-marriage-study-author-admits-lies-science-journal-says-n366266
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/05/27/disgraced-researcher-on-gay-marriage-accused-of-lying-about-funding/
Your facts are lies..The guy your talking about is a TOTAL LIAR. So what he as said is all lies..So you believe liars do you.. CRAZY
The guy trying to make him self cash and fame .So all your proof now has to be thrown out of the window..Be no good in court your evidence  

Also what he was doing was not in support for the gay community
legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1027
All that writing only to be told your full off shit..

Oh, you’re so politically correct. You’re so beautiful,I know, you’re so perfect. Aren’t you perfect. Aren’t you just a perfect young man
"Hey, give me a break. You know what? It’s stuff like that that people in this country are tired of. It’s stuff like that."

The anti-PC college professor (50, California)
‘I’m angry at forced diversity’

I’m a liberal-left college professor in the social sciences. I’m going to vote for Trump but I won’t tell hardly anybody.

My main reason is anger at the two-party system and the horrible presidencies of Obama and Bush. But I’m also furious at political correctness on campus and in the media.

I’m angry at forced diversity and constant, frequently unjustified complaints about racism/sexism/homophobia/lack of trans rights. I’m particularly angry at social justice warriors and my main reason to vote Trump is to see the looks on your faces when he wins.

It’s not that I like Trump. It’s that I hate those who can’t stand him. I want them to suffer the shock of knowing all their torrents of blog posts and Tumblr bitch-fests and “I just can’t ...” and accusations of mansplaining didn’t actually matter. That they’re still losing. And that things are not getting better for them. They’re getting worse.


http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/mar/03/secret-donald-trump-voters-speak-out

Before he ran, the left’s stranglehold on the national conversation of what is or isn’t tolerable was getting stronger by the minute. It was the year of Caitlyn Jenner. Rachel Dolezal. Black Lives Matter. Anyone who even hinted at disapproval was exiled. Every week, someone would dare to blurt out something un-PC, and the media would absolutely crucify them. It had me thinking this was it. We’ve lost. How on earth can we hope to defeat these people, with their complete domination of the national conversation and relentless narrative of “Progress! Tolerance! Acceptance! Feels!”?

Political correctness is the birthplace of disastrous, un-American policies that will destroy the country in a death by a thousand cuts. But here comes Trump, the first person who didn’t even blink when the machine turns its sights on him.

He didn’t just fight back. He chewed it up and spit it out.

I like trump so when your voting for him make sure you know what your voting for because what you say makes no difference to the gay community.
I see Donald trump like this.A bio party man.perfect president. republican liberal democrat all rolled into 1.
So could be a good thing trump. But then again could be the worse thing America have ever done
BUT can it get any worse than what's on offer now.So what ever happens still wont bother the LGBT
Community.
Plus why get rid of the LGBT movement Don't you like to PARTY Grumpy old fart Cheesy
I am to old to party but let the young enjoy there lives and be free .BORING MAN we don't get long on this planet Grin
legendary
Activity: 2800
Merit: 1115
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Go and do your research.


Disgraced Researcher on Gay Marriage Accused of Lying about Funding

Not only does it appear that UCLA grad student Michael LaCour lied about the results of his study on how easy it is to change minds on gay marriage, but it also appears he falsified data on his CV.

With much ballyhoo, Science journal published a paper by LaCour and his colleague, Professor Donald Green of Columbia University, which showed that opponents of gay marriage could not only have their minds changed after a 20-minute scripted conversation, but that their minds stayed changed over time.

The mainstream and advocacy media celebrated the results. After all, this fit into the narrative that Americans are eager to support “marriage equality,” and even opponents can be persuaded if they meet an earnest gay man face to face.

Turns out, it all appears to be a fraud. The grad student allegedly faked the data and later said he accidentally deleted it from his computer. His colleague hastily wrote to Science, stating the paper was a phony.

Now it comes to light that LaCour allegedly lied about funding sources for his now-disgraced study. He claimed he received funding for his paper from the Ford Foundation, the Williams Institute at UCLA, and the Evelyn and Walter Haas, Jr. Fund. Each institution now denies ever funding LaCour or his study.

Jesse Singal, writing in New York magazine’s Science of Us reported Tuesday that another funding claim on LaCour’s CV is also phony. LaCour said he received $160,000 from the Jay and Rose Phillips Family Foundation. The foundation reportedly told Singal they had not funded LaCour at all.

One of the odd angles of the media narrative is the comparison between Michael LaCour’s alleged fraud and the authenticated research of Mark Regnerus, who has become a punching bag for advocates of same-sex marriage.

Regnerus published the largest-ever analysis of children raised by LGBTs compared to those raised by single moms and those raised by their biological mother and father. His study showed that across a whole host of measurements, the children raised by two men or two women in a same-sex relationship fared far worse in life than those raised by the children’s biological mother and father. Despite an ongoing assault on his methods and findings, Regnerus’s study has never been retracted by the peer-reviewed publication that published it. What’s more, even though his university carried out an investigation, both his methods and findings were given a clean bill of health, even by those who support gay marriage.

Matthew Franck, writing at First Things, says any comparison between the two studies and the two researchers is entirely specious. One study was “the first ever research, using a nationally representative sample, on the young-adult outcomes for kids raised by people who have same-sex romantic relationships.” The other reportedly was a fraud. No comparison.

http://www.nbcnews.com/science/science-news/gay-marriage-study-author-admits-lies-science-journal-says-n366266
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/05/27/disgraced-researcher-on-gay-marriage-accused-of-lying-about-funding/
legendary
Activity: 2800
Merit: 1115
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
All that writing only to be told your full off shit..

Oh, you’re so politically correct. You’re so beautiful,I know, you’re so perfect. Aren’t you perfect. Aren’t you just a perfect young man
"Hey, give me a break. You know what? It’s stuff like that that people in this country are tired of. It’s stuff like that."

The anti-PC college professor (50, California)
‘I’m angry at forced diversity’

I’m a liberal-left college professor in the social sciences. I’m going to vote for Trump but I won’t tell hardly anybody.

My main reason is anger at the two-party system and the horrible presidencies of Obama and Bush. But I’m also furious at political correctness on campus and in the media.

I’m angry at forced diversity and constant, frequently unjustified complaints about racism/sexism/homophobia/lack of trans rights. I’m particularly angry at social justice warriors and my main reason to vote Trump is to see the looks on your faces when he wins.

It’s not that I like Trump. It’s that I hate those who can’t stand him. I want them to suffer the shock of knowing all their torrents of blog posts and Tumblr bitch-fests and “I just can’t ...” and accusations of mansplaining didn’t actually matter. That they’re still losing. And that things are not getting better for them. They’re getting worse.


http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/mar/03/secret-donald-trump-voters-speak-out

Before he ran, the left’s stranglehold on the national conversation of what is or isn’t tolerable was getting stronger by the minute. It was the year of Caitlyn Jenner. Rachel Dolezal. Black Lives Matter. Anyone who even hinted at disapproval was exiled. Every week, someone would dare to blurt out something un-PC, and the media would absolutely crucify them. It had me thinking this was it. We’ve lost. How on earth can we hope to defeat these people, with their complete domination of the national conversation and relentless narrative of “Progress! Tolerance! Acceptance! Feels!”?

Political correctness is the birthplace of disastrous, un-American policies that will destroy the country in a death by a thousand cuts. But here comes Trump, the first person who didn’t even blink when the machine turns its sights on him.

He didn’t just fight back. He chewed it up and spit it out.
legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1027
Gay parents have 'healthier and less argumentative children'
Five to 17-year-olds with gay parents have 'significantly better' general health and greater family cohesion
May be because they communicate to address problems of discrimination and bullying


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2336889/Gay-parents-healthier-children-better-self-esteem.html#ixzz42RpMoh3Q

Study Finds Same Sex Couples Make Better Parents: Is It ...
www.medicaldaily.com/study-finds-same-sex-couples-make-better-paren...
7 Jul 2014 - Gay parents might be better at raising children because they're more often ... due to the many channels they must go through compared to their ... "That's really a measure that looks at how well families get along, and it seems  .

I COULD GO ON AND ON WHERE IS YOUR STUDIES TO PROVE I AM WRONG

So who ever is saying Gay marriage will destabilise family life is a total IDIOT ..
More destabilised families come from straight sex couples than from gay couples..FACT
Go and do your research.





Pages:
Jump to: