Topic: Give Bitcoins to Homeless Jackie! (Read 17602 times)
I miss LoupGaroux!
This is touching and hilarious
But I am gonna keep my bitcoins, thanks much...
But I am gonna keep my bitcoins, thanks much...
Err.. Nope. Since I saw many people willing to donate than I don't have to do it
any update on her? this is very interesting. i hope she's doing well.
mr beetcoin i think i'll take an interest in you for necroing this thread
jackie was a scammer that spent the donations on satoshidice
any update on her? this is very interesting. i hope she's doing well.
If that is karaoke, they must be singing filthy sea shanties!
I didn't expect Jackie to give up so quickly.
She didn't take it too well and aged a bit
http://dtempestphotography.photoshelter.com/image/I0000hnw1zxkUzoY
That is ... awesome.
I just dug up the back story on how the original Homeless Jackie fell from grace.
Quote
...
I had a lovely husband, three wonderful children attending Ivy League schools, and a prized dog named Sonny. I even won the yearly MHALL contest two years in a row.
One day I saw this advert for an unbelievable product that had to be pre-ordered. I maxed out my credit cards and ordered the $30K device even though I was warned beforehand with, "Jackie, don't do it! We still haven't recouped from that PP." Needless to say...
I had a lovely husband, three wonderful children attending Ivy League schools, and a prized dog named Sonny. I even won the yearly MHALL contest two years in a row.
One day I saw this advert for an unbelievable product that had to be pre-ordered. I maxed out my credit cards and ordered the $30K device even though I was warned beforehand with, "Jackie, don't do it! We still haven't recouped from that PP." Needless to say...
You're not going to believe what other picture I discovered on that photography site. Somebody tell me that that's not the same woman at BFL. http://cdn.c.photoshelter.com/img-get/I0000TSK4y3GPjgU/s/860/860/KARAOKE-cover.jpg
I didn't expect Jackie to give up so quickly.
She didn't take it too well and aged a bit
http://dtempestphotography.photoshelter.com/image/I0000hnw1zxkUzoY
That is ... awesome.
...and that's why she needed to steal that makeup.
Oh well, there's always this for any masturbatory needs.
I didn't expect Jackie to give up so quickly.
She didn't take it too well and aged a bit
http://dtempestphotography.photoshelter.com/image/I0000hnw1zxkUzoY
That is ... awesome.
...and that's why she needed to steal that makeup.
I didn't expect Jackie to give up so quickly.
She didn't take it too well and aged a bit
http://dtempestphotography.photoshelter.com/image/I0000hnw1zxkUzoY
That is ... awesome.
I didn't expect Jackie to give up so quickly.
She didn't take it too well and aged a bit
http://dtempestphotography.photoshelter.com/image/I0000hnw1zxkUzoY
I was on my seven day forced vacation when this broke. If I would have been here, I would have found her(?) other sites, thus edd wouldn't have paid for self-hosting.
~Bruno~
~Bruno~
I was using maltego and found all of the other identities, aliases, sites and refrences, however there was a slim chance in hell her story was sticking with the fact she said she was homeless and using her friends accounts online, specifically a friend who taught her about bitcoin.... I was awaiting validation and verification from her since I confronted her with this early on, however everything blew up on her/him before the verification deadline we agreed upon.
I was on my seven day forced vacation when this broke. If I would have been here, I would have found her(?) other sites, thus edd wouldn't have paid for self-hosting.
~Bruno~
~Bruno~
I didn't expect Jackie to give up so quickly.
1) You are on Bitcointalk.
2) You're too literate.
3) You try to make it blatantly obvious that you are one and practically shove your claim down the other users' throats.
4) Your lies aren't well-constructed enough.
You're setting the bar for literacy pretty damned low if you consider Jackie "too literate". Not to mention being a misogynistic asshole by implying that women are less literate than men.
I will completely stand by all of my previous statements.
You know what, this was an interesting social experiment, so regardless of what happens:
agreed. Now i have most of the knowledge ill need to lead the next ponzi 
You know what, this was an interesting social experiment, so regardless of what happens:
agreed. Now i have most of the knowledge ill need to lead the next ponzi
You know what, this was an interesting social experiment, so regardless of what happens:
1) You are on Bitcointalk.
2) You're too literate.
3) You try to make it blatantly obvious that you are one and practically shove your claim down the other users' throats.
4) Your lies aren't well-constructed enough.
You're setting the bar for literacy pretty damned low if you consider Jackie "too literate". Not to mention being a misogynistic asshole by implying that women are less literate than men.
+1
1) You are on Bitcointalk.
2) You're too literate.
3) You try to make it blatantly obvious that you are one and practically shove your claim down the other users' throats.
4) Your lies aren't well-constructed enough.
You're setting the bar for literacy pretty damned low if you consider Jackie "too literate". Not to mention being a misogynistic asshole by implying that women are less literate than men.
Jump to: