Topic: Give Bitcoins to Homeless Jackie! - page 3. (Read 17604 times)
man I hate to poke fun in situations like this, but Edd I think I deserve to take a shot (you know why!)
I still can't believe anyone thought this was something other than a joke thread.
Yeah but I get my nicotine so no fucks.
You smoke? Do you buy your own cigarettes sometimes?
That would be kind of ironic for someone who asks for bitcoin donations. I sure would not give bitcoins to someone who would just burn them.
In her last blog post she explained how to scrounge cigarette butts if you want a smoke.
Its ironic these days that smoking is banned in most buildings that the homeless can easily have a smoking habit just from raiding the butts outside office buildings in the city
http://cam4btc.com/ ftw.
I toss half smokes away all the time.
I must have missed something, who got linked to this "chic"
Let me guess, actual Wong Rap's online fucked me over right? I figured. Well you're not gonna believe me regardless so let me explain anyways, I'm NOT wong rap. He gave me this account and a few accounts to promote my site. Probably wasn't the best idea but whatever, should've just let him say it.
So is the JackieChonk Twitter account another account which someone "gave" you?
And why don't scammers put any effort into their flounces these days?
Quote
BYE. Fuck you
[Bitcoin address] If you want. Free money is something I’m not passing up, peace faggots.
[Bitcoin address] If you want. Free money is something I’m not passing up, peace faggots.
Okay, Raize has sent me the evidence indicating that Jackie is a male prankster with an unsavory online background. While I wouldn't call it "conclusive proof," it does seem that the most prudent course of action would be to ask "Jackie" to prove she is what she claims to be and, as a matter of fact, a photo with her username (shoe on head optional) would indeed negate much of Raize's conclusions.
Since it seems likely that I may have been duped into helping this person set up a standalone blog simply for collecting donations under false pretenses, as soon as I have access to my computer, I'll be removing the content from public display until "Jackie" comes forward and clears her name.
Ironically, I was about to defend Jackie before she posted about going to her mother's funeral. Real or not, she must be unaware of how frequently strangers asking for money use that tactic.
Since it seems likely that I may have been duped into helping this person set up a standalone blog simply for collecting donations under false pretenses, as soon as I have access to my computer, I'll be removing the content from public display until "Jackie" comes forward and clears her name.
Ironically, I was about to defend Jackie before she posted about going to her mother's funeral. Real or not, she must be unaware of how frequently strangers asking for money use that tactic.
I'd say this is probably the best post on here, because it doesn't blatantly attack or defend "her". I hope that she is actually who she says she is.
LOL if you follow rule 34 then why do you continue to rule 34d?
I just rembered the OP of this thread was actually rexcoin. Was that what you meant? They're the same person?
Sorry, I meant "Jackie", not you.
Okay, Raize has sent me the evidence indicating that Jackie is a male prankster with an unsavory online background. While I wouldn't call it "conclusive proof," it does seem that the most prudent course of action would be to ask "Jackie" to prove she is what she claims to be and, as a matter of fact, a photo with her username (shoe on head optional) would indeed negate much of Raize's conclusions.
Since it seems likely that I may have been duped into helping this person set up a standalone blog simply for collecting donations under false pretenses, as soon as I have access to my computer, I'll be removing the content from public display until "Jackie" comes forward and clears her name.
Ironically, I was about to defend Jackie before she posted about going to her mother's funeral. Real or not, she must be unaware of how frequently strangers asking for money use that tactic.
Since it seems likely that I may have been duped into helping this person set up a standalone blog simply for collecting donations under false pretenses, as soon as I have access to my computer, I'll be removing the content from public display until "Jackie" comes forward and clears her name.
Ironically, I was about to defend Jackie before she posted about going to her mother's funeral. Real or not, she must be unaware of how frequently strangers asking for money use that tactic.
Always the same sob story.
I believe not too long ago, your word for mother was not "mom", but "utter cunt of cunts"
EDIT:
Whoops, seems I was wrong, it was "cunt beyond cunts" http://homelessjackie.com/one-of-the-worst-nights/
I believe not too long ago, your word for mother was not "mom", but "utter cunt of cunts"
EDIT:
Whoops, seems I was wrong, it was "cunt beyond cunts" http://homelessjackie.com/one-of-the-worst-nights/
No matter how much you dislike your mother, they're still your mother. You have a connection to family no matter how much you hate them. So allow her to pay her respects in peace.
Always the same sob story.
I believe not too long ago, your word for mother was not "mom", but "utter cunt of cunts"
EDIT:
Whoops, seems I was wrong, it was "cunt beyond cunts" http://homelessjackie.com/one-of-the-worst-nights/
I believe not too long ago, your word for mother was not "mom", but "utter cunt of cunts"
EDIT:
Whoops, seems I was wrong, it was "cunt beyond cunts" http://homelessjackie.com/one-of-the-worst-nights/
What the fuck? I didn't scam anyone. Asking for donations isn't scamming, I don't think you know this.
Let me guess, actual Wong Rap's online fucked me over right? I figured. Well you're not gonna believe me regardless so let me explain anyways, I'm NOT wong rap. He gave me this account and a few accounts to promote my site. Probably wasn't the best idea but whatever, should've just let him say it.
well an update, I didn't go to RI. Got my refund. I got a message from my uncle on Facebook that my mom died from a car crash 2 weeks ago. No one knew how to contact me but I'm going to upstate NY to pay my respects. This is becoming a pretty shitty day, thanks a lot.
Let me guess, actual Wong Rap's online fucked me over right? I figured. Well you're not gonna believe me regardless so let me explain anyways, I'm NOT wong rap. He gave me this account and a few accounts to promote my site. Probably wasn't the best idea but whatever, should've just let him say it.
well an update, I didn't go to RI. Got my refund. I got a message from my uncle on Facebook that my mom died from a car crash 2 weeks ago. No one knew how to contact me but I'm going to upstate NY to pay my respects. This is becoming a pretty shitty day, thanks a lot.
aaaaahahaahhahahahahhahha so insta-scammer tag? theymos must know something.
Yea im 92.35% sure he does, but i just would like a statement as to why, just so i wont do this again.
Agreed, I want some transparency. And I still don't see how asking for donations is deserving of a scammer tag. There was no promise of repayment. Even under false pretenses, at worst this makes him/her an ass, but not a scammer. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. Anyways, I could care less. I found this as an interesting experiment in human sociology, and I'm kind of disappointed they got a scammer tag.
I agree with you 100% just waiting for theymos statement for now..
If anyone has given coin to this scam, I want you to get your money's worth. PM me with the proof you sent coin (signed message from the address you sent from) to wong RAP's donation address, and I will provide the evidence. Due to the sensitive nature, I will request that you not repost it. I am hoping edd will provide a verification that the evidence you get in return is definitely comprehensive enough and worth your time to prove you sent coin to the donation address. Thanks.
aaaaahahaahhahahahahhahha so insta-scammer tag? theymos must know something.
Yea im 92.35% sure he does, but i just would like a statement as to why, just so i wont do this again.
Agreed, I want some transparency. And I still don't see how asking for donations is deserving of a scammer tag. There was no promise of repayment. Even under false pretenses, at worst this makes him/her an ass, but not a scammer. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. Anyways, I could care less. I found this as an interesting experiment in human sociology, and I'm kind of disappointed they got a scammer tag.
aaaaahahaahhahahahahhahha so insta-scammer tag? theymos must know something.
Yea im 92.35% sure he does, but i just would like a statement as to why, just so i wont do this again.
i know this sounds sexist, but its impossible to be an attractive female and be homeless. There is always some lonely rich guy that will take care of you
aaaaahahaahhahahahahhahha so insta-scammer tag? theymos must know something.
Wait, what? Why has she now got a scammer tag?
The donation address is the same as shown in her blog. So it's she. And I don't understand what accepting BTC donations has to do with scamming.
Also it wasn't her who opened this thread.
So why the scammer tag?
The donation address is the same as shown in her blog. So it's she. And I don't understand what accepting BTC donations has to do with scamming.
Also it wasn't her who opened this thread.
So why the scammer tag?
Also just saying im not sure why he/she would get the scammer tag within 1-2 days?
I mean look at bitcoinica and pirate, it took them so long to get there tags but why is there such special treatment on a 5 bitcoin donation which she only listed for DONATIONS?
I dont know why this required instant scamming tag but maybe theymos can make a comment soon?
Wait, what? Why has she now got a scammer tag?
The donation address is the same as shown in her blog. So it's she. And I don't understand what accepting BTC donations has to do with scamming.
Also it wasn't her who opened this thread.
So why the scammer tag?
The donation address is the same as shown in her blog. So it's she. And I don't understand what accepting BTC donations has to do with scamming.
Also it wasn't her who opened this thread.
So why the scammer tag?
Not sure, it might be something WAY deeper, jackie claims she is staying with someone who introduced her to bitcoin and is using his username to post, i do not know how true this is and if it is the guy who owns that account then maybe he did something wrong in the past?
Jump to: