of course not. as long as you continue to constrain it to 1MB.
You missed the technical point. Start was referring to "won't run".
i'm pretty sure he meant "start competing".
Topic: Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP. - page 264. (Read 2032248 times)
You missed the technical point. Start was referring to "won't run".
i'm pretty sure he meant "start competing".
of course not. as long as you continue to constrain it to 1MB.
Apparently you missed the technical point. I believe start was referring to "won't run".
Higher Ground
(I had that one in reserve
... since 1973) Game over, Frap.doc.
FYI, Nick Szabo retweeted (and added to his favorites):
https://twitter.com/oleganza/status/605117508971053057
"@oleganza: If Bitcoin was ever competing with Paypal or Visa, it would not even start. It competes with gold and central banks."
Thus Saith The LORD. Amen!
FYI, Nick Szabo retweeted (and added to his favorites):
https://twitter.com/oleganza/status/605117508971053057
"@oleganza: If Bitcoin was ever competing with Paypal or Visa, it would not even start. It competes with gold and central banks."
Thus Saith The LORD. Amen!
of course not. as long as you continue to constrain it to 1MB.
that's enough of an explanation to make me abandon it in favor of TPTB being Armstrong.
Now you are being delusional. vokain or anonymint must have said something that put your logic to rest.
But you can check yourself that Armstrong was at certain times (schedule is public) in Europe where he was on promo tour for his movie. He had speeches and Q&A sessions.
certainly possible. this is the spec forum after all.
but then he sure isn't smart putting so much faith in one guy.
who does this sound like?:
We are headed into an electronic currency regardless of what people say. Bitcoin will not survive, but it is useful to get people accustomed to a cashless society. The difference will be that the government version will be no ”anonymity” and what it being touted as a benefit is the elimination of crime – drug dealers will be eradicated (plus the government will get 100% of all its taxes).
http://www.silverdoctors.com/martin-armstrong-bitcoin-electronic-money-the-precious-metals/
We are headed into an electronic currency regardless of what people say. Bitcoin will not survive, but it is useful to get people accustomed to a cashless society. The difference will be that the government version will be no ”anonymity” and what it being touted as a benefit is the elimination of crime – drug dealers will be eradicated (plus the government will get 100% of all its taxes).
http://www.silverdoctors.com/martin-armstrong-bitcoin-electronic-money-the-precious-metals/
Reality (aka "I") rained on your Sunny Day.
that's enough of an explanation to make me abandon it in favor of TPTB being Armstrong.
Now you are being delusional. vokain or anonymint must have said something that put your logic to rest.
But you can check yourself that Armstrong was at certain times (schedule is public) in Europe where he was on promo tour for his movie. He had speeches and Q&A sessions in universities and cinemas.
...I don't buy his "computer model" explanation though.
You probably lack appropriate domain knowledge to form an accurate assessment?
Have you not reviewed his record of correct predictions? It is essentially flawless since the 1980s if you understand his predictions are conditional and price and time are separate predictions.
You are most possibly right. I probably lack of the appropriate knowledge; nevertheless I have (as stated) said that he "passed one test", which (clarifying further for those who misunderstood) that his "model" is proven to be working. What I'm not sure about is that it's based on a computer model ie: a relational database mining s/w that includes every single economic data out there, that is able through calculations to extract an accurate prediction within a chaotic model.
To put it into perspective, as a theoretical physicist, I rest assure you that such a model is defined as "unpredictable". If you know more on the matter, I'd be honoured if you satiated my curiosity and obliterate my ignorance. I can certify that I'm more than capable to understand (even though it will take some more time than most geniuses in here) subjects from IT to QM (nevertheless, I stopped a while ago, being productive on the 1st one). Thanks in advance for your help.
if you believe in the concept of forum plants, then TPTB_need_war fits the bill to a tee.
i don't know about Shelby Moore but i still think his acct could be mulitply owned and used to troll me down. the sleep charts i put up yesterday still hold.
i don't know about Shelby Moore but i still think his acct could be mulitply owned and used to troll me down. the sleep charts i put up yesterday still hold.
The sleep chart is somewhat interesting but you ignore the possibility that his sleep schedule shifts over time, something not uncommon among people who aren't tied to the clock by a 9-5 job or the like, especially those with insomnia.
To show that the person/people operating the account aren't sleeping you would have to analyze 24 hour windows and see how many of those don't have a sleep break, not just look at averages over several months.
TPTB, you mentioned arguing with me along with rpeitila in your comments about BTC price calls but I doubt that is correct. I rarely make those sort of predictions, and I don't remember doing so, although it is possible I suppose.
after going thru many of Armstrongs writings from this link: https://www.scribd.com/kzuur58
the writing styles are alike, imo, and his incessant, continual writings while in prison and even while in a hole seem to me to match that of TPTB and could acct for the lack of a typical sleep rhythm. the constant whining about his own health, comments from other ppl, and the historical references seem very similar. their equivalent outlook on Bitcoin and the NWO and one world currency views are identical.
one thing that could obscure the typical slope of the sleep cycles of the top 10 posters is their large #'s compared to Anonymint and TPTB. our larger #'s accentuate our waking bars while the rare middle of the night posts fail to increment in step thus deepening the troughs of our sleep cycles thus making them more visible. that's enough of an explanation to make me abandon it in favor of TPTB being Armstrong.
Or Bustin' Jieber.
Game over, Frap.doc.
FYI, Nick Szabo retweeted (and added to his favorites):
https://twitter.com/oleganza/status/605117508971053057
"@oleganza: If Bitcoin was ever competing with Paypal or Visa, it would not even start. It competes with gold and central banks."
Thus Saith The LORD. Amen!
FYI, Nick Szabo retweeted (and added to his favorites):
https://twitter.com/oleganza/status/605117508971053057
"@oleganza: If Bitcoin was ever competing with Paypal or Visa, it would not even start. It competes with gold and central banks."
Thus Saith The LORD. Amen!
MP et all can force their will only until Blockstream's pegged side chains arrive. Then afaics his GavinCoin short is rendered impotent since GavinCoin can be forked as a pegged side chain. What say he this?
...I don't buy his "computer model" explanation though.
You probably lack appropriate domain knowledge to form an accurate assessment?
Have you not reviewed his record of correct predictions? It is essentially flawless since the 1980s if you understand his predictions are conditional and price and time are separate predictions.
There is hidden order that is extracted when you have a $1 billion database of every financial detail over the past 6000 years.
go back and look at TPTB's posts since registering. they are filled with Armstrong references. does anyone see a problem with that?
i do; it's called lack of diversification. who worships just one guy all the time? no astute investor. that alone is cause for suspicion.
i do; it's called lack of diversification. who worships just one guy all the time? no astute investor. that alone is cause for suspicion.
Well, he's not alone I can tell you this. I know many guys that consider Armstrong as an almighty prediction-God walking among the mortals. On the other hand, I am convinced that every theory presented (by anyone) needs to be put into a test, no matter how bizarre it may look. I don't find his support to him particularly suspicious, even though I personally never tend to expedite a conclusion without testing thoroughly a theory first. FWIW from my point of view, Armstrong's one has already passed one test...
...I don't buy his "computer model" explanation though.
Don't believe him, just watch
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-WdrMLLpPg
go back and look at TPTB's posts since registering. they are filled with Armstrong references. does anyone see a problem with that?
i do; it's called lack of diversification. who worships just one guy all the time? no astute investor. that alone is cause for suspicion.
i do; it's called lack of diversification. who worships just one guy all the time? no astute investor. that alone is cause for suspicion.
Well, he's not alone I can tell you this. I know many guys that consider Armstrong as an almighty prediction-God walking among the mortals. On the other hand, I am convinced that every theory presented (by anyone) needs to be put into a test, no matter how bizarre it may look. I don't find his support to him particularly suspicious, even though I personally never tend to expedite a conclusion without testing thoroughly a theory first. FWIW from my point of view, Armstrong's one has already passed one test...
...I don't buy his "computer model" explanation though.
i know everyone has better things to do but if you have time, you should read those prison writings from Armstrong. to me, and i could be imagining things, they sound alot like TPTB. i honestly don't know what to think; all i know is something feels quite fishy
Babies Scared of Their Shadow Compilation 2013
REAL!!! SHADOW PEOPLE
It would only hurt his own position if not flexible.
go back and look at TPTB's posts since registering. they are filled with Armstrong references. does anyone see a problem with that?
i do; it's called lack of diversification. who worships just one guy all the time? no astute investor. that alone is cause for suspicion.
i do; it's called lack of diversification. who worships just one guy all the time? no astute investor. that alone is cause for suspicion.
Yeah, so we can either choose the one with the identifying "Number of the Beast" barcodes or the one without.
Jump to: