Topic: Harry Potter Vs Lord of the Rings - page 7. (Read 6085 times)
LOTS was best for me then HP.
Question: Which one you like more
Harry Potter - 5 (22.7%)
Lord of the Rings - 15 (68.2%)
none - 2 (9.1%)
Total Voters: 22
Looks like we got a clear winner with Lord of the Rings
this just tells me that this community has a high Intellectual level
Harry Potter - 5 (22.7%)
Lord of the Rings - 15 (68.2%)
none - 2 (9.1%)
Total Voters: 22
Looks like we got a clear winner with Lord of the Rings
this just tells me that this community has a high Intellectual level 
I'll go for the Lord of the Rings. Harry Potter in my opinion is vastly over-hyped and overrated. I had never liked it. The kids might vote for Harry Potter, but it is their choice.
to be honest, i choose Lord of the Rings, although i like harry potter too.
Lord of the Rings anytime.
Lord of the Rings is MUCH better than Harry Potter in every aspect except maybe protagonist... but you could make the argument that there is more than one protagonist. I mean there are about 3 to 4 different story lines I find that far more interesting that harry being the one and only protagonist .
LOTR: written by a brilliant academic. History is in a rich and inovative universe, deeply worked(he even made languages for the world). Universe based on european myths, with very in deep messages, especially if you are christian. Well written and descritibe, what gives substance to the world and to the history and makes many people says it is too boring because it is so descritive. One of the greatest books written in english
Harry Potter: writter without any relevant real world work in any area, self-contraditory world, no inovations nor good absortion of cultural elements, characters not developed in depth, poor language for 12 yo people, and in some decades at most will be forgotten.
You really trying to campare them?
you are making a mistake here..! you are comparing books..! when i specially mentioned Harry Potter: writter without any relevant real world work in any area, self-contraditory world, no inovations nor good absortion of cultural elements, characters not developed in depth, poor language for 12 yo people, and in some decades at most will be forgotten.
You really trying to campare them?
"I'm not talking about Books here I'm talking about the Movie series."
In my first post on this thread
LOTR: written by a brilliant academic. History is in a rich and inovative universe, deeply worked(he even made languages for the world). Universe based on european myths, with very in deep messages, especially if you are christian. Well written and descritibe, what gives substance to the world and to the history and makes many people says it is too boring because it is so descritive. One of the greatest books written in english
Harry Potter: writter without any relevant real world work in any area, self-contraditory world, no inovations nor good absortion of cultural elements, characters not developed in depth, poor language for 12 yo people, and in some decades at most will be forgotten.
You really trying to campare them?
Harry Potter: writter without any relevant real world work in any area, self-contraditory world, no inovations nor good absortion of cultural elements, characters not developed in depth, poor language for 12 yo people, and in some decades at most will be forgotten.
You really trying to campare them?
It's not fair to compare the greatest fantasy movie of all time to a movie where some kids with magical powers are jiggling with their wooden sticks... lol just kidding, absolutely love both of these series
The statement after " lol " that is "just kidding, absolutely love both of these series " was smart move .Nice way to avoid conflict both of the series mentioned above has many similarities b/w them .
I'm not talking about Books here I'm talking about the Movie series.
I'm not talking about Books here I'm talking about the Movie series.
The Lord of the Rings universe is huge and character background is extremely detailed. The films are impressive BUT not very appealing to all age groups and genders. Harry Potter far more enjoyable to the general cinema goers, I could imagine grand parents taking kids to the cinema to watch Harry Potter and not Lord of the Rings.
All in all, my vote goes to Lord of the Rings
It doesn't matter which series you like more, go and read their books. There are so many plots and side stories missed out in the adaptations.
It's not fair to compare the greatest fantasy movie of all time to a movie where some kids with magical powers are jiggling with their wooden sticks... lol just kidding, absolutely love both of these series
both of the series mentioned above has many similarities b/w them .
I'm not talking about Books here I'm talking about the Movie series.
I'm not talking about Books here I'm talking about the Movie series.
My vote goes to Lord of the Rings
It doesn't matter which series you like more, go and read their books. There are so many plots and side stories missed out in the adaptations.
Myself better is LOTR but my kids like more Harry Potter
I will no submit vote cuz no booth in selection.
I will no submit vote cuz no booth in selection.
I voted for Lord of the Rings its worth watching movie.
Lord of the Rings 
So we are discussing only movie adaptation of books? In that case LotR is the best adaptation ever created. Nuff said.
Lord of the rings
I've never been able to sit through LotR. Didn't like the Potter movies, but I enjoyed the books when I was younger, so I'll go with that because I sat through them.
Lord of the Rings
Just got more in it for adult viewers...
Just got more in it for adult viewers...
I vote for Harry Potter.
Jump to: