Topic: Hash-Kings Profit Switching / Custom Coin Miner 1.15.3.0 - page 14. (Read 6977 times)
Yea, crypto is dropping hard right now but just push through cause now is the time to hold.
Phi seems to have dropped hard on btc/day since this weekend. nist5 is just eeking it out on my 980ti/1080ti combo. A shame, over the weekend it was hitting 0.0015-0.0016. Now it's barely hanging on to 0.0011
Looking forward to NeoScript. That's by far the most profitable for my system (oc'd 1060) on both NiceHash and AwesomeMiner.
Your most profitable on a 1060 should be either skein or Phi maybe Nist5
Neoscrypt is only leading for AMD cards for the last several days
But Neoscrypt will be in the 1.9.0.1 release with both ccminer and a beta addition of the Palgin hsr neoscrypt miner.
1.9.0.1 will also include a major improvement to available AMD algos to mine.
Looking forward to NeoScript. That's by far the most profitable for my system (oc'd 1060) on both NiceHash and AwesomeMiner.
Okay i have a question. Since Zpool site from time to time is not showing for me and its reporting different hash rates then your miner which one is the correct ? Your miner or the site ? And if its your miner should i be worried that the zpool dont show the correct ones or just the site bugs fom time to time for me and they are synced ?
This is not a simple answer.
OK so the speed reported by zpoolminer and the speed reported on zpool site are both right.
In zpoolminer it is estimating your speed using a 100% luck factor
Meaning if everything is perfect you should expect this speed.
This would mean
a 0ms ping to the stratum server
you have no stale shares
you have no rejected shares
What the zpool site is showing you is actual speeds calculated over 5 Min which can fluctuate a lot but generally even out to 85-95% of what zpoolminer reports.
Okay i have a question. Since Zpool site from time to time is not showing for me and its reporting different hash rates then your miner which one is the correct ? Your miner or the site ? And if its your miner should i be worried that the zpool dont show the correct ones or just the site bugs fom time to time for me and they are synced ?
I just grabbed 1.9, and am attempting to benchmark now, but it seems it's only using one of the 2 1606 3GB in this rig in the benches. Is this normal/expected behavior?
Edit: I also switched off hide miners in the setup, yet it is doing so, I'd much rather be able to see their output rather than having to read logs to help troubleshoot as I go.
Edit: I also switched off hide miners in the setup, yet it is doing so, I'd much rather be able to see their output rather than having to read logs to help troubleshoot as I go.
I think perhaps it benchmarks one card at a time? So you have to wait on the first before the second starts? I ran into the same thing and ended up just benchmarking them separately using the check boxes.
Preliminary neoscrypt testing on a single 1080 shows
CCminer Trpuvot 2.2.3 = 1.010 MH/s or 0.0039333 BTC/day
New Palgin HSR Neoscrypt = 1.065 MH/s or 0.00041457 BTC/day
Were the most profitable is PHI doing 23.83 MH/s or 0.00067773 BTC/day
So I have added Nvidia neoscrypt for the next release but it is not the most profitable to mine.
Still to do before the next release.
V2 of my error correcting, caching API - Working on this now - Possible downtime when the new api is pushed live but should only be 4 Min or less
Add more algo's and miners for AMD miners
CCminer Trpuvot 2.2.3 = 1.010 MH/s or 0.0039333 BTC/day
New Palgin HSR Neoscrypt = 1.065 MH/s or 0.00041457 BTC/day
Were the most profitable is PHI doing 23.83 MH/s or 0.00067773 BTC/day
So I have added Nvidia neoscrypt for the next release but it is not the most profitable to mine.
Still to do before the next release.
V2 of my error correcting, caching API - Working on this now - Possible downtime when the new api is pushed live but should only be 4 Min or less
Add more algo's and miners for AMD miners
Hope things are going well today! I have had good success with the KlausT ccminer for neoscrypt as well. I think neoscrypt in general hits a sweet spot for the 1070 mining power as my 1080 ti is only ~ 27% faster on that algorithm at ~50% more power. Supposedly it has something to do with the GDDR5 (1060 and 1070's) vs GDDR5X (1080 and 1080 ti) memory latency, GDDR5 being more responsive. All that being said, I guess profitability still just depends on current market prices.
Oh nice. I just got two ti's with the same thought on resale potential. The prices right now are crazy! I was lucky to find a couple in stock for normal-ish prices, but it took a lot of looking...I think the price jumps/news in December will bring in a bunch of new hobby miners.
I'll keep an eye on my setup and see if anything else happens. I haven't had a change over to the dev address since the first one. If you can't find anything, I can try out your 5 minute dev version (if you want) and see if I can recreate anything.
I'll keep an eye on my setup and see if anything else happens. I haven't had a change over to the dev address since the first one. If you can't find anything, I can try out your 5 minute dev version (if you want) and see if I can recreate anything.
To what coin are you exchanging your profits? I'm using his miner since yesterday with 2x 1060 6GB and I'm pretty satisfied with the results it gives me. I used nicehash/awesome miner which gave me way less than zPool Miner does. Actually it's mining with phi, the only problem I had yesterday that it switched to nist5 and didnt gave any UI information and didn't mind, so I excluded nist5 and since them its working pretty fine, with an estimated value of $10.18 a day. I can't wait till he adds neoscrypt and maybe we will be able to get even more profit out of it.
At the moment I'm keeping them in BTC and exchange myself at a later date. I also had the change to nist5 for a bit yesterday but it worked properly for me. I've had it stay on 0 hashes for a minute or two but I believe that is due to either the API being worked on momentarily or the miner waiting for data from zpool.
When benchmarking it will benchmark each card individually and automatically hides the mining window. Once benchmarking is finished and normal mining starts it will show the mining window.
If only one card is showing up direct message me on twitter (@MyCryptoCoinz)or discord and i would be glad to take a look over teamviewer.
If only one card is showing up direct message me on twitter (@MyCryptoCoinz)or discord and i would be glad to take a look over teamviewer.
I just grabbed 1.9, and am attempting to benchmark now, but it seems it's only using one of the 2 1606 3GB in this rig in the benches. Is this normal/expected behavior?
Edit: I also switched off hide miners in the setup, yet it is doing so, I'd much rather be able to see their output rather than having to read logs to help troubleshoot as I go.
Edit: I also switched off hide miners in the setup, yet it is doing so, I'd much rather be able to see their output rather than having to read logs to help troubleshoot as I go.
Yea not sure why it flags polytimos miner and not any of the others but I can state that it is a false positive.
Hmm, windows defender mentions that it quarantined this
\zpoolminer2\bin\ccminer_polytimos\ccminer
when it popped up originally I told defender to restore it and it's running that miner now. Perhaps the initial estimates were just over inflated and leveled out.
\zpoolminer2\bin\ccminer_polytimos\ccminer
when it popped up originally I told defender to restore it and it's running that miner now. Perhaps the initial estimates were just over inflated and leveled out.
I'm still pretty new to this, so I apologize if this is this is a dumb question,
but should my mining have gone down going from 1.8.1.7?
I'm running a 980ti and a 1080ti. on 1.8.1.7 they were both mining phi at a rate of about 0.0015 a day. on 1.9.0.0 the 1080ti is mining skein and the 980ti is mining phi at a total rate of about 0.00125 per day.
Is that just coin markets changing I guess? I ran precise benchmarks in both versions and I'm on geforce 390.65 drivers.
but should my mining have gone down going from 1.8.1.7?
I'm running a 980ti and a 1080ti. on 1.8.1.7 they were both mining phi at a rate of about 0.0015 a day. on 1.9.0.0 the 1080ti is mining skein and the 980ti is mining phi at a total rate of about 0.00125 per day.
Is that just coin markets changing I guess? I ran precise benchmarks in both versions and I'm on geforce 390.65 drivers.
This is caused by the internal Profit normalization. Also make sure that Windows Defender did not delete a miner as this happens from time to time. If this continues happening send me a personal message on twitter or in the discord group and I would be glad to take a look with you over teamviewer.
I'm still pretty new to this, so I apologize if this is this is a dumb question,
but should my mining have gone down going from 1.8.1.7?
I'm running a 980ti and a 1080ti. on 1.8.1.7 they were both mining phi at a rate of about 0.0015 a day. on 1.9.0.0 the 1080ti is mining skein and the 980ti is mining phi at a total rate of about 0.00125 per day.
Is that just coin markets changing I guess? I ran precise benchmarks in both versions and I'm on geforce 390.65 drivers.
but should my mining have gone down going from 1.8.1.7?
I'm running a 980ti and a 1080ti. on 1.8.1.7 they were both mining phi at a rate of about 0.0015 a day. on 1.9.0.0 the 1080ti is mining skein and the 980ti is mining phi at a total rate of about 0.00125 per day.
Is that just coin markets changing I guess? I ran precise benchmarks in both versions and I'm on geforce 390.65 drivers.
That should only happen once as long as you told windows defender to allow the file. I will look into adding a integrity check before launch but will have to add it to my list so not ETA at this time.
Also.
API V2 has launched - should fix the bug with the miner randomly stopping when the API is lost. Please report any bugs with the API if they arise so I can address them quickly.
Also.
API V2 has launched - should fix the bug with the miner randomly stopping when the API is lost. Please report any bugs with the API if they arise so I can address them quickly.
Was trying to figure out why the app said it was mining two different threads, but showing it was using GPU2 for both. Turned out it tried to switch to skein on GPU1 but windows defender did what it does and threw up a false positive. Seems like when it prevented the miner from running, the app decided to just pull stats from gpu2 twice instead of attemping to relaunch something on GPU1. telling windows to ignore the file, stopping and restarting it seemed to fix it though. Anyway to have it fall back if something like that happens and I'm not around to see it?
i looked some settings and i try something but i want to be sure i have gtx 1050 and (i know its waste of time but its for the beer money) i usually get 0.00014-16 a day 0.00001 is important to me how can i set switch profitability threshold this precious? in settings max can set is 0.00 .If i set this to 0 will it give me what i want or should i wrote 1?
You set the switch profitability in the config file for now. the config file is located in.
configs and named General.json
Default is 0.05 for it to switch algorythms. But the default settings should give you the most consistent payouts.
i looked some settings and i try something but i want to be sure i have gtx 1050 and (i know its waste of time but its for the beer money) i usually get 0.00014-16 a day 0.00001 is important to me how can i set switch profitability threshold this precious? in settings max can set is 0.00 .If i set this to 0 will it give me what i want or should i wrote 1?
Preliminary neoscrypt testing on a single 1080 shows
CCminer Trpuvot 2.2.3 = 1.010 MH/s or 0.0039333 BTC/day
New Palgin HSR Neoscrypt = 1.065 MH/s or 0.00041457 BTC/day
Were the most profitable is PHI doing 23.83 MH/s or 0.00067773 BTC/day
So I have added Nvidia neoscrypt for the next release but it is not the most profitable to mine.
Still to do before the next release.
V2 of my error correcting, caching API - Working on this now - Possible downtime when the new api is pushed live but should only be 4 Min or less
Add more algo's and miners for AMD miners
CCminer Trpuvot 2.2.3 = 1.010 MH/s or 0.0039333 BTC/day
New Palgin HSR Neoscrypt = 1.065 MH/s or 0.00041457 BTC/day
Were the most profitable is PHI doing 23.83 MH/s or 0.00067773 BTC/day
So I have added Nvidia neoscrypt for the next release but it is not the most profitable to mine.
Still to do before the next release.
V2 of my error correcting, caching API - Working on this now - Possible downtime when the new api is pushed live but should only be 4 Min or less
Add more algo's and miners for AMD miners
Jump to: