It is common sense my friend, who else would be crying about it?? you think QRK holders are crying that it has reached fair value?
In life you're either a QRK holder or you're not a QRK holder. If you are a QRK holder and annoyed it has reached fair value then seek medical attention.
Consider the full minting and total number of coins, and it is fair value against any coin. Yes there are coins that i consider better however QRK was undervalued for months it is only reaching fair value it is not overvalued. Bill noticed this and recommended it as an investment, simple as that. I like your command of the english language and you're obviously a reasonably smart person. However you are wrong to single out QRK as being overvalued, it will increase in line with other coins or at an accelerated rate due to having a lot more media attention now and lots of services in the pipeline. There is an exchange coming for QRK directly to USD, have you seen the QRK site directly to amazon and ebay vouchers?? All of this can not be taken back now, QRK was undervalued because nobody much knew about it, this had changed you will not be able to moan and cry this into reversal. Your motive is obvious, you are new and have missed this boat. You have doge and datacoin in your avatar, they could turn out to be wise buys, data especially however they are not guaranteed to be a better investment now than QRK. Doge may never get to an exchange, promoting this coin and causing people to possibly buy any now or waste hash on it could be seen as a scam or risky investment.
You have to realise, never again will a coin sit there for nothing for months on end. QRK does not have 10's of billions of coins and it has been rock solid since it started.
There are charts showing the distribution of QRK is no worse than LTC, PPC and NMC, the top 100 wallets own about the same amount. Are they all scam coins? consider that QRK has been out far less time than the others and it shows you that the market has distributed QRK rather well given the time frame. If you watched the market you would see whales that still hold QRK dumping it 500k at a time near 11c. This is what the market does well it shakes out whales on major dipps and encourages buys as it goes up again.
First, get your (irrelevant) facts straight. I've been here since 2011 and in crypto since 2010. I'm not new to this system by any means.
Second, even IF we magically can assume that all people putting up arguments against QRK don't have any QRK, it's still a logical fallacy to imply that someone's motives are a reason to ignore their argument. Congratulations, it's still a garbage, irrelevant, illogical argument.
QRK was undervalued for months it is only reaching fair value it is not overvalued.
What gave QRK its intrinsic value at the time? What about it did you and other investors see that nobody else saw? What made it different, better from other cryptos back then? Only if you can answer these questions can you make the claim that it was undervalued.
There are charts showing the distribution of QRK is no worse than LTC
Where?
Edit (Thanks Meebo):
http://www.quarkcoins.com/quarkcoin-distribution.htmlAlright. I'm not going to attack this because it's hosted on Quark webspace. This, however, does not prove anything. There are actually no charts you could make that prove that Quark is evenly distributed because there's no way to know how many people own how many wallets, so there really IS no evidence that QRK is distributed well. There can't ever be.
Doge may never get to an exchange, promoting this coin and causing people to possibly buy any now or waste hash on it could be seen as a scam or risky investment.
DOGE is already on an exchange and I specifically tell people that DOGE is high risk if they ask for my opinion on it.
Finally, fallacies aren't in a domain of English so much as they are in a domain of logic.