I think I've heard from my bets that they're following high rollers for them to save time and as well as have that bit of confidence in their bets.
But as usual, there are pros and cons to this strategy. It is gambling and we all know that the chances are always there for both boats, winning and losing.
And if this is making you effective right now, there will be a moment in time that it won't be good as what you're experiencing. So, if it's doing good as of the moment then hit the momentum.
Nah, it actually went bad. Results are mostly losing than winning so that concludes this is not really a good strategy at all.
I changed strategy now, I am trying long parlays with low-amount bets and trying to cash it out if I build a good win. It just takes a lot of effort to monitor it.
I haven't tried it. But this hardly sounds as a sports betting strategy. This is blindly betting. But for experimentation or curiosity's sake, you could indeed try it but for a small amount only. I myself imitated the bets of friends before without any idea. I also remembered I made bets on recommendations without really knowing the players, the teams, their statistics, and their level of skills, and even without understanding the sports itself. I later found out its boring that way.
Correct, blind betting. That's what really happened because I don't really look at what game it is, I just believed the high roller is doing it because he was sure about his bet. But I am wrong, they are not really doing it because they have higher percentages of winning but more like just normal gambling.
Maybe if I could find that one guy that I could follow then this strategy will be better.
Blind betting too because I don't know the game but only follow those who have a history of winning more than losing. Sadly, the privacy options for Stake.com is high as users could keep their names hidden.