Topic: High Roller Tailing - page 4. (Read 750 times)

I don't follow high rollers because everyone can be one. You just have to have the balls to place bets as big as they do. What I follow though, are high streaks players. Anyone who I saw winning in successions with every game there is, I follow. Especially for strategy games that require rigorous thinking and planning. That way I can secure wins more likely than the person who tails high rollers.you can follow high roller games without matching their bets, especially for games like sports betting where you can place a bet of your own choosing. That being said it is a different story if you're trying to follow how these people bet too, including how much they place, which in that case you would be required to drop bags and bands.

The essence of enjoying your bet would be totally lost on the time that you do rely with others betting picks which im not really that much interested on having this way.Nothing beats out when you are making bets on your own or according into your own analysis which it is more enjoyable and something worth even though you had lost your bet but it wont really be giving out that kind of feeling of regret just because you are really that following someone on the time that you do place up your bet unlike when you are doing it on your own and on you own choice then it wont really be that regrettable. You would be experiencing it for yourself
on the time that you do make out those move or decisions in between.

That’s why OP get a bad result of 4-1, imagine if you do that for a thousand bets, that could be a big loss for you. Never tried this one since I always analyze and bet on something that I worked for, this is like following the trend but no guarantee that they are right. Betting is more fun when you do your own predictions, its more exciting for me. Someone might succeeding on following the odds and those big players but its not ok all the time.

for sure there are some gamblers who are curious with these high rollers, so it is not a surprise if the OP really did try to follow some of the bets of these high rollers. he was just unlucky with those bets. some may really got their success following some of them but do take note that when it comes to results in sports betting, you can really expect an upset would happen in any of those bets.

Someone playing this cam of game will need to have a big portfolio so you will not end up bankrupt.
I can see that this kind of betting is meant for the big boys who have money and are ready to take big risks not minding how much it would caused.
If you have a big bankroll then you can easily play this kind of game.

Even by analyzing it yourself there is no 100 percent guarantee of winning, especially if you imitate gamblers who bet with high rollers. does not mean, someone who stakes with high stakes that he will have a high chance of winning. not even that different as we do, basically all gamblers especially for that matter who bet on sports. everyone wants to win in their bets, whether it's the result of imitating other gamblers' bets or with the results of their own analysis. everyone must bet seriously, therefore they dare to bet high rollers. Nonetheless, what the OP is doing is an experiment he is doing to try to keep up with some high roller betting gamblers. But the point is, when it comes to betting, especially football, there are no really accurate predictions. after all, everything will always involve our luck.

We are talking about sports betting here not casino games and I think all sports bettors do always make a research first before they bet. If they play on a long parlay then that is only the time that they are making fun because the winning chance for long parlays are only small compared to a single or double bets. Knowledge plays an important role in sports betting but it doesn't mean that bettors of it are now immune to losses but losses can still occur normally.

The OP must not be disappointed but he better try again. I am sure that there will be times that he will now get lucky and win his bets. Risking big money in the game is not what you call a blind betting but it is when you just bet on your own randomly.

I agree with you, impossible for high roller not to be serious about the bet and just randomly choose the match as well as the bet and it looks like you are just unlucky, because your 2 bets in the same match are not going well, if Arsenal are playing as usual actually it's not difficult for the match to produce 2 goals and also Arsenal to win but this is indeed a match whose results are unexpected so as I said before you are just unlucky, but at least you don't blindly follow it by risking big money.
Maybe someone has done it and succeeded, it's just that this is not something that is common, so not many publish the results.

Copying user bets is one of the easiest ways to bet on sports betting without the need to look for more detailed information, but don't take it as a serious thing because if you can't analyze it yourself, maybe you won't win. But if you follow a user who bets on sports and is an experienced bettor, you may also win like him. But don't bet a lot of money by copying other users' bets because we don't know how big the chance is to win and whether the choice is the right choice. I've sometimes managed to do this and sometimes failed to copy user bets, but that's been fine.

Congratulations @OP that's really a sweet win regardless how much you bet in that's match, you proving the most impossible chance to win can happen if it's your day, while the most possible chance to win didn't happen because shit can happen anytime.

I think if someone want to bet a huge underdog have extremely high odds, it's better to bet on unpopular or low tier event. When it's a big and popular event, 99,99% the outcome is always the huge favorite will win.

I think your experiment is a very interesting one. Thanks for conducting it and posting the results here. We can't make any conclusions from just 5 bets, we need many thousands of bets for that, but we can discuss our expectations from this kind of betting.

I personally think that money-wise it's not worth it, or, in other words, it's the same as copying any other bets because in most cases people betting $1,000 at once are not more knowledgeable. They just can afford to lose $1k, same as we can afford to lose $1 or $10. But entertainment-wise it is surely interesting because we can make such bets and discuss our experiences in this thread, and kinda compete with each other in making more successful bets this way.

Agreed, every gambler bets upon their ability. In such manner, what's been said is true. For someone having $1000 in wallet and spending $10 is same as a person with $100000 in wallet spending $1000. It is all about the prediction, from the bet slip it looks like the person have tried to bet against the odds. Betting against the odds could bring good return if lucky, and this time it is not his day and so is OP's day 

The level of seriousness of bets wouldn't necessarily be determined by the amount. It is reasonable to assume that $1,000 to someone with $100,000 is equally as valued to $10 for someone with $1000. The rationale or thought would be the same for the person betting $10 as someone betting $1,000. I think that the trial that you conducted somewhat proves this theory.

That's the problem as I check on the names of the bettors, it's all hidden. There's a feature at Stake.com where you could hide almost everything.
But I do get your point. Maybe I should start looking for high rollers who don't hide their profiles and follow them instead.
As for trying again, I have not done it yet. For now, I am trying to accumulate more and there's something else that intrigues me to do rather than this.
No worries I can control it.
As I said in my first post, this is just out of curiosity if there are real people who are doing it. I am trying to find out the success or failure rate of their bets upon just tailing the high rollers. I know my sport and how analysis works to enhance the chance to win the game. It's the intriguing part that made this question pop out.
Reading the last sentence of the opening post will answer your question.

If it’s your hard earned money, then why you are acting on other people’s actions? I mean if by chance you win you will praise your luck, and if by chance you lose, you will curse those high rollers whose bets you copied. Thank God, the bets value wasn’t higher this time. I won’t really suggest to bet like this. It would be better if you do good amount of research for that game and bet on it. And believe me if you have knowledge on that sports, then easily you can predict the winner if you have a good observation. Make money with your own knowledge and confidence.

That used to be my view on high rollers but now I view them more or less the same as any regular gambler because sometimes I'll see some high rollers tail small gamblers that provide the best reasoning behind their picks.

I agree with the last part that you said though, it's one of the things that most gamblers tend to forget when tailing the bets of other gamblers as some of them would even take the effort to discourage others by sending toxic messages instead of blaming themselves for the loss.

Maybe OP needs to do a more test run for the long term. That will give us a clearer view if tailing at those so-called high bettors will be a success or not.

Since even professionals even losing in sports betting, the key here is their average winning rate. There might be a day that we tail on a certain bet but unfortunately loses it but the next day we decided not to follow them, they have now won it.

But that requires patience and more money before seeing a good result.

I rather not do it because high bet doesn't mean the person is going to win, although it has some vibe to it when you see someone placing a large bet you think that guy has to be confident in that outcome. There's always the other side of the medal though. Maybe that guy places a bet that's 1% of his paycheck. You think it's big money and to him it's pennies.
You can compare this to what Tate is doing. He was buying cars worth fortune just to show off because he had so much money. I wouldn't be able to afford one of those cars, so I could say that buying such car is a good idea since he's doing it, but it's not. Spending millions of dollars on cars that depreciate in value is a terrible idea even when you're rich. Rich people don't always know what they're doing and they don't always fall on all 4

 I have never done it in sports betting and I have never really thought about it, I think I would lose the essence of my entertainment, which is part of my objective, obviously there is excitement about winning, but I think that is what happens when you go deeper or look for alternatives additional, which is what it should be, but I think that first of all you have to see a line of long bets or see their habits as a reference.

I'll give you for example, and I'm not a HR but today I won betting on Mallorca, I got out of that constant line of play and I'm quite given to not making that type of bet, it was something based on information (always) and intuition, but In my data for those types of bets, I have a very high degree of accuracy when I make these types of bets against the odds.

It's not that I want to go against the odds, no, it's that they just come out, if you check my sports betting graph you'll see very pronounced peaks, but it wouldn't be because I put a lot of money, where by the way I'm also very constant in the size of bets, but I come out of that constant win factor of 1.3-1.7, so if you check those peaks you find yourself with bets greater than 3.5.

In this sense, for example, if I see that a HR wins a game like the one mentioned, I simply ignore it, unless I know him very well, I can try to "burn" some money with his bet.

So even if you follow that "technique" you should try to bet to your measure, because you always only see the tip of the iceberg of that bet, perhaps he has a reason that is a priority for him and that perhaps in all his bets he compensates in some way or maybe not, as mentioned above only put $1000 for fun.

And in that sense it is a lot of money for you, it is, but perhaps $1000 represents in the equivalence of "$" or bankroll as about $10 for that player.

Therefore, you think that the fact of putting $1000 in a bet means that this person is very knowledgeable or has inside information, but it is not like that, 99.9% of the time.

A bet of $1000 or $1 on the goal of winning, most of the time, should be determined by the prevailing statistical information that leads you to get the best odds, not the amount involved.

Sometimes you bet more $$ for a simple reason, the bankroll.

Maybe following such persons through our forum is good than following high rollers blank without proper understanding. I've followed bets suggested in a thread and it was mentioned as fixed match. It looked like some kind of fraud and tried with small amount and I was able to win the game, that too on odds above 2. Rather than tail betting can find something trusted like fixed matches.